remove some 3G compatible devices from its online store in the country. By the time Apple filed that suit in Southern California, it had won a temporary stay against the removal of devices from its German online store. The stay was eventually extended to cover the entire length of the appeals process. Motorola challenged the complaint and it was tossed out of court in early July by Judge Dana M. Sabraw, who gave Apple until Friday to re-file. The judge also provided Apple with some guidance on how to get the filing to stick if the Cupertino company decided to file again. Judge Sabraw's advice was apparently followed by Apple as the company did indeed re-file on Friday.
Motorola appears to have the Apple iPhone 4S in its scope for future legal action. In Apple's second amended complaint, Motorola is quoted as saying that Motorola has not yet legally challenged the Apple iPhone 4S yet because of a tactical reason which it does not want to share yet with Apple. As if we needed more courtroom drama. If Apple's filing in California results in a ruling that Motorola does have the right to sue Apple over the use of Qualcomm's broadband chips, we will most likely see in the States a Google filing against the Apple iPhone 4S. This suit would most likely have Google alleging infringement of 3G connectivity patents. The filing would probably also name the 4G Apple iPad and other Apple devices that use Qualcomm's broadband chips. On the other hand, if Apple prevails, its 3G/4G products will not be getting tossed out of its online store and Google will have to settle for lower licensing fees based on FRAND rates.