x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Motorola Moto X Pure Review

Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) 9.1

Posted: , by

Tags:

Pages
Motorola Moto X Pure Review

Motorola Moto X Pure Review
Motorola Moto X Pure Review
Motorola Moto X Pure Review
Motorola Moto X Pure Review
Motorola Moto X Pure Review
Motorola Moto X Pure Review
Motorola Moto X Pure Review
Introduction


If you haven’t noticed, the Motorola of today isn’t the same as the Motorola of the past. The company has gone through several changes over the course of the last few years, being notably gobbled up by Google back in 2012, only to be sold shortly later on to Lenovo. You’d think that the new Motorola, now a Lenovo company, would’ve been absorbed entirely and be given a clean slate, but it seems as though that’s not the case, as Lenovo’s influence is yet to have any profound presence in Motorola’s way of doing things.

That realization became more evident when its latest Moto X smartphones were revealed a couple months ago, bringing forth some upgrades that make them specs beasts like much of their rivals in the space, all the while being accompanied by affordable-for-the-class price tags. There are two Moto X versions this year: the Moto X Pure Edition for the US, and the Moto X Style for international markets. The two devices are almost identical in terms of both hardware and software, with the only difference being that the Moto X Pure Edition is sold unlocked, and has all the needed LTE bands for the US market. It'll also be the one that's going to be the focus of this review. Going for an intriguing fusion of mostly vanilla Android software with an alluring $399.99 cost, the Moto X Pure Edition absolutely seems to be our kind of smartphone. Let's take a deeper look!

The package contains:

  • Motorola Moto X Pure Edition
  • Turbocharger
  • SIM removal tool
  • Clear bumper
  • Users guide
  • Safety and information

Design

Bigger in size, same highly customizable design.

What’s most apparent here is the significant size increase, going from a manageable one with last year’s Moto X, to a size that puts it into phablet category. Certainly, it’s tougher to grasp comfortably with one hand, but it’s not tougher to hold than, say, the Galaxy Note5. Some won’t be thrilled by the increase in size and weight, but we find it still pleasant enough to operate without feeling that its size is too overbearing.

Besides the size disparity we’re dealt with now, the Moto X Pure’s design, much like previous Moto Xs, can be fully customizable to complement your particular taste and style – this alone is what makes it undeniably cool and still different. Sure, its design might not directly exude the premium finish of some other high-class smartphones out there, but when you can choose base colors for its chassis, accent colors, and even add an engraving, all without any additional cost tacked on, it’s impressively satisfying in how we’re given control to how it ends up looking. In addition, particular color combinations help to make its design stand out even more. Well, just know that certain materials, like the wood and leather options, do incur higher price points.

Considering that it employs the same design language as its predecessor, it means that many of the characteristics we’re familiar with are present here again – such as the power button and volume controls positioned on its right edge, 3.5mm headphone jack and SIM/microSD combo slot on the top, and a microUSB port on its bottom edge.

This time, however, we now have true dual front-firing speakers, which is always an appreciated asset. Another new change pertains to what’s accompanying the front-facing camera – an LED flash, which is a great addition for those who love taking selfies. And yes, the same Motorola logo dimple is found in the rear, but it has more in common to the first-gen Moto X because it’s not as recessed or large in size as the 2nd generation Moto X.

One last notable thing to point out, the Moto X Pure keeps up its protection by offering the same water-resistant nano coating to safeguard it against minor incursions - such as splashes for example.


Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015)
6.06 x 3 x 0.44 inches
153.9 x 76.2 x 11.06 mm
6.31 oz (179 g)

Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015)

Google Nexus 6
6.27 x 3.27 x 0.4 inches
159.26 x 82.98 x 10.06 mm
6.49 oz (184 g)

Google Nexus 6

Apple iPhone 6s Plus
6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches
158.2 x 77.9 x 7.3 mm
6.77 oz (192 g)

Apple iPhone 6s Plus

Samsung Galaxy Note 5
6.03 x 3 x 0.3 inches
153.2 x 76.1 x 7.6 mm
6.03 oz (171 g)

Samsung Galaxy Note 5


To see the phones in real size or compare them with other models, visit our Visual Phone Size Comparison page.

Motorola Moto X Pure Review

Display

They ditch AMOLED in favor of IPS-LCD, and with that, improvements accompany it in every category.

Ditching AMOLED technology, and opting to go instead with a 5.7-inch 1440 x 2560 (Quad-HD) IPS TFT LCD protected by Gorilla Glass 3, the Moto X Pure makes for a compelling argument on the specs front. Details are crisp and plentiful, which is what we'd expect from a number crushing QHD panel with 515 ppi... Well, the fun’s just beginning with this one, seeing that there are a lot of favorable qualities accompanying this new display.

Franky, this is a substantially improved panel over last year’s dim, colder-toned, and overblown AMOLED one. Its color temperature of 6748K, for example, is very close to that ideal reference value of 6500k, which gives it a very neutral tone – so it’s neither too warm nor tool cold. Secondly, its 2.19 gamma value is also an improvement over its predecessor. What’s really most astounding, though, is how it’s better at accurately reproducing colors in the sRGB color spectrum chart, as well as emitting a blinding 715 nit luminance, which demolishes last year’s mark of 385 nits.

Everything about the screen is improved, but in parting ways with AMOLED, we, of course, can tell that black is no longer the endless, deep pitch black that it once was. It’s especially noticeable when the screen ‘breathes’ for its Moto Display feature – it doesn’t necessarily achieve the same pure black tone as its AMOLED counterparts. Regardless of that, its potent brightness output, outstanding color reproduction, and vivid looks give it qualities that rival the Note5’s almost-perfect display.

Display measurements and quality

Maximum brightness (nits)Higher is better Minimum brightness (nits)Lower is better Contrast Higher is better Color temperature (Kelvins) Gamma Delta E rgbcmy Lower is better Delta E grayscale Lower is better
Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) 715
(Excellent)
1
(Excellent)
1:1072
(Good)
6748
(Excellent)
2.19
1.22
(Excellent)
1.81
(Excellent)
Apple iPhone 6s Plus 593
(Excellent)
5
(Excellent)
1:1407
(Excellent)
7018
(Good)
2.19
2.32
(Good)
2.76
(Good)
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 470
(Good)
2
(Excellent)
unmeasurable
(Excellent)
6722
(Excellent)
2.09
1.32
(Excellent)
1.94
(Excellent)
Google Nexus 6 270
(Poor)
1
(Excellent)
unmeasurable
(Excellent)
6551
(Excellent)
1.94
5.61
(Average)
2.32
(Good)
View all


140 Comments
  • Options
    Close




posted on 06 Oct 2015, 08:44 2

1. o0Exia0o (Posts: 895; Member since: 01 Feb 2013)


I thought that the base storage capacity was 16GB?

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 09:28

29. Nathan_ingx (Posts: 3615; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)


"Available in either 16GB, 32GB or 64GB capacities... " if you would be kind enough to read the 2nd page of the review, just above the benchmark graph, before wanting to be the first to post.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 09:31 4

32. o0Exia0o (Posts: 895; Member since: 01 Feb 2013)


I was referring to the "PROS" Section where it says: "Base 32GB storage capacity with microSD card expansion" I read the review, Im just trying to keep others from thinking that 32GB is the base...

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 09:38 3

39. Nathan_ingx (Posts: 3615; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)


Yikes!! Not my fault though... You should've mentioned "in the 'PROS'" section. XD
John V should really rectify that mistake.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 09:44 3

42. o0Exia0o (Posts: 895; Member since: 01 Feb 2013)


Ya, I was a little vague on that, my bad... But yes John V. Should change that...

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 10:42

63. 0kax0el0 (Posts: 153; Member since: 15 Nov 2012)


I've notice that mistake too, but can you confirm in Motorola's page the existance of the 16GB option? Here in Mexico the X Style is sold only in 32GB and 64GB options.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 10:50

66. o0Exia0o (Posts: 895; Member since: 01 Feb 2013)


According to Motorola's own press release the Moto X Pure Edition will start at $399.99 16GB

http://www.phonearena.com/news/Motorola-Moto-X-Pure-Edition-pre-orders-go-live-tomorrow-prices-start-at-399.99_id73239

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 11:50 3

84. alphabets (Posts: 8; Member since: 18 Mar 2015)


I knew what you were referring to as soon as I read it. Maybe if some people were kind enough to read page 4 of the review instead of being the first guy to call out the first guy to post, there would not be such confusion.

And yes, base is most definitely 16gb.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 20:48

109. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 12050; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)


Wouldn't be a mistake if OEs would stop releasing 16GB phones. Another wtf from Motorola and several others.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 20:53

110. roldefol (Posts: 4108; Member since: 28 Jan 2011)


Apple sets the bar on this front. If they go 32GB entry point, Motorola and Google and others will follow.

posted on 07 Oct 2015, 07:23

118. o0Exia0o (Posts: 895; Member since: 01 Feb 2013)


At least Motorola offered an SD card reader. Considering the price for the 32GB phone it is still very attractive at $449....

posted on 07 Oct 2015, 07:41

121. roldefol (Posts: 4108; Member since: 28 Jan 2011)


That would be my pick. The base model only has 9GB free. The 32GB would kick that up to 25, which is something to work with. But microSD really clinches it.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 12:06 1

88. Scott93274 (Posts: 4277; Member since: 06 Aug 2013)


LOL, I thought that you were referring to the video where he also mentions that the base model is 32 GB.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 12:11

90. o0Exia0o (Posts: 895; Member since: 01 Feb 2013)


I had not gotten to see the video yet, Its blocked where I am, but if John V. also says that the 32GB is the base storage he should probably change that too. I wonder if the "32GB base storage" factored in to his rating also?

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 15:32

100. Scott93274 (Posts: 4277; Member since: 06 Aug 2013)


Well, if you're stuck behind a work or school firewall, there may be a bit of a work around, it at least works for me. Take the video link, and paste it into Google translate, then click on the translated page. Odds are the firewall restricting youtube videos isn't smart enough to block the content this way. I've niticed that on some occasions it will still block the video, simply try to change the languages it's translating from or to.

https://translate.google.com/

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 15:54

103. o0Exia0o (Posts: 895; Member since: 01 Feb 2013)


Can't get Google anything at work, its all blocked. But now that I'm at home I can watch it. Thanks for the help though.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 15:59 1

105. Scott93274 (Posts: 4277; Member since: 06 Aug 2013)


Meh, I tried.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 16:01

106. o0Exia0o (Posts: 895; Member since: 01 Feb 2013)


It's all good. I appreciate the effort.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 12:54 1

92. Ray.S (Posts: 320; Member since: 19 Jul 2011)


Sorry for that, it's our bad. We've removed that from the pros.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 13:01

93. o0Exia0o (Posts: 895; Member since: 01 Feb 2013)


That's cool, Scott93274 also said that the video states that the 32GB is also the base storage option also.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 15:35 1

101. Scott93274 (Posts: 4277; Member since: 06 Aug 2013)


I'm not complaining, just pointing out a discrepancy. Everyone that visits this site and is remotely interested in the phone knows all there is to know about the device already, they simply read this article and video to get hands on impressions.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 15:59

104. o0Exia0o (Posts: 895; Member since: 01 Feb 2013)


The reason I bring it up is I found phonearena while looking for reviews on the LG Dare all those years ago. PA seemed to have the best specs list and reviews on it and that's what has kept me coming back ever since. So I do value when reviews have proper specs and information on devices. You never know, the information contained here could lead someone to continue to come back and be an active tech enthusiast like ourselves....

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 20:46 1

108. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 12050; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)


Motorola really should have just went with the 32GB as the base model. This is 2015. There's no reason for 16GB to exist anymore unless it's a budget phone under $200.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 22:59 2

111. Scott93274 (Posts: 4277; Member since: 06 Aug 2013)


But your body was ready for the iPhone, Post number 42.

http://www.phonearena.com/news/Apple-iPhone-6s-arrives-with-a-splash-welcome-3D-Touch_id73520

And I never saw any comment from you regarding your disappointment in the iPhone base model being 16 GB. And Motorola only charges $50.00 to up grade from 16 to 32, to 64. which is half of what Apple charges, you can also find a high speed, 128 GB Micro SDXC card for $60.00 on Amazon which isn't even an option for most phones these days, so your complaint about the base model storage capacity is a bit of a lost cause.

posted on 07 Oct 2015, 07:40

119. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 12050; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)


I've said it before many times. Take your head out of your rear and maybe you'll see it.

posted on 07 Oct 2015, 10:59 1

126. Scott93274 (Posts: 4277; Member since: 06 Aug 2013)


Share the link to the article and reference the post or you've never said it and you should just keep your mouth shut.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 08:44 3

2. Martos (Posts: 1; Member since: 06 Oct 2015)


Highest score pa has given a midrange smartphone imo

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 09:28 13

28. ThePython (Posts: 879; Member since: 08 May 2013)


It's hardly a midrange phone.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 10:04 12

48. sgodsell (Posts: 3346; Member since: 16 Mar 2013)


Since when is a SD 808 with 3 GB of RAM, with a QHD (2560x1440) mid-range?

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 20:44

107. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 12050; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)


It's a midrange phone.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 23:09 4

112. Scott93274 (Posts: 4277; Member since: 06 Aug 2013)


Call it what you like... you still said that you were buying one so I guess a mid range phone is good enough to replace whatever high end phone you had last year?

posted on 07 Oct 2015, 07:40

120. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 12050; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)


Stop whining. It fits my needs.

posted on 07 Oct 2015, 07:43

122. roldefol (Posts: 4108; Member since: 28 Jan 2011)


Then why bother calling it out as "midrange"? You know around here that's akin to "weak."

posted on 07 Oct 2015, 09:31 1

124. Scott93274 (Posts: 4277; Member since: 06 Aug 2013)


And every one of your posts in a Motorola article isn't you whining about something? Post 108 is a key example. Such double standards as usual.

posted on 07 Oct 2015, 10:11 1

125. roldefol (Posts: 4108; Member since: 28 Jan 2011)


He's a complicated guy. He likes Motorola, but he complains about them all the time. He criticizes Android, but he uses Android phones. It's fascinating, really.

posted on 10 Oct 2015, 06:51

128. ibend (Posts: 3858; Member since: 30 Sep 2014)


most of spec is highend, but SD808 is midranger.. and IMO $250-$500 is midranger class

posted on 11 Oct 2015, 03:52

130. roldefol (Posts: 4108; Member since: 28 Jan 2011)


I'm not sure what to call the SD808. It's not midrange like the 615, but it is significantly slower than the 810 or Exynos 7420. Upper midrange? Lower high end?

Point is, it doesn't make the whole phone midrange. And the whole point of the pricing is a no compromises affordable phone.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 10:07 2

49. roldefol (Posts: 4108; Member since: 28 Jan 2011)


The use of the SD808 over the 810 makes the phone smart, not midrange. What else you got?

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 11:53 1

85. Niva. (Posts: 420; Member since: 05 Jan 2015)


Use of the SD 808 makes this phone NOT a flagship.

It's a great phone, especially for the price, they got that part right. I still say the Nexus 6 is the biggest enemy for it though.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 13:34 1

94. DeusExCellula (Posts: 1084; Member since: 05 Oct 2014)


So Lg G4 and LG V10 are not flagships?

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 14:13

95. roldefol (Posts: 4108; Member since: 28 Jan 2011)


That's what the.... I'll call them performance elitists say. The definition of flagship is the banner-carrier for the brand. The G4 is a flagship. The X Pure is a flagship. The S6 is a flagship. The Note 5 is not.

posted on 07 Oct 2015, 00:30 1

113. fyahking (Posts: 859; Member since: 28 Jan 2015)


iPhone 6s is the highest score midrange phone.

posted on 07 Oct 2015, 05:41

117. roldefol (Posts: 4108; Member since: 28 Jan 2011)


People need to get over this "it's midrange" thing. As if there are only three classes of phone (low, midrange, high end.) Phones like the iPhone 6S, Moto X, Nexus 5X, G4 are what I would call upper midrange, or just mainstream. Balanced performance, great cameras, etc. They are not midrange in the way that, say, the Moto X Play or numerous HTC Desire models are.

posted on 17 Feb 2016, 14:21

142. uthur (Posts: 4; Member since: 30 Sep 2015)


Considering the G4 had the 808 then i assume it is a uppper tier CPU since the G4 is a flagship phone. I am currenly deciding between teh X Pure and the Nexus 6P

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 08:45 8

3. Dude2014 (Posts: 436; Member since: 12 Feb 2014)


PA is trying so hard to cover their stupid review on recent Android devices. Lol nice try but fail.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 08:48 10

7. SamsungPhanboy (banned) (Posts: 765; Member since: 31 Mar 2015)


No, fail on your part for not reading some of the reviews.

The last Samsung to get reviewed, everyone went all crazy, even though phonearena state THE PHONE RAN SLOW! That is unacceptable in 2015.

Hate all you want to on PA, but the truth is some of you can't accept that fact that not all Android phones are good.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 10:03 4

47. Ordinary (Posts: 2211; Member since: 23 Apr 2015)


http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_a8-review-1288.php

This just debunks your whole rant. Btw next time go easy with capslock.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 10:10 4

50. SamsungPhanboy (banned) (Posts: 765; Member since: 31 Mar 2015)


Not really.

http://m.timesofindia.com/tech/reviews/Samsung-Galaxy-A8-review/articleshow/48587999.cms

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 10:18 3

56. Ordinary (Posts: 2211; Member since: 23 Apr 2015)


http://gadgets.ndtv.com/mobiles/reviews/samsung-galaxy-a8-review-feels-so-flagship-729795

http://www.androidauthority.com/samsung-galaxy-a8-review-632440/

http://tech.firstpost.com/reviews/samsung-galaxy-a8-review-elegant-phone-good-battery-and-camera-will-face-off-with-oneplus-2-278651.html

Yes really.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 10:39 4

60. SamsungPhanboy (banned) (Posts: 765; Member since: 31 Mar 2015)


http://www.androidauthority.com/samsung-galaxy-a8-initial-impressions-630810/

Hmmm...even in the android authority review, they state home screen lag. So no, Ordinary, not really. Take this L

Direct quote from impressions Article:

"The phone is constantly lagging and stuttering"

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 10:42 2

64. Ordinary (Posts: 2211; Member since: 23 Apr 2015)


Yet they gave it 9.0 unlike PA 6.5

You are still holding the L mate. Good job on instant upvote... again.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 10:54 4

67. SamsungPhanboy (banned) (Posts: 765; Member since: 31 Mar 2015)


Take this well deserved L.

PA gave the phone a 6.5 which is a deserving score for a phone that "constantly lagged and stuttered," as Android Authority stated, which was a review source you cited.

So by your logic, even after using one of your own sources against you, pumping the score up for the phone is justified?

Hell no, ordinary. Multiple sites say the phone lags and stutters. Don't be mad at PA because they provided honesty in their review AND review score.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 11:01 2

68. Ordinary (Posts: 2211; Member since: 23 Apr 2015)


Clearly you didnt look over GSMArena, TechFirstpost, Gadgets etc.

With Exynos 5430 there wont be any lag whatsover so your point gets debunked in an instant. Even note 4 with qhd and older touchwiz was going great with Exynos 5433. There is no big margin between 5430 and 5433.

So much honesty they somehow "got" lower battery life than all other reviews LOL. Pls son rather look away, you are simply to stubborn.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 11:18 4

70. SamsungPhanboy (banned) (Posts: 765; Member since: 31 Mar 2015)


i'm stubborn? LOL please refer to conversation above. I stated all I needed to state.

1. The phone has displayed lagged and stutter, which is state in multiple reviews
2. Any reviewer has the right to heavily downgrade the score based on lag and stutter for a phone as expensive as the A8

Carry on, Son.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 11:21 2

72. Ordinary (Posts: 2211; Member since: 23 Apr 2015)


See post 69 before you pass out lol. No recover after that fam.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 11:32 4

75. SamsungPhanboy (banned) (Posts: 765; Member since: 31 Mar 2015)


LOL...refer to post 60

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 11:12 2

69. Ordinary (Posts: 2211; Member since: 23 Apr 2015)


Now before you make yourself look stupid again I am gonna drop this and body you:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSSFK1yloj8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knB1BUvYO3o

With whatever you come next you will be only marked as stubborn dude. L just hit you in your head.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 11:21 5

71. SamsungPhanboy (banned) (Posts: 765; Member since: 31 Mar 2015)


How stupid. Speed test and multitasking tests? Because that provides proof phones don't exhibit lag or stutter? LOL

As I stated before, take this well deserved L. Body me? Please, son.

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 11:24 1

74. Ordinary (Posts: 2211; Member since: 23 Apr 2015)


Yea nothing better to say just look stupid like usual. I am still waiting for you to post some proof about lag.

In the video its clearly seen that A8 can keep up with G4 and N5 so your whole rant got flushed down the toilet. You are classified as an ignorant after facts hit you in your head multiple times.

#norecover

posted on 06 Oct 2015, 11:35 5

76. SamsungPhanboy (banned) (Posts: 765; Member since: 31 Mar 2015)


You are waiting for me to post proof about lag??????

Here you go:http://www.androidauthority.com/samsung-galaxy-a8-initial-impressions-630810/

AND....you're done. Lol holy s**t, it's so easy debating with you since you are trying to be a selective reader.

It was a pleasure owning you today LMAO easy as f***

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Display5.7 inches, 1440 x 2560 pixels (520 ppi) IPS LCD
Camera21 megapixels
Hardware
Qualcomm Snapdragon 808, Hexa-core, 1800 MHz, ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53 processor
3 GB RAM
Size6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches
(153.9 x 76.2 x 11.06 mm)
6.31 oz  (179 g)

Latest stories