House once again passes controversial CISPA cybersecurity bill
Backed by some of the largest tech companies like Microsoft and Facebook last year, this time around - after the massive public outcry - those big names have backed their support. Companies like Mozilla and Reddit, along with advocacy organizations ACLU and EFF warn about CISPA being used as a pre-text for corporations to share private information about their users with the government. This would put the privacy of users at risk.
Democratic representative Jared Polis of Colorado, one of the most outspoken CISPA critics, argued that the bill is too vague and opens the door to searching through user data: "There are absolutely no protections with regards to what is done with this information," he said.
The bill proponents on the other hand did not shy away from even using the recent Boston Marathon bombing tragedy to make their case: "In the case of Boston they were real bombs, in this case they're digital bombs. And these digital bombs are on their way," Texas Republican Mike McCaul said.
Still, the CISPA bill needs to pass approval at Senate before becoming a law. We’ve also heard about the possibility of Obama issuing a veto. The saga about Internet freedoms and better cyberprotection continues.
source: GovTrack, House.gov
1. Aeires (unregistered)
Unfortunately the genie is out of the bottle, don't expect to ever get back to the days when the government had more important things to take care of than collecting data on it's citizens.
2. gwuhua1984 (Posts: 1237; Member since: 06 Mar 2012)
I don't understand how is the House passing a bunch of bills that aren't supported by the people. It seems more like they're voting for their own interest than the people they represent.
3. threed61 (Posts: 107; Member since: 27 May 2011)
Given that the industrial worlds economy and infrastructure are all computerized and online, what are the reasonable alternatives to protect both from those individuals and groups who care only about destruction?