NSA's PRISM reported to gather data from Google, Facebook, Apple and more, but all deny involvement
tech companies are allowing the US government to tap “directly into [their] central servers... extracting audio, video, photographs, e-mails, documents and connection logs" that can then be used to track people. Nine companies are listed in briefing slides as being part of the program's data collection, but at least three are already pushing back against the report.If you missed the earlier news, it turns out that back in 2007 under President Bush, the National Security Agency (NSA) set up a highly classified program code-named PRISM. The program started slowly, but has grown exponentially under President Obama since then. The claim of the Washington Post report is that a number of
The briefing slides show companies in order of when they joined the program, starting with Microsoft on September 11, 2007, and continuing with Yahoo, Google, Facebook, PalTalk (a service that was big during the Arab Spring), YouTube, Skype, AOL, and lastly Apple. The report says that back in 2008, Congress gave the Justice Department authority to compel a reluctant company “to comply” with the program, but Apple was still able to resist being pulled in until October of last year, mostly because no one wanted the news of this program to become public.
Of course, most of the companies named have all come out in various degrees to deny involvement, including Google, Apple, Facebook, Microsoft, Yahoo, and even Dropbox, which was named as a company that was "coming soon" to the program and not currently involved.
Google said it doesn't know about the program and isn't participating at all, and that it does not provide any government agency with a "back door" to company servers and user data. Google went on to tell The Next Web that it does not allow government agencies access to its servers, and has tried to be very clear that it doesn't allow the government API access and is not involved in this program or any similar program, adding in a statement:
Apple has been quoted as telling CNBC:
Facebook hasn't gone so far as to claim it doesn't know about the program, but has issued a similar statement to others, saying:
Microsoft has said to in a statement:
Yahoo hasn't commented directly about PRISM, but said in a statement:
And, a Dropbox spokesman released a statement to The Verge, saying:
Whether or not these companies do or do not give data to the government, it is fairly clear that PRISM does exist, and The Washington Post report explains more about what the program is and some on how it works. Supposedly, the NSA is capable of getting just about any data that it wants, but it does have certain criteria that must be met for the data collected.
The aim of the NSA is not to spy on American citizens, but to gather and analyze foreign communications and foreign signals intelligence. It is this that sets apart PRISM from the Verizon call logging we heard about earlier, which is specifically targeting Americans. With PRISM, the NSA has a set of criteria used to determine that the program is at least 51% confident of an individual's "foreignness" before pulling any data from that person's logs on various services. Unfortunately, this is only for the top-level data that is pulled in, and there is a ton of "incidental" data, meaning data on anyone in a suspect's inbox, that is also collected and this often contains data on Americans.
While the program only has a $20 million budget, it has apparently grown to an enormous level, and is said to be the largest contributor to the President's Daily Brief. Apparently, PRISM was referenced "in 1,477 articles last year" and now accounts for "nearly 1 in 7 intelligence reports", which is pretty crazy since the NSA counts the number of communications it sifts through in the trillions. And, while Facebook denies that it allows "direct access" to government agencies, the slides gathered by The Washington Post say that Facebook and Skype have become huge resources for PRISM, and once "the subject is believed to be engaged in terrorism, espionage or nuclear proliferation, an analyst obtains full access to Facebook’s 'extensive search and surveillance capabilities against the variety of online social networking services.'"
Of course, none of this actually answers the question as to what data has been gathered. We don't know how sensitive the information gathered has been, or who has been involved in the data collection.
More undoubtedly to come
It feels silly to try putting a "conclusion" on an article like this, because this is undoubtedly just the beginning of the news that we're going to hear about PRISM, the companies involved, and what kind of data is being processed by the NSA and the FBI. From what we have learned, it sounds like the program is real, and quite large, but the question remains as to what the involvement is from various companies, and what data is being accessed. Unfortunately, right now, we're stuck in the spot where The Washington Post is claiming one thing, and almost every company named in the report has denied involvement. We may find out more in time, but we can't say for sure right now what's going on. But, we will certainly stay on top of this story and bring you the latest as it comes in.
*Update* The Director of National Intelligence has come out saying that the report from The Washington Post, and the report by The Guardian "contain numerous inaccuracies". He has confirmed that there is data collection happening, but insists that the public's civil liberties are being protected.
This story is part of:NSA data collection - PRISM (19 updates)
18 June Google files with secret court to obtain permission to report on two data sets
17 June Eavesdropping scandal escalates: U.S. spied on Russian president Medvedev, other top politicians
17 June Apple issues official statement: “we do not provide government with direct access to our servers”
16 June WSJ: NSA does not gather cellphone-location records despite authorization to do so
16 June The NSA can listen to your calls without a warrant