Samsung Galaxy S II HD LTE Review

Samsung Galaxy S II HD LTE Review
Introduction:

Nearly a year of making its presence known in almost every single corner of the globe, the Samsung Galaxy S II has accomplished its goal by proving itself to be one of the most polarizing smartphones in recent memory. Keeping up with the times, the Korea-only Samsung Galaxy S II HD LTE sprinkles some much wanted upgrades to keep the beloved handset’s prestige glowing even more as it faces a never-ending wave of competition. It's actually very interesting for us to take a look at this handset, knowing that its U.S. variant, the Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket HD, will be making its way to AT&T’s lineup soon.

Please keep in mind, that the Galaxy S II HD LTE is a Korean model which is offered unlocked by some U.S. retailers online. However, its LTE and HSPA are not usable in the U.S., due to different bands, so it is 2G only.


Design:

Almost an exact facsimile to the original model, the only impressive thing this time around with the handset’s design is the fact it manages to retain a streamlined . Specifically, it’s only a hairline thicker at 0.37” (9.5mm), which is still regarded as being skinny by today’s standards.


Bigger seems to the trend nowadays, and rightfully so, the Samsung Galaxy S II HD LTE is outfitted a larger 4.65” HD (720 x 1280) Super AMOLED display, just as the Galaxy Nexus. Despite its choice of sticking with a PenTile matrix arrangement, it’s still sharp looking with its details – while enthralling us with its vivid colors, high-contrast, and exceptionally wide viewing angles.


As for the rest of the handset, everything remains intact as we find its microUSB port, volume rocker, dedicated power button, 3.5mm headset jack, and noise cancellation microphone in their usual locations. Additionally, it features the same 2-megapixel front-facing camera above its display, while its 8-megapixel snapper with flash is positioned in the rear.



Samsung Galaxy S II HD LTE 360-Degrees View:



FEATURED VIDEO

24 Comments

1. Birds

Posts: 1172; Member since: Nov 21, 2011

Well this review is somewhat harsh. Lol but it makes a lot of sense why you would feel this way. I agree the Galaxy Nexus is the better handset...Mainly because of software.

3. sorcio46

Posts: 435; Member since: Jul 27, 2011

Why Phonearena ?!? CONS LTE and HSPA are not usable in the U.S. > LTE will be available in the following years and in some countries is still available Sluggishness with its performance > Software problem (read down) No Ice Cream Sandwich > It will updated in the folliwing months This review is absolute madness

5. remixfa

Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008

unless you live in korea, its not really cons. hopefully by the time it comes here, its ICS filled.

6. kshell1

Posts: 1143; Member since: Oct 05, 2011

@remixfa, im adding a line to my tmo plan but the phones they have on the tmo site for free really suck, since you was a tmo employee i was wondering if you could help me

16. remixfa

Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008

lol, if you want free, then you need to wait for a sale. the normal free phones are clearance phones. there will be a president's day sale here shortly, but i dont have any details on it.

20. kshell1

Posts: 1143; Member since: Oct 05, 2011

I got to looking at your past post about the galaxy s 4G so i ordered it

21. remixfa

Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008

oh, I have the 3g vibrant, not the 4g. its almost identical though. still one of our best phones, even after 16 months.

23. tidus28

Posts: 26; Member since: Feb 08, 2012

if you want good deals on t-mobile phones go to target the galaxy s 2 is on sale for only 99$

24. metoyou

Posts: 279; Member since: Oct 19, 2011

Why PA reviewing this unit?? this is not for US!! even more funny it got con for not compatible with US band hahaha

2. Jericho unregistered

lol what u thaught it was going tn beat lg optimus lte. Fyi it aint better than lg.

4. jasongohjr

Posts: 75; Member since: Sep 26, 2011

I but if it was load with ios i-phonearena would definitely give it a 9/10 -.-

7. ZEUS.the.thunder.god unregistered

are you stupid iPA ? why the hell you gonna give it 5 ? why are you even reveiwing it when you know its a KOREA only model ? reveiw was good but rating was BS.

8. PhoneArena Team

Posts: 258; Member since: Jun 27, 2006

We review it, because it is available online from some retailers and people can buy it. We review its usability in the States, and that's why we don't like the fact that it doesn't have usable HSPA or LTE.

10. kshell1

Posts: 1143; Member since: Oct 05, 2011

PhoneArena has a good point, whats the point of a HSPA/LTE device if your only on edge.

14. -box-

Posts: 3991; Member since: Jan 04, 2012

So wait for the AT&T version. This was like reviewing a Verizon phone and giving it a failing score because you use T-Mobile. People who buy an international unlocked phone trend to be aware of its band limitations. That doesn't stop people from using unlocked phones on other carriers. IPhones number over a million on T-Mobile, there are numerous users of the Nokia Symbian models never officially released on our shoes on AT&T and T-Mobile, as well as Asia-based phones. Take down the review or give the phone a fair rating

18. remixfa

Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008

sorry, but i gotta disagree, PA. people that buy unlocked phones are generally more educated than the normal consumer about the pros/cons of doing so, and thus would understand that not all the features should work. The review should be done on its technical merits alone. Otherwise, the SGS2 9100, all iphones, and a bunch of other phones should be docked because none of them work fully on Tmobile where a lot of people with unlocked phones go... It just doesnt make sense to reduce score for that. honestly, i didnt even look at the final page for the score because I assumed it would have been the same as the skyrocket's score or a smidge higher for the screen improvements. After seeing people's reactions, and going back and reading it, I agree with them.

9. lukasound

Posts: 152; Member since: Nov 16, 2011

phonearena... You... Are... Crazy... :-/ this is one of technologicaly most advanced phones of today and you give it an average "5" score??? and why? because it wasn't made for US market? slugishness? live wallpaper layering on an HD resolution is not perfect and you give it a 5? iPhone has NO live wallpapers, NO hd screen (and a tiny one at that), so it should get a "2" rating! :-/ crazyness... *mad*

11. lukasound

Posts: 152; Member since: Nov 16, 2011

and another very important fact... not only americans read phonearena. i'm from europe... so phones should not be rated by regional usefulness...

12. nuadar1

Posts: 24; Member since: Dec 05, 2011

Well...I don't mean to be rude but this is really crappy review...for folks in Korea, this is probably 9/10... You really shouldn't review phones this way...and I'm also non-american

13. PaulNotFromSweden

Posts: 55; Member since: Sep 16, 2011

Some other reviewers here have a good point. If a phone isn't made for a particular market (in this case the U.S.), it shouldn't be rated as if it were used in that market. The phone should be rated on its merit. You wouldn't rate a hammer poorly because it can't tighten bolts very well. Likewise, this phone sounds like a winner for its intended purpose. So PA, I think you need a re-do on this one.

15. willardcw4

Posts: 170; Member since: Oct 01, 2011

Agree with re-evaluating the score. I don't think a phone not made for this country should be held at fault because you want to use it in this one. And how many people are going to pay an off-contract price for a phone they can only get 2G service on??? Doesn't make much sense; plenty of people that buy this phone will be using it on their respective country's 3G / 4G networks.

17. willardcw4

Posts: 170; Member since: Oct 01, 2011

I'm also tired of seeing "not having ice cream sandwich" as a con for phone reviews. Be patient PA, phones will be updated soon. The manufacturer doesn't HAVE to put ICS on a phone, it is a preference that you desire. Rate a phone on what it is, not what you want it to be. This phone is still a stellar piece of hardware, and last time I checked, Gingerbread was still pretty awesome. ICS will only make it BETTER.

19. Dr.Phil

Posts: 2314; Member since: Feb 14, 2011

Well, get ready for the next few weeks when phones are releasing with Gingerbread and they will mark it down one point because it won't have ICS...

22. henrickrw

Posts: 408; Member since: Sep 16, 2011

In still proud of my ceramic white galaxy S2 running VERTIMUS ice cream sandwich domination. BEST PHONE EVER.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.