Qualcomm could be fined $900 million by South Korea over patent abuse

Qualcomm could be fined $900 million by South Korea over patent abuse
Qualcomm may face a $900 million fine if the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) of South Korea finds the company guilty of abusing its patents. According to allegations, Qualcomm has charged Korean manufacturers unreasonably steep fees for licensing its products, thus violating the principle of fair market competition. The first verdict of the FTC will be revealed on July 20, and should Qualcomm be found guilty of preliminary allegations, the company may face the largest fine ever issued by the FTC of South Korea.

An FTC official, speaking to The Korea Times, had this to say on the matter:



Qualcomm has been collecting royalties from manufacturers on a per-product basis, calculating the fees based on the value of the whole product, rather than only on the used Qualcomm-patented parts. The company has been collecting some $1.27 million annually from manufacturers such as LG and Samsung. Last year, Qualcomm faced a similar $1 billion fine after an anti-trust dispute in China.

source: The Korea Times via Android Authority

FEATURED VIDEO

11 Comments

1. Barney_stinson

Posts: 672; Member since: May 30, 2016

Weird s**t;!!!

2. TechieXP1969

Posts: 14967; Member since: Sep 25, 2013

Make the liars pay! If an OEM is already paying for the chipset, why do they have to pay a royalty fee on top of it? Isn't that double dipping? Make them refund every OEM and fined them on top of it. And break them out of business and let them die.. Greedy lying dogs!

3. ebilcake

Posts: 1227; Member since: Jul 16, 2016

Oh dear, hopefully nothing will come of this.

4. marorun

Posts: 5029; Member since: Mar 30, 2015

Lol wana bet Samsung and LG started this? Cant beat them or make better stuff so you have to sue. Basically acting like apple on this one.

5. ebilcake

Posts: 1227; Member since: Jul 16, 2016

But they are making better stuff, last time I checked Exynos 8890 provided better overall performance well being more efficient, as did Exynos 7420 in last gen devices. This is just business, if it's true Qualcomm have been "double dipping" then it's going to cost them.

6. tedkord

Posts: 17318; Member since: Jun 17, 2009

What didn't they make better? The Exynos the past two years not only obliterated the Snapdragon line in benchmarks, but also in thermal performance and battery life. QC was bringing up the rear the whole time.

8. tedkord

Posts: 17318; Member since: Jun 17, 2009

"Cant beat them or make better stuff so you have to sue." That does describe a certain corporation, but it's not either of the two you listed.

10. yoghibawono

Posts: 240; Member since: May 04, 2016

funny PA didnt mention that the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) of South Korea is investigating this for 17 months

7. btbotimtim

Posts: 272; Member since: Dec 08, 2010

samsung and lg should have used sd820 on low end models so that they dont pay more.

11. yoghibawono

Posts: 240; Member since: May 04, 2016

no! ruin the competitiveness! if only Qcom holds the seat of flagships of SoC, prices will always be steep. Since it's Qcom (flagships) way or MTK way (cheap midranger).

9. cheetah2k

Posts: 2230; Member since: Jan 16, 2011

Good to see LG might get some $$ back for the overheating 810 failure that cost them millions in revenue having to drop to the 808 chipset and release a midrange G4 instead of a flagship performance leading G4..

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.