Average Android phone now costs half the iPhone, and the price gap is widening
Android average prices have declined hugely in the past few years. The drop is from $441 in 2010, to $380 in 2011, $320 in the following year, and lastly to $276 in 2013. Certainly, Android prices have become a big (if not the biggest) factor that has opened up the platform to a much wider market, and now Android dominates the world by market share.
Apple’s iPhones at the same time have also started going down in price, but at a much slower pace. While an average iPhone was sold for $710 in 2011, the price dropped to $686 in 2012, and to $650 in 2013.
What’s interesting, though, is comparing those dynamics to see how the price gap between the two platforms has been growing at a steady pace. At its high prices, Apple is reaping an overwhelming piece of the industry’s profits, while Android phone makers control the market share. Which one is better? For customers, it seems that Android’s model is clearly catching up, but looking from the point of view of companies, Apple certainly does not mind the profit.
1. Katrina (Posts: 61; Member since: 17 Aug 2012)
statista did a pretty lame analysis...
comparing average iphones?? you mean one iPhone to a billion different types of android phones.... of course theres a huge gap and no doubt the gap keeps increasing because alot of cheap android manufacturers (like china) are entering the market by offering lower prices.
lame analysis just lame
10. Finalflash (Posts: 863; Member since: 23 Jul 2013)
No he is right, you can't compare the iPhone to all the Android phones. You have to keep the comparison in its performance and functionality range and to compare it against the high end Android models would be unfair to it. It should only be compared to the low end cheap models (apparently only the Chinese ones according to him) because that is a more fair comparison...Apples to apples and all.
18. bossmt_2 (Posts: 409; Member since: 13 Oct 2009)
The title wasn't "comparable average android sale vs iPhone" because the sheer amount of data required and subjectivity (what is comparable, etc.)
Bottom line is that iPhones are more expensive and aside from the Galaxy line, Androids are much cheaper. Compare the market of flagship devices on Verizon (just one comparison there are many other) the base model for all. The iPhone 5s is 649.99, the GS4 is 599.99 HTC One 499.99 G2 499.99 Droid Maxx 599.99 Moto X 399.99.
Those are you comparable models if you would on one carrier, of those guys the average price is 519.99 would be lower if I didn't include the Droid Maxx, just wanted to include it for posterity. The iPhone is over priced, everyone knows it, you crying about the stat used won't change that.
This is a totally valid stat and it has to do with broadcasting what the emerging market is doing to the cost of phone with the slow death of the high end phone because of emerging markets. There's a reason Android is growing despite the iPhone being introduced into more markets.
50. ardent1 (Posts: 1968; Member since: 16 Apr 2011)
Dude, you should stop drinking the kool-aid.
Look at what Xiaomi charges for its top of the line android devices and look at the high-way robbery or fleecing that Samsung charges its over-priced products.
Android devices are commodities, and Xiaomi sets the standard for how much people should pay. $600 for a Samsung S4? -- in your effen dreams.
57. Droiderr (Posts: 27; Member since: 05 Mar 2013)
this shows how ignorant you are... 1st of all go and check the price of device and get your data correct. I dont live in the US so cant quote wxact rate. But doa search on amazon or ebay and you will get the price of s4 around $500. Even in india it being sold at equvalent of $500. So should be lesser in US.
And if u call samsung as overpriced i dont know what will you call apple and HTC. Eapecially apple which is selling a 10 year old technology in the market.
61. Kaiser2007 (Posts: 110; Member since: 16 Nov 2013)
You two miss the point. What FF trying to say is: "iPhone is crap. So, it should be compared to low end Android phone".
Btw: That's what I think he means.
62. Charlie_boy (Posts: 49; Member since: 04 Jan 2013)
Yup.. it's like comparing apples to key limes...
How about iPhone price vs averga flaghip price of the top 10 android manufacturers
26. techaman (Posts: 337; Member since: 03 Jul 2011)
they should also include the phones abilities/ functions lol if that was on the news people would say hey apple stop stealing our money for your name. just like the courts did in germany for price fixing.
36. willard12 (Posts: 485; Member since: 04 Jul 2012)
First, I thought Apple also started making the 5C? If the 5c was just my imagination, then a fairer comparison would be matching comparing the cost to build a device with the retail price. Since the iphone 5S only costs $197 to build...lower than every flagship Android device, the results would be the same.
2. X.E.R.O. (unregistered)
That's Android for ya'.
4. _Bone_ (Posts: 1995; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)
This is why we love Android. iFans gloat in their company being the most valuable, guess what, that's because you are overpaying them. I'm pretty satisfied with my $200 Nexus 4.
8. tech2 (Posts: 1114; Member since: 26 Oct 2012)
Yup. My £100 ($160) Moto G isn't bad either. Beats iPhone in every category except camera.
33. hurrycanger (Posts: 416; Member since: 01 Dec 2013)
Moto G ftw! It's good that the battery on that thing does last, unlike the Nexus 4 (which sure is a lot better, but the battery life sucks...)
58. Bioload25 (Posts: 124; Member since: 12 Nov 2012)
Im an android fan,but I've got to admit that the moto G isnt that much better than the iPhone 4s
Lets respect Apple and its products,because even though android flagships (or even mid rangers) have better hardware,the simplicity of iOS continues to catch the costumers' hearts and money
21. Sauce (Posts: 728; Member since: 28 Apr 2013)
I'm extremely satisfied with my $200 iPhone 5 and $0.00 iPhone 5s.
Not to mention my $200.00 Note 2 a while back.
While we're here, an off contract GS4 costed about the same price as an off contract iPhone. Thing is, most popular phones cost the same off contract. By popular I mean the Galaxy-iPhone line.
23. silver91342 (Posts: 7; Member since: 18 Oct 2013)
Only when they launch, GS4, HTC One, LG G2, all fall very fast in off-contract about a month or so later.
32. hurrycanger (Posts: 416; Member since: 01 Dec 2013)
$200? Dude, if you compare contract price to full retail price, you are doing it wrong. xD
Don't stay in the level of intelligence phone carriers want to lock you in.
48. profperez1 (Posts: 45; Member since: 08 May 2012)
Cost to buy it--the only way to judge. And then cost of ownership. So what you buy the phone for AND what you sell it for in 12-24 months. You will find the gap closes. I spent $800 on my iPhone 5. If I decide to sell it when the 6 comes out----will be in a much better position. I will likely keep the 5 and give it to my kid---which in the long haul is more stable.
34. Taters (Posts: 2088; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)
Except the GS4 actually costs a heck if a lot more to make. Don't be fooled by the estimated costs by those Ifixit sites. Those sites don't factor in the overhead of Samsung building factories and buying the materials to make all of those parts.
1080p screen vs less than 720p
2gb ddr3 ram vs 1gb ddr1
Gorilla glass 3 vs. Some low budget high yield version of gorilla glass 1
2600 mah battery vs a 1450 mah
You can't compare them. Apple rips you off plain and simple. You can't really justify it based on hardware. Software maybe but even that is a stretch considering how simple it is compared to other operating systems.
37. Sauce (Posts: 728; Member since: 28 Apr 2013)
It's all relevantly the same cost to make. A few paper specs don't change much. You sir have been the fooled consumer.
38. roscuthiii (Posts: 1658; Member since: 18 Jul 2010)
"Relatively" is the word I believe you were going for. Wrong word-of-the-day from the Rolodex.
And while it's true that not all specs on paper change the cost all that much, there are a few paper specs on paper that are much more "relevant" to higher production costs, plus specs that won't be found on paper.
(Also, my apologies for the grammar police moment there, but I just spent all day with someone using the wrong words trying to make himself seem smarter than everyone else in the room. It's a sore spot right now.)
60. apple4never (Posts: 672; Member since: 08 May 2013)
galaxies are pretty much android iphones are they not?
5. Just.Saying (Posts: 82; Member since: 04 Apr 2013)
In android terms, The hardware specs on the iPhone5 makes it entry level. So yeah, it is over priced.
25. T.F.O.A (Posts: 36; Member since: 14 Dec 2013)
Entry level spec on iphone 5 is optimized for OS itself. Software and hardware are balance, and the result is great performance.
27. bayusuputra (Posts: 939; Member since: 12 Feb 2012)
true that, a balance between mediocre hardware and mediocre software.
35. willard12 (Posts: 485; Member since: 04 Jul 2012)
"Optimized" software that doesn't have widgets, real multitasking, bluetooth file transfers, drag and drop file uploading, file management, micro sd support, etc.. It's essy for the hardware to perform great when it only has to launch apps. Oh, it also scrolls left and right like a champ for viewing of all the pastel draped icons.
53. tacarat (Posts: 82; Member since: 22 Apr 2013)
Throw in "alphabetized sorting". I hear it's all the rage.
40. redbowl (Posts: 3; Member since: 17 Feb 2014)
The iPhone consistently has the best performance out there. There is nothing entry level about its CPU or GPU performance, and this is before we get into inherently faster input lag, better apps, etc.
54. tacarat (Posts: 82; Member since: 22 Apr 2013)
I'd probably put windows phones in direct comparison to iphones. Maybe a tweaked android phone that's removed "standard" features to narrow it's focus. That's one of the reason iOS 7 has been poorly received by some. Apple's having to add features and they're not battery friendly. Android users are used to that fact already.
Not that it matters. Half the fun is the pissing contests these things drag up.
6. Taters (Posts: 2088; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)
The funny thing is that if every Android mid range and up ran iOS, then the performance would be literally identical to the high end iPhones. Talk about ripping you off big time since they basically charged you for 6 year old software until they finally spent more money on iOS 7. Sad.
28. Adrian38 (Posts: 52; Member since: 05 Nov 2012)
I don't know how people can be so stupid as to pay so much more, for so much less. We all know if anyone other than Apple manufactured the iPhone, it would have been a forgotten piece of crap years ago. Just shows how stupid consumers are these days.
55. tacarat (Posts: 82; Member since: 22 Apr 2013)
It's funny when you talk to a Mac loving iPhone person that got a new iPhone and had to immediately buy a new Mac because Apple upped the OS requirements again.
7. StraightEdgeNexus (Posts: 213; Member since: 14 Feb 2014)
Expect this price reach sky high when the iphone 6 launches with a large screen with average resolution(by android standards). Lol but iFans will say we get a larger screen and the headphone jack is at the bottom. Eagerly waiting for 'The next big thing'.
39. roscuthiii (Posts: 1658; Member since: 18 Jul 2010)
Don't forget the 6S when they finally increase the resolution.
9. amiaq (Posts: 314; Member since: 30 Jun 2012)
Apple's huge profit doesn't mean iPhone owners income goes to the next bracket up you know? There's nothing to be proud off apart from the share holders.
11. sip1995 (Posts: 54; Member since: 07 Feb 2014)
hahahaha........Nokia lumia 520 costs only $50
14. AfterShock (Posts: 888; Member since: 02 Nov 2012)
You get, what is given to you, no more.
You pay as told.
16. Sniggly (Posts: 6400; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)
Sure, if you buy something with an Apple logo on it, it's a status symbol. "I have money. I have taste." Is what you're saying.
Android users generally don't care about that. They're paying what they can for a phone that fits their needs.
46. kabhijeet.16 (Posts: 513; Member since: 05 Dec 2012)
Only true in case of Android devices because of several options.. So you get what you pay for... For iPhone there is no option but to pay the highest amount possible...
15. PAPINYC (Posts: 1950; Member since: 30 Jul 2011)
The "average" Android smartphone costs half as much as the iPhone and, yet, now is 10 times MORE capable ...... YES, the 'GAP is widening'!!!
42. redbowl (Posts: 3; Member since: 17 Feb 2014)
The "average" Android phone has much slower performance and inferior apps. Even a high end Android phone lags in those ways. In what way is it more capable?
44. alrightihatepickingusernames (Posts: 160; Member since: 29 Dec 2013)
Much slower performance? If maybe an extra second to load some things is "much slower" than definitely.
Inferior apps? For a tablet you could make that argument, not for a phone.
In what ways is it more capable? How moronic are you? Widgets, ability to download things outside of the app store, customizable keyboards and launchers, even a back button. That's not even getting into all the stuff you can do by voiding your warranty.
I'm going to assume you haven't read about Android since 2010.
45. redbowl (Posts: 3; Member since: 17 Feb 2014)
Yes, the average Android phone is low end and has "much slower" CPU and GPU performance given that even a high end Android smartphone will be slower than whatever the newest iPhone is.
Apps on Android are either iOS ports or are still waiting to be ported over. The differences in the app market are still there. Superiority on tablets is due to the fact that iOS apps are optimized while Android tablet apps are blown up smartphone apps.
Android is certainly more customizable, no question. Functionality added from professional developers is still superior given that iOS is where the money is. Same reason why Windows has better apps than Linux, and so on.
Either way, faster hardware and better software makes for a very capable platform, even if its missing widgets and the ability to add a Pokemon theme.
49. alrightihatepickingusernames (Posts: 160; Member since: 29 Dec 2013)
The performance difference between a high end Android phone and the latest iPhone is negligible. The iPhone is faster, but Android phones are also fast. Having used a low end Android device for a year and a half I can safely say that the loading times are still decent until you get past the year mark where the phone starts slowing down because it doesn't have TRIM.
I seriously doubt you are up to date with the app topic, aside from games and Apple's own applications the options are pretty damn close. With that being said I fail to see how there is greater functionality in iOS when the apps are similar, especially considering there are more app categories available in Android because it is different than iOS in nature.
Never said iOS wasn't capable, it certainly is. Better software is a matter of opinion, for me, Android is superior, evidently not for you. Better hardware? Can't argue there, the A7 is awesome.
And don't knock widgets man, they aren't the "battery hogs" that you may have been led to believe, they offer great functionality. I just like launchers because I prefer my device to feel like it's mine, I get that some people don't care that much.
17. Fuego84 (Posts: 244; Member since: 13 May 2012)
I don't buy android smartphones because they're cheap. I buy them because functionality wise they rule over apple even with the simplest of things like changing wallpaper.
19. Awalker (Posts: 47; Member since: 15 Aug 2013)
The U.S. market is little bit different because most phones are highly subsidized by carriers. Most of the rest of the world has to pay full for a phone so higher prices are a huge advantage.
20. alrightihatepickingusernames (Posts: 160; Member since: 29 Dec 2013)
Probably the biggest reason I stick with Android right here, they cost less and in most cases do more. I can get a phone with top notch hardware for $350 and that's awesome.
24. tedkord (Posts: 3776; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)
I couldn't find this study on Statista's site, so u have to ask: how is this data weighted? Is it by sales? Is it just each phones price?
Yes, there are some truly low end devices it there, but they didn't sell over 40 million like the S4. There are also, now, phones like the Moto X and the Nexus 5, which give high end experiences at low prices.
30. gamblor77 (Posts: 40; Member since: 26 Apr 2012)
A lot of the discrepancy comes from the fact that Apple likes to gouge it's customers and NEVER has sales. Whereas companies like Samsung actually recognize their tech is getting old and discounts it before the next generation arrives. Unfortunately if you're part of the Apple ecosystem they know they have you by the balls and milk as much as humanly possible out of you. I still don't know why people bend over and put up with that sh*t.
41. roscuthiii (Posts: 1658; Member since: 18 Jul 2010)
Basically, It's just to say they have an iPhone. A little while back I recommended a 4S to my mom and dad as a first smartphone, thinking I was doing them a solid suggesting a phone with a vaunted minimal learning curve & high quality... Yet all they do is complain. I thought to myself, "OK, the 4S is a little older now, not quite as supported as the 5/5S but it's still a good phone." Well, a few of my coworkers have newer iPhones and I still hear the same complaints.
Generally they slap the phone down on the desk, look at the Apple logo and then seem to say to themselves, "Oooh, I have an iPhone!"
52. networkdood (Posts: 5228; Member since: 31 Mar 2010)
Well, when the iphone 5S came out (and 5C), there were places, such as Walmart, selling it for around 179.00....