The best selling phone in the world: can you guess which one is it?
The reason for its popularity is without a doubt its price, as basically you could get one for tens of dollars without any lengthy contract agreements.
Among top smartphones, though, it’s probably no surprise that the Apple iPhone 5s is the single most popular gadget. Analysts estimate there are over 100 million iPhone 5s sold and that number will surely continue to grow, so we would not be surprised if one day in the future the iPhone 5s actually surpasses the Nokia 1100. This is just a guess, though, and even if that was to happen, it’d take years.
While we don’t have any hard data about the second most popular smartphone out there, it seems like it’s the Samsung Galaxy S III. Back in mid-2013, we heard about it getting nearly 50 million units sold, a number which has surely grown a lot since then.
1. Johnnokia (Posts: 464; Member since: 27 May 2012)
I read that in newspaper.. I knew 1100 is the best selling phone since 2005.
I also knew that Nokia sold 478 millions phones in 2011.
Number that could not be reached be any company yet ... Even Samsung
How great is Nokia.
Damn idiot elop
14. akki20892 (Posts: 3244; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)
Nokia made tablet in 2001 and didn't launch in market, they made touch screen phone and didn't launch in market, didn't made progress in symbian. They didn't had good ceo, and elop done same thing, didn't Nokia choose android in 2011 or developed meego and maemo.
16. Johnnokia (Posts: 464; Member since: 27 May 2012)
I am still having new 1100 in its original box.. I probably used it for one or two hours.
31. akki20892 (Posts: 3244; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)
One thing is secret. Nokia sold theirs device and services to ms, we think they shouldn't have been done that, but I think Nokia has something plan for it. Let's wait for 2016, maybe they will come back in device and services.
18. akki20892 (Posts: 3244; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)
In 2004 they made touch screen phone, and didn't take seriously. Symbian was giant and king before 2008 if they made deep progress in symbian it could be as android today.
22. Johnnokia (Posts: 464; Member since: 27 May 2012)
Symbian was "number 1" Phone OS till the end of 2010.
Nokia was very able to adopt Android and move flexibly to another platform, and also ensuring to be the largest smartphone manufacturer.
25. akki20892 (Posts: 3244; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)
The game turn around to iOS and android side in 2011, when Nokia choose wp, if they choose Android in 2011 they should have been sold phone around 200 millions.
33. The13thKing (Posts: 849; Member since: 26 Feb 2014)
I remember when i was a kid everybody had a nokia.. i thought cellphones were made by nokia.. then something went wrong, it's not only elop and his team.. it's the people that were before elop .. he chose wp because he thought it would develop fast and standout .. and it really took time for ms to really develop something credible till it became too late now ...
63. microsoftnokiawin (Posts: 880; Member since: 30 Mar 2012)
i'd agree with you but he got 25 million for selling the devices division of nokia and tbh if i was him i'd want the 25million as well
so in conclusion thinks he ruined nokia on purpose!
70. StraightEdgeNexus (Posts: 2618; Member since: 14 Feb 2014)
I bet the iphone 6 will be the best seller thanks to usual iFanboys and new iWannabes who wanted a big screen iPhone.
73. Image20four7 (Posts: 3; Member since: 28 Apr 2014)
My grandparents would love an iPhone with a larger screen!
20. proto (Posts: 48; Member since: 12 Sep 2012)
well it is nice to sell half a billion of cellphones, but when you have no profit from it... something was wrong.
21. elitewolverine (Posts: 1150; Member since: 28 Oct 2013)
If you blame it on Elop you are a person who knows nothing, literally nothing of the internal Struggles that were Symbian/Maemo/Meego projects.
When Elop stepped onto the scene, in 2010, the team which had working for 5 years, read that again, 5 years on Maemo/MeeGo, had not a single working phone to show Elop a new CEO looking at what they had to present, or the board.
They released the N9 in 2011, and within less than a year was able to release Win OS phone.
Maemo/Meego was bad enough that when they tried to license the in house OS, they couldn't, major companies like Samsung turned away from the OS. So it was spun off is now Jolla, and their first $400 phone doesn't even have LTE, and when trying to run on other non-jolla specified hardware, it was crashing during the expo. This is an OS that in some shape or form has been in development for 9years and it doesn't have LTE. MS now has 8.1, droid 4.4 and iOS 7.1.1.
23. akki20892 (Posts: 3244; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)
Nokia should have been take seriously to develop symbian. It was great os with a tons of features.
26. Johnnokia (Posts: 464; Member since: 27 May 2012)
They simply were able to adopt Android beside WP.
I'm not against WP. But counting on it as the main and only platform was the fatal mistake.
Samsung just took Nokia place when Nokia leave it.
If Nokia adopted Android since 2011, no one would care about Galaxy S or Note or Xperia ...
Nokia was number one in basic phones arena, featured phones, symbian and finally WP.
So why not Android???????
Just please, stop it
Hate that eFlop justifying
29. elitewolverine (Posts: 1150; Member since: 28 Oct 2013)
It is not Elop justifying, its derps like you hating on a man that was hired to do a job. He didn't stick a gun to the boards head, they all agreed.
Also Nokia already flirted with the idea of Android, BEFORE ELOP.
Again blame Elop, or like you say eFlop.
There is no guarantee with android either. Nokia would have been another Moto, stripped of its patents and bought by another company.
55. Liveitup (Posts: 868; Member since: 07 Jan 2014)
What all those uninformed bashers don't understand that Nokia was in a financial bind, yes they had money but not have enough money to continue operating as normal, MS even agreed to help them out financially as part of the deal, people can say that Elop got rid of Eseries,Vertu,8series,Nokia's headquaters, Nseries
and some employees what they don't realise that every company does the same thing faced with similar situations.
Nokia’s problems began in 2007 with the first release of the iPhone. Apple completely changed the mobile industry and Nokia failed to adapt. Even after the iPhone changed the face of mobile technology, Nokia’s former CEO (Olli) continued to focus on Symbian and what we now call feature phones. In the hands of Elop, Nokia has shrugged off the shackles of old ideas and embraced the smartphone future. Nokia couldnt realisically challenge Samsung for Android supremacy, Samsung dominates its just too big of a company, Elop even said that.
54. 0xFFFF (Posts: 2015; Member since: 16 Apr 2014)
Just because a patient is sick, doesn't mean you give them poison. And that is what Elop was -- poison.
64. microsoftnokiawin (Posts: 880; Member since: 30 Mar 2012)
you literally know nothing
n900 n810 n800 and more were all phones that were released in prior years the n900 coming out in 2009 so instead of spreading lies spread facts
Maemo 6 was due in 2010 when but nokia joined their maemo project with intel's Moblin to create meego which delayed it for one year so in reality only took them 2 years on meego
there were 4 meego devices due out in 2011 but thanks to Elop's &^%$* the 1st one was cancelled the the 2nd one was released successfully the 3rd one was manufactured on a small scale and given out to developers the n950 and then lastly the 4th one came out as the lumia 800
do you not agree that the burning platform memo destroyed symbian and meego
at 2011 symbian was still the most popular os and was nokia
s money cow instead of slowly killing he axed it straight away with no windows phone in sight for 9 month to come
and did i also mention that the n9 outsold lumia devices even though it was released in minor markets unlike the lumias and it won multiple awards more then any lumia and was considered as an iphone contender moving on
jolla supports LTE (yet another one of your lies) and it was the software which didn't which will be given in a soon update and jolla ran beautifully on the nexus 4 just because the port wasn't compelete doesn't make the OS crappy so please come back with something usefull !
65. elitewolverine (Posts: 1150; Member since: 28 Oct 2013)
Was this in response to me?
N810 - the phone...err device that entered the market without phone functionality. A result of internal strife between Symbian and Maemo?
N900, great, but at an entry price of 649 in 2010 for US markets it was steep and didn't sell (go figure as they were already behind). Not to mention by 2010, the iPhone 4 was out. 4 Generations of apps, market share and slippage. Not because of Elop but because of their own issues inside Nokia.
I do apologize for the LTE Jolla last I saw did not, this was towards the end of 2013, if it supported it before 2013, then it was added after Nokia got rid of the MeeGo project. As well the Jolla phone that I saw in the news did not support LTE and it is a $400 device and is due to be out this year (or now). Edit: Jolla's site shows that only finland supports LTE at the moment other countries will be announced at a later date.
Because the port wasn't complete? I did not say it was a crappy OS, did I? No, I stated that when it was running on other standard hardware it was crashing. How many people poke fun at MS when their beta software crashes on stage? If you are at an expo to show how well your OS scales to other devices, and it is crashing, that is not a good thing. Not horrible, but goes to show the OS is still being worked on. How many years later?
At any rate, we will let developers that worked inside Nokia and worked on the projects speak their tales.
74. microsoftnokiawin (Posts: 880; Member since: 30 Mar 2012)
yes but the reason it took 5 years as 1. internal conflict with symbian 2. merge with intel
yes there was internal problems along the road of developing meego
but meego was the way to go the fact that steven elop said we will not continue meego whether it's successful or not and only released it in smaller market tell me how this is a smart market move
the n9 won all these awards
In November 2011, the Nokia N9 won 3 out of 4 applicable titles (including design, camera and cellphone of the year) at a gala held by Swedish magazine and webzine Mobil.se.
In January 2012, the Nokia N9 Swipe UI was nominated for an IxDA Interaction Award.
In February 2012, the N9 reached number 1 in ranking "by rate" with a rate of 8.432 (out of 10) and votes of 74,940, and also number 5 by daily interest hits in GSMArena's ranking.
In April 2012, the N9 was awarded a Design and Art Direction "Yellow Pencil", in the interactive product design category, beating among others the iPad 2 and the Nokia Lumia 800.
more then any lumia it was praised more then any lumia
the burning platform memo please tell me how all these are smart business choices
and also thanks for the website great source of information
apology accepted and it supports almost all international frequencies :P
well i think the goal behind their expo was to show off the fact that it can run on more then just jolla hardware and let us not forgot the fact that a team of 150 developers made an Os that runs smoothly on samsung galaxy s2 hardware equivalent and this is my personal opinion but sailfish has alot more potential then windows phone but they have a waaaaaaaaaay steeper climb ahead of them
and again thanks for that story great story
71. utg001 (Posts: 31; Member since: 15 Nov 2013)
I believe Nokia ran short of resources. Almost all of its competitors had more than just one income source and Nokia made most of its income from mobile sales only. I think they just ran short of people to create a smart software to run their versions of smartphones to challenge iOS and Android. In that case, picking up Android and then altering it wouldn't have done them any good so basically they would just be selling devices with stock Android. I have no issue with that but perhaps they thought it might not be good enough answer to Touch whiz, sense or iOS.
They just basically looked for a mobile ready OS and MS was quick to realize the importance of Nokia and jumped to help where Google did not as it already had many manufacturers to look to. Google was not willing to help Nokia, it had no reason to do so, while MS needed to do it for its own survival in mobile market. I blame it on MS not on Elop, and I don't think it was a bad choice.
30. Ashoaib (Posts: 1212; Member since: 15 Nov 2013)
Wow thats a huge number... but 100million 5s sold is a wrong claim, it is not sold 100million yet
41. dratomic (Posts: 431; Member since: 09 Oct 2013)
yes its wrong. no way apple could have sold that much 5ses. there are not 100 million idi*ts in the world. and if there was no way apple couldve manufactured that much. and for the last time no way apple can sell 250 millions of one product model.
52. akki20892 (Posts: 3244; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)
Nokia 5230 sold around 150 million. It was smartphone, and it's huge for smartphone to sell this much.
37. MR-H- (Posts: 116; Member since: 10 Apr 2014)
i still have my 8600LUNA, and Scirroco black.
42. Liveitup (Posts: 868; Member since: 07 Jan 2014)
The only idiot is yourself and the others like yourself who upvotes comments like yours and lay blame at Elop's feet for a situation that was already in motion when he took over the reigns at Nokia, why don't you guys take off the fanboys glasses and take a look at the reality of the situation, it gets annoying after a while if you want to lay blame lay blame at the feet of Olli-Pekka Kallasvuo.
If it wasnt for Elop Nokia's S&D more than likely would not have been around as long as it did.
47. MR-H- (Posts: 116; Member since: 10 Apr 2014)
Why did he kill Eseries?
Why did he sell Vertu?
Why did he kill 8series?
Why did he sell there headquarters?
Why kill Nseries?
He killed everything even though Nokia still had money in reserve banks for blue days.
49. elitewolverine (Posts: 1150; Member since: 28 Oct 2013)
Because the OS's they were running were a dead end. By the time they would have had a working droid phone to play with, they were far behind in the droid market. They would have become another Moto, stripped of patents and gone.
He did not solely do those things, the board did them as well. Blame Elop all you want, when in reality, blame Nokia for the failed Symbian/MeeGo attempts.
50. Ashoaib (Posts: 1212; Member since: 15 Nov 2013)
But whatever justification you will give, the matter of fact is that he failed to turn around anything... he was a fail ceo
51. elitewolverine (Posts: 1150; Member since: 28 Oct 2013)
As all the other CEO's before him...?
72. Ashoaib (Posts: 1212; Member since: 15 Nov 2013)
All other ceo's? So nokia became market leader automatically? with failed ceo's?... wah, you are a genius
59. Liveitup (Posts: 868; Member since: 07 Jan 2014)
Nokia was actually gaining marketshare again when the division was sold but hey haters will hate just about anything or anyone related to MS in some shape or form, it will continue the irony is im sure some of them hating grew up on MS products and are even bashing using MS computers.
67. express77 (unregistered)
Nokia ruled. Burn in hell eflop and other hidden moles. Curse them.
2. PBXtech (Posts: 966; Member since: 21 Oct 2013)
I think Nokia has 6 of the top 10 most sold phones. Looked it up a while back, they have a good amount of feature phones that sold tons. Big reason why they dominated the cellular world.
3. amsam7 (Posts: 10; Member since: 07 Apr 2014)
It was a best phone.......feature phone, or basic as one would say.. Legend stay legend forever
4. Johnnokia (Posts: 464; Member since: 27 May 2012)
2011 Q1: Nokia sold 36 million Symbain and Meemo phones with 37% worldwide smartphone market share. Stephan Elop called those OS "the burning platform" and Nokia should phaseout them.
2014Q1: BlackBrrry sold 1.1 million BB10 phones. Job Chen still see a bright big future for BB10.
God.. Why this happened to Nokia??
Why Nokia's board could not find like John Chen or any CEO better than that Flop !!!
WE ALL LOST THIS LEGEND
7. Manti123 (Posts: 104; Member since: 10 Apr 2014)
I felt so sad when I read the facts that you just mentioned.
Nokia destruction plan was so clear and everyone was not able to see it.
Why the Finns did not see their glory's slaughtering procedure?
36. The13thKing (Posts: 849; Member since: 26 Feb 2014)
yes. and it I sometimes have that annoying idea that ms on purpose delayed updates to wp so it'll stay behind android to drown nokia and buy it. my way of thinking seems crazy, but hey it's microsoft, it reminds me of apple and facebook and these companies really creep me out
43. dratomic (Posts: 431; Member since: 09 Oct 2013)
actually there were board members who drove nokia to destruction before elop. you see if ceo is retarded board members can replace him but in elops case it didnt happen. they were looking for someone to blame everything on him and elop was willing to do that for the 25m $
48. MR-H- (Posts: 116; Member since: 10 Apr 2014)
So it's the "board of members" to blame.../
Any way no gives a rat about Nokia cause no one buys Nokia phones anymore....
10. ArtSim98 (Posts: 2220; Member since: 21 Dec 2012)
I still believe if Nokia continued MeeGo they would be on top. MeeGo was such a fantastic platform just in need of further development.
46. ArtSim98 (Posts: 2220; Member since: 21 Dec 2012)
I have 2 years of experience on MeeGo so i know what I'm talking about,
68. The13thKing (Posts: 849; Member since: 26 Feb 2014)
Lmaooo yeah the popular meego. Meego rocks. Meego made it everywhere. Oh elop. Meego would have brought Google to its knees. Go to H%ll.
24. elitewolverine (Posts: 1150; Member since: 28 Oct 2013)
And yet you forget to mention that when Elop stepped on board as CEO, not a single working MeeGo/Maemo Phone to present to the new CEO or the Board. This is the same OS that was in house development for 5years. The tools used between the Teams even within MeeGo were different. They had issues with the QT development tools as well. It had no LTE support and the new Jolla still doesn't.
Symbian was a dying platform, Cisco a prospective buyer to license the OS, walked away because of the mess that it was in. It simply couldn't compete with iOS or Droid in the market at 2010 mark.
I would post links to the end of both platforms and the history but I highly doubt you would come out of it thinking it was not Solely Elops decision.
40. Mr.Torture (Posts: 12; Member since: 15 Apr 2014)
Considering fact that N9 (along with N950) was a very first phone with MeeGo, I still think it was a great device overall to start with. To start a new successfull story... In both segments, software and hardware. Beside all internal struggles and "mess" as you call it.
Now, while in this actual moment and smartphone market, I do have the greatest respect for what Android became, just go back and remember the first Android device(s) and what they could or couldn't achieve. And then go even more in past, and remember what the first iPhone offered, and what ridiculous features it DIDN'T have. And then think about Nokia N9 and what (amazingly fresh features) it brought to a table. A table already full of n-th generation of iOS and Android phones.
What I think Nokia missed mostly in those days, is strong vision about where to go from that point onwards. And a little bit of courage I would say. What they ended up with, is "safe" option of jumping into Microsoft wagon, and hoping for the best. We are all witnessing just now how is that story evolving. What is left of Nokia is only a brand name, and it will be gone for good sooner or later. We got some devices bearing Nokia name, which we all know don't have much to do with Nokia.
53. elitewolverine (Posts: 1150; Member since: 28 Oct 2013)
It was the safe option. Intel and Nokia had different views on MeeGo, the lack of LTE support (that still plagues MeeGo as of 2014 under the Jolla brand, and something Nokia got with Lumia 900 just 6 months after the N9).
Spend millions/billions on a platform that while innovative had issues, or spend that cash else where and let another company make the OS for you.
The mess was mainly due to the politics of the Symbian Team, the tools that didn't always play nice for MeeGo and the issues with Intel.
45. brrunopt (Posts: 396; Member since: 15 Aug 2013)
37% ??? Symbian was at 27% , after falling down from a 66% peak...
I would call that a burning platform...
5. uzidon (Posts: 5; Member since: 15 Aug 2013)
Used this one, and it was simply brilliant for its price and category. Simple, light, thin, and one of the first phones I used with a flashlight!
Reminds me of Nokia's glory days. If only they had better heads at software division or had pushed Microsoft for better and more robust Windows Phone, Nokia would have been decades ahead of its competition in most part of the world right now.
8. FriendsOfSamsung (unregistered)
Because this phone is overproduced, that's why they sell it dirt cheap and collect all the minimum profit as much as they got just to cure their cash bleeding... This problem has solved after the m$ acquisition, and no reason to produce this dirt cheap phone anymore
19. Johnnokia (Posts: 464; Member since: 27 May 2012)
This phone has been discontinued in 2005. The time when Nokia had $32 million cash reserve.
Just read about something before spreading crappy comments... Troll
27. FriendsOfSamsung (unregistered)
It starts at 2005 and today is 2014 and it still available, in other words, it's overproduced, truths are so obvious here and I just told
Fanboys like you will quickly hide in a denial cave when the cons came out from Nokia...
35. SamDroid (Posts: 114; Member since: 14 Dec 2013)
What they mean is that the phone is still around. Just coz someone owns the first iPhone doesn't mean that Apple are still selling it. I guess simple logic is kinda hard to have these days
75. refillable (Posts: 583; Member since: 10 Mar 2014)
Especially for distinguished fanboys like 'FriendsOfSamsung'.
28. akki20892 (Posts: 3244; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)
Just tell Sammy to break this sold numbers. Then I will agree with u.