x PhoneArena is looking for new authors in New York! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Home
  • News
  • Microsoft scoops up smartwatch patents

Microsoft scoops up smartwatch patents

Posted: , by Alan F.

Tags:

Microsoft scoops up smartwatch patents
Microsoft apparently has a plan to profit in the smartwatch business, that revolves around receiving royalties on patents relating to the wearable. The plan is to let others make and sell the devices, while Microsoft gets paid for allowing these companies use of the intellectual property it owns. One recent patent received by Microsoft is for Discreetly Displaying Contextually Relevant Information on a display device. The patents revolve around a smartwatch receiving information wirelessly via a smartphone. The information being sent from smartphone to smartwatch can include simple notifications, to more complex GPS notifications.

Another new patent received by Microsoft is for Dynamic User Interfaces Adapted to Inferred User Contexts. Using sensors like accelerometers, microphones and GPS, a device can tell if a user is sitting, driving, jogging, or doing some other activity. Different UI displays would appear on a device, depending on the activity detected by the sensors.

A few years ago, it was determined that Microsoft was ironically making more money selling licenses for Android phones, than it was making from selling the Windows Phone OS. Back in 2012, the numbers that were bandied about showed Microsoft making nearly $800 million from royalty payments sent to the company by HTC and Samsung in the second quarter of that year. The crew at Redmond were getting $10 from HTC for each Android model sold by the latter. For each Samsung branded Android phone sold, Microsoft allegedly received $12-$13. Consider that at thew time, Nokia was paying Microsoft $20 for each Windows Phone model it sold, and you could easily see where Microsoft's allegiances laid at the time.

Since then, Android sales have continued to explode. It is possible that Microsoft still makes more money cashing in those royalty checks than from selling Windows Phone handsets. The acquisition of Nokia's Devices and Services unit changes things, since there will be no more licensing deals with Nokia. On the other hand Microsoft gets to keep all of the profits it makes from selling the handsets.

Microsoft might enjoy the idea of sitting back and collecting royalty checks while others do the heavy lifting (like manufacturing and marketing). After all, the template served them well with smartphones. That doesn't mean that Microsoft won't produce a smartwatch of its own. In fact, recently someone said that he spoke to a person in New York City who allegedly was testing a Microsoft watch. Even if such a watch is developed, Redmond's real focus might be on the smartwatches made by those who require Microsoft's patents to build them,.


source: USPTO (1), (2) via WMPoweruser

33 Comments
  • Options
    Close




posted on 28 Jun 2014, 01:48 13

1. joey_sfb (Posts: 2919; Member since: 29 Mar 2012)


Their legacy. Reborn as a patent troll.

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 04:29 8

10. chocowii (Posts: 327; Member since: 30 Jan 2014)


I cant blame Microsoft. They innovate and others follow.

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 04:30 11

11. Sniggly (Posts: 7025; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)


Are you for real?

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 06:45 8

16. QWIKSTRIKE (Posts: 864; Member since: 09 Mar 2010)


You nailed it Microsoft hasn't innovated since the creation of windows. Everything else they bought and stifled further innovation.

Excel was Lotus 123, Word is Lotus Note, I could go on, but why. I am a Microsoft user but I am also a realist. Steve Balmer was the biggest joke in their history and the legend continues.

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 16:21 4

31. StanleyG88 (Posts: 76; Member since: 15 Mar 2012)


Not quite, MS Word was developed by Charles Simonyi and Richard Brodie, hired by Bill Gates and Paul Allen in 1981. the first version was released in 1983.

Lotus Notes was developed by Iris Associates Inc between 1984 and 1989 when release 1 was released.

Lotus 1-2-3 was initially released as an Apple only application in Jan 1983. It had been developed off of a previous product a year earlier called Visicalc. After the into, Lotus dominated the SS DOS market for 2-3 years but then came out with suites Symphony & Jazz that went no where. They were slow to support the Windows platform which was coming into it's own at this time.

MS brought out their SS application as Multiplan in 1982 and as Excel in 1985. By 1988 it was outselling Lotus 1-2-3 because of Lotus's slow response to the Windows market.

Lotus ended up spending to much of their resources on making their products for IBM's OS/2 platform and lost any chance they had to compete on the Windows platform.

We all know. or should, what happen in the competition between Windows and OS/2.

posted on 29 Jun 2014, 04:51

33. sgodsell (Posts: 1235; Member since: 16 Mar 2013)


The publication date on the patent is June 26, 2014. Clearly this makes Microsoft a patent troll. Good luck Microsoft trying to sue Samsung or LG or Motorola. Pebble has been doing this for years. Samsung for a year with the Gear. If you can't beat them, then try and make money using your lawyers.

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 05:48 4

13. medicci37 (Posts: 627; Member since: 19 Nov 2011)


Either you own a massive amount of MS stock or chocowii is steve balmers screen name.

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 10:19

24. corporateJP (Posts: 1555; Member since: 28 Nov 2009)


LOL. Whatever, Papss...

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 05:44 1

12. Zylam (Posts: 51; Member since: 20 Oct 2010)


Hahaha

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 06:16 9

14. Liveitup (Posts: 1230; Member since: 07 Jan 2014)


You call MS a patent troll. do Google and others give away their patents for free. Go ogle bought Motorola for its patents and then sold the company to Lenovo, guess they won't use those patents then or they would be patent trolls right?.

People misuse the term patent troll. This is a classic case.

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 06:25 5

15. Sniggly (Posts: 7025; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)


No, uh uh. Google got (and kept) Motorola's patents as a defensive measure to deter further lawsuits by Apple (and probably Microsoft as well).

You don't get to claim that Microsoft buying up smartwatch patents, with no real plans to launch a smartwatch of its own, just as its competitors are close to or already launching wearables, is anything other than patent trolling. They didn't come up with the tech, they didn't put any work into it, and yet they're going to profit off of the investment that other companies are making. That's the very definition of patent trolling, you twit.

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 06:49 3

17. QWIKSTRIKE (Posts: 864; Member since: 09 Mar 2010)


You forget that it is not about giving patents away it's about buying them to make money with out contributing anything towards it's growth.
Microsoft did not create these innovations and patent them they are just trolling for money!

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 06:51 2

18. mistertimi (Posts: 76; Member since: 28 May 2014)


Liveitup dropping knowledge bombs all over the place! Love it.

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 07:02 1

19. StraightEdgeNexus (Posts: 3242; Member since: 14 Feb 2014)


And we have a fan of...well... Livingitupunderrock. LOL.

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 10:21 1

25. corporateJP (Posts: 1555; Member since: 28 Nov 2009)


Microsoft isn't a patent troll.

They're rapists. Look at Nokia as evidence.

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 11:17 2

28. medicci37 (Posts: 627; Member since: 19 Nov 2011)


You dont seem to understand why google bought motorola. not to patent troll but to protect themselves from patent trolls like MS & Apple

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 10:26 1

26. InspectorGadget80 (Posts: 6479; Member since: 26 Mar 2011)


M$/Apple both hate to loose or doesn't want to compete.

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 13:38 1

30. ikenvape (Posts: 65; Member since: 28 May 2014)


They're just playing a game of monopoly Apple edition

posted on 30 Jun 2014, 09:11

34. oboboy14 (Posts: 45; Member since: 27 Mar 2014)


Do you even know what a patent troll is? Microsoft is not a patent troll.

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 02:12 3

2. roscuthiii (Posts: 1801; Member since: 18 Jul 2010)


When the title said "scoops up" I figured that Microsoft must have bought some smartwatch patents...
But the fact that these were granted by the USPTO?! Really shows how badly the whole institution needs reform.

I would at least hope these are relegated as FRAND.

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 02:23 11

3. ihavenoname (Posts: 1393; Member since: 18 Aug 2013)


Microsoft smartwatch... They probably have to design new blue screen of death to fit the smaller screen.

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 02:40 2

4. StraightEdgeNexus (Posts: 3242; Member since: 14 Feb 2014)


ROFL xD

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 03:33 8

7. sip1995 (Posts: 817; Member since: 07 Feb 2014)


Actually Apple owns that now when they introduced the IOS 7.

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 03:27 7

6. Sniggly (Posts: 7025; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)


Yeah, sorry MS fanboys, I don't give a crap what grievances Google has supposedly committed against Microsoft that you like to whine about. Nothing they've done is nearly as bad as this. Nice to know that things haven't changed at the Evil Empire.

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 04:12 4

8. boosook (Posts: 1006; Member since: 19 Nov 2012)


So basically Microsoft received patents for ideas that Google has already implemented... I wonder how it's possible.

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 04:28 6

9. Sniggly (Posts: 7025; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)


The patents were already filed and approved by other companies. Microsoft just bought the preexisting patents.

Words cannot express how pissed off I am at their blatant setup for patent trolling.

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 07:21 2

21. Napalm_3nema (Posts: 936; Member since: 14 Jun 2013)


If you can't lead, make sure those who do are paying you to subsidize your entry into the race.

Without the Android royalties, Windows Phone would have been stillborn. They would have had no choice but to cancel it years ago. However, they ARE making that $2 billion and change, so you have one mobile OS sponsored by another mobile OS. Does that mean there should be Android branding on new Microsoft mobile devices?

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 07:15

20. So-Sayz-Eye (Posts: 29; Member since: 08 Nov 2011)


Did anyone pay attention and see MS filed the patent in 2012 and it only got approved recently. Its true smartwatches are not a new thing, one can argue those old remote control or calculator watches from the 80's and 90's are smartwatches. Anyone who's ever read a Dick Tracy comic or seen the movie always wanted that watch, so the idea is nothing new. The implementation of the smartwatch is. To be be honest I blame Pebble for this, they should have filed patents since way back when they started their Kickstarter. So for all those claiming Google implemented first it was actually Pebble.

posted on 29 Jun 2014, 02:52

32. elitewolverine (Posts: 1594; Member since: 28 Oct 2013)


No they do not see that. All they see is MS being awarded patents and '*ut huggers' not reading. Thinking Google invented the earth...

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 07:32

22. 7thspaceman (Posts: 1085; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)


the Microsoft "spot" watch was one of the first smart watch's on the market. check it out on Utube. it looks pretty good too. It's shame Microsoft did not put the technology of the original Big surface table top computer on a small tablet In 2007 when it brought out the surface table top touch screen computer. Microsoft went for big business version usage of the device instead of a smaller device for the consumer market. what a mistake that was.
it had features that were pretty good.

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 07:51 2

23. pmugghc (Posts: 7; Member since: 11 May 2014)


It's sad common sense can be patented.

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 11:00

27. VZWuser76 (Posts: 1397; Member since: 04 Mar 2010)


http://global3.memecdn.com/Common-Sense_o_129992.jpg

posted on 28 Jun 2014, 12:37 1

29. wax33 (Posts: 45; Member since: 06 Apr 2014)


I imagine it works more like this: some greedy idiots at USPTO receive the patent applications, they are way too dumb to understand or even try to understand what they're reading, OTOH they can understand "Microsoft great big company invented something", so they grant the patents. However common sense those patents might be to other people.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories