Apple denied preliminary injunction against Galaxy Nexus, Galaxy Tab 10.1N
A preliminary injunction – wherein a court allows you to temporarily ban a competitor’s product until a final ruling is handed down – can be a powerful tool to halt sales in the fast-paced mobile devices market. A two month injunction leading up to the holidays, for example, could cost a company the majority of sales for one product cycle, especially when newer phones (or tablets) may be introduced in 4-6 months.
But so far the attempts at a preliminary injunction have largely met with failure. Samsung as yet to win a single preliminary injunction against Apple in the European theater of war….err…litigation, and while Apple won one against the Galaxy Tab 10.1, the redesigned 10.1N appears likely to escape.
According to Florian Mueller of FOSS Patents, Apple most likely selected the Munich court for this attempt because of the presumed friendliness of the Munich court to preliminary injunctions. Yet the court turned down the attempt, with the presiding Judge stating: “Samsung has shown that it is more likely than not that the patent will be revoked because of a technology that was already on the market before the intellectual property had been filed for protection.”
We have a suggestion for Apple and Samsung: Lay off the preliminary injunction requests. You lawsuits aren’t making friends with anyone, it’s almost impossible to know which tech patents are valid until a verdict is reached, and you hurt customers when you reduce their product choices without even securing a court ruling.
So stop it, and get back to winning consumers’ hearts by building a superior product, rather than preventing stores from stocking someone else’s mobile gadget.
source: Bloomberg, FOSS Patents
18. Droid_X_Doug posted on 01 Feb 2012, 20:51 6 0
Other than a couple of recent iterations, things haven't exactly been going Apple's way on the patent front. Even Germany is not entirely in Apple's camp.
But I will bet the attorneys have got college funds in place for their kids as a result of the litigation.
2. squallz506 posted on 01 Feb 2012, 15:13 9 2
what patents is the GNex suspected of infringing? nice try apple.
3. GALAXY-S posted on 01 Feb 2012, 15:18 13 3
slowly but surely apple get peoples hate for using this strategy of competition
7. JeffdaBeat posted on 01 Feb 2012, 15:41 7 5
Actually, if you ask the general public, the vast...VAST majority of them have no clue this is going on. Apple will be just fine.
11. GALAXY-S posted on 01 Feb 2012, 16:09 5 2
yea exactly, the VAST majority doesnt know YET , but in time they will.. and im making sure they know aswell for those that are not informed
13. JeffdaBeat posted on 01 Feb 2012, 16:19 3 0
Apple has been suing people for years now. Apple's lawsuits aren't as interesting as the next Apple product...which is why no one really knows what's going on. But...whatevs. Do what you'd like man.
4. ivanko34 posted on 01 Feb 2012, 15:21 3 2
very sad day for apple fans if germany is no more friend with the apple gestapo
5. gallitoking posted on 01 Feb 2012, 15:28 4 18
"So stop it, and get back to winning consumers’ hearts by building a superior product, rather than preventing stores from stocking someone else’s mobile gadget."- as far as i know Apple is not violating any laws by doing this.. is in their right to do whatever they pleased if it is within the law.. so PA stop with this nonsense... they are within their right... and they have more than a year doing it.. and based on sales.. consumer dont care.. as long the released a new iphone every year and a redesign every 2 years I am happy.. and so is millions of current Apple consumers...
8. Scott_H posted on 01 Feb 2012, 15:43 10 1
You're also within your legal rights to not hold the door open for little old ladies - that doesn't make it a stance we endorse. Both companies are completely within their legal rights in asking for preliminary injunctions, but that doesn't change the fact that it's an anti-consumer move.
9. gallitoking posted on 01 Feb 2012, 15:52 2 7
usually companies dont cater to consumer. even though we are the ones that buy their product... so get back at me when Moto has unlocked the bootloaders on their cell phones.. like they promised... another anti-consumer move.. I can go on and on about companies that have little regard for consumers... all comoanies are out for money and.. as consumer either you buy the product or dont buy it...
10. medicci37 posted on 01 Feb 2012, 15:59 6 2
@gallitoking I see you are exercising your right to be a Asshole! You sound like one of the 1%.Thinking people are supposed to stop commenting because you tell them 2. Lol
17. stealthd posted on 01 Feb 2012, 19:45 2 1
Nothing more stupid than someone who laughs at their own post, which doesn't make sense.
21. atheisticemetic posted on 02 Feb 2012, 08:43 0 0
PA stop "nonsense" that lets people know how foolish these companies are behaving?
you're right people with either buy a product or not, but what ultimately defines my decision is the integrity of the product and how they go about doing their business
you are an Apple troll....try working for one of apples sweatshops and we'll talk
6. mukrenol posted on 01 Feb 2012, 15:38 3 1
hee hee... apple must have tick off the judge whom wanted to buy a samsung tablet but could not because of the stupid injunction
and good one PA finally seeing that the companies should focus on products and customers and not trashing each other in court
14. jove39 posted on 01 Feb 2012, 16:48 7 1
Apple is so obsessed with their current iOS devices...that they can't think of anything new now...(don't start with iCloud and Siri...things like that are in existence from years) and trying to prevent other companies from making successful products...Apple should now get out of money wasting work ethics and start in believing a market where healthy competition exist.
15. frydaexiii posted on 01 Feb 2012, 19:01 3 1
Apple is kinda like a kid who's been home schooled his entire life, and when he goes to work in public, he whining and bitching about how horrible the world is...
16. NewForce posted on 01 Feb 2012, 19:07 3 1
Not again crazy Apple bast***. Just please try to remeber,
"Apple Invented nothing, but only re-invented OTHER PEOPLE INVENTION".
So Apple are just "A GREATEST COPYCAT OF ALL TIME" company.
Tim Cook should be more man and man by himself than the mad Steve Job. He should also be man enough to put a stop to this craziness started by crazy Steve.
Cellphone industry are so peaceful before Apple came into the play. It's just like all other products like Car, Truck, Motocycle, Bicycle, TV, Washer, Video Recorder, Digital Camera you named it was never in the situation like what the crazy Apple did. Maybe Apple should be banned from making any cellphone or mobile tablet devices.
Apple, it's not 1st of April yet, so please stop your Apple foolishness will ya?
19. thinking posted on 02 Feb 2012, 02:28 2 0
"“Samsung has shown that it is more likely than not that the patent will be revoked because of a technology that was already on the market before the intellectual property had been filed for protection.”
This proves that Apple STOLE technology. Ideally, by Apple's standards, their products should be banned from sale.
20. atheisticemetic posted on 02 Feb 2012, 08:40 0 0
im thinking i wont buy an apple or samsung product again...
silly children, when will they grow up?
22. troybuilt posted on 02 Feb 2012, 16:04 0 0
Apple's strategy. Take out the competition through the courts and ban the sales. Make Apple the only device in all retail locations. I think Apple is upset because they didn't come up with the Android OS, so they want to take every company to court to ban their sales. They don't want competition.
23. troybuilt posted on 02 Feb 2012, 16:06 0 0
lol @atheisticemetic it's not Samsung, it's Apple. Samsung had nothing to do with it till Apple started taking them to court for their puny patents. Samsung makes great products.
24. InspectorGadget80 posted on 02 Feb 2012, 22:52 0 0
I GIVE APPLE N GALLITOKING A BIG f**k U!