Smartphones are picking up market share, Android still top dog, Nielsen study shows
1. ilia1986 (unregistered)
Apple betrayed me @ WWDC 2011 with their lack of widgets and further user customization if the OS.
Android all the way!
2. ilia1986 (unregistered)
Besides how can anyone buy the iPhone 5 with it's 3.7 - 4" screen when the Galaxy Note has just been announced with 5.3" SuperAmoled HD screen and a 1.4Ghz Dualcore processor.
5. PeterIfromsweden (Posts: 1230; Member since: 03 Aug 2011)
I don't know.
5.3 inch is toooo big anyway.
29. P-YWS (Posts: 83; Member since: 12 Aug 2011)
Why is 5.3" too big, considering that Bluetooth headset can be trendy, convenient, and law-abiding (during driving) as well? The 5.3" device can be put into the pocket of your pant, or your purse. When you need GPS function, when you are surving, when you are looking up for a phone number/address, 5.3" is so much more pleasant than the tiny 3.5" of iPhone2/3/4/5. My two cents.
6. ilia1986 (unregistered)
You hear me laughing?
10. ilia1986 (unregistered)
lol peter I was talking to iKing.
And we are yet to have any real definition of a smartphone screen size being too big.
We are talking about Samsung here, so it's taken for granted that the device will be comfortable to use.
18. darth8ball (Posts: 519; Member since: 02 Aug 2011)
I agree ilia, screen size can never be too big, it is the overall phone size that matters. Someone with small hands would want small while those of us with larger hands and fingers, bigger is better.
32. P-YWS (Posts: 83; Member since: 12 Aug 2011)
There is no perfect solution. To me, big screen size is good. With BT headset (the latest 4.0 can allow the battery to last much longer), I can wear it while I am talking to someone, and I search for a friend's address/phone using the not-so-tiny smartphone's touch screen which I drew out from the pocket of the pants which I am wearing. While I am doing the search, I don't need to do a lot of enlarge/reduce the font size as I would have to do on a smartphone with the relatively tiny (and hard to look at in native resolution) 3.5" touch screen. This is a very natural Use Case.
35. jhgkiu (Posts: 21; Member since: 31 Aug 2011)
Lol the Galaxy note doesn't have a HD screen it uses a superAmoled the old one from the Sgs even thought the superamoled is good on a 5.3'' screen the picture quality is gonna look like crap
4. PeterIfromsweden (Posts: 1230; Member since: 03 Aug 2011)
Just as i have been saying, WP7 only has 1 %, yes you heard it right 1, O-N-E % market share !
Now let's see how much of a push WP7 can make with Mango... ; )
9. drahmad (Posts: 480; Member since: 20 Aug 2011)
how much salary does samsung give you for bada marketing?
12. PeterIfromsweden (Posts: 1230; Member since: 03 Aug 2011)
nothing. Where did i mention bada here ?
15. remixfa (Posts: 14168; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)
with nokia and mango, i see them hitting 10% within the next 14 months.
26. PeterIfromsweden (Posts: 1230; Member since: 03 Aug 2011)
That ain't gonna happen, even with nokia and mango.
There is nothing different from a Htc trophy and a Nokia 703 wiht WP7 exept the design.
30. P-YWS (Posts: 83; Member since: 12 Aug 2011)
Please remember that Nokia bought one of the two major companies which produce "maps". This means that Nokia could offer better map related services and function. On the other hand, HTC is Taiwan-based and didn't spend much on R&D since its inception. On R&D count, Nokia definitely has far more. Question is: can Nokia realize the its R&D results in real life?
37. remixfa (Posts: 14168; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)
peter, u think nothing has a chance but bada. lol. hate to tell ya but bada doesnt have a chance.. :)
39. eiyoy009 (Posts: 57; Member since: 01 Jun 2011)
hey BADA BOY!!...your so sick abt your freaking OS... did i already heard about the word BADA...no!! i think it does not exist
25. drahmad (Posts: 480; Member since: 20 Aug 2011)
you mention it at least 10 times a day. lol
19. GJanee (Posts: 214; Member since: 29 Jun 2011)
well it's still more than what bada has, and will ever have. :D
27. PeterIfromsweden (Posts: 1230; Member since: 03 Aug 2011)
Nope, bada has more marketshare than WP7 so bada already has more marketshare than WP7.
8. darth8ball (Posts: 519; Member since: 02 Aug 2011)
A story on PA last week has the Android share in the US market @52%. Different surveys a few points difference maybe but 12 points. The other survey had Apple at 22% i can understand that gap, as being the max differential but my point is these surveys are jaded as to who orders them.
11. drahmad (Posts: 480; Member since: 20 Aug 2011)
In the coming three years, i vision an at least 25% share for WP 7 and above. lets bet.
13. PeterIfromsweden (Posts: 1230; Member since: 03 Aug 2011)
yeah, i bet you 10.000 dollars that WP7 won't have 25 % market share in the coming three years, unless they change the live tiles !!!
20. GJanee (Posts: 214; Member since: 29 Jun 2011)
why can't you just get over the livetiles? it's getting kinda boring, that the only complaitn about the second best OS on the market is s**tty visuals. can't you understand that this OS is not about visuals, it's about performance and functionality? seriously, who cares about visuals, when you have reliable phone for every situation?
and btw: changing the live tiles = more market share is the biggest nonsense you wrote in the last few days. :D
22. remixfa (Posts: 14168; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)
i like the live tiles. I just wish there was ways to mix and match live tiles and other things though. every OS has its good n bad.
23. darth8ball (Posts: 519; Member since: 02 Aug 2011)
Not that it matters which OS you consider second best, if you think that visuals don't matter in this industry, you need to take the DeLorean Doc Brown and Marty back to 1955
28. Stuntman (Posts: 784; Member since: 01 Aug 2011)
I generally don't care about visuals. I started to care a lot more when I first saw Windows Phone. The asymmetrical layout of the live/dead tiles on the homes screen and wasted space on the right just for a tiny arrow right at the top just bothers me greatly.
31. PeterIfromsweden (Posts: 1230; Member since: 03 Aug 2011)
I agree that performance and functionality is important as well, and that is certainly some areas where WP7 is lacking.
WP7 has even less functions than IOS !!!
performance is quite good on WP7, but still there are apps on the marketplace that can be extremely laggy.
24. drahmad (Posts: 480; Member since: 20 Aug 2011)
lol, people who buy wp are very happy with it. those tiles look cool when its in your hand. plus nokia has created extremely fancy looking phones as some leaked images show. nokia is famous for marketing. they only lacked a good OS last two years. With a windows phone they are taking a new start...There are several points that hit my mind, even analysts speculate an atleast 20% share for WP. See the last 50 news articles about windows phone and you will notice most of them are going in favour of WP. That is something very important.
33. PeterIfromsweden (Posts: 1230; Member since: 03 Aug 2011)
I've had those live tiles...they are even more boring in your hand than in the shops.
The problem with the live tiles are:
First of all they are square. People don't like things that are square, we like things that are more round in shape. For example, which is the most appealing a house that is square, or a flower that has rounded shapes ?
Okay, you might argue that the flower is more colorfull...
How about a tree (which is not more colorful than a house), compared to a house, which is the most appealing ?
Another example, which is the most appealing, a woman that is square, or has round shapes ?
You see, people like things that are round in shape.
Second, there is to much wasted space, when using the live tiles.
Third, the live tiles do nothing more than widgets, in fact widgets do more than the live tiles. With the live tiles you can see how many messages or missec calls you have. With widgets, you can read the message directly on the widget.
In other words they display too little information
These are the main reasons the live tiles are not good, and why people don't like WP7.
16. PeterIfromsweden (Posts: 1230; Member since: 03 Aug 2011)
dunno, don't think it has been launched in the US at all. Samsungapps for bada is not available in the US yet. Probably Samsung will launch the Wave 3 in the US soon.
17. hepresearch (unregistered)
No favorite team here... I am none of the above.
21. Mooooo (Posts: 212; Member since: 27 Aug 2011)
Sooner or later a bada phone probably will show up to test the waters here in the usa.
36. saiki4116 (Posts: 365; Member since: 31 Mar 2011)
not surprising when u can get 600$ phone for 200$(with contract) but that's the case in India