The Galaxy S27 is shaping up to be a story about cutting costs — but is it as bad as it sounds?

These rumored changes may not affect your experience.

0
The Galaxy S27 is shaping up to be a story about cutting costs — but is it as bad as it sounds?
Galaxy S26 for illustrative purposes | Image by PhoneArena
Samsung's upcoming flagship lineup is increasingly facing pressure from both inside and outside the company. The massive success of the Galaxy S26 series is mounting expectations for the sales growth of the Galaxy S27. 

But at the same time, rising component costs may be forcing Samsung to make some uncomfortable trade-offs. And now, fresh reports indicate the end user may not ultimately feel the impact. 

Undercutting the biggest player


Over 10 days ago, rumors hinted that Samsung may be considering the unthinkable: not to supply the 'vanilla' Galaxy S27 with its in-house display. Reports suggested the South Korean tech giant might collaborate with Chinese display manufacturer BOE for the base model. 



A fresh report surfaced on May 22, revealing Samsung's decision may be far more than just a rumor. ZDNet Korea notes (machine translated) that BOE has reportedly approached the tech giant with an informal offer to supply OLED panels for the standard model, undercutting Samsung Display by $5.

Recommended For You
What’s your take on Samsung’s rumored Galaxy S27 decisions?
6 Votes


BOE's reputation is somewhat 'iffy'


BOE is one of the biggest display manufacturers for mid-range and low-tier devices. However, the company has historically faced challenges in consistently meeting the stricter quality and yield requirements for flagship-tier smartphones, where leading brands demand excellence.



Notably, Apple allocated OLED production for the iPhone 17 and some earlier models to Samsung Display due to manufacturing problems encountered by BOE. But then, the iPhone 17e, which debuted in 2026, shipped with a BOE OLED screen. 

What does this ultimately mean for the Galaxy S27?

Galaxy S27 display: good or... not so much?


According to ZDNet Korea, BOE could utilize Samsung Display's diamond pixel patent for the assembly of the red, green and blue (RGB) subpixels. If true, this could mean the company might be able to produce OLED panels of similar quality to the Galaxy S26.

And if Samsung keeps the upcoming flagship's screen relatively unchanged, there are essentially no technical obstacles left for BOE. 

Undoubtedly, upgrades are what most users would certainly want to see. Still, the rising prices of components may push Samsung toward a more restrained approach to keep manufacturing costs under control. 

If BOE OLED panels are indeed introduced for the base variant next year, Samsung could also avoid another price hikes (at least for the Galaxy S27).

It goes beyond the display



If Samsung is forced to compromise on its flagship model's display, will that ease the difficult situation? Rumors indicate there may be another problem, driven by the skyrocketing price of semiconductors from Qualcomm.

Korean outlet Seoul Economic Daily points out that Qualcomm Senior Vice President Chris Patrick and other executives held a press conference on May 20. Officials explained that Qualcomm is actively seeking ways to keep prices manageable for key customers like Samsung without compromising performance. 


But if chipset costs continue to rise, the South Korean tech giant may struggle to secure the next-gen Snapdragon chips at a mass scale. Industry insiders have already speculated that Samsung could equip 50% of the Galaxy S27 series with the Exynos 2700, up from around 25% in the Galaxy S26.

However, Kim Sang-pyo, President of Qualcomm Korea, pushed back on these predictions. 


It's all about cost reduction


At first glance, a BOE OLED screen and an Exynos chip on a larger scale may make the next Galaxy S27 seem like a major downgrade instead of an upgrade. 

However, I've grown to appreciate what Samsung is doing with its in-house silicon. The Exynos 2600, which powers some Galaxy S26 models in select markets, turned out to be very similar in terms of performance to the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. 

If the tech giant pushes further for innovation, I have no doubt that the Exynos 2700 will turn out to be an even more efficient and powerful chip. In addition, if BOE meets Samsung's strict standards and produces the same quality OLED screen, users might not feel the impact of this cost-cutting decision.

Bottom line: I think Samsung is actively trying to find a reasonable solution to the increased manufacturing costs so that the end user doesn't have to pay the highest price at the end of the day.
Get Visible as low as $20/mo for 1 year. Limited time offer with code: FRESHSTART
$20 /mo
$25
$5 off (20%)
Offer Ends 6.1.2026 at 11.59pm ET. New members get $5/mo off the $25/mg Visible plan, $35/mo Visible+ plan, or $45/mo Visible+ Pro plan for the first 12 months. Promo code FRESHSTART required at checkout.
Buy at Visible
Recommended For You
COMMENTS (0)
Latest Discussions
by readdriver • 2
by ECPirate37 • 1
by menooch18 • 3