x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Battle of the Always On Display: LG G5 versus Samsung Galaxy S7

Battle of the Always On Display: LG G5 versus Samsung Galaxy S7

Battle of the Always On Display: LG G5 versus Samsung Galaxy S7

Hot off their recent introductions during Mobile World Congress 2016, the LG G5 and Samsung Galaxy S7 have notable qualities about them that make them stand out so much. For the Galaxy S7, Samsung amassed critical acclaim for the outstanding performance out of its latest flagship. As for the LG G5, it’s still on its way to being released, but rest assured, it has already sparked interest and intrigue because of its updated, modular design.

Interestingly, though, the two companies introduced similar features in its flagships. While it’s not technically the first time we’ve come across this feature, considering that it’s been something that’s been employed amongst smartwatches, including the respective bunch from both companies, the new Always On Display features in the LG G5 and Samsung Galaxy S7 makes the process of viewing the time quicker and faster than ever before. Therefore, users no longer need to press the power button, or execute some other gesture, in order to turn on the screen to view the time and other pertinent information.

We have a pre-production unit of LG G5 in our possession, so we thought it'd be a good idea to quickly to see its implementation and how it competes to what Sammy has done with the Galaxy S7.

Battle of the Always On Display: LG G5 versus Samsung Galaxy S7
Battle of the Always On Display: LG G5 versus Samsung Galaxy S7
Battle of the Always On Display: LG G5 versus Samsung Galaxy S7
Battle of the Always On Display: LG G5 versus Samsung Galaxy S7
Sure, they’re similar in premise, but there’s always the matter of their executions. Considering they’re utilizing different display technologies, the outcome isn’t going to be exactly the same. We’ve been using the Verizon version of the Galaxy S7, so we’ve been acquainted with its Always On Display feature for a bit of time now. However, the LG G5 unit we’re checking out here is a pre-production model, so it’s not a final build – albeit, we can expect pretty much the same end result regardless.

The Always On Display might be perceived as a new feature, but we have to remember that previous phones offered something similar to a certain degree – such as the case of the secondary screens found in the LG V10 and Samsung Continuum. From what we’re told by LG, the G5's IPS-LCD display can keep a backlight on for about 30% of its normal brightness and have a small area of the screen display a few items, such as time, a personal message, and pending chat notifications. It’s been stated that it consumes up to 0.8% of battery per hour, according to LG.

Samsung’s interpretation doesn’t stray too far from the intended outcome, but nonetheless, there are still some subtle differences in how it’s executed. Because it’s employing AMOLED technology, pixels can be turned on individually, so that the entire panel doesn’t technically need to be powered on. Now, even though Samsung doesn’t have exact numbers for battery drain per hour, they estimate that it uses less than 1% or so of the battery per hour.

Throwing out numbers is one thing, but what about their actual, real-world performances? Well, it simply breaks down to primary things that we expand upon below.

Visibility


In the dark, or on those days when it’s cloudy and gray, we don’t find any issues viewing the content on either phones. Visibility isn’t a problem, as their respective screens deliver adequate iridescence. Therefore, the time, date, and accompanying notification icons are all quite visible from a normal distance.

However, as we inspect them closer, there’s a clear winner between them – and that’s the Galaxy S7. Under direct light, or bright conditions as whole, the information displayed by the Galaxy S7’s Super AMOLED screen is brighter, clearly defined. Under the same conditions, it’s undeniably noticeable that the Galaxy S7 is far more distinctive to make out with the eye. In comparison, the LG G5’s IPS-LCD panel is just subdued; nowhere as potent. Don’t get us wrong, we can still make out what’s there on the G5, but not from even a moderate angle. In such scenarios, the content displayed is just too dim for us to read, and we have to adjust to face the phone head-on.

Content


And of course, there’s also the matter regarding what kind of content can be displayed by them. By default, the two present us with the time, date, and icons for incoming notifications. That said—and this is important—Samsung's take on the features only shows notifications from official Samsung apps. In comparison, the G5 will display any third-party notifications. In fact, when they first hit your phone, you'll see a large icon to let you know what app is begging for your attention, eventually shrinking in size and falling in line with any other notifications you might already have received. And while that's a big win for LG in our view, Samsung does offer far more diversity in terms of customization. That’s because in addition to choosing various clock styles, we even have the option to select different calendar styles as well. Best of all, too, there’s an option to choose a stock image, which gives it a little bit more personality.

Oppositely, LG’s interpretation isn’t as diversified with its portfolio. In fact, there are no other options to choose from when it comes to the clock style. The only other option at our disposal is setting a signature to be displayed instead of the time. Yes, we can have some sort of quote or witty statement, but it’s just disappointing that it’s limited in its scope. Who knows, but maybe this call all change down the road? Maybe they’ll open it up to other styles to choose from? Still, based on this pre-production model, there’s no denying that it could benefit by offering just a bit more variety.

And the winner for now is....


Based on what we’re experiencing, Samsung’s interpretation seems like it’s the better one in terms of hardware execution. The content on the screen is noticeably easier to make out, even at an angle, and that means you save yourself the trouble of having to strain your neck to see what's going on, as you do with the G5. Samsung's is also more diversified in that you can choose between various styles for the clock and the calendar, or even set a custom image if you're so inclined.

That said, we do have to give it to LG for thinking of the many third-party apps that we all use. So whereas Samsung limits you to getting notifications on the screen from just its own apps, with the G5 there's no discrimination, and we find that far more useful. And when those inevitable "X app has been updated" notifications start hitting LG's phone, you'll know there's no reason to wake it up with just a peek. 

Finally, it's worth pointing out that the widgets and images shown by the Galaxy S7 have their locations changed every once in a while. This is to avoid screen burn-in – a degradation of the screen caused by displaying a static image for long periods of time. This isn’t the case with the G5, because it uses an IPS LCD display – this allows is to keep the placement of its always-on content static.

All in all, we’re going to reiterate and say that both Samsung and LG have done a decent job, just in different areas. Quite frankly, if we were to get the visibility and customization available with Samsung's Super AMOLED displays, and combine it with the third-party app support from the G5, we'd have a far superior feature than either of the two separately. 



84 Comments
  • Options
    Close




posted on 16 Mar 2016, 09:11 7

1. SamsungPhanboy (banned) (Posts: 765; Member since: 31 Mar 2015)


LG G5 is growing on me a bit..

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 10:03

20. Adreno (banned) (Posts: 755; Member since: 12 Mar 2016)


Hey SammyPhanboy, I thought you'll conclude the S7's Always On Display to be superior to G5's, since your username indicates so???

What's up, man.

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 10:18 14

27. Wiencon (Posts: 1762; Member since: 06 Aug 2014)


Hey I thought we don't want to judge others here
And he is far from Samsung fanboy, he has shown it on numerous occasions but you're quite new here so you may have missed it ;P

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 11:34 2

54. j2001m (Posts: 2788; Member since: 28 Apr 2014)


Also the themes can make changes to Samsungs always on display unlike lgs

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 11:40 1

56. j2001m (Posts: 2788; Member since: 28 Apr 2014)


Please note on both phones having the display always on will do big time battery damage as it turns off android 6.0 standby battery saver

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 12:36 1

64. xocomaox (Posts: 118; Member since: 14 Dec 2015)


It will drain (S7) approximately 0.9%/hour while in deep sleep. With AOD off, the phone drains about 0.16%/hour while in deep sleep. I've tested this using the S7e (Verizon) over multiple nights.

Also, you are incorrect. Doze still activates when AOD is enabled.

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 09:16 7

2. ZeneticX (Posts: 62; Member since: 27 Feb 2014)


would've been perfect if the AOD supports 3rd party notifications on the samsung

anyway I still leave it on, really handy in checking the time and putting less stress to the home/power button

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 09:16 13

3. w1000i (Posts: 65; Member since: 22 Jul 2015)


Where is the battery test for it

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 09:29 2

8. manzer (Posts: 32; Member since: 05 Apr 2014)


i would also like to see a battery test, feature on and off. im happy with my moto display, wave my hand near the phone then the display shows. i cant belive that LG is doing it with a LCD screen. just seems wrong

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 10:05

21. Adreno (banned) (Posts: 755; Member since: 12 Mar 2016)


Not untill I see the battery test result. But yeah, LG's LCD displays are top-notch.

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 09:19 13

4. Felix_Gatto (Posts: 897; Member since: 03 Jul 2013)


Feature like this is always look better on AMOLED screen.

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 09:27

6. xperiaZlover (Posts: 188; Member since: 15 Nov 2015)


Milk gray because LG has reduced brightness to the lowest amount and has even used a sort of software which adds a gray filter .
I am pretty sure LG has used a software screen filter as well.

LG one is better because of lowest battery consumption.
Samsung is the winner as they have a balance between vivid quality display and power consumption.

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 09:35 5

11. catze86 (Posts: 594; Member since: 07 Dec 2015)


LG have lowest battery consumption?

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 09:45 7

15. tyrionTheWise (unregistered)


Battery consumption of g5 is 0.8% per hour while Samsung one is 1% per hour. Not a huge difference considering how bright the Samsung one is.

That being said, nothing matches the amazing implementation of Motorola.

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 10:09 2

22. Adreno (banned) (Posts: 755; Member since: 12 Mar 2016)


It's but obvious, since AMOLED are brighter.

But LG's LCD consuming less power versus Samsung's SAMOLED ?- it's great archivement

No matter how you look at it.

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 13:59

70. Samsg (Posts: 6; Member since: 05 May 2015)


Agreed. Well done to LG for such a low consumption for an LCD AOD.

posted on 19 Mar 2016, 05:34

83. EcoCare (Posts: 383; Member since: 30 Jul 2014)


Yeah, but then again why not jump to AMOLED display instead?

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 10:12 1

23. catze86 (Posts: 594; Member since: 07 Dec 2015)


Per hour vs per Day

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 10:28 3

28. tyrionTheWise (unregistered)


No. Both are per hour.

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 10:39

36. catze86 (Posts: 594; Member since: 07 Dec 2015)


Source?

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 11:14 2

46. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10434; Member since: 14 May 2012)


"Now, even though Samsung doesn’t have specific estimates for battery drain per hour, they tell us that it uses about 1% or so of the battery in a [day.]"

Here you go. :)

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 12:28 2

63. tyrionTheWise (unregistered)


PA did an error there. See GSM ARENA battery test. They actually tested it and it's 1% an hour.

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 10:14 1

24. catze86 (Posts: 594; Member since: 07 Dec 2015)


Per hour vs per Day

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 14:02

71. Samsg (Posts: 6; Member since: 05 May 2015)


Per day is incorrect they've made a mistake. Read other reviews and the comment above.

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 10:15 1

25. catze86 (Posts: 594; Member since: 07 Dec 2015)


Per hour vs per Day

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 09:29 7

9. alexp999 (Posts: 68; Member since: 16 Mar 2016)


From what I have read, one very important thing missed on this is that the LG can display notifications for all apps, the Samsung can only display notifications for Samsung apps.

Seems like a win in terms of content for the LG imo....

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 09:41 4

12. catze86 (Posts: 594; Member since: 07 Dec 2015)


Thats not a big deal. But, Lets put our hope for future firmware update.

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 09:52 4

17. alexp999 (Posts: 68; Member since: 16 Mar 2016)


For me it would be a big deal if it didn't show a gmail notification, or twitter, etc.

I'm sure it can be fixed with a software update, I was just quite surprised to read that the S7 only supported Samsung notifications out of the box...

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 10:57 4

41. Itiskonrad (Posts: 17; Member since: 22 Feb 2013)


This is a very big deal and would make the display essentially useless for me. I and most I know use Gmail and 3rd party text apps like Textra or Chomp.

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 11:47

57. j2001m (Posts: 2788; Member since: 28 Apr 2014)


So you telling me they just done this big test over the 2 and was looking for ways for the lg to beat the Samsung ver and they did not work out that lg does other notifications, please post links to where this as been test to show all notifications and it's 100% not with other icons so you have no idea what it is to you go past the all on display anyways

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 12:56 2

66. BillyxAllen (Posts: 6; Member since: 10 Mar 2015)


Go watch a YouTube on Lg G5 always on. Its clear as day that it uses any notifaction icon

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 14:49

72. Itiskonrad (Posts: 17; Member since: 22 Feb 2013)


Look at the pictures of the LG G5 always-on display in this article. It shows the "Slickdeals" icon notification (that big SD). This is a pretty specific icon for a specific notification. For the life of me, I can't imagine why Phone Arena didn't even bring this up as a difference between LG's and Samsung's implementations. Bizarre. Also, yes, there are tons of youtube videos of people showing additional third-party icons on the G5 Always On Display.

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 09:32 1

10. xperiaZlover (Posts: 188; Member since: 15 Nov 2015)


I still don't think IPS LCDs suck.
LG IPS quantum dot display is brilliant. With its insanely high 800 CD/m2 brightness.
IPS LCDs by Sony and LG are giving a great counter-attack on Amoleds still .
Good examples are G5 and Z5p. Onpar with the Amoleds.

But there would be a time when we will have to move to OLED for sure.

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 09:45

14. catze86 (Posts: 594; Member since: 07 Dec 2015)


IPS are sucks in my Lumia. Its Yellowish. I prefer Samsung PLS screen over IPS and Amoled.
OEMs will move to OLED eventualy

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 10:31

29. xperiaZlover (Posts: 188; Member since: 15 Nov 2015)


Lumia don't use the best IPS displays.
There are low quality and high quality IPS panels.
Low quality IPS panels are worse than even excellent TFT panels in color accuracy and vividness.
Honestly I haven't used the lumia 950
But from the entry level and midrange models I can say that they couldn't compete with Sony and LG IPS tech.
Lumia 550 display is good for the price range.
But 530/535/540/630/640 were crap...
520 was not bad for the price at that time.

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 10:50

39. catze86 (Posts: 594; Member since: 07 Dec 2015)


Lumia 920 is highrange phone, you know! And its still yellow. At least that happened to my friends phone. Mine is 720. Samsung PLS is better in my opinion.

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 16:47

76. Pattyface (Posts: 1518; Member since: 20 Aug 2014)


The 920 was highend years ago. Most screens looked mediocre by today's standards of lcd

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 09:47 4

16. dennisfurlan (Posts: 18; Member since: 22 Jun 2015)


I agree that almost everything about the S7 AOD is more compelling — except the range of notifications, which is pretty important. My understanding is that you don't get email nor social network notifications on the S7 AOD, which, to me, are probably the most important. So, on that score, the LG G5 appears to have the edge (forgive the pun).

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 10:01

19. GreenMan (Posts: 913; Member since: 09 Nov 2015)


Anyhow, back to the topic...

I think Samsung is the clear winner, simply because of AMOLED Display...

I believe that AMOLED is more power efficient when displaying just plain black & white and will most likely live up to the compnay's claim of roughly ~1% Battery drain per day...

LG, OTOH, is way more power consuming.. So much, that most (if not all) won't even bother turning this option on on their G5's... Specially those individulas who like to squeeze out 2 days on full charge (Like me, for example!)

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 10:17

26. Adreno (banned) (Posts: 755; Member since: 12 Mar 2016)


"I believe AMOLED is more power efficient when displaying just plain black & white"

You're correct about it being effecient whilst displaying black, but AMOLED consumes power dramatically whilst displaying white. :P

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 10:37 1

34. catze86 (Posts: 594; Member since: 07 Dec 2015)


Amoled is very efficient because it doesnt need backlight like TFT and its variasions. The problem is Android is a power hungry OS compared to the others.

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 11:17

49. GreenMan (Posts: 913; Member since: 09 Nov 2015)


Well, LED stands for Light Emitting Diode for a reason! Each pixel has its own light...!

So, during Stand-By mode, only few pixels will be working and 'sucking the juice'... That's MUCH MUCH efficient than LCD...

In case of LCD, the whole screen's back light is working which equates to more, MUCH MORE juice consumption!

G'Day!

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 13:57

69. Samsg (Posts: 6; Member since: 05 May 2015)


Yes LED is supposed to be more efficient yet here it uses more of the battery per hour than LG's LCD. Makes you wonder. Good day!!

posted on 17 Mar 2016, 04:45

80. ibend (Posts: 3501; Member since: 30 Sep 2014)


a little correction,
AOD on G5 didnt need to turn on the whole screen backlight, it only light a portion of backlight required for Always On Display..
with the lowest brightness used, it can compete with AOD on amoled screen efficiency, but its obviously darker compared to amoled -_-

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 11:19

51. krystian (Posts: 56; Member since: 16 Mar 2016)


It's more power efficient if there's more black no doubt. But LCD is actually less power efficient with black or dark because it has to run a diffuser to darken the bulbs which requires extra power. But each scenario is very dependent on the entire screen and what is being displayed. There really isn't any scenarios where all white is ever displayed. Furthermore Dark themes have become popular in apps. And even some OS's allow dark theme throughout.

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 10:54 3

40. marorun (Posts: 3127; Member since: 30 Mar 2015)


Samsung fail.

No third party notification make this feature useless!

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 10:59 1

43. dennisfurlan (Posts: 18; Member since: 22 Jun 2015)


It doesn't make it useless.

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 11:05 4

45. Itiskonrad (Posts: 17; Member since: 22 Feb 2013)


Seriously. Who uses Samsung mail and Samsung text apps?

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 11:14 1

47. catze86 (Posts: 594; Member since: 07 Dec 2015)


Me and Everyone who buy Samsung phones.

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 11:52

59. j2001m (Posts: 2788; Member since: 28 Apr 2014)


Where does it say third party notifications support for the lg, also nothing stopping Samsung from doing this at any time with an update, but I be thinking it takes more battery

Also if the lg does do it, it's all under 1 icon

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 14:54

73. Itiskonrad (Posts: 17; Member since: 22 Feb 2013)


Nope. Look at the pictures of the LG G5 always-on display in this article. It shows the "Slickdeals" icon notification (that big SD). This is a pretty specific third-party icon for a specific notification. For the life of me, I can't imagine why Phone Arena didn't even bring this up as a difference between LG's and Samsung's implementations. Bizarre. Also, yes, there are tons of youtube videos of people showing additional third-party icons on the G5 Always On Display.

Also, yeah, there's nothing stopping Samsung from adding it, but I'm not interested in buying the phone and praying that someday they add it out of the goodness of their heart sometime in the future.

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 15:20

74. GreenMan (Posts: 913; Member since: 09 Nov 2015)


Itiskonrad Well lad, There's little something called "pebbles smart watch"...
Cheap, reliable, productive, long lasting and efficient!
No need to pull that 6 Inch Behemoth of a cellphone out of your pocket for every single notification!

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 10:32 1

30. Venkatramanan (Posts: 308; Member since: 15 Aug 2014)


Is it the same feature as the Nokia's glance?

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 10:33 1

31. Venkatramanan (Posts: 308; Member since: 15 Aug 2014)


Is it the same feature as the Nokia's glance?

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 10:35

33. catze86 (Posts: 594; Member since: 07 Dec 2015)


Yes, it is

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 10:39

35. Venkatramanan (Posts: 308; Member since: 15 Aug 2014)


Thanks. Missing Nokia.

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 10:34

32. Venkatramanan (Posts: 308; Member since: 15 Aug 2014)


Who to Undo the like here.

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 10:49

38. marorun (Posts: 3127; Member since: 30 Mar 2015)


I personally prefere Motorola implimentation.

Move your hand near the phone its show time and notification ( with good brightness! )
Receive a notification and its show time and the notification.
Take the phone in your hand and its show time and notification.

This way its not always on for nothing.

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 10:58 1

42. dennisfurlan (Posts: 18; Member since: 22 Jun 2015)


What if you always want it on, as bedside clock display, for example?

posted on 16 Mar 2016, 11:19 1

50. boys.noize (Posts: 18; Member since: 03 Jan 2016)


on motorola, you have a nightmode in the clock-app for that matter

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories