Larry Page repeats denial of Google involvement with PRISM, calls for more transparency
18 June Google files with secret court to obtain permission to report on two data sets
17 June Eavesdropping scandal escalates: U.S. spied on Russian president Medvedev, other top politicians
17 June Apple issues official statement: “we do not provide government with direct access to our servers”
16 June WSJ: NSA does not gather cellphone-location records despite authorization to do so
16 June The NSA can listen to your calls without a warrant
1. darkkjedii (Posts: 15623; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)
Larry is lying his butt off. Everyone who denies involvement, is deeply involved. Google has notorious spying/collecting issues in from the past...they're involved.
2. darkkjedii (Posts: 15623; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)
And yes apples involved too, they're just as bad as google.
3. HASHTAG (unregistered)
So, in other words, if I came to you and accused you of stealing my phone, or anything w/ value, and denied it, but of course I wouldn't do a such thing, I'm lying? That's pretty much what you're saying.
7. darkkjedii (Posts: 15623; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)
Hash just watch. It'll come out, and this isn't to rag on google either. We're gonna be shocked at just how many companies are involved.
4. Zero0 (Posts: 592; Member since: 05 Jul 2012)
Actually, there's a small part of me that says he's sincere.
Google did try to take away National Security Letters (information requests with a gag order). They failed, but they tried.
It's in Google's best interests to make sure that its users' information is private. Otherwise, people stop using Google services, stop seeing Google ads, and Google stops making money.
5. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)
Yes, Larry is lying his butt off. Google themselves publish a report that says how many times they have responded to subpoenas for data. The FISA court order is a subpoena, so Google has by its OWN admission provided data pursuant to the subpoenas.
6. darkkjedii (Posts: 15623; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)
Exactly. Denial is often the first line of defense. This will also have an impact on glass.
9. darkkjedii (Posts: 15623; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)
Places wanting to ban it from the premises
11. roscuthiii (Posts: 1949; Member since: 18 Jul 2010)
Subpoena's are limited in scope pursuant to the specifics of a case. What PRISM is/was is an entirely different animal.
And yes, Google has always been forthcoming letting people know just what authorities have been asking of them.
10. madpiyal (Posts: 108; Member since: 11 Feb 2013)
Are you trying to be smart by bending truth Mr. Page? I thought you are better than Schmidt, but seems like you are as evil as your mentor. How can we trust your words for transparency when in the same speech you are blatantly lying about Google's involvement with the Govt.????