Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Review
Samsung Galaxy Note smartphone a couple years ago, a time span that seems oh so long ago thinking back on it. And then last, year, the Korean based company continued the momentum with its successor, Samsung Galaxy Note II. Apparently people love gigantic smartphones, which seemed preposterous many years ago when smaller phones were the trend at one point, but people continue to be amazed in awe by these behemoths in the space.
Unlike the other rival phabelt/tabphones, Samsung’s Galaxy Note series smartphones brought on an additional element that made them unique amongst the masses – the pressure sensitive S Pen stylus. Again, the stylus is nothing new, but with Samsung’s take on the timeless piece, they managed to implement it in a way that actually improves the overall interaction with a smartphone. So, that leads us to its most recent offering in the Samsung Galaxy Note 3.
Call it Sammy’s other flagship smartphone, the Note 3 is of course the successor to last year’s Note II, and it’s planning to take the upcoming holiday season by surprise. No doubt, it’s sporting all the customary upgrades in the specs department, but Sammy doesn’t neglect to enhance the experience too. Also, there are other several subtle changes with the design that makes it different from previous Notes – albeit, at heart, it’s still a big fella that’s not ashamed of letting people know. However, the question that remains is if the Galaxy Note 3 has enough allure to tantalize consumers over other recent prized smartphones that are revving up for this busy holiday season.
The package contains:
- USB cable
- Wall charger
Interestingly enough, there’s a subtle change with the choice of material it’s rocking this time around. Underneath it all, the Note 3 is still a plastic constructed smartphone, which enables it to trot around a relatively easy weight of 5.93 oz – it’s lighter than the Note II before it. Needless to say, it adds an element of sophistication to the smartphone, which is complemented by the stitching around its border too, but overall, the design doesn’t make it drastically different.
Nowadays, we’ve grown so accustomed to large phones that we deem their size as “normal.” Indeed, the Note 3 is one of those obvious devices, but it’s still capable of being tucked away in our pockets – thought, it occupies a huge chunk of space while it’s in there. Furthermore, it continues to be an unwieldy thing to hold with a single hand, due to its wide figure. In fact, it’s a device that’s best operated with two hands.
The buttons present on the Note 3 are all easy to feel and press, with very good tactile feedback, and that goes for the trademark physical Home key underneath the display as well. The Menu and Back keys, placed alongside the Home key are of the capacitive kind.
Taking its cues from the Galaxy S4, the Note 3 happily tucks along a useful LED notification light in close proximity its earpiece and front-facing 2-megapixel camera. In addition, there’s a built-in IR blaster too, that should please hardcore couch potatoes by giving them the power to control their home entertainment goodies.
Around the rear, the Note 3 is armed with a beefier sized 13-megapixel auto-focus camera, up from the previous 8-megapixel snapper in the Note II. Naturally, it features all of the goodies we’d expect from a high-end smartphone – like a backside illuminated sensor, LED flash, 1080p video recording, and slow motion video capture. Peeling off the faux leather back casing, we gain access to its equally ginormous 3200 mAh battery. Something we tend to rarely see amongst high-end devices, Samsung continues to make us happy by providing us with that microSD card slot.
At first glance, it’s not something that stands out at us, but upon closer inspection, we’re finding ourselves doing a double take at its microUSB port. Wider than usual, the Note 3 actually features a microUSB port 3.0, which comes packaged with the appropriate new cable. Now, there’s no cause for alarm, seeing that the phone is still compatible with any normal microUSB port. With microUSB 3.0, it enables the Note 3 to simply be faster with charging and data transfers – and that’s about it.
151.2 x 79.2 x 8.3 mm
5.93 oz (168 g)
144.4 x 73.9 x 8.5 mm
6.00 oz (170 g)
138.5 x 70.9 x 8.9 mm
5.04 oz (143 g)
137.4 x 68.2 x 9.3 mm
5.04 oz (143 g)
Just like before, the S Pen here with the Galaxy Note 3 is pressure sensitive – enabling it to precisely know how much pressure is being applied. Therefore, strokes will have either more/less emphasis depending on how much pressure is applied. Additionally, the S Pen works in conjunction with the smartphone’s various Air View functions – something that comes in handy with the web browser. Although it doesn’t entirely replicate the pen/pencil & paper experience to the teeth, it’s as close as we can get with a smartphone at the moment.
As we’ve mentioned, there are some “advanced” functions with this update S Pen. First, the Note 3 recognizes when it’s removed/inserted from its slot. Secondly, there’s a new feature with the S Pen called “Air Command,” which then allows us to gain access to some additional new functions we’ll expand upon later in the review. And lastly, for those who somehow have a knack for losing stuff inexplicably, there’s also an alert that notifies us when we’re too far away from the S Pen – reminding us that the S Pen isn’t in its slot.
Wowzers! Obviously, 1080 x 1920 pixel displays are nothing new on smartphones, but heck, we’re constantly impressed by them nevertheless. Adding another 0.2-inches to its size over its predecessor, this latest Note 3 smartphone wields an even larger 5.7-inch Super AMOLED display. And it simply looks marvelous over last year’s model! With so much real estate to work with, details don’t get compromised thanks to its 1080p resolution, which makes even miniscule text in the web browser pop with plenty of clarity. Additionally, it exudes all the qualities that make our eyes glisten with joy – like its rich & saturated color reproduction and wide viewing angles. Despite all of its niceties, it continues to wash out when it’s used outdoors where the sun is present.
Utilizing the same technology seen with the Galaxy S4, the Note 3’s Air View functionality extends to our fingers as well – something that isn’t exclusive to the S Pen. Specifically, the display is able to recognize when our finger is hovering over it. However, the handset seems to do a better job of tracking the S Pen more than our finger, but nevertheless, we’re glad to know that we have the option to use our finger too.
Display measurements and quality
|Maximum brightness (nits)Higher is better||Minimum brightness (nits)Lower is better||Contrast Higher is better||Color temperature (Kelvins)||Gamma||Delta E rgbcmy Lower is better||Delta E grayscale Lower is better|
|Sony Xperia Z1||495
|Samsung Galaxy Note 3||360
The numbers below represent the amount of deviation in the respective property, observed when a display is viewed from a 45-degree angle as opposed to direct viewing.
|Maximum brightness Lower is better||Minimum brightness Lower is better||Contrast Lower is better||Color temperature Lower is better||Gamma Lower is better||Delta E rgbcmy Lower is better||Delta E grayscale Lower is better|
|Samsung Galaxy Note 3||56.1%
|Sony Xperia Z1||78.2%
The CIE 1931 xy color gamut chart represents the set (area) of colors that a display can reproduce, with the sRGB colorspace (the highlighted triangle) serving as reference. The chart also provides a visual representation of a display's color accuracy. The small squares across the boundaries of the triangle are the reference points for the various colors, while the small dots are the actual measurements. Ideally, each dot should be positioned on top of its respective square. The 'x: CIE31' and 'y: CIE31' values in the table below the chart indicate the position of each measurement on the chart. 'Y' shows the luminance (in nits) of each measured color, while 'Target Y' is the desired luminance level for that color. Finally, 'ΔE 2000' is the Delta E value of the measured color. Delta E values of below 2 are ideal.
This measurements are made using SpectraCal's CalMAN calibration software.
The Color accuracy chart gives an idea of how close a display's measured colors are to their referential values. The first line holds the measured (actual) colors, while the second line holds the reference (target) colors. The closer the actual colors are to the target ones, the better.
This measurements are made using SpectraCal's CalMAN calibration software.
The Grayscale accuracy chart shows whether a display has a correct white balance (balance between red, green and blue) across different levels of grey (from dark to bright). The closer the Actual colors are to the Target ones, the better.
This measurements are made using SpectraCal's CalMAN calibration software.
Drag the picture or use the keyboard arrows to rotate the phone.
Double click or press keyboard Space to zoom in/out
1. jodeci888 (Posts: 34; Member since: 14 May 2009)
I can't wait. ..... getting mine next week AND keeping my unlimited data due to the glitch.
13. PapaSmurf (Posts: 7768; Member since: 14 May 2012)
Btw, I read that Verizon fixed the glitch if that's your carrier.
15. msa1988 (Posts: 417; Member since: 30 Mar 2010)
They did, but the benefactors get to keep the unlimited data. Good for VZW for staying true.
I was shocked as well to see this only get a 9. It's entirely too big for my liking, but this thing truly is a beast.
107. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 3880; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)
See I don't get how PhoneArena.com does their reviews. How can the Samsung Galaxy Note III with its sick processor, 3GB of RAM, insanely bright 1080p 5.7" Super AMOLED, & new S-Pen technology only get 9.0?
The iPhone 5c which is just last year’s iPhone 5 but in plastic so it's a downgrade from the iPhone 5 STILL get a 9.0?
Based on the review style of PhoneArena.com shouldn't the Samsung Galaxy Note III get at least the same as the iPhone 5s?
Just too much inconsistency from PhoneArena.com on these reviews lately.
138. Immolate (Posts: 274; Member since: 17 Jun 2011)
If you're reading PhoneArena for the reviews, then you need to get out more. Read it for the frequency of updates as that's their strength. If you want relatively unbiased reviews, go elsewhere. PA is an Apple shop.
140. jdoee100 (Posts: 305; Member since: 04 Jun 2013)
From PA reviews:
"We can't say that the Xperia Z1 is the best Android smartphone out there right now.." PA score 9.2
"Obviously, it’s not the most mouthwatering inducing iPhone we’ve seen to date..the iPhone 5s proves itself as being a feared competitor in the space." PA score 9.3
"..the Note 3 continues to be the best in its class." PA score 9.0
141. Kal-el (Posts: 91; Member since: 14 Dec 2012)
how this is the same rating and the plastic iphone 5C is beyond me....john v needs to rethink his ranking system to be more concise and accurate
143. heyhi (Posts: 123; Member since: 19 Feb 2013)
two of the cons i totally disagree...Weak speaker??
i saw a review from a very good italian review website the HDBLOG making a comparison among Note 3 and G2.
The guy put side by side the 2 phones and played the same song and the Note 3 was much louder in comparison to the G2. The guy also stated that. The G2 seemed to have a better quality sound due the stereo speakers though.
"Limited apps support with Air View, Gestures, etc"- what else do you need??
Not contesting the score and really dont care about it cuz sometimes they doesnt mean anything, but write something that makes sense.
In the Q&A about the Note 3:
JoePhoto asks: "I want to know how loud is the "bottom" speakers ??? I would have prefered FRONT-facing like HTC-One. I am also interested in how bright it is in sunshine ???"
We'd say the speaker is loud enough, just don't expect it to be as good as the HTC One's.
147. theruleslawyer (Posts: 108; Member since: 23 Apr 2012)
The g2 has a mono speaker. Just two ports for whatever reason. Its pretty clear when you cover one up.
155. heyhi (Posts: 123; Member since: 19 Feb 2013)
sorry...yeah, it seemed that it had stereo speakers, also i think i misunderstood the specs...it has stereo sound rec., not speakers.
170. heyhi (Posts: 123; Member since: 19 Feb 2013)
android authority review
at 4:38 the guy says: " the speaker of the Note 3 is pretty loud...."
thats the third confirmation i see
Weak speaker?? what??...is it expensive?? and the fruit devices are not?? im starting to agree with the people in here....
this smells like a fruit reviewer.
172. Ikechukwu (Posts: 134; Member since: 03 Oct 2011)
LMFAO!!! such irony. Like a sea-saw; high remarks, low relatively low ratings and 'mmmm' remarks attract higher ratings. I guess you really can't get unbiased reviews from PA :)
203. andrewkpopboy (Posts: 8; Member since: 04 Oct 2013)
A Joke You Mean Cause That Z1 Aint NOTHING
168. rusticguy (Posts: 2826; Member since: 11 Aug 2012)
It lacks the fruity logo at thew back .. that itself is worth +1
179. c.hack (Posts: 496; Member since: 09 Dec 2009)
Instead of counting specs, you actually have to use the phone. I would take the 5c over the clumsy joke that the Note3 is any day. Even despite Samsung fudging the benchmarks, the iPhones show that iOS simply runs faster and is much more efficient. You can't just throw CPU and memory at the android problem and get the phones to run smooth. The SG4 and Note3 still lag and tutter when scrolling, their touch response is slower, and screen quality in much poorer than the iPhone.
Its only PhoneArena's Android bias that gace the Note such a high score.
198. miket247 (Posts: 81; Member since: 16 Apr 2013)
Go to GSMARENA to read a real, proper, and accurate review without iPhoneArena biased. Most PROs said that the 5C is a step back for Apple, investors killed Apple's stock over the 5C, but iPhoneArena gave it huge praise. "Apple makes plastic cool!" Like the rest of the OEM don't know what there doing. They criticized Nokia on there plastics but Apple's are great?
202. andrewkpopboy (Posts: 8; Member since: 04 Oct 2013)
Exactly, The Note 3 In Technology Terms The Best Of 2013 And Should Get An Automatic 10 It Deserves
52. bubbadoes (Posts: 326; Member since: 03 May 2012)
goood luck on your unlimited...they fixed it...i had it to, but it's goneeeee...i had to buy 10gigs based off of my previous usage, but being the fact that I am not unlimited anymore, my daily surfings on LTE will go down
56. PapaSmurf (Posts: 7768; Member since: 14 May 2012)
That sucks. If you really want unlimited LTE and live in a major city, get T-Mo. Speeds of 40+ is nice.
210. Truddy90 (Posts: 1; Member since: 05 Oct 2013)
I have a way for people to get unlimited data with Verizon. Let me know if you are interested. Truddy90@gmail.com
74. MobileKicker (Posts: 212; Member since: 19 Sep 2013)
And the iphone 5c got 9
It is not justified
193. AnTuTu (Posts: 692; Member since: 14 Oct 2012)
Hi guys Johnnnnnnnnnnnnnn VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV from iPhonearena here that's why I am giving this beast 9.
Hey John let Nick do these reviews.
225. chocolaking (Posts: 430; Member since: 22 May 2012)
PA rated this phone as no CONs.. wtf is zero CONs
brilliant review! totally brilliant pa
2. tech2 (Posts: 1926; Member since: 26 Oct 2012)
Lol ! it scored same as iPhone 5C. Unbelievable !
6. MrKoles (Posts: 307; Member since: 20 Jan 2013)
So, iPhonearena thinks a last year iPhone5 in a new, colourful and REVOLUTIONARY coating is just on the same level as the Note3...
Congrats guys! *applause*
17. buccob (Posts: 1373; Member since: 19 Jun 2012)
thats the problem when there is more than 1 guy writting the reviews.
31. PapaSmurf (Posts: 7768; Member since: 14 May 2012)
Nick or Ray would differ on this score I know that for a fact.
35. PhoneArena Team (Posts: 238; Member since: 27 Jun 2006)
Please read this page:http://www.phonearena.com/howd
owerate(you can find a link to it next to the review rating).
37. PapaSmurf (Posts: 7768; Member since: 14 May 2012)
My biggest complaint is the expensive con. Where's that con on all iPhone models?
50. joey_sfb (Posts: 2791; Member since: 29 Mar 2012)
iPhone 5s 32G cost more than a note 3 32G but only for note 3 it become a Con. wow!
109. Dr.Phil (Posts: 897; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)
I have to agree with you and the fellow users on this one. Either the iPhone 5C score should be updated or this score should be improved.
What's more is that when you look back at PA's review of the Note 2 (which was the same price then as the new Note 3 is now, $300 on contract) it NEVER mentioned the price as being a con. I'm sorry PA but this is inconsistent. It would make sense if the Note 3 increased in price over the last generation, but it didn't.
Also, has anyone else noticed that most of PA's reviews of new devices seem to fall in the 8.5 and above range? Either PA is not being critical enough of devices or they are afraid to offend the viewers by being critical of a product they like. I want to see more devices fall in the 8.0 range or the 7.0 range. By being more critical, you are helping the consumer more and you gain recognition by fellow blogs and consumer review sites for having thorough critiques (phone manufacturers may even ask to partner with you in the future similarly to how car manufacturers partner with Consumer Reports to improve their vehicles).
199. miket247 (Posts: 81; Member since: 16 Apr 2013)
+1 on that DrPhil! The best reviews are done at GSMARENA. 12 page indepth reveiw with no needless comments, and a last paragraph opinion by a PRO! Whats wrong with a 8 of 10 - which is above great, but not exceptional (9 of 10) or almost perfect (9.5)!
181. c.hack (Posts: 496; Member since: 09 Dec 2009)
Of course the Note only has 16 GB usable because of all the Samsung bloatware.
80. tech2 (Posts: 1926; Member since: 26 Oct 2012)
In the link you provided a sentence mentions: 'As the technology evolves, it is logical that the new models should meet higher expectations'
Where is that logic when testing 5C ? 5C has same specs as the last year's model not to mention the cheaper material, thick and heavy body. Still a depreciation of only 0.3 percent...smh
142. Kal-el (Posts: 91; Member since: 14 Dec 2012)
OHHHH THX for the link PA....yes we can read....but it doesn't mean ur reviewer has a print out besides them and actually follow this word for word hence the inaccuracy in rating between phones ....and complaints from everyone on here -_____- Thanks for link thou...i'll be sure to send it to john v
44. jdoee100 (Posts: 305; Member since: 04 Jun 2013)
Not just iphone, PA has rated Z1 and G2 better than the Note 3. Congrats PA. Note 3 is only faster, bigger, and more capable than those phablet wannabes.
89. bodzio1809 (Posts: 66; Member since: 28 Aug 2013)
Note 3 is better that Z1 and G2? LOL. It depends on what you like and what u need. I prefer LG G2. And it's not faster. They all got S800 that is faster than Samsung Exynos Octa. Don't forget also about LagWizz which is one of the worst optimized launchers. I saw lags on Note 3 presentation. Also I got S3 so I know about it.
92. PapaSmurf (Posts: 7768; Member since: 14 May 2012)
I have a S3 and lag is non existent so I'm taking your comment with a pinch of salt.
95. bodzio1809 (Posts: 66; Member since: 28 Aug 2013)
As u can see in your link S800 is better than Samsung Exynos. Have u ever got or use iPhone? I got 4S before S3 and that's why I noticed lag. Now I installed Nova and device run much better. TW and plastic body are two most cons of Samsung, but I like Amoled screens.
I see a lot of Samsung fanboys here :)
101. PapaSmurf (Posts: 7768; Member since: 14 May 2012)
1) Running a benchmark once isn't the beat indicator on how it performs. Getting an average is more accurate.
2) Phones score equally, so there's no this chip is better than this one (Adreno 330 vs Mali T628 is a different story)
3) There's an iPhone 4 in my household, so yes.
4) When I ran stock, my phone didn't lag like at all. Rarely had hiccups but every phone does once in awhile.
5) Plastic = removable battery, which is a deciding factor of me getting a phone or not.
6) Not a Samsung fanboy, just a lover of phones in general.
117. bodzio1809 (Posts: 66; Member since: 28 Aug 2013)
1,2) I agree, but Exynos take much more RAM in idle(1.6-1.8 GB to 1.1-1.2 GB on S800). Also u can't shoot 4k videos on Exynos and it don't has LTE. So that's why version with S800 is better. Also older version of Exynos Octa got a lot of problems with heating etc.
3) So u know what i mean, still iPhone 4 is bad example, because it got not enough power to the screen with such a high resolution.
4) Not every phone, just Androids, Symbian etc.
5) Samsung Wave got full metalic body with removable battery
6) Me too :)
207. andrewkpopboy (Posts: 8; Member since: 04 Oct 2013)
Obviously, Were Going To Argue About This Ridiculious Rating Which Needs A 9.5-10
188. timaustin2000 (Posts: 35; Member since: 15 Feb 2013)
I've used an S4 at length on numerous occasions and it lags like a dog, despite packing an s600. An updated-firmware Xperia Z with the S4Pro lags less. Yes, really.
Touchwiz is a bloated, ugly, messy and un-intuitive loss. It's the one and only reason that I don't buy Samsung's.
212. saffant (Posts: 212; Member since: 04 Jul 2011)
G2's software is a big joke. Your standards must be horrible if you really prefer that over the Note 3.
Oh and say goodbye to phone updates just like the case with the original Optimus G.
S3 is crap compared to note 3. What an asinine comparison. gtfo.
178. PunyPoop (Posts: 714; Member since: 18 Jan 2013)
The last year iPhone 5 is better than SAMSUNG phones mate..
218. TheYellowDart (Posts: 14; Member since: 18 Oct 2013)
I always think of this Mxyzptlk character as someone who just LOVES to trol all day long. I mean this place can't be his only stop, must make rounds on the xbox or something. Kinda like a nicotine addition that feeds off of the contempt of others. Trol on you crazy pigeon of loathing!
Anyhoo I can't wait for LG's answer to the Note 3 (The LG Pro not so much). Not sure how they'd up the ante processor wise but the an improved IPS screen along with the G2 camera and throw in a few more perks and that'd be my phone come January. If not the Note 3 will do just fine!
135. easymomo (Posts: 89; Member since: 04 Jul 2012)
This is the first time I write this: iPhonearena
219. TheYellowDart (Posts: 14; Member since: 18 Oct 2013)
I almost want to say they shouldn't directly compare the scores for android and ios phones. Like say sure the Iphone 5c gets this score for apple folks but would score low for an android user determined by what either one really looks for in a phone. When it comes down to it someone who wants a 5c would look at a Note 3 like some giant hand eating pocket snatcher while the Note 3 guy looks at the iphone 5c user as someone with an apple stamped on their forhead loser.
4. chunky1x (Posts: 227; Member since: 28 Mar 2010)
I really doubt about the PA points system.
73. artealis (Posts: 98; Member since: 15 Dec 2010)
its apple favor point system, put apple sticker on note 3 it will boost the point to 10, cant fight the fruit here.
76. MobileKicker (Posts: 212; Member since: 19 Sep 2013)
Yeah because apple's logo is more valuable than any logo out there
|Display||5.7 inches, 1080 x 1920 pixels (386 ppi) Super AMOLED|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974, Quad core, 2300 MHz, Krait 400 processor
3072 MB RAM
|Size||5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches|
(151.2 x 79.2 x 8.3 mm)
5.93 oz (168 g)
|Battery||3200 mAh, 25 hours talk time|