Nokia Lumia 630 (Single SIM model) priced at $95 in India by Flipkart

Nokia Lumia 630 (Single SIM model) priced at $95 in India by Flipkart
Those looking for a low-priced handset in India could make a nice pick-up with the Nokia Lumia 630. The Windows Phone powered handset is now being offered for the equivalent of $95 USD in the country. The deal is offered by online retailer Flipkart. The Nokia Lumia 630 comes with Windows Phone 8.1 pre-installed, and features a 4.5-inch screen with resolution of 480 x 854.

The Nokia Lumia 630 is driven by a quad-core Snapdragon 400 CPU with the Adreno 305 GPU crunching graphics. 512MB of RAM is on board along with 8GB of native storage. Those who need more memory can use the 128GB capacity microSD slot. The 5MP rear-facing camera does not have a flash, and there is no front-facing snapper. An 1830mAh battery keeps the lights on. The model is an entry-level device for those who don't need all the bells and whistles. It also is a good choice for those purchasing their first smartphone.

There's no word from Flipkart as to how long this deal will be available, so if you are interested in taking advantage of the discount, you might want to get your order in now.

Flipkart has the Nokia Lumia 630 on sale

Flipkart has the Nokia Lumia 630 on sale


source: Flipkart via WMPoweruser

Related phones

Lumia 630
  • Display 4.5" 480 x 854 pixels
  • Camera 5 MP
  • Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 400, Quad-core, 1200 MHz
  • Storage 8 GB + microSDXC
  • Battery 1830 mAh(13.1h 3G talk time)

FEATURED VIDEO

18 Comments

1. RaKithAPeiRiZ

Posts: 1488; Member since: Dec 29, 2011

lol it still wont sell ...better suited for landfill

2. LetsBeHonest

Posts: 1548; Member since: Jun 04, 2013

A snapdragon 400 with 512 MB ram. Completely Wasted potential. $95 is a great price.

7. hemedans

Posts: 746; Member since: Jun 01, 2013

then buy 535 or 638

11. LetsBeHonest

Posts: 1548; Member since: Jun 04, 2013

I love clear black display. 638 is nice but way too costly compared to the price tag of 635($95). There isn't no point in making phones with 512 MB ram in 2015.

3. Anshulonweb

Posts: 468; Member since: Feb 07, 2014

actually much better android phones are available on flipkart at same price....

5. Venkatramanan

Posts: 327; Member since: Aug 15, 2014

At this price and specs android can't give smooth performance. Android can give good experience if the spec is high. But this price and Specs, WP gives smooth performance. If i have to choose a mid range or low end phone, I will choose WP only.

6. nokia12

Posts: 610; Member since: Nov 19, 2013

this is not 2012 so stop giving that old argument .. low end androids have evolved and are as smooth as wp See Moto E and Android One phones and other phones ..

8. hemedans

Posts: 746; Member since: Jun 01, 2013

nop they are not smooth as wp i own s4, s3. htc one m7 and lumia 620 i can prove that.

10. LetsBeHonest

Posts: 1548; Member since: Jun 04, 2013

His point is completely valid. I'm using WP now & I've owned many phones. Also I've used recent Android low end phones especially Moto's they are definitely as smooth any WP I've used.

12. Liveitup

Posts: 1798; Member since: Jan 07, 2014

No its not, the majority of Androids at the price point of cheap Lumias offers nowhere near the great user experience as WP.

13. joey_sfb

Posts: 6794; Member since: Mar 29, 2012

Yes! they are, Liveitup. Stock Android is very smooth compare to Samsung Touchwiz. I can now verify it with my Motorola Xoom and Nepture Pine compare to the overpowering high end Samsung device. For me, I would recommend Android One for low end and Samsung only for the high end. WP is for special application or you can get it cheaply like $20 then its a good buy otherwise stick with Moto or stock

14. Liveitup

Posts: 1798; Member since: Jan 07, 2014

No they're not do you realize just how many cheap Android phones they're are out there only few OEMs thus far has signed on to Android One. The funny thing about Android one is that it betrays typical Android gone are the customization instead its just pure like WP just not as nicely coded.

16. Venkatramanan

Posts: 327; Member since: Aug 15, 2014

Except stock android, all other low end android lags. My mid ranger T2 ultra which released in 2014 lags. WP is better than stock android.

9. joey_sfb

Posts: 6794; Member since: Mar 29, 2012

Same person singing the same song. I playing with a Nepture Pine that has 512 MB ram running jelly bean 4.1.2, its still smooth. If fact i am quite shock that 512 MB for Android is still that good. For general use there no different from my high end Android device. The only different is the graphic intensive game. See you in 2015, i guess you will be singing the same old song. 512 MB is 2015 can't get more pathetic than that.

15. Liveitup

Posts: 1798; Member since: Jan 07, 2014

Show us Android running smooth on 512 Mb. Show us the evidence.

17. joey_sfb

Posts: 6794; Member since: Mar 29, 2012

There a media channel call youtube. Search it yourself. Oh I forgot no official youtube app in wp8. Pathetic again.

4. Hashed unregistered

I'm currently using the dual sim variant, and I like it a lot. It's reliable and the battery backup is very good. I loved Android, but I'm a WP guy now.

18. 7thspaceman

Posts: 1597; Member since: Feb 14, 2011

Microsoft's first Branded Lumia 535 is a better choice than this one is. Kind of makes me wonder why Microsoft is selling it

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.