Dutch court denies Apple's request for Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 injunction

Dutch court denies Apple's request for Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 injunction
Apple was hoping to get a sales ban against the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 in the Netherlands, citing eery similarity to its own iPad 2 tablet, and including some pretty generic design sketches.

The request has now also been denied by an appeals court, with the judge basically saying that while the two slates sport some similarities, they are not as broad as Apple was trying to portray them, similar to what the Californian judge said in the lawsuit there.

Samsung has its EU logistics hub in the Netherlands, and, at one point, it was feared that Samsung might have to reshuffle its distribution chain in Europe to sell its flagship tablet there, if an injunction took place in the land of windmills.

This might also have repercussions in Germany, where the Galaxy Tab 10.1 sales were banned before the holidays, and Samsung filed an appeal, thus eventually resulting in lifting the ban there as well, and leaving the final design right infringement verdicts for the trials later this year.

source: FOSSPatents



1. mullman85

Posts: 12; Member since: Dec 28, 2011

Way to go Sammy!!!

2. Droid_X_Doug

Posts: 5993; Member since: Dec 22, 2010

I wonder how much Apple has spent pursuing sales bans against Sammy's products? Other than in Germany, I don't see the expenditure bringing much benefit to Apple. And if someone in Germany really wants a Sammy tablet, I doubt they aren't getting one. This is just arrogance taken to a higher level courtesy of Apple's pile of cash.

10. JonGarrett

Posts: 34; Member since: Aug 06, 2011

apple reportedly spent $100 million on its lawsuits against HTC so I suppose they spent maybe twice as much against Samsung. either way, its a waste of money, time and resources.

3. remixfa

Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008

way to keep losing, apple :)

4. kshell1

Posts: 1143; Member since: Oct 05, 2011

DENIED!!!!!!!!!!! again :)

5. mctcm

Posts: 204; Member since: Oct 19, 2011

the amusing irony of this is that the more injunctions that are lost, the more likely it is that precedence will be set against their claims making it that much more difficult to bring suit in the future

6. theBankRobber

Posts: 682; Member since: Sep 22, 2011

Apple can only play the same card over and over again until somebody grows some balls and put a end to this BS

7. ZEUS.the.thunder.god unregistered

i am delighted. good job done sammy

8. thinking

Posts: 130; Member since: Jan 19, 2012

Apple's squarish tab looks suspiciously similar to squarish TVs and monitors and movie screens people have been using. Will someone apply for an injunction against all squarish Apple products?

9. taz89

Posts: 2014; Member since: May 03, 2011

wait how can this be possible?Samsung copied apples rectangle its so obvious....lol it was only a matter of time before the courts got its sense together.

11. TKFox007

Posts: 303; Member since: Nov 02, 2010

You'd think that with all these losses that Apple would just quit and accept Android as a worthy opponent to iOS.

13. ilia1986 unregistered

That means that they are going to make iOS more user customizable... Unfortunately - not going to happen. My iPhone 4 will never have Widgets it seems. /cries

12. MorePhonesThanNeeded

Posts: 645; Member since: Oct 23, 2011

So because of the founders vendetta against Android, instead of making money through deals and such you waste non refundable money on frivolous lawsuits. So on top of not making cash, you are also spending cash that could have been used for something like making the products cost a little less or more R&D. This is the type of crap that business corps can't stand, emotions. They ruin a perfectly good strategy with illogical, ridiculous thought processes and can cost you billions if you are a publicly traded company. Matters not how much money you have in reserves, investors like one thing, making money and when you make moves that start losing money they get concerned. How long do you think Apple can continue this sort of nonsense before their investors have had enough? In this ecosystem of technology it's pretty tough to keep a large company at bay with product bans, they have the resources to fix the offending piece and then get it out to market quickly then what?

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.
FCC OKs Cingular's purchase of AT&T Wireless