German court decides to re-open Motorola-Microsoft case; stays coming for Apple-Samsung?
On Friday, Judge Andreas Voss said that he is not ready to make a decision and has reopened the case because an April 20th pleading by Microsoft brought up credible facts that would allow the Redmond based software giant to use a prior user defense in a new trial. Regardless of whether or not a new trial is ordered, we are looking at a delay of a few months while the court re-examines the case.
has written up a scorecard of the Apple-Samsung legal battles. So far, Samsung has not won anything in court against Apple anywhere in the world, and has lost its first three German patent cases. Meanwhile, Apple has yet to have a technical patent or utility model enforced. It has had some success with patents related to design or claims of unfair competition. In March, the court in Mannheim tossed out Apple's infringement claim on its slide to unlock utility patent not because the infringement didn't happen, but because of a question about the validity of the claim.
Last week, the Mannheim Court stayed a case brought by Apple over a photo gallery patent that was successfully enforced by Apple in other countries. Back in Germany, the court is expected to issue rulings soon on some of the Apple-Samsung battles that we have been hearing about and Foss Patents expects to see more stays issued by the court. This doesn't mean that the cases have been dismissed. A stay is a court ordered suspension in a legal proceeding which means that in these cases, it would not equal a Samsung victory. The court could re-start proceedings if Apple can prove the validity of their patents. And again, there is a big difference between the validity of and the infringement of a patent.
source: FossPatents (1), (2)
1. windowsRocks (Posts: 147; Member since: 28 Oct 2011)
Apple should sue Samsung for stealing A from Apple. lol.............
2. jonnyb120 (Posts: 1; Member since: 11 May 2012)
The writer for FOSS Patents is a paid consultant of Oracle and Microsoft. His anti-Google stance should be taken with a grain of salt.
3. iluvtrolling (banned) (Posts: 15; Member since: 11 May 2012)
Your stance should be taken with a grain of salt instead. Who are you?
7. ardent1 (Posts: 1862; Member since: 16 Apr 2011)
Why are stating the obvious? The writers at phonearena.com were shocked by his unbiased blogs.
8. anywherehome (Posts: 971; Member since: 13 Dec 2011)
Forget.....apple and microsoft just want to destroy the best mobile open source OS wirh ridiculous patents.....so Google can not defeat according to you?
Morality of MS or Apple is zero ground....;)
Google does good for the mankind: cars for blinds, translator, perfect maps, ... for us......without Google we are still 10 years behind just with MS and Apple ;)
And this "open source" behavior is not good just for those who keep the power, because The Google is a true democracy
5. starandmountain (Posts: 36; Member since: 01 Apr 2012)
thanks to that advertisement, i can't
read the news on my phone!
satphone please go away...
6. Bluesky02 (Posts: 1429; Member since: 05 Dec 2011)
I'm not an expert or something. But since 2yrs i've been reading this.
Microsoft was already paying Motorola license fees on H.264. The thing was Motorola was asking 3billions license fees per year, which sound ridiculously huge. So Microsoft decided to take Moto to court for unfair licensing fees. Flash forward to now, Microsoft went to Motorola for Android licensing fees, Motorola decided to not pay and again continue this same matter to court. Adding Xbox 360 wifi adapter technology infringement.
Right now Microsoft is asking for fair licensing fees.
9. microsoftnokiawin (Posts: 648; Member since: 30 Mar 2012)
seriously all these companies need to stop wasting money in courts
and use it in developing their own technologies and ideas and crap so they don't get sued