x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Home
  • News
  • Google selling Motorola makes sense because it gives Google more power over Android (and Samsung)

Google selling Motorola makes sense because it gives Google more power over Android (and Samsung)

Google selling Motorola makes sense because it gives Google more power over Android (and Samsung)
Today's news that Google was selling its Motorola devices division to Lenovo for $2.91 billion was shocking, but it probably shouldn't have been much of a surprise. Maybe I'm not the normal user, but I am a huge fan of the Moto X and what Motorola has been doing, and I've already run through the five stages of grief in the past few hours since the deal was announced.

When the rumor first came out, I thought it couldn't be real, but given that it was reported by Reuters, it was hard to deny. I got a bit angry, because I had literally just bought my Moto X last month, and I considered the bargaining aspect of maybe selling my Moto X in protest. I was sad about the prospects of Motorola's amazing products, but soon accepted the news as more details came out. 

Larry Page has said that "Lenovo intends to keep Motorola’s distinct brand identity", which right now means a focus on near-stock Android software and the Moto Maker customizations. And, to ease the other concerns that lingered, the news came out that Google is not selling the Motorola Advanced Technology Projects group, meaning that Project Ara and other "moonshot" ideas like security tattoos and biotech sensors are staying with Google. 

Rationally, it makes sense


All that leaves is the rational thinking and conspiracy theories that will inevitably surround this deal. Starting with the rational side of it: this move was likely inevitable. From the moment Google purchased Motorola for $12.5 billion, the prevailing idea was that the deal was mostly about the patents, and we always assumed that Google would likely offload the hardware divisions because Google is at heart a software company, not a hardware company. That assumption was validated early on when Google sold the set-top box division of Motorola to Arris for $2.35 billion. Google likely boosted the value of the
Google selling Motorola makes sense because it gives Google more power over Android (and Samsung)
Motorola smartphone division from where it was when Google first purchased the group; and if you combine the set-top box sale with this one, that adds up to $5.26 billion plus whatever licensing fees are coming from the Motorola patents. That brings the cost of the Motorola patent portfolio down to under $7.24 billion, which isn't so bad for 24,000+ patents to help protect the Android ecosystem.

The surprise came then because Motorola didn't unload the smartphone division, and actually let it run in a very Googley way. Google was running Motorola as a separate entity, but it was obvious that Motorola was making its product decisions with influence from Google. The Motorola custom software disappeared in favor of near-stock Android with only a few choice improvements, which were added as apps that could be updated through Google Play, meaning much faster system updates. Motorola adopted AMOLED displays in a way that Google had always hoped manufacturers would. And, Motorola offered choice, not just by breaking Motorola's long-standing partnership with Verizon and bringing the Moto X to other U.S. carriers, and the Moto G internationally, but through the Moto Maker and the deeper customization available there. 

Of course, through all of this, Motorola has consistently lost money for Google, and estimates say that in total since Google acquired Motorola in 2011, the division has lost close to $2 billion for Google. Google is expected to announce its Q4 earnings tomorrow, so we'll see if Motorola has been able to slow the bleeding at all since it ramped up the Moto Maker offerings and began the rollout of the Moto G, but even if it has it would only point towards reasons why Lenovo is buying and not to value that Google is getting. 

Even so, the profit margins for most smartphone makers is pretty low, somewhere around 2-3%. The only manufacturers that can command more than that on a consistent basis are Samsung and Apple. Given the recent price drops of the Moto X, and the low margins on the Moto G, Motorola had very little chance of generating profits. It was assumed that maybe, like other Google properties, profits didn't matter so much as the changes that Motorola could instigate in the market. But, conquering the emerging markets was inevitable, the quality of the Moto G likely just sped up the improvements in low-end hardware that were coming anyway. The other big change Motorola was poised to make was with the modular phone idea of Project Ara, but Google is keeping hold of that with this deal anyway. 

Larry Page said in his blog post on the deal that the reason Google was selling Motorola was because the only way to be successful in the smartphone market was to be "all-in". That was something Google couldn't do, and it seemed like the road was a long one for Motorola to make it to the "all-in" status as well. Motorola had started by focusing solely on the U.S., and it had just recently begun expanding into Europe and South America. But, if you combine Motorola with Lenovo, which has seen success in Asia, that is a formidable combination, especially if Lenovo really does let Motorola continue as it has been going. It is always possible that Google wants Motorola to succeed, and sees this as the best option for that. 

Google made us all feel like it was really going to continue supporting Motorola, but in reality the honeymoon couldn't last, because the company was being run in a bit too Googley a way. The Moto X didn't gather much customer support, so the other Android hardware makers didn't get too worried, but then the Moto G came out, and that likely ruffled some feathers, not the least of which were the feathers of Samsung, because emerging markets is the big growth market of the future for smartphone makers. 

The Samsung conspiracy


Google and Samsung have had something of a tense relationship recently, because Samsung controls a huge amount of the Android ecosystem, but has also been edging away from Google with its own content stores on its Galaxy devices as well as its own mobile OS in the works with Tizen. Last week, the big news came down that Google and Samsung had agreed on a global cross-licensing patent deal; and today, we learned that the talks between Google have
Google selling Motorola makes sense because it gives Google more power over Android (and Samsung)
continued and widened. It has been rumored that Samsung has agreed to possibly kill off its Android-hiding Magazine UX that it had planned for its new line of tablets, and also to promote Google Play content rather than its own stores. 

When the report of that came out, we were careful to mention that there has been no report of what Google's side of the agreement might be in this deal with Samsung. There is almost no way that Samsung would agree to do something as drastic as promoting Google Play over its own stores if it weren't getting something in return. It's possible that Google agreed to waive the Google Play Store licensing fees, or maybe it took a lesser part of the patent deal in order to get Samsung to cooperate on this. Google might have agreed to give Samsung the reigns on the Nexus devices coming up.

But, what if this is Google's payment for Samsung agreeing to tone down its Android software? Maybe Samsung asked for one thing: for Google to be completely out of the smartphone hardware business. Obviously, it's unlikely that Google could have pulled off the deal with Lenovo all that quickly. Maybe Google has been in preliminary talks with companies about selling Motorola from before, but wasn't very serious about making a deal. Samsung likely would have known that the possibility was there, and maybe Samsung pushed a bit once the talks with Google began early this year. Both sides get what they want: Google gets a more Android-friendly Samsung, and Samsung gets Google out of the smartphone business. 

Conclusion


I used a lot of maybes in that last passage, because there's no way to know right now if any of that speculation is accurate. But, the reports about the new deal between Samsung and Google have said that there was a "sea change" in the relationship between the two sides, and that there will be more details coming because there are more deals in the works. Samsung and Google are likely still talking through this new partnership and what each side can offer the other. Whatever paths the talks are taking, Google is in a far better bargaining position to get what it wants, and what the Android ecosystem needs, if Google isn't a direct competitor with Samsung. That means selling Motorola would a necessary move for Google. 

The idea extends beyond Samsung as well. Google likely found it more difficult in negotiating any deals with hardware partners while it had Motorola in its stable. Sure, having Motorola would give Google a way to strongarm partners, but Google has always been a company to lead with a carrot rather than a stick. And, there are enough new mobile platforms springing up, including Samsung's own Tizen, that hardware partners could threaten to abandon Android just as much as Google could possibly threaten to take over the hardware of Android itself. 

Google is not Microsoft, and Android is not Windows Phone. Windows Phone has had its success almost entirely through the work of Nokia. Android has been successful because of the myriad hardware makers pushing devices worldwide, which is something Google could never do on its own. So, any potential threat of Google using Motorola would easily be outweighed by losing other hardware partners, meaning that in the end, Motorola had to go, no matter how much we (I) may have come to love the Google Motorola. 

62 Comments
  • Options
    Close




posted on 29 Jan 2014, 20:21 1

1. jphillips63 (Posts: 184; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)


Sounds like here it's a power play in who has the biggest set of balls.

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 21:07 12

16. nokia12 (Posts: 326; Member since: 19 Nov 2013)


great article Michael..
this is how a partnership should be , equal and mutual benefits for both..
unlike Microsoft Nokia ..where 1 just rips off the other until its worthless and then grabs it for pennies..

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 22:27 1

37. blazee (Posts: 305; Member since: 02 Jan 2012)


This is seriously disappointing. i have the moto x and i love it its a great device, but now without google behind it i feel like it wont be getting the same support. I recently just got it and i think im gonna now return it

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 20:26 2

2. BattleBrat (Posts: 1142; Member since: 26 Oct 2011)


Now I must turn to Sony, but they don't have anything for Verizon
Goodbye MOTO :-(

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 20:34 6

4. E.S.1 (Posts: 293; Member since: 14 Sep 2013)


You should consider LG G2. It's an awesome phone.
I used GS4 and HTC One but LG is so much better you will like it.

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 20:47 7

8. __0__ (banned) (Posts: 242; Member since: 07 Jan 2014)


The software is like touchwiz , bloaty and heavy on LG . I seriously dislike skins like LG UI and s**twiz .

Battlebrat should change to GSM carriers so he could bring in whatever he wants

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 20:51 1

11. BattleBrat (Posts: 1142; Member since: 26 Oct 2011)


I have a note 3 on t mo as well, I can confirm that the UI is horribly bloated, the RAZR is nearly as fast and its two years older

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 20:58 2

15. domfonusr (Posts: 372; Member since: 17 Jan 2014)


If my LG Viper can run LG's UI half-decently, then the G2 should be downright smooth and buttery. Even if it isn't, don't worry... its Android, so you have options.

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 21:17

20. EarnYourLeather (Posts: 87; Member since: 14 Feb 2012)


It is. There is virtually no lag.

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 21:32 2

25. DigitalJedi_X2 (banned) (Posts: 346; Member since: 30 Jan 2012)


The G2 is insanely smooth. I haven't encountered any lag at all yet.

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 21:45

31. PBXtech (Posts: 980; Member since: 21 Oct 2013)


On the G2 it runs insanely smooth. I find a lot of the features are extremely helpful as well. Coming from being a die hard Nexus fan, the G2 surprises me all the time.

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 20:29

3. darkkjedii (Posts: 12340; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)


Wow, sounds like trouble in paradise. I can't blame Samsung for pushing ahead with Tizen, but android propelled them into the lime light, from simple feature phones. If they do leave android, which means they'll become a huge and direct competitor, that won't be good google...stay tuned.

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 20:40 3

7. joey_sfb (Posts: 3085; Member since: 29 Mar 2012)


Well let just say they realize they need each other to continue to prosper.

Damn I do like the magazine ux interface. Can google work with flipboard to bring it to lollipop?

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 20:34

5. domfonusr (Posts: 372; Member since: 17 Jan 2014)


I'm not entirely convinced. I read elsewhere that, of the 17,000 Motorola patents in Google's possession, they are willingly parting with 10,000 of them. That is a big chunk that they are losing by letting Moto go. Why are they giving up so many? Are those 10,000 not considered valuable? I wish I knew the answers to these questions. I'll be looking around for answers.

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 21:28 3

23. nokia12 (Posts: 326; Member since: 19 Nov 2013)


as per verge only 2000 patents will be transfered while rest will be licenced...

these 2000 patents must be old hardware related.. that's why google not keeping them..

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 21:41 1

29. domfonusr (Posts: 372; Member since: 17 Jan 2014)


Okay, I found the Verge article you cite:

http://www.theverge.com/2014/1/29/5358620/lenovo-reportedly-buying-motorola-mobility-from-google

I have also read elsewhere, and it is worth noting, that the Moto patent portfolio failed to get the money they demanded form Microsoft back in 2010, and failed to elicit an ITC decision that would have blocked imports of the iPhone more recently. Perhaps they are letting go of that clump of them because they were proven to be valueless in the mobile patent wars.

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 21:40

28. elitewolverine (Posts: 1917; Member since: 28 Oct 2013)


My though would be that they bought Moto to do patent protection, they have since found that their portfolio is outdated and doesn't protect them much against the likes of Apple or other companies. They are spending more than they are worth in defending them. With samsungs patents Google can now chew more of those up in terms of usage without penalty.

What we may see is a google Samsung ui next year, that google will use as the new 'stock' interface and probably introduce it as lime 5.0 or whatever.

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 21:44

30. domfonusr (Posts: 372; Member since: 17 Jan 2014)


Here's the problem with Samsung's patents: they get invalidated and beaten in many instances. I don't trust Samsung's patents to protect Google any more than they protect Samsung.

I really really hope that Google doesn't use any of Samsung's UI's for stock Android... that could prove to be disastrous.

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 22:42 1

40. Taters (Posts: 3492; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


They might get invalidated in the states but that's more because of stupid jurors and Apple being the United States super power more than the patents themselves.

They got ITC to ban iPhones but Obama stepped in. I wouldn't say they are bad at all.

posted on 30 Jan 2014, 12:33

54. domfonusr (Posts: 372; Member since: 17 Jan 2014)


Yeah, but what good are patents if that keeps on happening over and over again? If the cronyism reigns supreme, and patents are invalidated on the whim of some power player who has already personally picked a winner, regardless of patents, then what good are those patents? Apple is clearly the 'chosen one' for the higher ups in a lot of these cases. Apple has become so strong of a poster child for US commerce that the President personally overturns ITC rulings to defend them. No patent can beat that. They're unbeatable because they have the favor of the right people.

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 20:40

6. ProblemSolver15 (Posts: 165; Member since: 14 Jun 2010)


Definitely a shake-up in the world of consumer electronics. This can either be very bad or very good for consumers because removing Motorola from the playing board can certainly mean no more Motorola devices on Verizon here in the States. I mean, who knows what Lenovo will do with the device department for Motorola. Guess we'll just have to see. I'm interested to see how how his will play out. They were a major manufacturer here in the US.

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 20:47

9. __0__ (banned) (Posts: 242; Member since: 07 Jan 2014)


Damn , even I am a note 3 user serisouly dislike samsung now . They so evil

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 20:50

10. pongkie (Posts: 505; Member since: 20 Aug 2011)


I feel sorry for Lenovo all they got from this deal is a brand

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 20:54

13. domfonusr (Posts: 372; Member since: 17 Jan 2014)


... and 10,000 mobile telecom patents.

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 21:29 3

24. DigitalJedi_X2 (banned) (Posts: 346; Member since: 30 Jan 2012)


Google isn't losing 10,000 patents. Google already stated that they will keep the vast majority of Motos patents.

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 21:45 1

32. domfonusr (Posts: 372; Member since: 17 Jan 2014)


Yep, just read that at the Verge thanks to nokia12.

2,000 patents. That's still a decent chunk.

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 21:46

33. elitewolverine (Posts: 1917; Member since: 28 Oct 2013)


licensed not keep, meaning when that runs out google does not own the patents, Lenovo will. This is to ensure Lenovo doesn't get crazy and allows google time to use the patents with free of fear. And also some leverage. In the end though license and owning are two different things. Unless I misread the article, in that way, my bad.

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 21:57

34. domfonusr (Posts: 372; Member since: 17 Jan 2014)


Well, first I read:

http://www.phonearena.com/news/Official-Google-sells-Motorola-to-Lenovo-for-2.91-billion_id51970

where the 10,000 figure was cited from China Daily. Then I read the article from the Verge (cited above in comment #29), where they say that 2,000 patents are being sold (transferred) while the rest are being licensed out to Lenovo (without any reference to them being transferred upon the end of the licensing term). I read that as Google keeping 15,000 of their Motorola-sourced patents, which they will license to Lenovo until the end of term, or until further notice for all I know. Otherwise, I know very little, and I am asking questions with the hope that I'll find out what is really going on from the folks who have found the sources that I haven't yet found.

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 20:53 1

12. QWIKSTRIKE (Posts: 903; Member since: 09 Mar 2010)


Lenovo took IBM PC division and look at them now I think Lenovo, and Motorola may turn a few heads in the future.

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 20:58 1

14. BattleBrat (Posts: 1142; Member since: 26 Oct 2011)


I must admit they did wonders for their PC division, one of the worlds largest if memory serves. But the new think pads don't have that IBM "soul" and I fear the new motos won't either, I thought the moto X wasn't a true moto till I saw the 4G radio comparison where it buried the competition, then I knew the Moto X was a true moto, strong radios and all. We will see if moto keeps its "soul"

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 21:08

17. 14545 (Posts: 1138; Member since: 22 Nov 2011)


So will this mean no more inexpensive phones from MOTO, and back to the super expensive flagships? BTW MH, how's your screen on time on the X?

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 21:12 2

18. Sniggly (Posts: 7177; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)


I've decided to sit back and watch this one. I still don't like the deal one bit, but there does seem to be some business logic behind the move.

I'm pleased to see that Ara, at least, is staying with Google. Perhaps it'll be the next evolution of the Nexus line?

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 21:16

19. nctx77 (Posts: 554; Member since: 03 Sep 2013)


The bottom line is that Google doesn't make phones, they make android. I have also heard that the Nexus devices will end in 2015 to focus on Google play devices. The Moto x will now be basically a Lenovo phone.

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 21:20 1

21. Taters (Posts: 3492; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


I really doubt that Samsung really cares about doing Nexus devices. They are probably their least successful products. The Nexus 10 is brilliant but it didn't sell much.

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 22:32

38. Adrian38 (Posts: 134; Member since: 05 Nov 2012)


The Nexus devices are incredibly successful. They are among some of the most desired devices on the market. You have to remember that the Nexus line of devices were never meant to sell millions and millions of devices. Google stated that from the start.

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 22:37

39. Taters (Posts: 3492; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


That isn't Samsung's idea of success.

posted on 30 Jan 2014, 15:28

57. Jillxz (Posts: 147; Member since: 04 Jun 2012)


But not successful to the mainstream of consumers.

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 21:20

22. xperiaDROID (banned) (Posts: 5629; Member since: 08 Mar 2013)


All I can say that Google is a irresponsible company, buy Motorola and make few phones then sell it off to Lenovo because of Samsung. Samsung is a evil company, really. Samsung may be the one who will kill the Nexus line as well.

But oh well, good luck to Motorola and Lenovo. Hope they can work together and make more awesome phones in the future

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 21:59

35. alltechinside (Posts: 247; Member since: 21 Apr 2013)


Lol saying samsung is evil with no evidence to back up.... Did you seriously even read the article? Besides, there is no way Google can somehow sell it to Lenovo over a short span (after the agreement between samsung and google). google was probably thinking of selling motorola beforehand. They even made sure not to sell patents and project ara.

But yes, I'm unhappy to see motorola go bye bye. Moto X was an interesting product and I was interested in using one...

Not sure whether Lenovo's influence is going to be good or not.... it's just disappointing though.. I think we will be seeing lenovo skins soon enough :(

posted on 30 Jan 2014, 00:28 1

46. Commentator (Posts: 2467; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)


Uh, they kill kittens and steal candy from little boys and girls. What more evidence do you want?

Anyways, I don't get why everyone's so hostile towards Samsung over this. Google was going to sell Moto regardless, and if they weren't, Samsung would have every right to be irritated with them. Samsung certainly didn't kill Moto. In fact, I expect Motorola to be far more successful under Lenovo than under Google, whose forte clearly isn't running hardware companies.

I see Google as the villain here, (apparently) strong-arming Samsung into ditching Magazine UX, which I think was a pretty neat development into Android.

posted on 30 Jan 2014, 03:58

49. wolfsaviorzx (unregistered)


Main reason everyone is so hostile towards samsung, is samsung doesn't care about android and would abandon it in a minute if people would switch over to Tizen. If you notice how Samsung has become like Apple in blocking 3rd Party accessories and preventing competition from using theirs.

posted on 30 Jan 2014, 10:54

53. g2a5b0e (Posts: 2550; Member since: 08 Jun 2012)


Is that right?

http://www.phonearena.com/news/Update-being-sent-to-Samsung-Galaxy-Note-3-to-fix-a-problem-with-third-party-S-View-cases_id51888

People only see what they want to see.

posted on 30 Jan 2014, 15:35

58. Jillxz (Posts: 147; Member since: 04 Jun 2012)


I'm glad Google did . We don't need a windows lookung phone in Android. If you love that UI so much , go to Windows .

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 22:56

42. NokiaFTW (Posts: 2054; Member since: 24 Oct 2012)


Samsung may also be the one to kill Android all together.

posted on 30 Jan 2014, 15:37

59. Jillxz (Posts: 147; Member since: 04 Jun 2012)


yep . I think that is quite possible. I really dislike samsung a lot and I don't wish it well at all. Sorry . it's just another Apple.

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 21:36 2

26. glentomas123 (Posts: 70; Member since: 01 Jun 2011)


Google acquired Moto for ownership of its IP portfolio. That got what they wanted.

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 21:40

27. navi13 (Posts: 2; Member since: 29 Jan 2014)


..this makes me feel sad..i've always been a motofanatic since my first motorola phone..the C380, then my E398, next was my SLVR L7i, and my ROKR Z6w which i couldn't use already because it's battery was already dead..but hey, still functional!
i really love motorola phones! i wish i could be able to have a moto x or even a moto g (dual sim version).

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 22:08 1

36. fireblade (Posts: 714; Member since: 27 Dec 2013)


Noooo.... Chinese company is gonna destroy it.

posted on 29 Jan 2014, 22:50 1

41. NokiaFTW (Posts: 2054; Member since: 24 Oct 2012)


It does make sense since Samsung is slowly slipping away from Google and trying to create an ecosystem of its own. Now, after selling Motorola, Google can try to control Android (and Samsung) a little bit more. Samsung is a bigger threat to Android (and Google) than any other OS in the world.

posted on 30 Jan 2014, 00:04

44. networkdood (Posts: 6301; Member since: 31 Mar 2010)


Google makes money from the sales of Android devices through ads, and is not seeking to control Android, as it cannot, unless it were to make it a closed ecosystem, such as Apple's iOS. Any company can take Android and create its own flavor from it, as Amazon did.

posted on 30 Jan 2014, 04:01

50. wolfsaviorzx (unregistered)


Google controls Android (as they create the new verions). I don't think they really want Android to be the future though. If you look at Chrome OS, it's quite obvious they invested in Android to fight off Apple. Not because they see it as the final OS solution (both Android and IOS have serious design flaws that will kill each if changes aren't made eventually).

posted on 30 Jan 2014, 15:38

60. Jillxz (Posts: 147; Member since: 04 Jun 2012)


It just might be the other way around lol. Samsung might control Google.

posted on 30 Jan 2014, 00:03

43. networkdood (Posts: 6301; Member since: 31 Mar 2010)


Google did well with this deal - I had a Motorola phone - disappointed that its bootloader was never unlocked...swore never to purchase another Motorola smartphone as they are mostly just a bunch of mid range phones...

posted on 30 Jan 2014, 00:07

45. networkdood (Posts: 6301; Member since: 31 Mar 2010)


Rather own an LG, Samsung, Asus, Sony product than a Motorola product and millions of people around the world think the same - Motorola must change people's minds on its offerings and the stuff that came out since the Droid RAZR was just marginally ok, although, I did love my DROID RAZR and the look and feel of the device.

posted on 30 Jan 2014, 01:30

47. kaikuheadhunterz (Posts: 771; Member since: 18 Jul 2013)


It's a pity that Motorola's new devices didn't come to Southeast Asia

posted on 30 Jan 2014, 03:12

48. Altair (Posts: 333; Member since: 02 Feb 2012)


BB blocked Lenovo because of a real security issues. Now Lenovo can make even bigger and better strike in form of Motorola. It is now Chinese based company (which has close relationship with Chinese communist goverment) that holds hand over the heart of Motorola and its users. Wondering why USA lets this happen, while Canada didin't?

posted on 30 Jan 2014, 15:41

61. Jillxz (Posts: 147; Member since: 04 Jun 2012)


American greed . The greediest country of them all.

posted on 30 Jan 2014, 16:46 1

62. g2a5b0e (Posts: 2550; Member since: 08 Jun 2012)


Please show me your proof of Lenovo's close relationship with the Chinese communist government. Don't be the guy who makes up conspiracy theories when you can't back it up. That just makes you a liar.

posted on 30 Jan 2014, 07:30 1

51. aksa123 (Posts: 226; Member since: 30 Jan 2014)


With this, I hope motorola will enter asian markets. And drop the price :)

posted on 30 Jan 2014, 08:34

52. boosook (Posts: 1072; Member since: 19 Nov 2012)


About the Samsung deal, that's exactly what I thought. Add the rumors that from 2015 Samsung won't sell Windows notebooks anymore but only Chromebooks, that it will release its own version of smart glasses and that Google will ditch the Nexus line and we have a well defined scenario: Google and Samsung made a deal. Google gave Samsung its patents and promised not to make hardware anymore (both directly and via Motorola), Samsung promised not to drop Android in favor of Tizen and maybe also to favor Android versus Windows. And Motorola was the victim to sacrifice.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories