Softbank-Sprint reach a deal with the U.S. over security issues
The security agreement would be the biggest hurdle remaining for Softbank. The deal would require Sprint to have a four-member national-security committee with a security-director that would sit on Sprint's board. Members of the committee would have to be approved by the government. The U.S. government would also get the right to veto Sprint's equipment purchases. The deal would also force the carrier to remove some Chinese sourced equipment from one of its affiliates by 2016. That could cost Sprint more than $1 billion in equipment purchases.
The move by the U.S. government to force Sprint to toss out its Huawei branded equipment used by Clearwire brings up questions about Chinese manufacturers like Huawei and ZTE. Last year, there was concern that the companies could be dealing in espionage while hiding behind what would appear to be a ordinary smartphone manufacturing company. Sprint is on the verge of closing out its acquisition of network wholesaler Clearwire after raising its bid above Dish's offer for the company. Even though the government looks closely at telecom deals involving foreign firms, requesting certain equipment to be removed, and seeking veto power over equipment purchases are quite unusual.
Sprint shareholders are set to vote on the Softbank deal on June 12th.
1. tigermcm (Posts: 560; Member since: 02 Sep 2009)
seriously Dish just let Softbank/Sprint do their thing.
2. lanlaymt (Posts: 2; Member since: 29 May 2013)
I would not trust Cisco either. They bought foreign companies to avoid " US tax".
3. tokuzumi (Posts: 81; Member since: 27 Aug 2009)
Apple and Google do whatever they can to avoid US tax, too.
6. metalpoet (unregistered)
all companies pretty much do that nowadays, even celebrities and pretty much all politicians do that
4. tokuzumi (Posts: 81; Member since: 27 Aug 2009)
I don't like the fact the gov't is going to step in and tell a private company what equipment they can and cannot buy. But if it means sprint *may* use US sourced network components of high quality (high quality is the key), I am fine with that.
5. lsutigers (Posts: 558; Member since: 08 Mar 2009)
The main reason is because Sprint is a huge government contractor, mostly federal gov't. Sprint and AT&T are the only US owned wireless carriers so you can expect a lot of that business to shift to AT&T or maybe this national security committee will keep the business at Sprint, who knows.
Sprint runs the national FBI database DCSNet among other things.