Best phone and tablet of MWC 2012: Poll Results
9. azri05 (unregistered)
Bcoz it 2nd?
3. nnaatthhaannx2 (Posts: 820; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)
The only problem here is, no one is actually going to get the phone because the phone itself isn't that great.
4. andro. (Posts: 1986; Member since: 16 Sep 2011)
Agreed,camera enthusiasts will by a SLR camera,phone enthusiats would buy a much better phone than the 808. The 808 is be in a small niche sale category
5. haseebzahid (Posts: 1853; Member since: 22 Feb 2012)
how can u be certain and you don't know everyone is the world so stop making ridiculous claim. no one said it was made to turn the smartphone market upside down its another category for camera-phones so people can still buy these
12. Captain_Doug (Posts: 907; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)
It's a phone, not your mother. Quit being so offended that someone has higher standards for a phone.
10. alexkerr (Posts: 4; Member since: 14 Feb 2012)
Actually there's a LOT of talk online about people ditching their compact cameras, their Androids, their iPhones and their N8's (current best phone camera in the world until the 808 appears) and replacing them all with the 808 Pureview. Quite a few SLR owners too are wondering why they're carrying around bulky, heavy, very expensive SLR cameras when for many shots the 808 will be superior. Seriously, it's that good.
7. bayusuputra (Posts: 961; Member since: 12 Feb 2012)
i, too, agree that 808 is one of, if not the best device at MWC, quad core phones are great, but quad core technology was already introduced few months prior, the good thing is that it is making ways to phones in MWC.. but that camera sensor, that's a really new thing!
but again, the best device doesn't mean it will grab the most sales.. i voted for the 808 due to its technological breakthrough, but honestly speaking, i will not buy it.. i lean more for the honourable mention one..
8. alexkerr (Posts: 4; Member since: 14 Feb 2012)
Actually the phone is amazing. Tell me the truth: have you used Nokia Belle? Most people who've upgraded their phones to it think it's amazing, like having a whole new phone, and easily as good as iPhone or Android.
People will still have their preferences of course, but there is just no way you can claim the phone is not amazing. The features in the hardware and in Symbian beat every other phone on the planet hands down.
The screen res is fine because you can't see the pixels in normal use anyway so higher res screen is totally pointless.
Unlike Android, Symbian does not need a fast processor. N8 with 680 Mhz processor and Belle is clearly faster than many 1GHz+ Androids. However, the 808 Pureview has a 1.3 Ghz processor, it also has probably the most powerful GPU out there, and again unlike Android, Symbian uses the GPU fully for most of the OS and UI.
Furthermore, Nokia have always been renowned at making phones with far better build quality, signal strength, battery life, call quality and so on than ANY of the competition. This is proven time and time again.
The fact is they have all this in the 808, an even better OS again with Belle Feature Pack 1 (which no one has used yet in public) and they have just produced a camera that beats everything else in the world inside or outside a phone, hands down.
Sorry dude, but that's the facts, and you're going to have to accept it!
Judging by the incredible reception the 808 has got it will sell millions and millions and millions.
6. Leo_MC (Posts: 683; Member since: 02 Dec 2011)
2nd of march, Phonearena posted an article called "Best MWC 2012 phones" (this onehttp://www.phonearena.com/news
/Best-MWC-2012-phones_id27598);there's no mention of Nokia...
11. pjasinow (Posts: 3; Member since: 06 Mar 2012)
I Think software in phones is becoming a bit thrashed. All platforms give you a great experience. Nokia nailed it concentrating on hardware like nobody else. Apart from the well mentioned camera, things like a fm transmitter, super high quality sound recording and have you seen that screen they've been using on there phones of late, its totally viewable in direct sunlight. This phone packs a punch that I'm sure manufactures felt cause they know when all that stuff hits the windows platform as well it'll be a force.
15. snowgator (Posts: 3346; Member since: 19 Jan 2011)
It was nice of Phone Arena to talk about the actual poll and those devices announced at MWC in-between references of the iPad 3 which had nothing to do with MWC. Very professional, Victor.
I am curious how the 808 sells. There is a ton of buzz about it. I am actually very happy Symbian fans have something to be excited about!
17. chapizzo (Posts: 116; Member since: 13 Sep 2011)
Well the poll says it all. Its not always about the number of cores or screen resolution all the time. Even the 808 has a seemingly inferior processor and screen resolution, people still like it.
I don't think any body takes out their phone to look at the screen and see if there are any visible pixels. Neither do they check out what the processor is run like at any given moment, coz it doesn't really matter when the phone does what its supposed to do.
And then i wonder how the ipad made it into this article, which was about phones and tablets from MWC!
18. Evil_SaNz (Posts: 259; Member since: 20 Oct 2011)
The concept of a smartphone is to provide us the best experience for surfing the web:
requirements, while standard features like call quality is acceptable:
1) Bigger screen, the better - up to 5" should fit in every standard jeans pocket, unless the buyer is shorter than 1m and 50. More important is thinness, so the phone is aderent to the leg and barely visible.
2) Connectivity - great wi fi reception, fast hspa+ or LTE
4) Battery - as always
5) Full web experience - html5 and flash. For flash I'd like to have the choice for having it or not, who cares if it's dying or its mobile version is unstable. Sport streams and youtube @1080p still require flash.
6) Screen quality - screen technology, resolution, colours.
This said, world is great because it's various: there are people that pick a smartphone to play games or take photos...everyone is free to take what he likes the best.
19. -RVM- (Posts: 331; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)
U have some good points, but in general your definition of smartphone is wrong. Web browsing is only one of many things important in smartphones.
20. stylinred (Posts: 50; Member since: 03 Mar 2012)
eh... dumbphones can web browse rather well too...
21. stylinred (Posts: 50; Member since: 03 Mar 2012)
LOL the HTC OneX wont be getting quad cores worldwide; LTE versions have to settle for dual cores....