Another "free" phone deal proves too good to be true

A dispute between Verizon and AT&T highlights the common, and often confusing, tactics used in carrier advertising.

2comments
Verizon logo
Verizon was called out by rival AT&T for a "free" Google Pixel 10 Pro ad that wasn't entirely accurate. In response, Verizon simply pulled the commercial before a formal ruling was made, effectively ending the dispute.

What's the deal with this "free" phone ad?


If you’ve ever shopped for a new phone, you know the carrier deals can be a bit of a mess, especially when they throw around the word "free." This time, Verizon got caught in the crossfire. AT&T filed a challenge with the National Advertising Division (NAD) over a Verizon commercial for the new Google Pixel 10 Pro.

According to AT&T, Verizon's ad implied you could get the shiny new Pixel for free on any of their plans. The problem? That wasn't the case. The offer was reportedly only available to customers signing up for Verizon's most expensive plan, the Unlimited Ultimate tier.

Before the NAD, an advertising watchdog, could even dive into the merits of the case, Verizon informed them it was permanently discontinuing the commercial. As a result, the NAD closed the case, which for compliance purposes, is the same as if they had ruled against Verizon.

Recommended For You

Although the ad has been officially pulled, you can still (for now) watch the ad here.

Why this carrier spat matters for you


This isn't just about two telecom giants bickering; it's a perfect example of why you have to be careful with carrier promotions. The word "free" almost always comes with a hefty asterisk. While AT&T played the hero here by calling out a competitor, let's be real—they run the exact same kind of promotions.

These "free phone" deals typically work by applying monthly bill credits over a 24 or 36-month contract. You're required to stick with a specific, often premium, unlimited plan for that entire duration. If you decide to switch carriers or downgrade your plan early, you'll suddenly owe the remaining balance on the "free" phone.

It’s a classic lock-in strategy used by all major carriers to keep you on their most profitable plans. So, while Verizon's ad may have been a step too far in its vagueness, the underlying practice is standard across the industry.

Do you think wireless carriers need a watchdog, like the NAD, to supervise advertising claims?

Yes, otherwise they'd go rogue taking advantage of consumers
96.34%
No, it should be up to the consumers to catch false claims.
3.66%

Always read the fine print


This situation is just another Tuesday in the wireless world. Carrier advertising is often designed to be just enticing enough to get you in the door, leaving the important details buried in the fine print. Verizon pulling the ad was the right move, but it’s a shame it took a legal challenge from a direct competitor to make it happen.

My personal advice? Treat every "free" phone offer with a healthy dose of skepticism. Before you sign anything, calculate the total cost over the entire contract period, including the expensive monthly plan you're tied to. Often, you might find that buying the phone unlocked and finding a more affordable plan actually saves you money in the long run. This incident is just one more reminder that when it comes to carrier deals, you have to be your own best advocate.


  • 2-3 Related Stories (bulleted)
  • 2-3 Related Stories (bulleted)

Travel Easy with Nomad eSIM – 25% Off

25% off eSIM data-only plans & global coverage - enter code IPHONE25, sign up required
Check Out The Offer
Google News Follow
Follow us on Google News
COMMENTS (2)

Latest Discussions

by silverfang77 • 1
by RxCourier9534 • 9

Recommended For You

FCC OKs Cingular\'s purchase of AT&T Wireless