Motorola Moto G (2015) ReviewMotorola Moto G (2015) 9
This has been the summer of summers for strong mid-range propositions, evident by the amount of sub-$300 priced devices we’ve seen come to market. Smartphones like the Asus Zenfone 2, Huawei P8 Lite, Microsoft Lumia 640, and Alcatel Onetouch Idol 3 have shown us that there’s a ton of value in this particular segment – and it doesn’t look like this trend is going away any time soon! That’s wonderful news for consumers, as well as for the companies making those phones.
Before all of this, though, we have to remember that Motorola established this segment first with the introduction of the original Moto G a couple years ago. We can’t forget about how they popularized the segment, but its latest offering is aiming to continue the legacy of delivering exceptional value and performance. Even with thick competition already in the midst, the third-generation Moto G stands firmly in its ground with its hard-to-beat full price of $179.99. So can it deliver the goods?
The package contains:
- Motorola Moto G (2015)
- Wall charger
- Read me guide
- Safe, smart, protected information
A water-resistant construction and deeper customization thanks to Moto Maker, this is undoubtedly the best designed Moto G to date in the series!
In standard fashion, the 2015 Moto G stays true to the series’ humble styling. It’s not premium, that’s for sure, nor is it cheap-cheap like some other phones in the same price category – so it finds a balance that we find pleasant, and in a way, timeless. Instead, the new Moto G flaunts a few subtle aesthetic changes, such as a slightly larger overall footprint and a new metallic-like trim bezel. Moreover, its rear plastic casing now has a rigid pattern to it. And finally, it wouldn’t be a Moto G without the soft dimple in its back.
What’s most astounding about the new Moto G is that it now offers IPX7 certification, which ensures that it’s water-resistant to survive submersion under 1 meter of water for up to 30 minutes. Now that’s flat out news to our ears, as it’s a delicious treat we don’t see in devices in its class! And of course, we put it to the test by rinsing it over the faucet, playing music in the shower, and submerging it in a bucket full of water. It survived all of the testing!
The fun doesn’t end there either, just because the new Moto G is treated to Moto Maker – presenting prospective buyers with a unique way of personalizing the phone. From choosing the front and rear casing colors, to even the accent color of the plate around the camera lens compartment, there’s more discretion for it to stand out with bold colors. All told, this is the best model in the series to date! It might appear simple and quaint superficially, but the addition of a water-resistant construction and deeper customization courtesy of Moto Maker makes its pricing fine and dandy in our books!
Although it might seem like it’s flaunting dual front-firing speakers, it’s actually not. Rather, the cutout above the display is strictly used for its earpiece – while the bottom is the speaker itself. Considering it’s still relatively easy to handle with one hand due to its size, both the power button and volume controls are found near one another on the right edge of the phone. Rounding things out, it also features a microUSB 2.0 port, 3.5mm headphone jack, and noise cancellation mic around its trim.
142 x 72.4 x 12.2 mm
5.47 oz (155 g)
141.5 x 70.7 x 11 mm
5.26 oz (149 g)
143 x 70.6 x 7.7 mm
4.62 oz (131 g)
141.3 x 72.2 x 8.8 mm
5.11 oz (145 g)
The specs might be unchanged, but there are small improvements all around with the display.
From a specs standpoint, there’s nothing terribly new here with the 2015 Moto G screen – it’s a 5-inch 720 x 1280 HD display with Corning’s Gorilla Glass 3 protecting it. From the looks of it, the display appears to be of the IPS-LCD variety, just like before with the previous Moto G phones. Boasting the same sized display and resolution, there’s no change whatsoever with the details. Therefore, it’s sharp and effective enough when using it from a normal distance.
While it certainly would seem there’s not a lot different to the display this time around, it flaunts some minor improvements that technically makes it a superior panel over its predecessors. First and foremost, it produces a more potent luminance of 449 nits, which makes it fairly reasonable to see under bright lighting conditions. On top of that, baby step improvements are made to its color temperature and gamma value, which chime in at 7440K and 2.27 respectively (vs 7625K and 2.56 for the Moto G 2014). While the screen’s color temperature is an improvement over last year, it’s still by and large a colder toned panel – so colors tend to have a hint of blue in them (most noticeable with white).
Speaking of color production, there’s honestly no major changes here. It does a decent job with accurately reproducing all gradients in the sRGB color chart spectrum. Distortion is evident at some angles, which causes colors to appear washed out at times. It’s not terrible, but still noticeable to the eye.
The benchmark results are one part of the overall picture, but at the end of the day, while it might not have the crazy specs to make it super compelling, but for a budget phone, its display is agreeable.
Display measurements and quality
|Maximum brightness (nits)Higher is better||Minimum brightness (nits)Lower is better||Contrast Higher is better||Color temperature (Kelvins)||Gamma||Delta E rgbcmy Lower is better||Delta E grayscale Lower is better|
|Motorola Moto G (2015)||449
|Motorola Moto G (2014)||390
|Huawei P8 lite||380
|Microsoft Lumia 640||352
The numbers below represent the amount of deviation in the respective property, observed when a display is viewed from a 45-degree angle as opposed to direct viewing.
|Maximum brightness Lower is better||Minimum brightness Lower is better||Contrast Lower is better||Color temperature Lower is better||Gamma Lower is better||Delta E rgbcmy Lower is better||Delta E grayscale Lower is better|
|Huawei P8 lite||81.6%
|Motorola Moto G (2014)||86.4%
|Motorola Moto G (2015)||86.6%
|Microsoft Lumia 640||88.4%
The CIE 1931 xy color gamut chart represents the set (area) of colors that a display can reproduce, with the sRGB colorspace (the highlighted triangle) serving as reference. The chart also provides a visual representation of a display's color accuracy. The small squares across the boundaries of the triangle are the reference points for the various colors, while the small dots are the actual measurements. Ideally, each dot should be positioned on top of its respective square. The 'x: CIE31' and 'y: CIE31' values in the table below the chart indicate the position of each measurement on the chart. 'Y' shows the luminance (in nits) of each measured color, while 'Target Y' is the desired luminance level for that color. Finally, 'ΔE 2000' is the Delta E value of the measured color. Delta E values of below 2 are ideal.
This measurements are made using SpectraCal's CalMAN calibration software.
The Color accuracy chart gives an idea of how close a display's measured colors are to their referential values. The first line holds the measured (actual) colors, while the second line holds the reference (target) colors. The closer the actual colors are to the target ones, the better.
This measurements are made using SpectraCal's CalMAN calibration software.
The Grayscale accuracy chart shows whether a display has a correct white balance (balance between red, green and blue) across different levels of grey (from dark to bright). The closer the Actual colors are to the Target ones, the better.
This measurements are made using SpectraCal's CalMAN calibration software.
24. CyberFalcon (Posts: 223; Member since: 17 Apr 2014)
PA can you please check and update whether your review unit is faulty or not?
4 hr 10 min is way too much.
48. thesyd (Posts: 4; Member since: 31 Jul 2015)
Not faulty, it's just the default charger that sucks, its a 500mAh. With a normal 1/1.5mAh it would take something like ~2h30
2. walkman800 (Posts: 113; Member since: 26 Aug 2014)
Seems like Motorola did it again. Good job!
3. Cheezwiz (Posts: 430; Member since: 29 Dec 2014)
Looks like a lot of value, but I really would have liked to see a 32GB option.
4. MisterQ (Posts: 33; Member since: 13 Feb 2015)
Waiting for X Play review!! When is it coming?
6. elitewolverine (Posts: 5076; Member since: 28 Oct 2013)
Really a 9? I guess PA I guess, I wish your reviews had better weight to them considering how other phones get judged. At any rate, glad to see the water resistant rating. But for 220 hard for me to pick it over a bigger phone for nearly the same price.
18. buccob (Posts: 2512; Member since: 19 Jun 2012)
What phone offer something similar for the same price?
27. buccob (Posts: 2512; Member since: 19 Jun 2012)
Lol, I just made a post here:http://www.phonearena.com/news
/Third-generation-Motorola-Moto-Gs-IP-X7-certification-on-the-line-in-video-water-test_id72154asking about those two devices to see what people think...
But there IS a price difference and it is about 80$... and even if I love Sony I think I'm more inclined to recommend the Moto G to my dad... I've been reading many problems about the M4.
33. elitewolverine (Posts: 5076; Member since: 28 Oct 2013)
What phone offers LTE 5in 720p, Good camera, enough ram, Sd slot ability to install nearly all apps to sd out of the box, great battery performance, screen brightness up there, smooth fast....for $130 or less?
Its all relative. I would choose two phones over this one for either same or similar price up to 250.
While it would be a WP.
I agree. M4 Aqua would be another choice.
I just don't see anything other than price that puts this phone up to a 9. Especially with 8GB of ram on an OS that limits SD installs without 3rd party intervention.
35. buccob (Posts: 2512; Member since: 19 Jun 2012)
its actually 1GB of RAM and 8GB of ROM for the basic model, the other one being a respectful 2GB of RAM and 16 of ROM... and while I agree that 16GB should be the bare minimun for Android, many light users like my 65 y/o dad will be extremely satisfied with an 8GB model (though not the 1GB of RAM)... and Android L allows you to install some applications to the microSD card which helps a lot...
The real issue here is mainly Google apps that take an embarassing ammount of space and are limited to internal storage...
Google Play Services
Google App (search)
All those are HUGE storage hogs and sadly unmovable, but I like them... other people might disable most of them anyway.
49. thesyd (Posts: 4; Member since: 31 Jul 2015)
"and Android L allows you to install some applications to the microSD card which helps a lot..." The Android 5.2 "M" will have an option to format the micro sd as "internal memory".
68. elitewolverine (Posts: 5076; Member since: 28 Oct 2013)
"Some apps" However any apps that require security will not allow it since android doesn't encrypt sd card data. Unless I missed the news about it actually being secure now.
8GB of rom is ok for some users. Amazingly its the older ones that fill up their phones and have no idea why. I have a 65yr old dad as well. Boom the 925 was full in 2 months. I have a 63yr old mother. Boom 521 with a 16gb card was full. Now it wasn't all them (mother more so), they have 7 grand children that like to play on their phone when over, they download apps etc that kill space, and the older people have no clue its on there.
Then we can take the calls I do daily, again older people that have no clue that their 8GB phone now only has 4GB or less of rom, then they download like 10 apps and its gone. Android M is still some away, and since I don't have a preview of it...wont be able to comment on it. However imo anything is better than the mess of Lollipop I have to deal with on a day to day basis, especially when it came to the G3. However, our test S6 has been really good, only a few hiccups and is doing great, The test G4 imo is nicer but for somereason seems to reboot for no reason and it has no apps on it (other than preinstalled ones).
Point being though was I have no clue as how this got a 9, when other capable phones that can do the exact same that cost either 50+$ less or just slightly more and yet constantly get 8 or below in ratings. We could talk software all we want, but no one is going to get a Moto G and be the worlds techy person and be the majority by any means.
79. vananucho (Posts: 68; Member since: 01 Jun 2011)
Kyocera Hydro Elite. Sort off. It's ultra cheap tho (About $50-60)
61. coldspring22 (Posts: 304; Member since: 28 Feb 2015)
How about Lenovo K3 Note @ $160 (antutu 46000, 2GB ram 5.5 HD ips screen, 5MP/13MP camera, SD card slot/ removable battery, near flagship performance) . Or even Xiaomi Redmi Note @ $170 ( 5.5 ips screen, 2GB ram, 3000mah removable battery, SD card slot 5MP/13MP camera). New moto G is pretty good, but there are still better values out there.
67. Augustine (Posts: 1043; Member since: 28 Sep 2013)
The Lenovo is not sold nor does it work with the LTE bands in the US. The Xiami is 3G only. The Moto G, for being available for sale and working on LTE in the US, makes it the default choice for US consumers.
72. coldspring22 (Posts: 304; Member since: 28 Feb 2015)
I have Xiaomi Redmi Note (FDD-LTE version) and use it in USA. I get 11 MB/sec download on HSPA+ on tmobile. Now that's not LTE, but it's hell of a lot faster than what I would ever need (even faster than my home DSL!!!) Who needs 4G LTE if your data usage capped out at 2GB? HSPA+ is more than fast enough for most any use I can imagine. In addition, if you really need 4G LTE for whatever reason, you can get HK version of Redmi Note which is fully compatible with all 4G LTE standard in USA
88. perry1234 (Posts: 101; Member since: 14 Aug 2012)
There is a WiFi bug with Lenovo K3 Note , once you are connected to a WiFi network you will have to restart the phone to swith to a 3G network or connect to a different mobile network. Just google it .; Happens with my dad's phone all the time.
Hardware is just part of the story . Moto G3's software is very stable and reliable. It has no bloatware slowing down the phone. This all results in incredible real life performance.
9. antoxi4 (Posts: 9; Member since: 05 Jun 2015)
Okay Iphone, Blackberry, and td too chinaphone)
14. Pattyface (Posts: 1518; Member since: 20 Aug 2014)
Bad example as those are not owned and mfg in China.. Only mfg
30. antoxi4 (Posts: 9; Member since: 05 Jun 2015)
yup but if they change owner it does not mean chinacompany))
8. aksa123 (Posts: 319; Member since: 30 Jan 2014)
250 minutes to recharge.....................................................................................................
20. buccob (Posts: 2512; Member since: 19 Jun 2012)
It looks bad, but in my opinion PA never gives a proper charging test.
The never test different chargers with different outputs (fast charging or not)...
For example, my Z3 Compact has a rating of 208 minutes... and its probably because for them it was shipped with an old GreenHeart sony-ericsson charger of 850mAh... while my device came with a 1.5Ah charger that goes from 0 to 100% in about 150 minutes... (I tested twice), and it is not even a Quick Charge 2.0 charger which would in theory make an even greater difference.
So for me it is actually more important to see what they scored in battery life, not in recharging time...
If PA make the same battery drain test for every device... it is only fair that they use the same charger for every device for the recharging time test. (at least as an additional comparisson)
46. thesyd (Posts: 4; Member since: 31 Jul 2015)
Yep, they used the 500mAh charger that's in the box.
51. aksa123 (Posts: 319; Member since: 30 Jan 2014)
Ok thanks. But 500mAh charger? That's so lame!
Most non-techsavvy ppl use default charger, but it looks like they need to buy a new one after all.
76. buccob (Posts: 2512; Member since: 19 Jun 2012)
So they basically just tested how long it takes to charge the phone from a computer USB Port...
11. Augustine (Posts: 1043; Member since: 28 Sep 2013)
I guess that it lacks Qi charging too, yes?
47. thesyd (Posts: 4; Member since: 31 Jul 2015)
It takes that long only with the 500mAh charger that's in the box.
16. Symon_Fleece (Posts: 335; Member since: 30 May 2014)
Very fast review!, but moto g deserves the score 9. IPX7 is a bonus too in $180 phone
17. cripton805 (Posts: 1421; Member since: 18 Mar 2012)
I hope boost mobile gets the 2gb/16gb version.
19. surethom (Posts: 605; Member since: 04 Mar 2009)
A better upgrade from the 2013 MotoG did not like the 2014 version, but wish the price of the 2gb 16gb was under £200
Motorola should of discontinued the 8gb version totally, too many apps cannot be moved to sd card.
21. oliolio (Posts: 3; Member since: 09 Dec 2014)
Regarding the charging time, are you using motorola's charger? Cause in my country, my 2013 moto g comes with a charger and it is rubbish. slow charging times and spoils fast too. charging with a better brand's charger resulted in normal charging speeds for me.
25. Joshing4fun (Posts: 1231; Member since: 13 Aug 2010)
A good phone for kids or people who don't use their phone much. But that's about it.
91. Rifqiandi (Posts: 23; Member since: 28 May 2015)
Eh, why would people who don't use their phone much need waterproof? Also, why Gorrila glass if they don't use it a lot? lol
26. Donbenie (Posts: 207; Member since: 04 Aug 2013)
Regarding the Moto charger,my OG Moto g charger is still the worst POS supposedly original charger in my collection,I honestly won't knock the charging time until I try other chargers..
37. fanboy1974 (Posts: 1345; Member since: 12 Nov 2011)
I'm more of a flagship guy so not really in the maket. If I see a prepaid one for about $50 I may buy one for my motorcycle due to it being waterproof.
43. gaming64 (unregistered)
Well certainly you aren't middle class.
38. Nexus4lifes (Posts: 155; Member since: 13 Feb 2014)
Moto g 2015: display color temp: 7440 : cold by and large
iphone 6 plus: 7150(approx): perfect display nothing even comes close.
Jon V for you
Jon seriously stop reviewing non-iphones.
39. miket1737 (Posts: 2366; Member since: 17 Mar 2013)
To be fair 7440k and 7150k is fairly noticeable(the difference)... They say 6500k is about the perfect white balance but usually your eyes get used to your display of your own phone(its properties like white point and stuff)
Mostly seen on white backgrounds
40. legiloca (Posts: 1199; Member since: 11 Nov 2014)
Well that was super fast... Haha! Nice one PA
42. DroidMystic (Posts: 83; Member since: 31 Oct 2014)
Wow, I think this Moto G3 will be successful.
44. digitalw (Posts: 64; Member since: 20 Dec 2011)
If you are not dependent od Android, then Lumia 830 is better value, at least for me.
Better screen, better camera (IOS and dark) , better battety, QI charging. But on the end of a day, depends on your personal needs. However, nice toy :)
45. jellmoo (Posts: 1486; Member since: 31 Oct 2011)
Not sure about pricing where you are, but in Canada the 830 ranges between $400 and $500. Not exactly the same price category.
64. PorkyBurger (Posts: 585; Member since: 18 May 2013)
Latvia has it for around $230
52. tonyv13 (Posts: 37; Member since: 07 Jun 2015)
so how did the zenfone 2 got a lower score when the 2gb model has a 1080p screen and 16gb storage ?? how come moto g 3 gen didn't get a Battery is not user replaceable con? 9 as a score? don't tell me Motorola is paying you guys???I'm currently using a moto g 1th gen was waiting for the moto g announcement , but processor wise probably is only a 10-15% improvement from my current moto g . seems like I should wait for the moto x play for 300$ seems like a better deal or maybe zenfone 2 4gb model.
54. brasstax (Posts: 280; Member since: 16 Apr 2014)
Am I the only one who finds it baffling that the benchmark scores of 2 of the leading mid range value propositions in the form of the Lenovo K3 Note and Asus Zenfone 2 are not included in the review?
Fact is, these two phones are not only slightly cheaper, they are also faster & more powerful without skimping out on quality. Not to mention, there are several snapdragon 615 based phones as well.
Sorry PA, I have to disagree on the 9 rating. Stock AOSP aside, the Moto G (2015) offers far less for a 2015 value mid ranger compared to the competition.
56. Tondern (Posts: 97; Member since: 23 Feb 2015)
Zenfone 2 is not on the benchmark charts it has unmatched value and performance in this price category. It would make the Moto G look REALLY bad. And the Zenfone 2 is still not globally available, much to my disappointment.
57. Augustine (Posts: 1043; Member since: 28 Sep 2013)
You realize that you can add other phones to benchmarking charts, don't you?
71. blinx (Posts: 23; Member since: 09 Oct 2013)
have to agree with you... dont know why sites are forgeting about meizu who just released the meizu m2 for less than 100 dollars and has almost same if not better offerings than the moto g 2015(excluding the water resistance)..
55. legiloca (Posts: 1199; Member since: 11 Nov 2014)
I'm gonna have to wait for GSMarena's review on this phone, PA always make the benchmark performance scores look horrible.. just like HTC Desire Eye, the Antutu score I always get is around 40,000 up to a hair behind Galaxy S5 and PA literally just posted 28,000.. LIARS at best
58. NitishNK (Posts: 36; Member since: 03 Jul 2015)
Hey PA! Whats dis? Where comes the lumia 640 in between wen u guyz know that AnTuTu for wp is not same as that for Android. If at all u r comparing, then wy u didnt compare in the Battery test.. U also noted that the 1080p video it shoots is below par, glitches in some games. Then how the heck it got 9?