First real HTC One UltraPixel camera samples pop up (video)
1. BattleBrat (Posts: 1475; Member since: 26 Oct 2011)
I'm gonna get SOOOO many thumbs down for this, but my iPhone 4s takes better shots.
21. AnTuTu (Posts: 1580; Member since: 14 Oct 2012)
Your iPhone 10 even can't take these kind of photos lolzzz :)
26. TylerGrunter (Posts: 1522; Member since: 16 Feb 2012)
By chance have a comparison between the results of the HTC One and the Iphone 5 (which camara is supposed to be better than the one in 4S), and I can call your bulls**t!
It's easy to check how much noise the iPhone 5 camera has under low light.
So don't post stupid comments to create flame wars please!
2. B3BLW29 (Posts: 238; Member since: 02 Mar 2012)
I dont know abt iPhone 4s but my lumia 800 would definitely kick its ass (At least from above pics).
32. RiseAgainst94 (Posts: 281; Member since: 03 Mar 2012)
My Lumia 900 would get Its ass kicked by it and the 900 and 800 have the same terrible sensor.
36. -box- (Posts: 3991; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)
"Terrible"?! I have a 900 and would not call the camera "terrible". Behind the times compared to a 920 or 808, yes, (about on par with a 4s) but not terrible. Look at some recent Pantech smartphones or the Nexus4 to see a lower-quality smartphone camera.
43. B3BLW29 (Posts: 238; Member since: 02 Mar 2012)
You would be saying this if you really had Lumia 900/800.
40. JulianGT (Posts: 89; Member since: 15 Oct 2012)
my almost 3 years old nokia n8 takes better shots
3. aokde (Posts: 186; Member since: 09 Jul 2012)
They basically reduced the resolution of photos and that's it. I don't see anything special in those photos. Shame on you htc.
20. cezarepc (Posts: 716; Member since: 23 Nov 2012)
GS3 (even GS2) and Note2 on 5MP takes better pics. That's a common technique to reduce noise. Video of the One is great though.
24. jove39 (Posts: 1875; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)
Did you viewed those images at 100% size? Image with water bottle seems way better for HTC One
28. shikroi (Posts: 187; Member since: 24 Sep 2012)
The sad thing is that they called out the 808 in their info graphic and they made jabs at in the conference. Even though the one is a superior phone; with regards to camera quality its not even approaching the 808, i don't think this cam can even beat the n8. It will be interesting to see low light comparisons with the 920.
6. tusshharish (Posts: 342; Member since: 23 Oct 2012)
sorry to say but it is just average camera.....
7. tusshharish (Posts: 342; Member since: 23 Oct 2012)
nothing special...............it is average camera.....
8. tiara6918 (Posts: 2042; Member since: 26 Apr 2012)
I don't want to judge from the images and videos above but I'll just wait for the review...
10. RaKithAPeiRiZ (Posts: 1488; Member since: 29 Dec 2011)
the camera has alot of bokkeh....looks good
9. Stoli89 (Posts: 333; Member since: 28 Jun 2010)
The iPhone 4S/5 has a backlit sensor with 1.4 micron pixels. The Nokia N8, with its 12MP sensor, 1.75 microns. The Nokia 808, with its proprietary 41MP sensor, virtual pixels of 4 micons at 5MP output and 3.2 microns at 8MP output.
In all of these cases, the resolution is superior to what has been revealed with the HTC One. Sure, the larger pixel approach gathers more light per pixel. Coupled with OIS, this should result in solid low light performance. Unfortunately, it seems to sacrifice in other areas, such as excessive noise. Nokia's Pureview on the 808 has taken noise literally out of the equation...or mostly in most circumstances. The HTC One is not even close.
11. Kalevro (Posts: 56; Member since: 11 Sep 2011)
They brought more light into the pics but maybe they would have had sucess if the camera sensor was in the above average zone, like maybe in the more memorable 8 to 10 megapixels zone.
They do it like Sony, HTC. Bringing in imperfected technology.
12. _Bone_ (Posts: 2154; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)
Looked at these and some more under proper lightning, and I'm not that impressed. Maxed out at 4MP, they should look pixel sharp, as a matter of fact, you put 920 or iP5 samples next to them (resized to 4MP) and they look slightly sharper. I notice quite a bit noise reduction which is the reason behind the Xperia Z's disappointment, I prefer the results untouched by SW. But I love the pre-buffer technology, makes a lot of sense, and the HDR tech on both sides comes handy, so it's perfectly tolerable.
So why don't results blow away competition? Because, ironically, when HTC says megapixels don't count, it applies to them too: no matter if the sensor has 4mil large or 13mil small pixels, if it's the same size as the rivals, results will be decided by sensor tech and not pixel count, and the sharpest results of any technology over 4, 8 or 13MPs is still produced by (thumbs down coming) the iPhone 5. The Exmor RS has potential too as some of the Chinese manufacturer's samples look very sharp at full 13MP, but I fear the sensor tech is the same for the HTC that was featured on the DNA, and it doesn't matter if it's has larger pixels capturing just 4MPs, same sensor will result in same overall sharpness (resized to a certain resolution obviously).
Still want the phone.
14. Kalevro (Posts: 56; Member since: 11 Sep 2011)
Didn't Sony make Apples' camera sensors. I think the camera team just configured the lenses on the iPhone 5 but still can't argue with your fact.
18. yero789 (unregistered)
Yes that's right,Sony makes Apple's camera sensors,but I like Nokia's Carl Zeiss camera sensors too,they produce natural colors in photos.
22. rgxVOiD (Posts: 440; Member since: 30 Aug 2012)
Hopefully Sony can squeeze more juice out of that Exmor RS with some software tweaking
13. shadez10 (Posts: 427; Member since: 15 Jan 2012)
i dont see any special thing about this ultrapixel gimmick from HTC...
and also video quality is average....
16. jove39 (Posts: 1875; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)
Htc one pictures are for sure better than Nexus4...when viewed at 100%
17. yero789 (unregistered)
As I see compared to Nexus 4,there is no real difference,I mean it is the same photo quality,not something new.Just my opinion!
19. louiemapa (Posts: 28; Member since: 01 Nov 2012)
I think my 3310 takes better photos than this. XD
23. rizevnarastek (Posts: 347; Member since: 06 Sep 2012)
yeah... blah, blah, blah.. you'll get the tests and you'll see...