Here's what the Galaxy S7 and S7 edge look like from the back

Here's what the Galaxy S7 and S7 edge look like from the back
We've had quite a good look at the purported Galaxy S7 (edge) press renders, and on first impressions, it doesn't appear that much has changed. As the onlooking tech world comes to terms with two largely unchanged handsets -- visually, at least -- resident mobile informant Evan Blass has offered a rear view of the flagship pairing. If you were, or perhaps still are looking for a major switch in design from the S6 and S6 edge, then you're going to be disappointed. 

Even from the other side of the devices, one could easily be looking at the models of yesteryear. With that said, the consensus seems to be that design-wise, Sammy has finally reached a standard that appeases fans of a higher-end finish. After years of polycarbonate, 2015 was a comparable festival of metal and glass. With the much-lamented microSD slot set to make a dramatic return, perhaps Samsung feels it has drawn parity between style and functionality. 

Either way, if you are planning on snapping up either the S7 or its edgier counterpart, here's what they'll probably look like from the back:

Here's what the Galaxy S7 and S7 edge look like from the back

If nothing else, the renders do underline the notion that the standard S7 will be smaller than the S7 edge. The former is expected to pack a 5.1-inch display, while the latter will probably offer 5.5 inches of real estate. 

Along with the customary processor bump, rebirth of the microSD slot and fast charging, Samsung is also expected to bow out of the megapixel race. The main snappers of both upcoming handsets will drop down in sheer resolution from 16 to 12 megapixels, with heavy focus to be placed on improving low-light capabilities. As has been discussed at great length, there's far, far more to a camera than the pixel count, and ultimately, we'd expect the 12-megapixel S7 duo to produce superior results than older models. 

Check out our constantly-updated rumor roundup of the Samsung Galaxy S7 here, and do let us know what you think of the design via the comments. 

source: Evan Blass

Related phones

Galaxy S7
  • Display 5.1" 1440 x 2560 pixels
  • Camera 12 MP / 5 MP front
  • Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 820, Quad-core, 2200 MHz
  • Storage 32 GB + microSDXC
  • Battery 3000 mAh(28h 3G talk time)
Galaxy S7 edge
  • Display 5.5" 1440 x 2560 pixels
  • Camera 12 MP / 5 MP front
  • Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 820, Quad-core, 2200 MHz
  • Storage 32 GB + microSDXC
  • Battery 3600 mAh(36h 3G talk time)

FEATURED VIDEO

30 Comments

1. artificialintelligence

Posts: 166; Member since: Dec 05, 2015

(S)EXY7

27. Switch00

Posts: 535; Member since: Sep 04, 2013

Georgeous. Just like S3.

32. Kakarotto

Posts: 255; Member since: Dec 07, 2010

*S2. S3 is ugly.

2. Clars123

Posts: 1073; Member since: Mar 16, 2015

these are obviously fake.. 1.look at the heart rate sensor its just a photoshopped square 2.what are the odds of the reflection off the phones backs being at the exact same spot 3.That camera lens is taken from the Galaxy A(2016) and look slightly crooked 4. Look very closely to the right side of both phones..doesn't it look like there's an excess slab of metal on the side?

10. mawi2013

Posts: 67; Member since: Oct 18, 2014

Its only a render...

13. Clars123

Posts: 1073; Member since: Mar 16, 2015

compare this to the S6 official renders..especially images of the back..they show how fake these are

3. DefinitiveKid

Posts: 259; Member since: May 15, 2013

Didn't I read somewhere that the S7 wouldn't have a protruding camera? That's what I'm mostly interested about.

4. Busyboy

Posts: 731; Member since: Jan 07, 2015

LOL.. I thought Samsung wanted to succeed?

11. xgrgtr

Posts: 43; Member since: Sep 04, 2015

Samsung is already number one

17. Busyboy

Posts: 731; Member since: Jan 07, 2015

Profits and sales are falling tho..

20. ph00ny

Posts: 1986; Member since: May 26, 2011

Who isn't falling at the moment?

23. Busyboy

Posts: 731; Member since: Jan 07, 2015

Apple

29. JumpinJackROMFlash

Posts: 464; Member since: Dec 10, 2014

They're not increasing either.

5. SenorThrottles

Posts: 284; Member since: Dec 23, 2015

I like that it seems like they're getting rid of the ugly blue-black look of the S6

6. DefinitiveKid

Posts: 259; Member since: May 15, 2013

Yep, I never got why they would call this type of color "black", as it's always clearly been some kind of deep blue. I thought it didn't look bad on the S6, but true black would be great.

9. SenorThrottles

Posts: 284; Member since: Dec 23, 2015

I liked it at first, but after a while it kinda looked tacky to me

14. SYSTEM_LORD

Posts: 1168; Member since: Oct 05, 2015

That's what was called Sapphire black, as sapphires are most famously blue. Lower quality ones often are a very deep blue-black color. The description is perfect for those of use who are familiar with gemstones

31. Krjal

Posts: 411; Member since: Dec 19, 2013

I love the sapphire black personally. Gives some interest to the boring and ubiquitous flat black everything else uses.

7. tedkord

Posts: 17094; Member since: Jun 17, 2009

Evan Blass seems to be keeping busy in retirement. ;)

8. talon95

Posts: 981; Member since: Jul 31, 2012

The Edge version has the curve on the front so it shouldn't be rendered with the same shading of a curve on the back. Sort of a poor photoshop job rather than a real render. This quick/poor speculation really doesn't help any of us.

12. j2001m

Posts: 3060; Member since: Apr 28, 2014

The edge is going to have a curve on the back also, it's to make room for the bigger battery

24. talon95

Posts: 981; Member since: Jul 31, 2012

Somehow i doubt it, but I'm fine with being proven wrong. There still shouldn't be a reflection curve at the top and bottom. It's not spherical. So it's likely still just a photoshop job and I don't trust it at all.

18. Jimrod

Posts: 1605; Member since: Sep 22, 2014

Samsung logos front and back is tacky. Aside from that is elegant enough, if a bit bland.

19. ReticentHamster

Posts: 150; Member since: Jan 19, 2015

I believe these to be fake, and here's why: Aside from the camera graphic looking very flat and out of place, look at the right side of the renders. See that weird, long button protrusion? I don't think that would be left in on an official render. seems like the originator of this got a little "Clone stamp tool" happy or something.

21. Baracus

Posts: 223; Member since: Sep 15, 2012

It's gonna be covered by a grippy case within minutes of getting it so really doesn't matter what it looks like.

25. talon95

Posts: 981; Member since: Jul 31, 2012

A lot of people don't use cases, and when they do clear ones are very popular.

28. Baracus

Posts: 223; Member since: Sep 15, 2012

I use the phone while walking a lot so mainly just need extra grip on the sides.

22. SkyfallWalker

Posts: 73; Member since: Jan 28, 2016

Battery life is at the top of my agenda but I know Samsung will always deliver.

30. JumpinJackROMFlash

Posts: 464; Member since: Dec 10, 2014

Too bad they removed a replaceable battery. Bu then again what else would they include in the Note 6 to get people to upgrade?

26. Clars123

Posts: 1073; Member since: Mar 16, 2015

Also notice that the wallpaper resembles a '6' and not a 7..

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.