Samsung Galaxy Core Review
The Galaxy Core is one more soldier in the horde of Samsung Android smartphones. As if made out of a single blueprint, all Samsung handsets look alike and this one is no exception. Dressed in that typical Samsung uniform however hides an interesting device: one that marches not in the forefront with top of the line specs, but indeed in the core of Samsung’s army - the mid-range.
The Samsung Galaxy Core comes in both single and dual SIM versions (named Galaxy Core Duos), and we have the dual SIM one for review. It comes equipped with a 4.3-inch display, a dual-core processor and a 5-megapixel camera in a well-rounded package selling at a very affordable price.
Overall, the Galaxy Core does not shine in any particular area, but it hits all the bases of a decent smartphone. Is that enough to survive in a fiercely competitive dog-eat-dog world of Android devices? Or does it need a little extra flare after all? Let’s see.
In the box:
- microUSB to USB cable
- Wall Charger
- User Manual
By design, the Galaxy Core is a typical Samsung device, made out of the same general blueprint as a horde of other Android handsets by the Korean company. Is it plastic? Yes. Is it identical to so many other Samsung phones? Yes. But is it practical? Yes, as well.
129.3 x 67.6 x 8.95 mm
4.37 oz (124 g)
121.5 x 66.6 x 9.7 mm
4.07 oz (116 g)
134.8 x 67 x 9.26 mm
4.59 oz (130 g)
131 x 68 x 9.9 mm
4.94 oz (140 g)
The Galaxy Core comes in a white and blue versions, and we have the white one for test. The build quality is solid, with no screaking parts. The handset is thin rather than thick at 9mm (0.35”). It is very lightweight, tipping the scales at only 124 grams (4.38 oz). It is also relatively compact and easy to use single-handedly, plus it won’t stick out of your pockets like some larger phones. Under the easily removable back cover are a user-replaceable battery, a microSD card slot and the two micro SIM card slots.
The button layout is standard for Samsung. There is a single physical home key on the front, the lock key is on the right side and the volume rocker on the left. You can easily find the buttons in the dark as they protrude a bit. They also have nice travel and pressing them is effortless. The microUSB port is located on the bottom of the device, and up top is a 3.5mm headset jack.
Volume rocker (left)
Power key (right)
3.5mm jack (top)
microUSB port (bottom)
The sides of the Samsung Galaxy Core
More popular slideshows
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 vs Samsung Galaxy Note 2
14 Oct 2013, 05:28
Apple iPad Air vs Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition
16 Nov 2013, 04:22
Google Nexus 5 vs LG G2
11 Nov 2013, 06:01
Apple iPhone 5s vs Samsung Galaxy S4
27 Sep 2013, 05:59
Google Nexus 5 vs Samsung Galaxy S4
12 Nov 2013, 07:21
Nokia Lumia 1520 vs Samsung Galaxy Note 3
28 Nov 2013, 08:05
Google Nexus 5 Review
06 Nov 2013, 07:04
The 4.3-inch LCD display on the Galaxy Core features a middling resolution of 480 x 800 pixels (WVGA). The screen is not razor sharp and you’d notice slight pixelization. Technically, pixel density comes at 217ppi, slightly below average, but we would not count this as a fatal flaw given the price of the handset.
The first thing you notice when you fire up the display is that it is just not bright enough. At a peak brightness of merely 343 nits, everything on it looks dim to the point where it’s hard to use the device outdoors. Color accuracy of the display is high and generally we are pleased with the picture. Viewing angles are good and colors do not deteriorate even when viewed from an angle.
Samsung also saved on oleophobic coating and the screen quickly gets covered in greasy smudges, making it hard to read and forcing you to wipe it clean way too often. There is also no light sensor and that means no automatic brightness setting. Samsung had to cut it short somewhere to arrive at the affordable price, but lacking automatic brightness setting is just plain annoying. Luckily, Samsung includes a brightness slider right in the notification dropdown for easy and quick control.
1. xperia1409 (Posts: 9; Member since: 06 Jul 2013)
Why Do Samsung make phones with nearly same specs and just differ their names???? -_-
2. Kurai (unregistered)
Why the hell is this piece of crap 8/10?
7. FiddyPence (Posts: 19; Member since: 08 Aug 2012)
Because this is Phonearena and its made by Samsung ?
23. sssssssss (Posts: 6; Member since: 18 Aug 2013)
smartphone which can't even play subway surfer smoothly gets 8 points while some powerful smartphone still gets below 7 ;)
24. yudi.nemesis (Posts: 934; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)
You may have heard about Samsung that pays the reviewer to give a good review for a Samsung phones.
This Galaxy Core review prove that it actually happened.
26. GTR722 (Posts: 193; Member since: 20 Oct 2012)
If this was a Sony Phone...no more than 6.0...and we all know that.
4. garlic456 (Posts: 57; Member since: 24 Dec 2012)
WHY THE HELL THIS PHONE RECORDS VGA VIDEO WITH THIS SPECS
5. yudi.nemesis (Posts: 934; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)
Dear PhoneArena please explain To me, the rating
system that you use.
Because i don’t understand why Galaxy Core get 8 in PhoneArena rating, when there are other phones that have the same price range but with better performance.
6. PhoneArena Team (Posts: 237; Member since: 27 Jun 2006)
We've decided that in its price range, the Core is a good phone, that deserves rating 8/10. Feel free to list the phones that you think are better in the same price range, this will be helpful :)
12. Kurai (unregistered)
If phonearena is a phone, i'll rate it .5. Why? please read thishttp://www.phonearena.com/howd
owerate. . . that's how you're answering every damn question . . .sorry for the rude words . . . but it's what i think is going on . . .
13. Kurai (unregistered)
es/Sony-Xperia-L_id7786. . . the xperia L gets a 6.5?
17. yudi.nemesis (Posts: 934; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)
Xperia L is much better with better chipset, better and faster connectivity and also have better camera
I think 8 for Galaxy Core doesn’t fit at all with what you explain herehttp://www.phonearena.com/howd
Maybe that’s the reason why a lot of people who don’t agree with this review.
18. yudi.nemesis (Posts: 934; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)
At NegriElectronics Xperia L and Galaxy Core have same price point about $260
25. yudi.nemesis (Posts: 934; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)
So you can not give more
reasonable explanations why G Core deserves rating 8/10, when there are other phones in the same price range but with better performance and more features???
27. GTR722 (Posts: 193; Member since: 20 Oct 2012)
So Phone Arena...Xperia L, same price range, better specs...but 6.5 ?? and this Samsung 8.0 ?? Sorry PA, but dont try to hide the obvious.
48. jowenfm (Posts: 3; Member since: 05 Nov 2013)
just wanna ask if this galaxy core can support these kind of games
*candy crush saga
*temple run 2
and other online games
8. xperiaDROID (Posts: 3704; Member since: 08 Mar 2013)
Okay, let me get this straight. You guys rated the HTC Desire 600 7/10, and now you rate the Samsung Galaxy Core 8/10.
The Desire 600 has a quad core processor, dual front speakers, better screen (245ppi).
The Galaxy Core has a dual core processor, single rear speaker, lower screen (217ppi).
PhoneArena, you really need to explain how you guys rate. If it's a Samsung phone, no matter how bad it is, you guys will rate it higher than the others?
10. PhoneArena Team (Posts: 237; Member since: 27 Jun 2006)
Please read this page -http://www.phonearena.com/howd
owerate- and the conclusion of this review.
28. GTR722 (Posts: 193; Member since: 20 Oct 2012)
Now explain me why the Xperia L with better specs, same price range, released months ago gets 6.5 and thos Core 8.
33. sswain (Posts: 31; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)
The Desire 600 costs $350 unlocked whereas the Galaxy Fame costs $200. That's an almost 80% increment. They're not even in the same league.
The Galaxy Core is doing battle with the Xperia M and the Optimus 5 II. All of which cost almost exactly the same ($180-220). Not the Xperia L nor the Optimus L7 II, both of which are a step above ;)
The PhoneArena team erred in mentioning the Desire 600 on this page. It's direct competitor is the Xperia SP. Both retail for ~$350-$400 unlocked :)
44. mhikan22 (Posts: 2; Member since: 25 Sep 2013)
The Desire 600 has a quad core processor, dual front speakers, better screen (245ppi) Cash Price: PHP 17,990
The Galaxy Core has a dual core processor, single rear speaker, lower screen (217ppi).Cash Price: PHP10,990
Now See... Case Close buy your Desire 600 XD so expensive
11. WTF24 (Posts: 2; Member since: 20 Aug 2013)
why the F, does this one got 8/10 while the likes of xperia L got 6,5/10? xperia L has better chip set GPU,PPI count, has almost d same battery capacity 1750mah to 1800mah ,the same 4.1 jb, has better camera 8mp to 5mp,and the price that is not that far $350 to $300 yet it only got 6.5..
16. djcody (Posts: 26; Member since: 17 Apr 2013)
4/10 for dual sim. Next!!! If is 99$ off contract then OK other whise piece of junk
19. k4j98 (Posts: 59; Member since: 12 Jul 2012)
I can understand everyone's confusion about the rating, but there is a lot more to consider than specifications.
21. shuaibhere (Posts: 587; Member since: 07 Jul 2012)
29. najib1312 (Posts: 54; Member since: 08 May 2013)
Ooops, PA did it again!!
I don't argue with the fact that this phone got 8/10 since it's price is only USD230 in Malaysia. But I'm pissed at the fact that the relatively better Xperia L got only 6.5/10 despite having better specs at the same price. Except the dual-sim functionality, Xperia L triumphs in ALL departments but PA didn't even recommend this in the conclusion.
My conclusion would be: "If dual-sim is a must, Galaxy Core is the best bet as it got all the bases covered. But if u don't need the dual-sim standby, close your eyes and just buy Xperia L. Forget the other brands."
41. keliori (Posts: 2; Member since: 06 Sep 2013)
No najib, even in dual-sim arena I can't consider this phone as the best.
Around $250 price range some other phone are better than this.
-Acer Liquid E2 Duo
Correct me if I'm wrong
31. itsdeepak4u2000 (Posts: 1484; Member since: 03 Nov 2012)
So this phone is better than Xperia ZR, L & Desire 600 as far with ratings. WTH is this going on PA? Please change your rating system or else change your name. Now onwards I'll not trust PA for their Reviews.
34. iluvsonynokia (Posts: 35; Member since: 27 Aug 2013)
Formula to find real rating score
Samsung =10-pa rating/2
Sony =pa rating + 1/2 pa rating
35. mecool (Posts: 5; Member since: 13 Aug 2013)
phone arena u r doing bad...
xperia m and xperia l r way better than the crap core
36. transgressor01 (Posts: 12; Member since: 24 Aug 2013)
maybe the best featured mid range price smartphone
40. keliori (Posts: 2; Member since: 06 Sep 2013)
I don't get it, why this phone scores better than Acer Liquid E2 Duo.
In my country Samsung Galaxy Core Duos priced slightly higher at $260, while Acer Liquid E2 Duo priced at $250. Both are unlocked.
So basically not only Galaxy Core is a bit more expensive, it also offers lower specs.
Yet it got better score here...sorry to say but it really doesn't make sense at all.
43. Hytparts (Posts: 3; Member since: 07 Aug 2013)
Fox fixing, is it easy? these cell phone replacement repair parts are too multiple to select right.
45. mhikan22 (Posts: 2; Member since: 25 Sep 2013)
this phone is so amazing !!! nothing 2 complain ..... cheep price and good quality.... other phone is good 2 but so much expensive XD ......
47. jowenfm (Posts: 3; Member since: 05 Nov 2013)
can galaxy core support these kind of games
FIFA 2013,,,candy crush saga,,,temple run 2 and other online games?
46. jowenfm (Posts: 3; Member since: 05 Nov 2013)
is this samsung galaxy core supported with these kind of games
*candy crush saga
*temple run 2
and other latest online games
49. garlic456 (Posts: 57; Member since: 24 Dec 2012)
Oh my god. calm down....
I'm sure Temple Run 2 and Candy Crush is supported but not sure about the Fifa