x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Nokia Lumia 1020 Review

Posted: , by John V.

Tags:

Go to page
Nokia Lumia 1020 Review
Introduction:

Finally! Some would vouch that it was a long time coming, especially when the Nokia 808 PureView has been making the rounds since last year, but we finally have that combination of a Windows Phone and PureView camera from Nokia’s camp. Looking back to last fall, we all believed with enough certainty that the Nokia Lumia 920 was going to be it, but alas, that wasn’t the case. Instead, we had to wait until now to finally see the device that hardcore shutterbugs have been itching to behold.

Everyone talks about how bigger is better, right? In the world of cameras, people are sometimes led to believe that higher megapixels would instantly mean that it would produce better results, but as we all know too well, it’s not necessarily the megapixel count that matters when it comes to delivering sharp shots. At first glance, the 41-megapixel PureView camera that the Nokia Lumia 1020 is packing along its rear will garner plenty of raised eyebrows – especially when that figure just sounds insanely high. However, there’s always this invisible fence that in turn makes us cautious, and to an extent, even skeptical about its effectiveness. Well folks, it’s here in the flesh, and it’s gunning to be the class leader in the camera phone category.

The package contains:
  • microUSB cable
  • Wall Charger
  • Lanyard attachment
  • Quick Start Guide
  • Product Safety and Warranty Guide


Design:

If this looks familiar to you, then you shouldn’t be surprised in the very least, since the Lumia 1020 employs all the characteristic design elements of its predecessor(s). By now, the unibody polycarbonate design of the handset is pretty much expected, but instead of sporting a glossy chassis, it has this strange matte finish to it – making it less prone to smudges and fingerprints. Unfortunately, seeing that it’s packing one hell of a beefy camera in its rear, it’s profile is nowhere as bulimic thin as some of the other flagship devices out there.

Nokia Lumia 1020 employs all the characteristic design elements of its predecessors - Nokia Lumia 1020 Review
Nokia Lumia 1020 employs all the characteristic design elements of its predecessors - Nokia Lumia 1020 Review
Nokia Lumia 1020 employs all the characteristic design elements of its predecessors - Nokia Lumia 1020 Review

Nokia Lumia 1020 employs all the characteristic design elements of its predecessors


Honestly, the hump in its rear makes it a bit awkward holding and using the device at first, but after some adjustment, it doesn’t become too much of a nuisance – albeit, it still feels a bit alien. Sure, it’s top heavy due to all the hardware stuffed into its camera housing, but when we think about a 41-megapixel camera, we’re surprised how light it really is, especially over the 808 PureView. Overall, the handset still has an appealing design seeing that it very much looks like a smartphone first with an impressive camera attached to it – as opposed to being designed as camera first, with the smartphone part being secondary.

Nokia Lumia 1020
5.13 x 2.81 x 0.41 inches
130.4 x 71.4 x 10.4 mm
5.57 oz (158 g)

Nokia Lumia 1020

Nokia 808 PureView
4.88 x 2.37 x 0.55 inches
123.9 x 60.2 x 13.9 mm
5.96 oz (169 g)

Nokia 808 PureView

Samsung Galaxy S4 Zoom
4.94 x 2.5 x 0.61 inches
125.5 x 63.5 x 15.4 mm
7.34 oz (208 g)

Samsung Galaxy S4 Zoom

Apple iPhone 5
4.87 x 2.31 x 0.3 inches
123.8 x 58.6 x 7.6 mm
3.95 oz (112 g)

Apple iPhone 5

To see the phones in real size or compare them with other models, visit our Visual Phone Size Comparison page.


Much like other flagship Lumia smartphones, this is packing the same set of buttons and ports around its body – they include the familiar trio of capacitive Windows Phone buttons, microUSB port, 3.5mm headset jack, noise-cancelling mic, standard mic, power button, volume control, and two-level shutter key.

Nokia Lumia 1020 Review
Nokia Lumia 1020 Review
Nokia Lumia 1020 Review

As for the speaker, it’s placed on the lower left corner of the handset – hidden behind the precision cut microdots. Mimicking a point and shoot camera, there’s a spot in the lower right corner that allows us to attach the included lanyard with it, which goes to show that Nokia is really targeting this as a point and shoot replacement.

Much like other flagship Lumia smartphones, this is packing the same set of buttons and ports around its body - Nokia Lumia 1020 Review
Much like other flagship Lumia smartphones, this is packing the same set of buttons and ports around its body - Nokia Lumia 1020 Review
Much like other flagship Lumia smartphones, this is packing the same set of buttons and ports around its body - Nokia Lumia 1020 Review
Much like other flagship Lumia smartphones, this is packing the same set of buttons and ports around its body - Nokia Lumia 1020 Review

Much like other flagship Lumia smartphones, this is packing the same set of buttons and ports around its body


Without question the star of the show, the Lumia 1020 is most notable for its mind-boggling 41-megapixel PureView camera – you know, that noticeable bulge in the rear. Knowing that it’s the single most prized feature of the handset, Nokia made sure to arm it with some serious technology. For starters, it features a 1/1.5” sensor, which is actually smaller than the 1/1.2” one in the 808 PureView. Now don’t let that fool you, mainly because its size is what helps to keep the Lumia 1020 far more admiring in size than its far cousin. Rounding things out, it also packs along a six-element lens with ZEISS optics, second-gen optical image stabilization (OIS), backside illuminated sensor, 3x lossless zoom, LED flash, and a Xenon flash.

The star of the show is the Lumia 1020's mind-boggling 41-megapixel PureView camera - Nokia Lumia 1020 Review
The star of the show is the Lumia 1020's mind-boggling 41-megapixel PureView camera - Nokia Lumia 1020 Review
The star of the show is the Lumia 1020's mind-boggling 41-megapixel PureView camera - Nokia Lumia 1020 Review

The star of the show is the Lumia 1020's mind-boggling 41-megapixel PureView camera


That’s a mouthful, right? Well, there’s even more in the video side of the camera, as it’s able to produce 720p and 1080p videos in different capture rates – 24, 25, and 30 frames per second. If we take a look at that 1080p video recording quality at 24 frames per second, it’s widely garnered in the video world for having that ‘cinematic’ look and feel. All told, the hardware is already proving itself in more ways than none, but as always, it’s not the higher megapixel count of a camera that counts, so we’ll get into more detail later on its quality.


Display:

We really can’t blame Nokia with this one, just because it’s limited to what the Windows Phone 8 platform is able to handle at the moment. Sharing the same exact displays found in the recent Lumia 928 and Lumia 925 models, the handset’s 4.5-inch 768 x 1280 PureMotion HD+ display with ClearBlack technology is beginning to sound stale. At the very least, we want a 1080p display, just to keep it in the same company as other high-end models on the market. Despite the fact that there’s no improvement with this particular display, it’s still pleasant looking with its iridescent color reproduction, deep black color, and wide viewing angles. And at the same time, its resolution is effective enough for us to make out even fine text in the web browser – albeit, it’s obviously not as sharp as the competition.

The 4.5-inch 768 x 1280 PureMotion HD+ display with ClearBlack technology - Nokia Lumia 1020 Review
The 4.5-inch 768 x 1280 PureMotion HD+ display with ClearBlack technology - Nokia Lumia 1020 Review
The 4.5-inch 768 x 1280 PureMotion HD+ display with ClearBlack technology - Nokia Lumia 1020 Review

The 4.5-inch 768 x 1280 PureMotion HD+ display with ClearBlack technology





Nokia Lumia 1020 360-Degrees View

150 Comments
  • Options
    Close




posted on 23 Jul 2013, 23:04 10

1. Birds (Posts: 927; Member since: 21 Nov 2011)


YESH!!!! YESH!!!! YESH!!!!! Now time to read the review...

posted on 23 Jul 2013, 23:55 3

27. Nathan_ingx (Posts: 2964; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)


Eh?
Something tells me you commented before you read it.

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 04:52 4

97. _Bone_ (Posts: 2061; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)


There's quite a bit of noise at full res during daytime, interestingly a LOT of post-processing as well, softness and sharpening. Not as good as the 808, but an improvement over the 920. Dynamic range is a bit tight, there's just a few samples without some part burning out. This is a surprise, I'd guess it has an inferior lens (maybe the 920's).

Night samples look... well, just bad, even downsampled to FHD. Right now, let's say this is pre-release test, but as of now Exmor RS beats the current 41MP PureView in raw capabilities, while the 808 laughs all over both, oh well, I might get that one.

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 05:12 6

100. _Bone_ (Posts: 2061; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)


Wow, taking a shot took SIX SECONDS after the tap in the video.

Saving was an additional 4. It takes TEN SECONDS to take a 2nd shot. That's just ridiculous.

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 12:46 1

125. sergiobr (Posts: 307; Member since: 25 Feb 2013)


Comments in dpreview.com (Pro photographer)
---------------------------
http://connect.dpreview.com/post/1305711237/lumia-1020?page=4
---------------------------
By philinnz (7 hours ago)
horrible noisy images even in good light. It seems it must be difficult to hold the camera level so you would lose 10mp straightening and cropping. I think I got better results 12 years ago with my old kodak dc-280
---------------------------
By ovibor (7 hours ago)
I agree, horrible photos!
---------------------------
By Zlik (6 hours ago)
The point is to use it as a great 5MP camera which surpasses everything else in smartphone territory (except the Nokia 808). I agree that the full sized images don't look that good, but downsampled to 5MP, they are excellent.

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 04:54 10

99. Sarajevo (Posts: 37; Member since: 30 Nov 2012)


:)
PA rate for iPhone 5 was 9.0 - user rate was 8.5
PA rate for Galaxy S3 was 9.3 - user rate was 9.0
PA rate for Lumia 920 was 9.0 - user rate was 9.4

So it is obvious that PA prefer iPhone and Samsung (read Android) and PA is not tolerant toward Nokia :)

I hardly wait to see user rate for this monster...

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 08:46

114. protozeloz (Posts: 5321; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)


actually that's dependent on the number of users on each device

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 11:59 1

122. dexter_jdr (Posts: 991; Member since: 28 Jun 2012)


so youre saying we got more 920 owners than iphone5 and s3?

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 12:47

127. protozeloz (Posts: 5321; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)


No, I'm saying a higher amount of people the morel likely for people to find things they don't like (and more likely trolls to mess with the score if you have been on PA for around 4 years)

Devices with lower profiles get more honest reviews from uses

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 13:16 1

130. protozeloz (Posts: 5321; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)


And here is the example
http://www.phonearena.com/phones/Nokia-Lumia-920_id7471/reviews

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 13:24

131. gazmatic (Posts: 502; Member since: 06 Sep 2012)


good to know that professional trolls just love to f shiit up

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 14:16

133. protozeloz (Posts: 5321; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)


We had figured this out when a device that was supposed to start arriving to users was already getting low feedback with weird excuses... Its not a pleasant thing to say, also its a lie that a device turns into such a horrible experience that people give them a 1 point score...

posted on 27 Jul 2013, 10:02

145. skyguy7567 (Posts: 148; Member since: 17 Nov 2012)


Sony PA gave 8.5 for Sony Flagships (User 9.3) other phones 6.5 (Average user reviews are all over 9.2) Just move on and go for GSMArena. I used to highly recommend this site and now I'm telling my friends to just look at the USER reviews.

posted on 23 Jul 2013, 23:05 4

2. Commentator (Posts: 2169; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)


My only concern would be how the phone rests on its back. From my experience camera-humps tend to pick up some wear-and-tear near the bottom.

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 00:18 3

34. UrbanPhantom (Posts: 944; Member since: 30 Oct 2012)


Hump or no hump, this camera has balls (excuse the sexual metaphor). I would call it a first choice for anybody even mildly interested in photography. It's also a good all round device, even if it does have the same Krait CPU and Adreno 225 GPU as the 920. Personally, I think it deserves closer to a 9/10, but the Android community is always going to be biased against WP smartphones and tablets...

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 00:51 4

37. No_Nonsense (Posts: 826; Member since: 17 Aug 2012)


Nah, I'd personally call 8.5 fair. TBH, besides the 41MP camera, I expected a larger sensor (1/1.2 vs 1/1.5) and OIS included. Besides, the 1020 doesn't offer a more compelling hardware over the 920 and 925, which obviously matters when you are going to shell around $100 contract free over the 920/925. Also, since it ain't gonna come at less than $700 apiece contract free, I'd want WP more evolved or rather, evolving at a faster pace than at what it does currently, and I ain't talking about the app store.

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 01:06 7

40. UrbanPhantom (Posts: 944; Member since: 30 Oct 2012)


No_Nonsense, you have been exposed for your lack of knowledge about the Lumia 1020: it does come with OIS, which is active even during 1080P video captures. You will have to do better in order to convince myself and the rest of the crowd that you actually know what you are talking about...

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 01:15 5

42. iushnt (Posts: 461; Member since: 06 Feb 2013)


u hv turned into a nokia fan..

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 01:38

46. No_Nonsense (Posts: 826; Member since: 17 Aug 2012)


Well, I'll simplify it for you then: I wanted a 1/1.2 sensor along with OIS and a better processor along with WP's fast pace of development in building an OS that is as feature rich as Android/Symbian back in the day. The 1020 is likely gonna be more expensive than the 920/925, and I can't justify the $100 more that I'll have to shell out if I bought one contract free. Besides, I already have the 808, and I wanted a total package that would justify shelling that amount of money. The 1020 is likely good, but I personally find it difficult to justify the premium it asks for, considering it isn't notches above in terms of h/w over the 808 (in terms of camera) and a bit of hardware increments over the 920 series, not just adding an extra gig of RAM.
TBH, it's gonna be difficult to recommend it to anyone other than a smartphone enthusiast over a 920 if they wanted a WP device. It's one thing to like a company's devices and wanting them, but another to trying to want your opinion on a device to be the same as everyone else's. If the 920/808 didn't exist, and only the 925/1020 did, then it wasn't hard recommending it. And yes, I already knew that the 1020 had OIS. So before you say, someone's lack of knowledge has been exposed, why don't you comprehend what he's written above?

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 02:04 2

50. UrbanPhantom (Posts: 944; Member since: 30 Oct 2012)


No offense, but the 808 is a bulky machine running on a now obsolete OS. It weighs more, does less, and does not compare well to the new L1020 in terms of true value. The L1020 is far slimmer, and the OIS video feature is a big plus not to be discounted. The L920 was already an excellent smartphone, and adding the 41MP camera to it has made it an even better solution...

Also, the difference in sensor size between the 808 and 1020 is marginal at best, and is hardly worth taking into consideration. You are basically hanging onto an older prototype that has been perfected. It's up to you to decide if the 808 is worth keeping, but Symbian is a dead platform. Those who want the best camera available on a smartphone are unlikely to buy an outdated 808; the L1020 should be their one and only option.

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 02:10

52. No_Nonsense (Posts: 826; Member since: 17 Aug 2012)


56.25% smaller area isn't marginal by any means. Symbian is a dead platform, w/ arguably no support from Nokia for the time being, agreed upon, but there's no denying Symbian is more feature rich than WP. Lumia 920 was good for its time, and for the price it sells here, its great. But the same hardware offered 10 months later, (this sits on MS's head, not Nokia's) isn't great. Those wanting the best camera on a phone are gonna buy the 1020, agreed.

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 02:22 3

55. EXkurogane (Posts: 863; Member since: 07 Mar 2013)


808PV does not have BSI sensor, remember than, 1020 has BSI sensor to allow more light in, to make up for the smaller sensor.And to maintain slimness, this change makes sense.

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 02:42 2

62. Altair (Posts: 292; Member since: 02 Feb 2012)


Not to mention 2GB ram which will be in great need in Amber update (better multitasking).

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 03:13 3

73. utopium (Posts: 5; Member since: 02 Dec 2011)


Yes, 808 is thicker/heavier, but easier to hold in hand as it is 10 mm less in width. And it does not do less, it's quite the opposite: 808 has HDMI, SD Card, FM Transmitter, USB OTG, replaceable battery, profiles, real multitasking, widgets, file browser, offline alarm, bigger sensor, ND filter, sharpness/contrast settings, more image resolutions to chose from, other browsers beside the one offered in the box, etc.

Sure, 1020 has better/bigger screen, faster processor, more apps, more developer attention, OIS, BSI, bigger apperture, manual focus, shutter time setting, it's slimmer/lighter, it has that interesting grip with extra battery, but 808 is still a tough competitor for it and 1020 is not quite an obvious upgrade from 808, esspecially considering the price. I am tempted to wait for 1030 or something, or at least for its price to drop seriously and WP to evolve more before even thinking of droping my 808. Maybe in 9 months 1020 will be more attractive for me (WP updates, smaller price, Flipboard, Instagram, more premium software, etc), now it is not yet enough.

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 03:37

88. No_Nonsense (Posts: 826; Member since: 17 Aug 2012)


You hit the nail on its head.

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 02:43 3

63. EXkurogane (Posts: 863; Member since: 07 Mar 2013)


And, phonearena says bad battery life, engadget says good battery life... =.=;

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 06:25

101. snowgator (Posts: 3158; Member since: 19 Jan 2011)


Battery life is so subjective from device to device. Who knows if you will win that lottery or lose it.

Fingers crossed everytime you get a new device.....

posted on 23 Jul 2013, 23:06 14

3. mi55u (unregistered)


same old design, same old processor, same old everything...
s4 zoom is way better than this

posted on 23 Jul 2013, 23:08 37

5. arsenaljimenez (Posts: 137; Member since: 03 May 2012)


delusional

posted on 23 Jul 2013, 23:08 18

6. Commentator (Posts: 2169; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)


Well all power to you if you want to walk around with a digital camera pressed up against your face all the time.

posted on 23 Jul 2013, 23:21 17

13. PapaSmurf (Posts: 6606; Member since: 14 May 2012)


It's not Nokia's fault Microsoft has been sitting its ass all day and not being able to support 1080p yet.

posted on 23 Jul 2013, 23:43 8

16. protozeloz (Posts: 5321; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)


1 1080p could be considered overrated... sometimes increases the resolution so dam high it doesn't matter and just consumes note power

2 I still think that would have been nice with android and 1080 would have been OK to go with it

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 11:19 3

120. DFranch (Posts: 128; Member since: 20 Apr 2012)


I agree. My 55" tv is 1080P, I've never understood why a 4.5 inch phone needs it. It's just ever increasing specs to drive sales, whether it is necessary or not.

posted on 23 Jul 2013, 23:46 8

19. Commentator (Posts: 2169; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)


It's just more of the same we saw with WP7, which was cursed to support single-core Snapdragons and WVGA resolutions for the entirety of its miserable 2-year existence. Apparently MS hasn't learned anything.

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 06:33 1

103. snowgator (Posts: 3158; Member since: 19 Jan 2011)


Not going to defend MS for it's pace, just it's vision. This company is trying hard to stop the train, back it up, get it on the track that get's it to mobile and off the tracks which are PC/software driven which requires backing up this monster of a company and then catch up to the locomotives that are already going 100 mph.

Everything WP has done works, and mostly well. Of course there are exceptions, but Nokia has done an exceptional job supporting their WP devices and making them stand out. This is no different- it is just a little more pricey due to it's tech. It will be supported. It is something that will appeal to a strong level of consumer: cameras on smart phones are very important. Nokia is smart to release this now to spur sales.

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 02:44 2

64. Altair (Posts: 292; Member since: 02 Feb 2012)


To be honest, with current technology, I more likely choose 920 with its current screen, than 920 with 1080p. Simple answer is, that 1080p drains battery a lot faster and for what?

Offering something I really don't need. Batterylife is the most important feature in mobile device.

posted on 26 Jul 2013, 03:08

144. yann (Posts: 42; Member since: 15 Jul 2010)


Why you need 1080p on 4.5" screen???
Currently it have 332ppi. Do you see them? Obviously not.
Then why you need 1080???
And one comment to PA: Your cons: specs?!? Do the phone laging? Working fine, right? Then what the hell you talking about this stupid SPECS? I've SGS4 and it still laging and sometime freezing, even with last SPCECS...
Do the phone lags or freeze?

posted on 23 Jul 2013, 23:41 6

15. protozeloz (Posts: 5321; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)


sorry But The s4 zoom its not way better, you have a camera that makes calls and its probably a awkward to use for daily stuff

posted on 23 Jul 2013, 23:48 5

23. iushnt (Posts: 461; Member since: 06 Feb 2013)


even i consider s4 zoom way better than this. But its my opinion. If i want latest smartphone with good camera then i'll go over s4, HTC one which does my job. But if I want a superb camera and a great smartphone then i'll go for s4 zoom. I don't consider WP as great OS as for now

posted on 23 Jul 2013, 23:45 13

17. haseebzahid (Posts: 1775; Member since: 22 Feb 2012)


ROFL to Zoom the fail of year

posted on 23 Jul 2013, 23:46 4

20. tigermcm (Posts: 607; Member since: 02 Sep 2009)


the galaxy Ss dont all look the same? oh and please dont start the spec argument. droid needs higher specs windows doesnt that is all

posted on 23 Jul 2013, 23:51 3

25. iushnt (Posts: 461; Member since: 06 Feb 2013)


yes a true daddy OS needs higher specs compared to WP. I think Lumia's also look all the same. Android is like what windows in on PC and WP is like what IOS is on smartphone. Smooth, low resource hungry but way too less features

posted on 23 Jul 2013, 23:55 4

28. protozeloz (Posts: 5321; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)


actually any OS benefits from better specs, its not only OS performance but many windows phone devices won't enjoy the graphics and details I'm games made for the tegra 4 or the snapdragon 600+

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 02:52 4

66. Altair (Posts: 292; Member since: 02 Feb 2012)


Well, considering we are talking about a mobile phone with quite small screen. If I really want to enjoy really graphically extensive games like Skyrim, Call of Duty series etc. I will like to play them with a real keyboard, large screen (40+") and desktop computer. Not with tiny 4.5" mobilephone.

What I am trying to say, is that OEM:s knows where to draw a line what they are offering and to whom.

There is a reason why cars doesn't have a helicopter wings.

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 04:00 1

92. Nathan_ingx (Posts: 2964; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)


You mean rotor blades...or aeroplane wings. Right?

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 06:30

102. protozeloz (Posts: 5321; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)


Actually flying cars do are not mass produced due to personal interest and safety concerns rather than convince

Also with HDMI and Bluetooth controller nearly any game can be enjoyed on a big screen and with the right stuff... Also we could say the same about the pracrical use of a superb camera phone

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 03:10 2

71. pdexter (Posts: 2; Member since: 24 Jul 2013)


You can't be serious. That, thing doesn't even look like a phone. It also features screen from 2007.
You have to be quite a Android fanboy to go for that thing.

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 06:43

107. Jaeel (Posts: 20; Member since: 18 Apr 2013)


If you need to knock someone out, yes.

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 12:46

126. gazmatic (Posts: 502; Member since: 06 Sep 2012)


hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

the galaxy s4 camera is better than the zoom

posted on 23 Jul 2013, 23:07 9

4. arsenaljimenez (Posts: 137; Member since: 03 May 2012)


The camera alone should get it up to the 9's -_-

posted on 23 Jul 2013, 23:09 12

7. Commentator (Posts: 2169; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)


This is PhoneArena though, not CameraArena. They do the best they can to balance out all aspects of smartphones, not just certain features.

posted on 23 Jul 2013, 23:15 3

9. Jason2k13 (Posts: 548; Member since: 28 Mar 2013)


its like putting the best camera on a feature phone and you would give it a 9? When reviewing a phone, you review everything not just ONE feature.

posted on 23 Jul 2013, 23:16 3

10. Birds (Posts: 927; Member since: 21 Nov 2011)


The camera needs an update to fix it's low light performance. This camera, though good, is only really exceptional in great lighting. It is still quite a bit ahead of the competition but I was expecting more from the low light performance.

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 03:54

90. Edmund (Posts: 645; Member since: 13 Jul 2012)


Check out the verge review before jumping to conclusions. Phone arena makes a bucket load of money from google advertorials (they're the ones that have the word "FEATURED" under the title) so I'd really be questioning the editor's objectivity.

posted on 23 Jul 2013, 23:20 7

12. Berzerk000 (Posts: 3642; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)


The camera isn't the only part of a phone, much less the most important one. The fact that you think it should get a 9 just for the camera is plain silly. A phone is only as good as it's OS, and WP is still not good enough to be a top competitor.

The Lumia 920 got a 9, the 1020 got an 8.5, because even though it has a better camera, that's the ONLY improvement over the 920 which was released nearly a year ago. These high end Lumias are getting old because of the limitations of WP.

posted on 23 Jul 2013, 23:45

18. protozeloz (Posts: 5321; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)


this ^

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 00:15

33. neutralguy (Posts: 1152; Member since: 30 Apr 2012)


Youve said it yourself. The os has limitations, if you review a product, isnt this considered? Did the performance of the phone suffered from it? I guess not. This means it should be around 9.

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 00:49 3

36. UrbanPhantom (Posts: 944; Member since: 30 Oct 2012)


The Lumia 1020 doesn't just have a rear camera that's marginally better than it's nearest competitors: it absolutely destroys every other device, and even surpasses the vaunted 808 that ran on Symbian. The value of having such an awesome camera ultimately depends upon the buyer: fans of iOS and Android with little or no interest in photography are going to dimiss the device as irrelevant. However, people like myself who want to have the best possible image quality from their smartphone will consider this to be a viable purchase option...

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 01:14 2

41. Commentator (Posts: 2169; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)


Of course different people will have different preferences in what is important in a smartphone, and I think it's plain silly that people take PhoneArena's numbering system as seriously as they do.

The way I see it, the numbering system really only applies to high-end flagships that compete in the same price-range and feature-sets (i.e. HTC One, Samsung S4, iPhone 5, etc.), but to compare a mid-range phone or a dedicated camera-phone to a high-end device like the S4 is ridiculous because they are in no way meant to compete with each other.

posted on 24 Jul 2013, 01:47 4

47. UrbanPhantom (Posts: 944; Member since: 30 Oct 2012)


Actually, the Lumia 920/925/928/1020 family give the iPhone 5 and S4 a pretty good run for their money. The only significant weakness are the number of apps for WP8, but virtually all of the major wares are there, excluding the much over-hyped Instagram. Unless you absolutely need 1080P 5' main screen and mini-HDMI out, the S4 offers no big improvements. That's why it didn't sell as well as was expected. The iPhone 5 is slim n' slick, but devoid of basic features like NFC, and that means poor value in my eyes...

The Lumia 1020 is a good smartphone, with the best camera available on the market (bar none). I believe persons who value having a powerful rear camera are still going to buy this device, regardless if it's on WP8 as opposed to iOS or Android.

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Nokia Lumia 1020

Nokia Lumia 1020

OS: Windows Phone 8
view full specs
Display4.5 inches, 768 x 1280 pixels (334 ppi) AMOLED
Camera41 megapixels
Hardware
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960, Dual core, 1500 MHz, Krait processor
2048 MB RAM
Size5.13 x 2.81 x 0.41 inches
(130.4 x 71.4 x 10.4 mm)
5.57 oz  (158 g)
Battery2000 mAh, 19.1 hours talk time

Latest stories