x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Home
  • News
  • Motorola and Apple each file for summary judgment in Wisconsin FRAND case

Motorola and Apple each file for summary judgment in Wisconsin FRAND case

Posted: , by Alan F.

Tags:

Motorola and Apple each file for summary judgment in Wisconsin FRAND case
Motorola and Apple are squaring off in a courtroom in Wisconsin in a case dealing with FRAND-pledged patents. Under the FRAND rules (which stands for Fair, Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory), the holder of a patent publicizes the terms under which a license for the patent will be issued. Both sides on Friday filed with the court for a summary judgment. If the motion is granted, most of Apple's claims would disappear. On the other hand, Apple asked the court for partial summary judgments which would allow the court to rule on some of Apple's claims "as a point of law".

Judge Barbara Crabb who is presiding over the summary judgment motions

Judge Barbara Crabb who is presiding over the summary judgment motions

Judge Barbara B. Crabb has set up a schedule with opposition briefs due on May 30th, 2012. Until June 11th, both sides will get to reply in support of each side's motions. That culminates in a summary judgment hearing and a ruling on the motions. The question is whether Judge Crabb will be able to make a ruling in time to have an effect on another Motorola-Apple battle in Chicago. The Chicago case is much larger than the one in Wisconsin and deals with 15 Apple and 6 Motorola patents. Much of the information about the summary judgment motions have been sealed.

Motorola's summary judgment filing deals with a number of Apple's claims that it wants the court to eliminate with one bang of the judicial gavel. For example, Motorola wants the court to eliminate Apple's request for a number of Declaratory Judgments ranging from one stating that Motorola's patents were not offered on FRAND terms to one that says that Motorola committed patent misuse. Apple's motion for partial summary judgment says that the Cupertino based firm, "moves for partial summary judgment to establish elements of its breach of contract, antitrust, unfair competition, and patent misuse claims," which seems to be some of the exact same claims that Motorola is trying to get a ruling on in its favor with its summary judgment motion.

source: FOSSPatents

3 Comments
  • Options
    Close




posted on 30 Apr 2012, 19:56 1

1. Corpsemaker (Posts: 63; Member since: 10 Jul 2010)


WISCONSIN!!!!!!!!!!!

posted on 30 Apr 2012, 20:38

2. networkdood (Posts: 6267; Member since: 31 Mar 2010)


Why are there different cases in different areas of the U.S.
They need to consolidate the cases into one and try it in D.C.
Better yet, cases involving patents need to involve every country's laws, so, perhaps, just consolidate all cases around the world into one GInormous one and have the trial in NYC.

posted on 30 Apr 2012, 20:39 2

3. theBankRobber (Posts: 647; Member since: 22 Sep 2011)


Well we all knew this day was coming, but lets see how everyone else handles this. Back and forth on who's right and who's wrong. Frand this and Frand that, need some popcorn and fanyboys and we have a SHOW.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories