Apple's own content delivery network is supposedly live, has 10 times the capacity that is currently needed
It's more than sure that this substantial bump in the available capacity is aimed at providing users with a seamless experience once iOS 8 and OS X Yosemite arrive this fall. This will probably ensure that there will be no download issues during the updates of said operating systems.
Rumor has it that Apple is partnering with numerous ISPs on the development of its CDN. It's speculated that this project might have cost Apple around $100 million in 2014 alone.
At the moment, some OS X downloads arrive directly from Apple's CDN, but iTunes downloads have not yet been redirected through the new network. Alas, users probably won't notice any immediate change. While it's unknown if Apple will break free from its 3rd-party CDN providers, it is safe to say that it will rely less on them in the foreseeable future.
source: Streaming Media via BGR
1. PAPINYC (banned) (Posts: 2315; Member since: 30 Jul 2011)
OMG "Peter K", please go back to Creative Writing 101:
"According to a numerous sources," - syntax
"Reportedly, the netwoek provides," - Spelling
"It comes beyond a reasonable doubt" - REALLY
As for the news story, it just proves how brainwashed Apple has its' followers. Third-party content delivery networks, so, iTunes is really Akamai, what an iScam!
P.S. Already took a screenshot, don't bother denying this masterpiece; will republish in the NY Times with full credit to you, of course.
2. Arte-8800 (banned) (Posts: 4562; Member since: 13 Mar 2014)
They don't care. It's gone to a stage that people stop going to church and is iWorshiping Apple Steve job iMore.
Nothing new here, Apple is great at iDelusioning public perceptive.
The new iApple they have gone to will be even more i Conceptual.
9. PAPINYC (banned) (Posts: 2315; Member since: 30 Jul 2011)
iAgree with you too oh malevolent 'dark' one, the article just made no sense and, therefore, dumb. Now please don't take my words out of context and cry racism; you see, iUsed partial quotes because iReferenced just part of your name. After all, your name is "darkkjedii", hence, 'dark', is it not?
Oh 'dark' one, oh 'dark' one, wherefore art thou my 'dark' one?
11. Arte-8800 (banned) (Posts: 4562; Member since: 13 Mar 2014)
Attacking the person is always less effective than arguing with logic and focusing on the issue. Otherwise, it will just lead to trading personal attacks back and forth, with no kind of helpful resolution. People like just not willing to discuss an issue with an end goal of walking away with a better understanding. Instead, you just simply want to win their argument by whatever means necessary, and this often involves the use of ad hominem.
And do explain why this is a dump post?
3. sprockkets (Posts: 1361; Member since: 16 Jan 2012)
Some are speculating that this is just a red herring - sure apple will use it for software updates/upgrades. But they probably are really going to use it for video streaming.
4. Hallucinator (Posts: 344; Member since: 24 May 2010)
When you guys just throw a I in front of everything, you seem Incredibly Idiotic.
10. Arte-8800 (banned) (Posts: 4562; Member since: 13 Mar 2014)
Really. The irony and delusional.
Apple has Trademarked the word "i "
More like Apple users and fans are more iDiotic.
I'm not saying that.
Wikipedia and every techwebsites and even in youtube. Even editors and Wallstreet aswell as the whole wide world is saying that.
Says the idiot whose calling me, when your the main culprit.
Admit it iBoy, ... If not.
I owned you, and start back peddling.
14. PAPINYC (banned) (Posts: 2315; Member since: 30 Jul 2011)
The 'i' is there because it belongs there; pretty iRonic from someone who wrote, and iQuote, 'seem Incredibly Idiotic," And, don't you mean 'seems iNcrediBly iDiotic'?
12. Furbal (Posts: 403; Member since: 22 Sep 2012)
Hopefully they don't get throttled (since they'll have more skin in the game) by the ISP's like they are trying to do to Netflix and their ilk. Maybe this could help net neutrality...
15. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5954; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)
"Maybe this could help net neutrality..."
How so? Apple has paid the ISP 'partners' to assure its traffic is processed faster than any competitor's traffic.
The issue of pay-to-play is at the core of the net neutrality debate.