Apple crushed Samsung in the battle for 2025 smartphone market supremacy, and I think I know why

At least a few of the causes behind Apple's victory over Samsung in the smartphone war last year seem pretty clear to me.

6comments
This article may contain personal views and opinion from the author.
Apple iPhone 17 and Samsung Galaxy S25
Last year's global smartphone sales numbers are in (from more than one market research firm), and for the most part, they're not very surprising. Counterpoint Research, Omdia, and the International Data Corporation (IDC) all put the mobile industry's 2025 volumes at a slightly higher level than 2024's total (just as the three companies predicted at the beginning of the year), and the top five vendor club is completely unchanged (both as far as brands and their order is concerned).

That sounds terribly unexciting for those of us who like to follow the quarterly and yearly shipment reports like a sporting event where everyone loves an underdog story or a race with lots of twists and turns and frequent leadership changes. Fret not, though, as I think I've found the smartphone market's most exciting development of the past year (at least for neutral spectators) and a couple of the key reasons why this happened.

One company seems to have learned from (some of) its past mistakes


Can you guess what company I'm talking about? That's right, Apple. Don't agree with me? Then you must have not paid enough attention to the iPhone 17 family launch back in September. 

Instead of jacking up the prices of all its latest and greatest high-end handsets without rhyme or reason (which has happened a few different times in the past), the Cupertino-based tech giant made the "vanilla" iPhone 17 just as affordable as its predecessor while bumping up the base storage from 128 to 256 gigs.


Recommended For You

That's basically considered a price cut in many cultures, and although Apple didn't really advertise that particular upgrade very aggressively, consumers definitely noticed, especially in the crucial (and very budget-leaning) Chinese market, where the non-Pro iPhone 17 was at one point estimated to have improved the iPhone 16's demand by 31 percent.

That's a huge progress for a brand that only boosted its overall handset sales by 10 percent in 2025 compared to 2024 (at least according to Counterpoint Research), which was not just enough to secure the number one spot in the vendor chart, but also eclipse Samsung, Xiaomi, Vivo, and Oppo's growth during the same timeframe.

Of course, one swallow does not a spring make, and one (massively) successful smartphone model does not a market leader make, so the iPhone 17 Pro Max certainly deserves some praise for its own popularity, especially in the US. The thing with the new 6.9-inch giant is... that it wasn't supposed to sell that well, at least as far as I'm concerned.

Why do you think Apple defeated Samsung in 2025?


Better put, the iPhone 17 Pro Max is not fully deserving of its success, doing the exact opposite of the "base" iPhone 17 by costing $100 more than the 16 Pro Max and offering no additional storage. While a few other specs were upgraded, a comprehensive head-to-head comparison between the two jumbo-sized super-flagships found that the new phone signifies "devolution in action" rather than evolution in many key departments, which brings me to the second major reason why I think Apple was able to keep Samsung at bay with relative ease in 2025.

One company seems to have lost its focus


There are no prizes for guessing who I'm referring to this time around, but before getting into my criticism of Samsung's... uninspired 2025 product lineup and launch strategy, allow me to clarify something.

While some of you may not consider Apple's latest win over its arch-rival a complete blowout, I believe Samsung can't be happy to see a full percentage point between its market share and that of the market leader after basically drawing Apple in both 2023 and 2024. Once again, that's according to Counterpoint Research, which is important to point out because the IDC, for instance, actually puts Samsung closer to Apple's industry-leading score at the end of 2025 compared to the previous year.


Either way, no market research firm is claiming that Samsung is the world's number one vendor this time around, and I think that's a lot due to the company's own mistakes in addition to Apple's very inspired iPhone 17 choices.

We've already established that the iPhone 17 Pro Max was a "beatable" device, and the reason why Samsung didn't release an objectively better product in 2025 is because many of its resources were wasted on pointless endeavors. 

I'm looking at you, Galaxy S25 Edge, but also you, Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE, and last but not least, you, Galaxy Z TriFold. If some of the efforts that went into making one of these phones a success (and failing spectacularly) and simply making the other two had gone to the Galaxy S25 Ultra instead, maybe that thing wouldn't have looked so similar to the S24 Ultra.

I'm obviously not saying that the S25 Ultra is a bad phone or that it flopped at the global box-office. But it could have certainly been better (or at least cheaper), which could have led Samsung back to the top spot in the handset vendor hierarchy.


The same can absolutely be said about the company's 2025 additions to the mid-range Galaxy A family, which were... boring and incapable of stealing (enough) attention away from the iPhone 16e to return to the glory days of such blockbusters as the Galaxy A50 and A51. The sad thing (for Samsung fans, but also for neutrals expecting a tighter battle for supremacy in 2026) is that the Galaxy A57 and the Galaxy S26 family don't look very exciting or... inspired either (at least based on the most recent rumors), as Samsung once again seems more focused on experimenting with quirky new designs than making core products as awesome as they can possibly be.
Google News Follow
Follow us on Google News

Recommended For You

COMMENTS (6)

Latest Discussions

by 30zpark • 3
FCC OKs Cingular\'s purchase of AT&T Wireless