T-Mobile/Sprint merger looking more and more likely after another state reconsiders its stance1
It's still hard to say exactly how soon that might be, but shortly after the Federal Communications Commission formally voted to greenlight the creation of a true rival to Verizon and AT&T's industry duopoly, yet another state has joined the growing group of key merger backers. Colorado's official support is even more meaningful than Florida's recent vote of confidence, as The Centennial State had intended to take part in a lawsuit challenging the mega deal scheduled to kick off in December.
Of course, the legal action is still chugging along, with Colorado and Mississippi's exits these past couple of weeks lowering the number of plaintiffs down to 16. That sounds like a far too sizable group to annihilate in less than two months, especially with reports a while back claiming settlement negotiations were "miles apart."
a local news outlet is reporting today both T-Mobile and Dish made serious long-term commitments regarding infrastructure and jobs in exchange for State AG Phil Weiser's formal blessing.It's becoming abundantly clear that T-Mobile and Sprint, as well as Dish, will have to deal with the concerns and desires of each opposing state attorney general individually, which means the end of the merger saga might not be as near as it seems after all. As far as Colorado is concerned,
pledged to occupy Sprint's place as the nation's number four mobile network operator and thus provide the competition the market needs.Specifically, Dish has vowed to bring a grand total of around 2,000 new jobs to Colorado, as well as set up and maintain its wireless headquarters in Littleton for at least seven years. Dish, remember, is a very important piece of the "New T-Mobile" puzzle, having
After purchasing Sprint's entire prepaid business, Boost and Virgin Mobile included, as well as $3.6 billion worth of 800 MHz spectrum, Dish will also have to deploy 5G service as quickly as possible in Colorado. Otherwise, a penalty of $20 million could be imposed, while T-Mobile will need to pay $80 million if its specific terms of the same agreement are not met. These concern what part of the state has to be covered by blazing fast 5G signal several years down the line, and let's just say it's a lot.