Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 and Galaxy Ace 3 eventual specs leak to curb your enthusiasm

Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 and Galaxy Ace 3 eventual specs leak to curb your enthusiasm
From the Russian source that gave us the tidbits on the upcoming Galaxy Zoom cameraphone now come the alleged specs of two less exciting products from Samsung - the Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 and Galaxy Ace 3.

As is becoming pretty apparent, Samsung is planning on several Tab 3 models, based on screen size - after the Tab 3 8.0, we now have specs for the Galaxy Tab 3 10.1. Coded GT-P5200 for the version with cellular connectivity, and P5210 for the Wi-Fi slate, the internal name for the tablet is said to be Santos, and availability is slated for June, apparently hinting at an appearance at the June 20th Samsung event in London.

The 10-incher runs Android 4.2 Jelly Bean and have a 1280 x 800 pixels, dual-core processor clocked at 1.6 GHz, 1 GB RAM, 16/32 GB of internal memory plus microSD slot, a frontal 1.3 MP and rear 3 MP cameras, with battery capacity of 6800 mAh. If these specs indeed pan out, it's clear that Samsung will be letting the device out at rock bottom pricing. Dimensions are claimed to be 243.1 x 176.1 x 7.95 mm, and weight - 510 grams. Not the thinnest and latest 10" slate out there, but still one of the most compact.

The other leaked info is about an eventual Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 (GT-S7270). It is to have a 4" LCD with 800 x 480 pixels of resolution, dual-core processor at 1 GHz, a gig of RAM plus 4 GB of internal memory and a memory card slot, 5 MP camera and 1500 mAh battery. The Galaxy Ace 3 is supposed to sport a 121.2 x 62.7 x 9.8 mm chassis. Evidently this one won't break the bank for you either.

FEATURED VIDEO

50 Comments

1. Kurai unregistered

another week, another galaxy.

2. xperiaDROID

Posts: 5629; Member since: Mar 08, 2013

Just let it be, Samsung is exercising.

5. ashb22

Posts: 19; Member since: Jun 15, 2012

Another weak Galaxy.

12. WHoyton1

Posts: 1635; Member since: Feb 21, 2013

Haha let the hating begin....if your gonna joke like this please go away...

22. quadrazeus

Posts: 359; Member since: May 03, 2013

What's wrong with his comment? Don't you find these galaxies weak?

24. WHoyton1

Posts: 1635; Member since: Feb 21, 2013

another implying there have been many weak galaxies lately....and why the hell do you keep replying to my posts about samsung.....

31. quadrazeus

Posts: 359; Member since: May 03, 2013

Because you just keep on praising them, even if they play dumb moves like this one.

32. tashreef

Posts: 476; Member since: Nov 24, 2012

these samsung fanboys are not going to accept it.... Blind Trolls

35. WHoyton1

Posts: 1635; Member since: Feb 21, 2013

hahaahah says the idiotic nokia fanboy....and name me one incident in which i have openly insulted another company except apple! none so no im not a samsung fanboy im a Fandroid! the only reson i dont complement other companies is there is no news on other companies!

46. Dr.Phil

Posts: 2299; Member since: Feb 14, 2011

It's possible the 1.6 Ghz dual-core processor is an Intel processor, which would make it a pretty good device.

43. ashb22

Posts: 19; Member since: Jun 15, 2012

I'm not a Samsung hater. I typed that comment on my Galaxy Tab 8.9, while watching my Samsung TV. And my phone is a Galaxy S3. I am, however, disappointed in every tablet that Samsung has released since their first generation of Galaxy Tabs. The resolution on the Tab 3 is terrible, and it has less RAM than my phone.

13. WHoyton1

Posts: 1635; Member since: Feb 21, 2013

Shouldn't that be a good thing....Samsung is giving people what they want choice...there is no point complaining about if there still first in android smartphone releases...that's good it raises more and more awareness for android I don't see how that's bad...

19. tashreef

Posts: 476; Member since: Nov 24, 2012

this is not bad, it becomes bad when the samsung fanboys cries loud when other manufacturers go with these specs. Looks like samsung is not listening to their Fanboys. LOL

33. Nathan_ingx

Posts: 4767; Member since: Mar 07, 2012

Choices that confuse people is not a good choice at all.

36. WHoyton1

Posts: 1635; Member since: Feb 21, 2013

how do they confuse people its a pretty simple naming system!

40. Nathan_ingx

Posts: 4767; Member since: Mar 07, 2012

The specifications...the specifications.

42. WHoyton1

Posts: 1635; Member since: Feb 21, 2013

ohhh ok my mistake i apologise :)

48. TheBitterTruth unregistered

Woooooooh! What an innovation. Really guys?

3. donjunior

Posts: 50; Member since: May 28, 2013

Samsung is the king. keep it up. More innovations.

7. xperiaDROID

Posts: 5629; Member since: Mar 08, 2013

You called this an innovation?! *facepalm*

8. tashreef

Posts: 476; Member since: Nov 24, 2012

what you said? "innovation" ? ROLF You are not on "Nokia" article...

14. WHoyton1

Posts: 1635; Member since: Feb 21, 2013

Hahaha if I'm honest I don't think Nokia innovate as much as you think they do...I think Sony probably innovate more...or Samsung...and I'm not new here so I know the amount of red thumbs I get but that's what I think...persuade me otherwise....

17. tashreef

Posts: 476; Member since: Nov 24, 2012

please mention some Samsung innovations ? i don't remember when i last heard the word "innovative" for samsung ... ahhhh.. i just don't remember

23. SleepingOz unregistered

Open your beloved nokia and see how many parts in it were developed and produced by Samsung. Mobile DDR, MCPs, Amoled HD.. Samsung is just too big to be bypassed.

25. WHoyton1

Posts: 1635; Member since: Feb 21, 2013

ok ....smart touch....smart pause.....smart stay....and dont give me the BS that there not innovation there gimmicks because i think the software involved in them and the use for them i find pretty good is more innovative than the camera tech nokia have been putting out!

30. tashreef

Posts: 476; Member since: Nov 24, 2012

oh please, this gimmick features are not innovations ...

45. taikucing unregistered

Funny, I'm not a samsung fanboy & I sometime bash samsung too, but truth must be told to blind people like you. Samsung has many patents in the world, not only in mobile phone, but also in many fields of engineering. Do you know Samsung Group? It consists of mobile phone, electronics, chip manufacturing, appliances, telco equipment, military, heavy industries, etc & etc (so many that I can't mention). And this one is from their electronic division only:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_top_United_States_patent_recipients where does DDR memory in your nokia phone come from? I bet it comes from Samsung. Perhaps the amoled screen in nokia phones is from samsung too. Ah, I see Nokia is innovating in camera. Why doesn't Nokia make a SLR camera that can compete with Sony/Canon/Nikon's camera? At least samsung make a SLR camera eventhough it's not the best.

16. SleepingOz unregistered

Funny how such an "innovative" company is struggling to gain market share. Going as far a faking ads to mislead potential customers.

20. tashreef

Posts: 476; Member since: Nov 24, 2012

yes you are right, i agree the ad was fake. but What Samsung did? they hired nonsense Paid Trolls to bash other companies, how cheap.. And no need to call Nokia fake, samsung also advertised its device having Flash, when there is no flash... Cheap+Fake = samsung

21. SleepingOz unregistered

Again, this was a careless mistake from Samsung Taiwan. How can you advertise something people will immediately notice is not there?! If Samsung really intended to mislead their customers, they would have advertise the GYDuos as such, WORLDWIDE, like nokia did! Not just in Taiwan!

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.