x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Smartphones are picking up market share, Android still top dog, Nielsen study shows

Smartphones are picking up market share, Android still top dog, Nielsen study shows

Posted: , by Nick T.

Tags :

Smartphones are picking up market share, Android still top dog, Nielsen study shows
According to the latest Nielsen study that puts the U.S. cellphone market under the microscope, four out of ten handsets across the nation fall into the smartphone category. In comparison, smartphones held 38% of the market earlier this spring, which shows that feature phones are slowly being taken over by their smart counterparts. That, of course, is not too surprising of a result as earlier studies show that the majority of users who get themselves a new handset go for a smartphone rather than a feature phone.

Furthermore, 40% out of all U.S. smartphone users own an Android device, which is a percent up when compared to the results from the previous Nielsen survey. The iPhone's market share, however, remains unchanged standing at 28%, but the upcoming release of the iPhone 5 might give that number a boost. RIM and its BlackBerry smartphones, on the other hand, seem to be losing grip on the market as their share has slightly declined and now stands at 19%. Microsoft's Windows Mobile platform still has a lot of catching up to do as it still holds only 1% of the pie.

Besides being the most widespread mobile platform, Android holds a leading place in yet another category. From innovators to late adopters, the majority of smartphone users who intend to get a new device next year say that it is going to run Android. Apple's iPhone, however, is not far behind in terms of desirability and it even holds the lead in that category among early adopters.

So, which team do you favor? Are you a loyal iPhone fan, an Android enthusiast, or a BlackBerry aficionado? Feel free to let us know by dropping a comment in the section below.


Smartphones are picking up market share, Android still top dog, Nielsen study shows
Smartphones are picking up market share, Android still top dog, Nielsen study shows

38 Comments
  • Options
    Close






posted on 01 Sep 2011, 10:03 5

1. ilia1986 (unregistered)


Apple betrayed me @ WWDC 2011 with their lack of widgets and further user customization if the OS.

Android all the way!

posted on 01 Sep 2011, 10:04 6

2. ilia1986 (unregistered)


Besides how can anyone buy the iPhone 5 with it's 3.7 - 4" screen when the Galaxy Note has just been announced with 5.3" SuperAmoled HD screen and a 1.4Ghz Dualcore processor.

posted on 01 Sep 2011, 10:06 2

3. iKingTrust (banned) (Posts: 716; Member since: 27 Jul 2011)


you are joking right?

posted on 01 Sep 2011, 10:07

5. PeterIfromsweden (Posts: 1230; Member since: 03 Aug 2011)


I don't know.
5.3 inch is toooo big anyway.

posted on 01 Sep 2011, 13:07

29. P-YWS (Posts: 88; Member since: 12 Aug 2011)


Why is 5.3" too big, considering that Bluetooth headset can be trendy, convenient, and law-abiding (during driving) as well? The 5.3" device can be put into the pocket of your pant, or your purse. When you need GPS function, when you are surving, when you are looking up for a phone number/address, 5.3" is so much more pleasant than the tiny 3.5" of iPhone2/3/4/5. My two cents.

posted on 01 Sep 2011, 10:09 2

6. ilia1986 (unregistered)


You hear me laughing?

posted on 01 Sep 2011, 10:10

7. PeterIfromsweden (Posts: 1230; Member since: 03 Aug 2011)


nope...

posted on 01 Sep 2011, 10:17 1

10. ilia1986 (unregistered)


lol peter I was talking to iKing.

And we are yet to have any real definition of a smartphone screen size being too big.

We are talking about Samsung here, so it's taken for granted that the device will be comfortable to use.

posted on 01 Sep 2011, 10:33 4

18. darth8ball (Posts: 520; Member since: 02 Aug 2011)


I agree ilia, screen size can never be too big, it is the overall phone size that matters. Someone with small hands would want small while those of us with larger hands and fingers, bigger is better.

posted on 01 Sep 2011, 13:18

32. P-YWS (Posts: 88; Member since: 12 Aug 2011)


There is no perfect solution. To me, big screen size is good. With BT headset (the latest 4.0 can allow the battery to last much longer), I can wear it while I am talking to someone, and I search for a friend's address/phone using the not-so-tiny smartphone's touch screen which I drew out from the pocket of the pants which I am wearing. While I am doing the search, I don't need to do a lot of enlarge/reduce the font size as I would have to do on a smartphone with the relatively tiny (and hard to look at in native resolution) 3.5" touch screen. This is a very natural Use Case.

posted on 01 Sep 2011, 14:19

35. jhgkiu (Posts: 21; Member since: 31 Aug 2011)


Lol the Galaxy note doesn't have a HD screen it uses a superAmoled the old one from the Sgs even thought the superamoled is good on a 5.3'' screen the picture quality is gonna look like crap

posted on 01 Sep 2011, 10:07 2

4. PeterIfromsweden (Posts: 1230; Member since: 03 Aug 2011)


Just as i have been saying, WP7 only has 1 %, yes you heard it right 1, O-N-E % market share !
Now let's see how much of a push WP7 can make with Mango... ; )

posted on 01 Sep 2011, 10:17

9. drahmad (Posts: 480; Member since: 20 Aug 2011)


how much salary does samsung give you for bada marketing?

posted on 01 Sep 2011, 10:19 2

12. PeterIfromsweden (Posts: 1230; Member since: 03 Aug 2011)


nothing. Where did i mention bada here ?

posted on 01 Sep 2011, 10:22 4

15. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


with nokia and mango, i see them hitting 10% within the next 14 months.

posted on 01 Sep 2011, 12:29

26. PeterIfromsweden (Posts: 1230; Member since: 03 Aug 2011)


That ain't gonna happen, even with nokia and mango.
There is nothing different from a Htc trophy and a Nokia 703 wiht WP7 exept the design.

posted on 01 Sep 2011, 13:11

30. P-YWS (Posts: 88; Member since: 12 Aug 2011)


Please remember that Nokia bought one of the two major companies which produce "maps". This means that Nokia could offer better map related services and function. On the other hand, HTC is Taiwan-based and didn't spend much on R&D since its inception. On R&D count, Nokia definitely has far more. Question is: can Nokia realize the its R&D results in real life?

posted on 01 Sep 2011, 14:50 2

37. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


peter, u think nothing has a chance but bada. lol. hate to tell ya but bada doesnt have a chance.. :)

posted on 02 Sep 2011, 08:22

39. eiyoy009 (Posts: 57; Member since: 01 Jun 2011)


hey BADA BOY!!...your so sick abt your freaking OS... did i already heard about the word BADA...no!! i think it does not exist

posted on 01 Sep 2011, 11:59

25. drahmad (Posts: 480; Member since: 20 Aug 2011)


you mention it at least 10 times a day. lol

posted on 01 Sep 2011, 10:36 1

19. GJanee (Posts: 214; Member since: 29 Jun 2011)


well it's still more than what bada has, and will ever have. :D

posted on 01 Sep 2011, 12:29 1

27. PeterIfromsweden (Posts: 1230; Member since: 03 Aug 2011)


Nope, bada has more marketshare than WP7 so bada already has more marketshare than WP7.

posted on 01 Sep 2011, 10:16

8. darth8ball (Posts: 520; Member since: 02 Aug 2011)


A story on PA last week has the Android share in the US market @52%. Different surveys a few points difference maybe but 12 points. The other survey had Apple at 22% i can understand that gap, as being the max differential but my point is these surveys are jaded as to who orders them.

posted on 01 Sep 2011, 10:19 2

11. drahmad (Posts: 480; Member since: 20 Aug 2011)


In the coming three years, i vision an at least 25% share for WP 7 and above. lets bet.

posted on 01 Sep 2011, 10:19 2

13. PeterIfromsweden (Posts: 1230; Member since: 03 Aug 2011)


yeah, i bet you 10.000 dollars that WP7 won't have 25 % market share in the coming three years, unless they change the live tiles !!!

posted on 01 Sep 2011, 10:40

20. GJanee (Posts: 214; Member since: 29 Jun 2011)


why can't you just get over the livetiles? it's getting kinda boring, that the only complaitn about the second best OS on the market is s**tty visuals. can't you understand that this OS is not about visuals, it's about performance and functionality? seriously, who cares about visuals, when you have reliable phone for every situation?

and btw: changing the live tiles = more market share is the biggest nonsense you wrote in the last few days. :D

posted on 01 Sep 2011, 11:29 1

22. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


i like the live tiles. I just wish there was ways to mix and match live tiles and other things though. every OS has its good n bad.

posted on 01 Sep 2011, 11:53

23. darth8ball (Posts: 520; Member since: 02 Aug 2011)


Not that it matters which OS you consider second best, if you think that visuals don't matter in this industry, you need to take the DeLorean Doc Brown and Marty back to 1955

posted on 01 Sep 2011, 13:05

28. Stuntman (Posts: 836; Member since: 01 Aug 2011)


I generally don't care about visuals. I started to care a lot more when I first saw Windows Phone. The asymmetrical layout of the live/dead tiles on the homes screen and wasted space on the right just for a tiny arrow right at the top just bothers me greatly.

posted on 01 Sep 2011, 13:17

31. PeterIfromsweden (Posts: 1230; Member since: 03 Aug 2011)


I agree that performance and functionality is important as well, and that is certainly some areas where WP7 is lacking.
WP7 has even less functions than IOS !!!
performance is quite good on WP7, but still there are apps on the marketplace that can be extremely laggy.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories