Samsung announces 2020 goal for 5G, hits 1Gbps in tests
China and the EU both have been working on developing 5G standards and have been throwing money at the technology in hopes of be able to write the international standards for the service. But no matter how much is thrown at 5G, it takes a tech company with the reach of Samsung to help commercialize those standards.
We're talking about 5G being available in seven short years. Until then, we still have a long way to go before the full potential of 4G LTE is achieved.
source: YonhapNews, VR-Zone via Engadget
1. wumberpeb (Posts: 452; Member since: 14 Mar 2011)
Sprint's 4G LTE rollout should be done by then
46. tiburonpineda (Posts: 39; Member since: 27 Feb 2012)
Hahaha Sprint is the worst cellphone provider ever.
21. jcarrigan (unregistered)
alot can change in 7 years. 7 years ago the iPhone didnt exist. Smartphones were pretty much useless. and cell phones altogether were considered a luxury whereas nowadays cell phones are a requirement to a happy facebook filled life :)
24. tedkord (Posts: 6417; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)
Smartphones weren't useless. They weren't as powerful, but they weren't useless. I had some HTC WinMo phones back then, and in some ways, WinMo was better back then than some of todays mobile OS 's.
I really wish Microsoft had made WP much more like WinMo 6.5, instead of more like iOS. I'd be on a WP phone right now.
28. jcarrigan (unregistered)
Let me rephrase what I said then. 7 years ago smartphones were not nearly as popular and accepted amongst people of all ages as they are now.
55. g2a5b0e (Posts: 3248; Member since: 08 Jun 2012)
Cell phones were also definitely not a luxury 7 years ago. Maybe in the '90s.
EDIT: I guess I should rephrase. Cell phones in the U.S.
62. jcarrigan (unregistered)
7 years ago i still saw plenty of morons walking around with pagers and people thought i was nuts for having a cellphone and almost no one had a smartphone. People ran businesses who still used a landline and a pager.
67. Rager722 (Posts: 276; Member since: 30 Jan 2013)
and a fax. lol what the hell is as fax these days...
68. jcarrigan (unregistered)
OMG i hate fax machines. I hate how its 2013 and there are these multi billion corporations that want crap faxed, okay one: not everyone has a fax, everyone has email and possible access to a scanner or a phone app scanner.
two:fax machines dont even work half the time
and three:can we please be done with landline phones so fax machines cant be used! lol
69. g2a5b0e (Posts: 3248; Member since: 08 Jun 2012)
I'm not sure where you live where that was the case, but I bought a cell phone in 2003 as a broke college student. They may not have been as ubiquitous back then, but if broke college students can afford cell phones & plans, they are NOT a luxury item anymore.
58. TheRequiem (Posts: 205; Member since: 23 Mar 2012)
I'm not understanding why it's necessary to bash Sprint on a completely unrelated post. It also shows how arrogant and out of the loop you are. Sprint will be mostly done with their 4G LTE rollout by the end of this year and completely done by this time next year. Lets also not forget, despite Sprints bad reputation from some poor decisions made several years ago... They still have more spectrum then all the other carriers combined. They also have been making some incredible decisions lately that will make them a game changer and a major competitive player in a by 2014, the new york times confirms this. Lets look at some facts you'll need to be educated on.
1) Sprint is not just rolling out LTE, they are redoing their entire network from the ground up with next generation modular technology developed by Samsung. When Sprint is done with their network vision, they will essentially be able to deploy any technology with the flip of a switch and cabinet upgrade very easily, where as other carriers will have to do a complete rollout again like they've been doing the past couple of years. They will also use half the energy the others will be using and have double the capacity.
2) Sprint will not only match Verizon and AT&T in signal strength, they will likely succeed them due to having 3G on 800mhz and having roughly half the amount of people on their network.
3) They will likely have their complete network overhaul, which lets not forget is much more advanced then Verizon's or AT&Ts technology done at the same time AT&T finishes there's and not really that much long after Verizon finishes there's this year and way ahead of T-Mobile, further showing how irrelevant your comment is.
4) Be thankful you even have 4G as an option. As I type this in China on Edge on my iPhone, they don't even really have 3G yet and likely wont have 4G for some time.
5) This is also a big deal - while Verizon and AT&T continuously lobby and limit customers, Sprint is actually for the people and lobbies against the limiting of our rights. Get real man, STOP BASHING SPRINT, retard
60. Daftama (Posts: 587; Member since: 03 Nov 2012)
Well said. .. the problem is people want now now now. ..wait till soft bank comes in...2-4 years you will see sprint the number choice for people
63. JEverettnow (Posts: 224; Member since: 11 Mar 2013)
Ummmm, I talked to a gentleman that installs these LTE cabinets and he said Sprint's are not only the least expensive out of Verizon and T-Mobile, but they are also 5 times the size and dont have the technology that t-mobile and verizon have in their cabinets.
I have used Sprint's LTE all over the bay area of northern california where it is fully deployed and in some areas where it isn't fully deployed. I get anywhere from 1mbps to 16 mbps download speeds with dropped calls. They now released something saying the actual deployment of LTE will be the middle of 2014 where it won't be fully developed and will reach 200 million pop instead of 250 million. Sprint is definitely huffing wolf tickets.
64. a_merryman (Posts: 749; Member since: 14 Dec 2011)
There is not a chance that Sprint's post network vision upgrade cabinets are 5 times bigger then Verizon and T-mobiles.
And what they released said that they would only reach 200 million pops by the end of 2013, instead of their goal of 250 million pops. They're still on track with finishing NV 1.0 and 2.0 upgrades on their network by 2014. Not too mention that the old iDen network is getting shutdown this June and sprint is putting a nationwide LTE carrier on those frequencies, in addition to a CDMA carrier. And once Softbank purchase is complete and the clearwire purchase is complete latter this summer, they will start aggressively using clearwire's spectrum for absolutely massive bandwidth.
65. JEverettnow (Posts: 224; Member since: 11 Mar 2013)
I was told that the LTE cabinets that go on the tower are much larger than Tmobiles and Verizons and that they require an actual crane to install. Im sure different regions have different equipment though. From samsung to Alcatell Lucent. We have been told that NV will be done by the end of 2013, but recently they changed it to middle of 2014. Its a very slow process. When AT&T needs additional towers they are up. I can't even get calls at a SF Giants game, let alone go on the internet. When I do have LTE it has consistently been slower than competitors 3g speeds. I hope this changes.
4. Nathan_ingx (Posts: 3135; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)
People are going to have a hard time paying the bills.
On the bright side, 3G and LTE data costs might be reduced, hopefully.
9. kozza3 (Posts: 592; Member since: 17 Oct 2012)
isn't that how its supposed to work? but in all seriousness, when the hell are we gonna get sat-link smartphone connectivity/speed? imaging being able to go anywhere on the planet with service!!!
34. Bernoulli (Posts: 2186; Member since: 01 Sep 2012)
get the Nokia from Dr Who, no matter where IN TIME AND SPACE you always have service.
6. TheMan (Posts: 433; Member since: 21 Sep 2012)
According to VZW's CIO and CFO, the cost to provide LTE service is less than 3G. Clearly, the savings were not passed on to the consumer, likely because of increased demand vs supply issues.
Greed could also be playing a role.
14. speckledapple (Posts: 887; Member since: 29 Sep 2011)
Oh that is easy to assume. Just because its cheaper for companies like Verizon to produce does not mean they will lessen the cost. The gain for them would be pointless. They will most likely maintain the prices while demand increases and the costs remain stable.
8. TheMan (Posts: 433; Member since: 21 Sep 2012)
Beside speed boosts, improved call quality would be nice.
10. darac (Posts: 2156; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
That is insane.. 4K movie download in 20 seconds
11. Nathan_ingx (Posts: 3135; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)
You're typing this with a grin aren't you? :P
16. MistB (Posts: 581; Member since: 07 Jul 2012)
Galaxy S XI with holographic video downloads and a foldable 10 inch becomes 50 inch Galaxy Note X with mind control, can see where this is going. My old man will finally transition to 3G and be getting my trusty Nokia N80 to finally replace his beloved but long dead Nokia 8210 by this time :)
35. Bernoulli (Posts: 2186; Member since: 01 Sep 2012)
why don't we just get the Dr Who nokia that always in time and space has coverage?
12. chistoefurpuffer (Posts: 140; Member since: 11 Mar 2013)
Damn Samsung! Why you gotta be so awesome?
13. speckledapple (Posts: 887; Member since: 29 Sep 2011)
It does not matter how much money China throws at it, the EU will probably win as the US will most likely not utilize a technology that was homegrown versioned from China. Sucks but true.
15. InspectorGadget80 (Posts: 6961; Member since: 26 Mar 2011)
Com on 4g LTE haven't hit every market here in the u.s.
26. tedkord (Posts: 6417; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)
Well, 2020 is a ways off. I the meantime, I'm sure we'll see LTE advanced here, and the carriers will insist on calling it 5g.
17. som (Posts: 768; Member since: 10 Nov 2009)
T-Mobile is working on 5G network it is good with Samsung phones it will left iPhone in the dust.
45. mydi.maus (unregistered)
t-mobile doesnt cover half of u.s on lte..and your saying is working on 5G..
18. taikucing (unregistered)
2020... yeah, it's the crysis & nanosuit era..
19. Galen20K (Posts: 523; Member since: 26 Dec 2008)
do we REALLY need to be talking about 5G already....??
30. HDShatter (Posts: 1021; Member since: 17 Jan 2013)
Would rather have unlimited lte than like 5gb 5g.
20. N-fanboy (Posts: 538; Member since: 12 Jan 2013)
In Ethiopia its still 2G and the fastest speed is like 128KBPS.
38. opensourceftw (banned) (Posts: 148; Member since: 01 Jan 2013)
Pretty sure data speeds are not the primary concern of the citizens of Ethiopia
54. nobelset (Posts: 270; Member since: 17 Oct 2012)
Wazzup my Ethiopian bro, cheers from Myanmar, where we we have INSANE 2G speeds and get charged about 7 cents per minute talk time.
22. princedeking (Posts: 9; Member since: 07 May 2013)
sammy has the best engineers?..,.,.,, well am waiting::>
44. SonyFindOneDroidple (Posts: 660; Member since: 11 May 2013)
Yah the internals of gs4 got a lot of praise because of the neat engineering..
23. sarge77 (Posts: 202; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)
yeah I was just going to mentioned about sprint 4g lol I dpight we'll get 10gig thats impossible tobpropose those speeds like 4g lte xan support upto over 100mgs and you really only get 10% of that..
39. a_merryman (Posts: 749; Member since: 14 Dec 2011)
10% of 10 Gbps is still faster then most people have in their home for wired internet. LTE-Advanced which will be rolling out soon has a theoretical limit of 1Gbps so far I think...
29. grahaman27 (Posts: 358; Member since: 05 Apr 2013)
*real world speeds will vary*
lte is supposed to have 150mbps when you really only gets like 8.
51. PapaSmurf (Posts: 9680; Member since: 14 May 2012)
Yeah of you think T-Mobile's 42 HSPA+ is 3G.
32. darkkjedii (Posts: 14382; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)
Keep pushing the envelope Sammy. The current innovation leader
36. Bernoulli (Posts: 2186; Member since: 01 Sep 2012)
Let's all just get the Dr Who nokia so no matter where in time and space we are we have service!
41. jromy (Posts: 114; Member since: 26 Feb 2013)
Dude/Dudette. Let. It. Go. Cool idea, awesome even. But not really relevant to what this article is about.
43. Bernoulli (Posts: 2186; Member since: 01 Sep 2012)
yes it is, retard, more than half of the global population in the world are still using GPRS/EDGE, and there other retards are worrying about 5G? bitch please.