x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Sony Xperia Z2 vs Samsung Galaxy S5

Pages
Sony Xperia Z2 vs Samsung Galaxy S5

Sony Xperia Z2 vs Samsung Galaxy S5
Sony Xperia Z2 vs Samsung Galaxy S5
Sony Xperia Z2 vs Samsung Galaxy S5
Sony Xperia Z2 vs Samsung Galaxy S5
Sony Xperia Z2 vs Samsung Galaxy S5
Introduction


Ladies and gentlemen, we're now five months into the year, and we can declare the 2014 edition of the flagship derby in full swing. Arriving third on the scene is Sony's refresh of the Xperia Z1 in the Xperia Z2, and despite it being chock-full of promise, the competition is not about to let it have a field day.

Prime among the Z2's rivals is Samsung's equally solid new Galaxy S5. Truth be told, Samsung's new top shelfer has quite a bit going for it. Which is all the more reason to be impressed by the Z2, which seemingly has a leg up on it. At least on paper. Indeed, the flagship Xperia has the slightly more remarkable body and the slightly bigger screen, battery, and pixel count on its camera. Does that necessarily make the Xperia Z2 the slightly better device? Take them eyes off that specs chart and join us in order to find out.

Design

The Z2's rectangular and clear-cut, glass-and-metal body looks nothing like the S5's more-ergonomic, rounded plastic.

Design-wise, Sony and Samsung have taken two differing approaches, and even a cursory glance reveals them. Rectangular in nature, the Xperia Z2 is the bulkier of the two, and is on the heavy side at 163 grams (5.75 oz). In comparison, the 145 gram (5.11 oz) Galaxy S5 is more lightweight, and its rounded form factor makes it the, hands down, more ergonomic device to hold. That said, the S5's all-plastic exterior appears modest next to the glass-and-metal Z2.

A choicer pick of materials may not have necessarily been on the mind of Samsung, but it did borrow a page off Sony's book: IP certification. More specifically, the IP67-rated S5 is now neck-and-neck with the IP58-certified Z2 in what is becoming an increasingly sought-after department. Put in layman's terms, the two otherwise cryptic abbreviations certify the two devices' ability to withstand dust or water ingress. It's worth pointing out that the S5 is completely dust-tight, while the Z2 is the slightly better swimmer. Of course, this back-and-forth didn’t stop there, and the port flaps-cluttered Z2 still is a bit of a sore sight for the eye, whereas the S5 sports the more simplistic, flaps-free frame (save for the microUSB port). The S5 also proves superior as far as navigating the power and volume buttons go – they’re clickier, and not as sticky as with the Z2 – though it does lack the dedicated, two-step shutter key of Sony’s flagship.

Lastly, while the Xperia Z2 opts for on-screen buttons, Samsung’s signature home button and capacitive keys leave the full 5.1-inches of the S5’s AMOLED screen for you to do with as you will. Speaking of displays…


Sony Xperia Z2
5.78 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches
146.8 x 73.3 x 8.2 mm
5.75 oz (163 g)

Sony Xperia Z2

Samsung Galaxy S5
5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches
142 x 72.5 x 8.1 mm
5.11 oz (145 g)

Samsung Galaxy S5


To see the phones in real size or compare them with other models, visit our Visual Phone Size Comparison page.


Display

Sony is finally doing it: the Xperia Z2's IPS panel proves a step ahead of the AMOLED panel on the Galaxy S5.

Looking back, both Sony and Samsung have had a shaky record, at least as far as the quality of their displays is concerned. For its part, Sony kept insisting on using inferior TFT panels with poor viewing angles and washed out colors, while Samsung's bet with AMOLEDs has often been criticized for its inaccurate color reproduction and relatively low peak brightness. As almost every other thing in this industry, however, improvements have been made.

Starting with the 5.2-inch, 1080p screen on the Xperia Z2, we finally see Sony thaw and adopt IPS (In-Plane Switching) tech. The panel in question has a very good color temperature of 6909 K (so whites appear white), and peak brightness, at about 460 nits, is also up to speed and allows for outdoors use. At 2.59, gamma isn't as excellent, but that's far from a deal-breaker. Speaking of colors, those are over-saturated on the whole, but overall reproduction is acceptable.

In comparison, the 5.1-inch, 1080p AMOLED display on the S5 is, strictly speaking, a tad inferior. It's got a cold color temperature of 8183 K, and this leads to some notably bluish whites and messed up shades of gray. Peak brightness is also a notch lower, at 442 nits (but still enough for use outside), and gamma, at 2.25 is pretty spot on. As for color reproduction, Samsung's panel offers heavily-saturated and notably incorrect colors.

Display measurements and quality

Maximum brightness (nits)Higher is better Minimum brightness (nits)Lower is better Contrast Higher is better Color temperature (Kelvins) Gamma Delta E rgbcmy Lower is better Delta E grayscale Lower is better
Sony Xperia Z2 458
(Good)
16
(Poor)
1:1329
(Excellent)
6909
(Excellent)
2.59
4.41
(Average)
2.95
(Good)
Samsung Galaxy S5 442
(Good)
2
(Excellent)
unmeasurable
(Excellent)
8183
(Poor)
2.25
5.08
(Average)
7.38
(Average)
View all


156 Comments
  • Options
    Close






posted on 15 May 2014, 07:18 11

1. StraightEdgeNexus (Posts: 3689; Member since: 14 Feb 2014)


Clash of the Titans.

posted on 15 May 2014, 07:47 3

14. hmd74 (Posts: 481; Member since: 31 Jan 2013)


Clash of clans :D

posted on 15 May 2014, 09:23

59. itsdeepak4u2000 (Posts: 3718; Member since: 03 Nov 2012)


Head to head and cut to cut....

Nice article Chris.

posted on 15 May 2014, 17:18 7

95. cheetah2k (Posts: 1598; Member since: 16 Jan 2011)


I have both Z2 and S5. I 100% disagree the IPS display is better than the S5's display. Not sure what crack Chris was smoking, but must have been good stuff

posted on 25 May 2014, 03:35

144. The13thKing (banned) (Posts: 849; Member since: 26 Feb 2014)


lmaoooooo you have nothing

posted on 27 May 2014, 04:55 1

163. T.Law (Posts: 415; Member since: 10 May 2014)


I have the Z2 and most of my friends have the S5. I have to admit that I prefer the screen of the S5 and the colour reproduction is no where near inaccurate. But I'll never trade my Z2 for the S5 though.

posted on 15 May 2014, 07:54 8

18. sar44 (Posts: 278; Member since: 14 Apr 2014)


In movie and pro photo mode the temperature 6500K, also they have 106-107% SRGB, its better than 130% in Z2.
forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=52446659​​#post52446659
brightness at s5 in a auto mode is 698. also much better antiglare
At Z2
130% SRGB. All image are designed for SRGB standard (99.9% of the colors in nature), and enhanced range is color distortion, oversaturation and red hues.
Lack of OIS
No isocell (isocell have better color, better dynamic range)
No oled (oled have ideal black color, ideal contrast, ideal viewing angle, ideal response speed, all much better than lcd)
Weak sound in headphones
Large energy consumption (3200 mah batery life less then 2800mah S5 and 2600 mah M8)
FBReader Video 3D Games
HTC M8 2600 mА·h 22 h. 10 m. 13 h. 20 m. 3 h. 20 m.
Galaxy S5 2800 mА·h 17 h. 20 m. 12 h. 30 m. 4 h 30 m.
Xperia z2 3200 мА·h 15 h. 20 m. 11 h. 00 m. 3 h. 30 m.

posted on 15 May 2014, 08:13 1

31. StraightEdgeNexus (Posts: 3689; Member since: 14 Feb 2014)


TL;DR version please and clickable links.

posted on 15 May 2014, 08:17

33. sar44 (Posts: 278; Member since: 14 Apr 2014)


are not allowed

posted on 15 May 2014, 08:44

41. StraightEdgeNexus (Posts: 3689; Member since: 14 Feb 2014)


http://www.xda-developers.com/
not allowed huh

posted on 15 May 2014, 14:18

91. Odiin (Posts: 342; Member since: 23 Apr 2013)


What is this? I didnt get anything.
Downright confusing.

posted on 16 May 2014, 10:14 6

115. buccob (Posts: 2578; Member since: 19 Jun 2012)


Read GSMArena battery score and cry...

http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_xperia_z2-review-1078p3.php

Battery life is one of the best out there... way more than SGS5

posted on 25 May 2014, 03:36

145. The13thKing (banned) (Posts: 849; Member since: 26 Feb 2014)


what about the battery life test here on PA and other sites? #StopTheHate #iInsistSonyIsForOldPeople #DontStartPreaching

posted on 26 May 2014, 08:27 1

161. buccob (Posts: 2578; Member since: 19 Jun 2012)


PA battery life test only involve 1 type of test...

GSMArena test 4 areas: Talk time, Web Browsing, Video Playback and Stand By... then they make an average out of them...

In my opinion GSMArena has a much more comprehensive and complete Battery life test...

and c'mon buddy... dont bring hashtags crap here... it doesn't make your post look good.

posted on 15 May 2014, 08:03 3

25. sar44 (Posts: 278; Member since: 14 Apr 2014)


I am not a fanboy, at S5 also has disadvantages
forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2746925
and lg (little camera sensor, no oled, no isocell, plastic body, no waterproof, bad sound at headphonres) and htc (thick bezels, little camera sensor, no oled, no isocell, no ois) and apple (thick bezels, little camera sensor, no oled, no isocell, no ois, little screen)

posted on 15 May 2014, 08:09 12

29. StraightEdgeNexus (Posts: 3689; Member since: 14 Feb 2014)


So no isocell has become a dealbreaker huh. Cool.

posted on 15 May 2014, 08:16 3

32. sar44 (Posts: 278; Member since: 14 Apr 2014)


Read about, watch video, isocell have better color and dynamic range.
phonearena.com/reviews/Camera-comparison-Huawei-As​cend-P7-and-Oppo-Find-7a-vs-Samsung-Galaxy-S5-LG-G​2-iPhone-5s-HTC-One-M8-Sony-Xperia-Z1_id3694
eprice.com.tw/mobile/talk/124/4899661/1/rv/sony-xp​eria-z2-review/
eprice.com.tw/mobile/talk/124/4899662/1/rv/sony-xp​eria-z2-review/
4pda.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=515584&view=find​post&p=3043522 6
and the others comparisons

posted on 15 May 2014, 09:30 8

63. refillable (Posts: 1047; Member since: 10 Mar 2014)


Unnatural DR and oversaturated photos of the S5 cancel your argument very quickly. Also, please stop posting unclickable links! I have not seen the video tests though.

posted on 15 May 2014, 09:40 8

72. sar44 (Posts: 278; Member since: 14 Apr 2014)


You are true samsung hater. All on the contrary. No oversaturation, colors are maximally natural, unlike bsi

posted on 15 May 2014, 09:46 7

75. refillable (Posts: 1047; Member since: 10 Mar 2014)


You never handle DSLRs, do you?

posted on 15 May 2014, 09:59 4

80. sar44 (Posts: 278; Member since: 14 Apr 2014)


At S5 DR better than bsi in smartphones, but not better then bsi in DSLR, because smaller sensor. Colors at S5 better then bsi in smartphones and bsi in DSLR. Less electrical crosstalk between pixels. The excess charge less spreads out in the wrong cell.
More photons exactly comes with microlenses and going in the right photodiode.

posted on 16 May 2014, 05:28 4

105. refillable (Posts: 1047; Member since: 10 Mar 2014)


My Point is, A good DSLR Photo doesn't oversaturate things like the S5's camera does. Less electrical crosstalk means that colours will not be flexible, hence the result is some oversaturated pictures and unnatural colours.

posted on 15 May 2014, 11:12 3

84. josephnero (Posts: 559; Member since: 16 Nov 2011)


Let them go bro.sammy fans are getting worse than apple and nokia

posted on 15 May 2014, 13:09 3

87. Ashoaib (Posts: 3229; Member since: 15 Nov 2013)


Which phone has DSLR? Here people are talking about phone

posted on 16 May 2014, 05:29 1

107. refillable (Posts: 1047; Member since: 10 Mar 2014)


A good DSLR can be a 'reference' to compare good smartphone cameras. There is nothing wrong with talking about DSLRs here.

posted on 16 May 2014, 07:06

112. sar44 (Posts: 278; Member since: 14 Apr 2014)


http://4pda.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=515584&st=860#entry30435226

posted on 18 May 2014, 02:21 1

124. refillable (Posts: 1047; Member since: 10 Mar 2014)


I don't wanna believe untrusted sites. How they showed the details that the Z2 captures baffles me.

posted on 19 May 2014, 09:28

126. Heddy87 (Posts: 28; Member since: 19 May 2014)


hahaha... really?
I own my z2 and taking photos they were never blurred in the background.. did they clean the lens from fingerprints... Total fake or old software. As also the kidding sharpness of sgs 5.. Tried them both in same occasion and place.. Z2 was not far worse than S5 but still a first class in compact cams, and hits perfectly clear macro scene, next time use a cam holder if you have shaky hands.

posted on 16 May 2014, 07:10 1

113. sar44 (Posts: 278; Member since: 14 Apr 2014)


http://www.androidauthority.com/isocell-how-it-works-344628/

posted on 19 May 2014, 23:56 1

128. refillable (Posts: 1047; Member since: 10 Mar 2014)


I know that. What I'm talking about was how it produces more saturated pictures than BSI, which is not nice considering that saturation is oversaturated (at least for me). And I have many friends who agrees with me.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories