LG might sue Qualcomm if it exclusively modifies the Snapdragon 810 chipset for Samsung
1. Neros (Posts: 1016; Member since: 19 Dec 2014)
Even if modded, it still doesn't stand a chance against exynos. Poor LG.
11. zachki17 (Posts: 261; Member since: 14 Sep 2014)
Lg has her own Home Nuclun processor made by lg .. It octa core 1.5 Quad core and 1.7 quad core the poor is you .
20. TyrionLannister (unregistered)
It's an ARMv7 based cortex a7 + a15 combo and stands no chance against these monsters
23. AfterShock (Posts: 3698; Member since: 02 Nov 2012)
Nuclun is not ready, nor competitive yet.
This is a true fanboy above is my guess
42. cheetah2k (Posts: 1579; Member since: 16 Jan 2011)
Nuclun is s**tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt.. And LG know it.
I can't see how modifying the 810 for "suppliers needs" violates anything against LG. To me it seems Samsung has worked out the issues with the 810, and this could be a positive for all who use the 810.
46. engineer-1701d (unregistered)
No flagship phone with a 1.5 or 1.7 CPU would sell
53. g2a5b0e (Posts: 3724; Member since: 08 Jun 2012)
If you really think that clock speed is the deciding factor in how good a chip set is, you truly know nothing about tech. Change your name. It's completely ironic.
3. vincelongman (Posts: 4445; Member since: 10 Feb 2013)
I can see LG point of view
But they shouldn't have accept Qualcomm's chip if it was overheating
They should have demanded Qualcomm to fix it too
6. mostafawael.1998 (Posts: 240; Member since: 01 Oct 2014)
yes. LG should have insisted on fixing the overheating issues, not just using a bugged chip and suit itself ...
30. nokia12 (Posts: 486; Member since: 19 Nov 2013)
its not easy for LG and xiaomi
they likely figured that every other OEM will be using same SD 810 so every phone will likely overheat the same..
and to avoid any delay in bringing phone to market ( samsung can afford delays)
they both went ahead and used it in their phones in order to have an early sales and advertisement advantage over competitors..'
samsung can do that because they have a ready exynos to fall back on
43. cheetah2k (Posts: 1579; Member since: 16 Jan 2011)
Samsung definitely in the box seat on this one. Whats the worst case for them - Exynos. Is Exynos bad - h3ll no, its an awesome chipset and Qualcomm know it.
The losses Qualcomm could face with Samsung abandoning their chipsets could be excessive.. not to mention a slip in share price and other handset manufacturers questioning the use of the chip...
We may see more manufacturers choosing the Exynos chipset in the future if Qualcomm continue to drop the ball.
34. JumpinJackROMFlash (Posts: 450; Member since: 10 Dec 2014)
They don't have the Exynos as a fallback threat.
44. cheetah2k (Posts: 1579; Member since: 16 Jan 2011)
LG could always go to Mediatek.. Its not a bad chipset TBH
4. HugoBarraCyanogenmod (Posts: 1134; Member since: 06 Jul 2014)
Boycott Qualcomm, crapdragon gonna crap
51. iWin_Droid (Posts: 76; Member since: 22 Jan 2015)
Your dearly Xiaomi products run on Qualcomm's chipsets ;)
52. sorcio46 (Posts: 435; Member since: 27 Jul 2011)
Stay with your anti-modding SoC like Exynos! I'll go with Qualcomm all the way!
5. leotrim (Posts: 21; Member since: 01 Oct 2014)
Samsung will start new age with is Samsung Exynos 7420 a 14nm chip
45. cheetah2k (Posts: 1579; Member since: 16 Jan 2011)
I so hope so. Samsung have spent up big to make Exynos a Snapdragon killr
7. SuperNova (banned) (Posts: 649; Member since: 15 Jan 2015)
Oh no! LG, Samsung is our brother. The real enemies are Apple and Chinese makers.
17. Napalm_3nema (Posts: 2185; Member since: 14 Jun 2013)
These are companies, not humans, and they are competitors to boot. Each and every one would like nothing better than to take out each other, not just Apple. The Android ecosystem isn't comprised of a bunch of buddies, only the fanboys are.
32. willard12 (Posts: 1693; Member since: 04 Jul 2012)
56. g2a5b0e (Posts: 3724; Member since: 08 Jun 2012)
Give me a break. The only reason the other companies are jumping into it is because they know that they could all be affected if Apple wins that suit. It would set a precedent that Apple can do whatever it wants in the court world. You can believe that if that was not the case, they wouldn't care. When that suit is over it will be business like usual.
25. seven7dust (unregistered)
not really LG is Samsungs biggest competitor , ever notice how LG is finally profitable in their phone division , but now samsung lost profit as a direct result.
all the years before 2012/13 samsung was riding high but LG was failing.
LG can never compete with high end smartphones made by Apple, the company's brand value is too inferior , but they can sure as hell compete with samsung and take money from the phone divisions.
29. Kruze (Posts: 1285; Member since: 30 Dec 2014)
How is that relevant? This is all about unfair. Qualcomm is UNFAIR.
35. SuperNova (banned) (Posts: 649; Member since: 15 Jan 2015)
Unfair? I'll tell you what is unfair. Being the biggest patent troll ever, Apple was backed by US court Judge Koh and robbed hard-earned money from Samsung, is it called fair?
8. rd_nest (Posts: 1593; Member since: 06 Jun 2010)
"yet it's somewhat unlikely that it will succeed to produce such large volumes of its Exynos silicons..."
That's a weird statement, specially considering Samsung have their own manufacturing plant and have recently invested a great deal in that once again. On the contrary, as A8 is being manufactured by TSMC now, Samsung foundries will have more chance of producing Exynos if required.
9. Felix_Gatto (Posts: 903; Member since: 03 Jul 2013)
But why Exynos is still exclusive to Samsung and Meizu?
18. elitewolverine (Posts: 5184; Member since: 28 Oct 2013)
cost and just like how ibm chips were exclusive
27. rd_nest (Posts: 1593; Member since: 06 Jun 2010)
Simple, ask LG or HTC. They think taking the processor from their competitor isn't good!
10. Plasticsh1t (Posts: 470; Member since: 01 Sep 2014)
Partially it's LG's fault. They shouldn't accept the SD 810 after knowing there are issues with it.
Snapdragon screwed big time with the 810!!
14. zachki17 (Posts: 261; Member since: 14 Sep 2014)
Sd810 has problemes with Quad HD phone Not Full Hd the G flex Works fine with Sd810 and perform a lot better is a beast
21. AfterShock (Posts: 3698; Member since: 02 Nov 2012)
No one could get crap to run it as it was neutered from running benches on only Flex2 that had 810 in it, so how can you tell us it performs better?
13. GeorgeDao123 (Posts: 431; Member since: 20 Aug 2013)
So why didn't LG think of request Qcom modified chips before making G Flex 2? LG is ridiculous this time.
15. zachki17 (Posts: 261; Member since: 14 Sep 2014)
Sd810 works fine with Poled Full Hd but for G4 and S6 they will come with Quad HD so that the problems
22. AfterShock (Posts: 3698; Member since: 02 Nov 2012)
Lg was going to try an let this slide an push a buggered product onto its own customers.
LG sucks as of right now!
24. Macready (Posts: 965; Member since: 08 Dec 2014)
Hardly. Best G Flex 2 results in Geekbench are in the 4580 range, where the Exynos 7420 tested up to 5480.
But the alarm bells go off when you look at the major spread in results of the G Flex 2. Ranging from 1820 to 4582, with an average just above 3500 out of 260 tests. That's less than 10% above average 805 level in the Note 4. This hints at a lot of throttling.
16. zachki17 (Posts: 261; Member since: 14 Sep 2014)
We shoulf never say lg fault or lg suck .. Because no LG = No tacticle Phone right now .. No iphone and not galaxy
47. engineer-1701d (unregistered)
Go get yourself a tizen phone since you are in India
19. vuyonc (Posts: 1014; Member since: 24 Feb 2014)
Dun dun dun. The SD810 rumour drama continues. Tune in next week same time on the Chipset Channel .
Next episode on "Game of SoCs": House LG finally meet in court with House Qualcomm. Qualcomm, found guilty for tweaking, demands trial by combat. 2 champions will be put to the task. Only one company will survive. The Kingdom of ARM holds its breath!
31. PeterK. (Posts: 296; Member since: 13 Nov 2013)
Valar Snapdraghulis! Okay, we tried, at least!
26. itsdeepak4u2000 (Posts: 3718; Member since: 03 Nov 2012)
Samsung is one of QC's biggest clients and Galaxy S series is best selling devices if Sammy gets out then QC will face big loss.
33. roentgen1108 (Posts: 12; Member since: 21 Jan 2015)
They will sue case against QC after they claim that 810 is still OK and it is the least heat inducing chipset yet the rumors are'nt true? Oh well how about that. Admit it that samsung is their more priority than LG.
48. engineer-1701d (unregistered)
It's proven that the sic throttles power to stop over heating look at the benchmark tests
Lg jumped the gun to show of for ces
36. j2001m (Posts: 2943; Member since: 28 Apr 2014)
Not going to happen and this is why,
Samsung:your 810 cpu is crap and our cpu out scoure it.
qucrapcpu:no problmes mate we send you a 811 In March just in time. For 1$
Samsung:ok we sell them to China as they always buy crap
37. tokuzumi (Posts: 963; Member since: 27 Aug 2009)
If QC makes a slightly modified 810 for Samsung, and another version for everyone else, what's the issue? Assuming processing power is the same, and performance of the chip is within tolerances, it really shouldn't matter. If a customer was going to order millions of one chip, and they asked for a modification, I'd give it to them, since the costs to make the change would be spread out over millions of chips.
39. strudelz100 (Posts: 644; Member since: 20 Aug 2014)
Exynos, Qualcomm, Nvidia, Mediatek: Not going to be much difference between their SoC's in 6 months. Every single one of them are going to be using 4 x A57 and 4 x A53.
And all games are so far within the capabilities of all flagship GPU's; not any point on having the best GPU unless you're one of those people who thinks they can see pixels at 500 ppi, and drags their battery life and performance down with absurd device resolution.
If Snapdragon is having overheating issues only in Samsung devices: It likely means the thermal design of Samsung's future lineup is poorly designed. Which would jive with LG's claims that the 810 does not overheat for them.
It could easily be the kernel in use on Samsung devices as well. Or aggressive background processes, likely errors in the software causing heating.
54. j2001m (Posts: 2943; Member since: 28 Apr 2014)
Sorry I am lost all the geekbenth scores show they overheat, it as nothing to do with Samsung design, they just saying we are not going to limit the phone and make it crap like lg and htc, I.e. Use a 2k screen will not work on the 810 to they get it fixed in the 811
41. mike2959 (Posts: 538; Member since: 08 Oct 2011)
Stupid lawsuit. A manufacturer can make a product better for a particular vendor if he chooses. Here we go again let's sue because everyone and everything has to be the same. LG just pissed because they settled for whatever, and Sammy say nope not gonna settle. Jack wagons.
50. julian6.0 (Posts: 27; Member since: 29 Jan 2014)
i kind of get where LG is going qualcomm did say i did not over heat the manufacturer claimed that it's one of the least heat-inducing chipsets currently available on the market. why would they say this. so if they do modify then they are actually agreeing that there is a problem and they still didnt fix and let LG go ahead with the release. now LG feels left out they should sue cuz they should´ve fixed it first if it was overheating.
55. j2001m (Posts: 2943; Member since: 28 Apr 2014)
Geekbenth scores show they all full of crap