Smartphone owners buy iPhones "much more than first-time owners"
1. Meleagru (Posts: 87; Member since: 03 Dec 2012)
It's probably the price. For a first time buyer, they would rather go with something less expensive.
3. Dorothy69 (banned) (Posts: 498; Member since: 21 May 2013)
No, it's because most users are iDiots and, therefore, once they accept their iDiocy they fully commit to their destiny.
15. Eonnaydra (Posts: 217; Member since: 23 Oct 2012)
You should be banned.It's unpolite and rude to make iPhone's users idiots.
Remember,it's just a phone!
33. user312 (Posts: 68; Member since: 21 Aug 2012)
Well thats a phone that "iDiots" can pick up and use. No learning curve necessary to click glossy blocks.
14. theoak (Posts: 324; Member since: 16 Nov 2011)
I know iTunes can scare folks too.
To import movies, music ... anything ... it needs to go through iTunes.
Android, you just drag and drop and you are golden.
Its about Apps too. You sink your money into apps. With a new iPhone, you don't have to repurchase those apps. If you flip to Android, you may end up having to.
18. Napalm_3nema (Posts: 1505; Member since: 14 Jun 2013)
2010 called, and they want their iTunes excuse back.
2. Commentator (Posts: 2752; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)
1) Somebody buys a cheap Android phone because they want/need a smartphone but don't want to spend too much.
2) The cheap Android phone is user-unfriendly and laggy.
3) They are turned off to Android completely, turn in their old phone, and pick the "safer" iOS route.
6. Commentator (Posts: 2752; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)
Coming from somebody named "androidfanboy," I'm not sure I should really trust your assessment of myself.
My theory is based on direct observation of friends and acquaintances who have gone through that exact process.
24. ardent1 (Posts: 2000; Member since: 16 Apr 2011)
If look at Virgin Mobile or Boost Mobile, you can find cheap android devices for as little as $60 to $70.
You go to WalMart and look at the Net10, StraightTalk, etc, the android devices are easily under $100.
You to Verizon Wireless online and look at their prepaid smartphones, all three devices are currently on sale for less than $100.
There's no reason to pay more than $300 for an android device. Even the highend smartphones like the Samsung S4 only cost about $200 to make. The sad news is android smartphones is a commodity, and adding 1080 screens, 8 to 13 MP shooters, other fancy gimicks does not justify the $600+ MSRP.
You look at the Optimus F7 going for $250 and then android camp want to say a Samsung S3 is worth $400. The S3 is not worth $150 more than the F7. What I am saying is that if you look at the prepaid market today for android handsets, their prices would highlight how overpriced the highend android devices. It's like saying the Samsung S4 is worth $350 more than the F7.
Sorry, but I am not drinking that kool-aid
25. Commentator (Posts: 2752; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)
My comment generally referred to low-end Android phones from 2+ years ago. I agree that most low-enders in this day and age are perfectly fine, but you have to admit that quite a few questionable devices made it through the cracks between 2008 and 2011, and a lot of people were turned off to Android because of them.
9. darkkjedii (Posts: 14569; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)
100% agree with you bro. You also have some like me, who can't decide what's best, and fall in love with both. +1
4. tedkord (Posts: 6576; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)
Is this supposed to be surprising? A large number of iPhone users will buy only the iPhone no matter what, while the rest of us by whatever is best at the time for us.
12. akki20892 (Posts: 3767; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)
fist time: around 6% and previous: around 3%
10. androiphone20 (Posts: 1613; Member since: 10 Jul 2013)
hmm that's true, I just switched to iphone and I don't think i'll settle for anything now
11. androiphone20 (Posts: 1613; Member since: 10 Jul 2013)
hmm that's true, I just switched to iphone and I don't think i'll settle for anything else now
19. bigstrudel (Posts: 518; Member since: 20 Aug 2012)
I used to have the latest quad core android offering. But it's size was just inconvenient and awkward for me. Didn't fit in my pockets without jabbing me.
When I went looking for pocketable android devices that had great performance with a fluid UI and a nice display; I basically came up empty handed. That's why I switched. Android needs compact size and performance.
There are some great options now with the One Mini, and the Moto X. But these devices literally just came out.
20. Commentator (Posts: 2752; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)
It's nice to see Android manufacturers are starting to follow a trend: "regular" sized flagship, mini flagship, and a max flagship. It used to be if you wanted a compact Android phone you'd have to compromise on all sorts of specs.
27. xtian1103 (Posts: 361; Member since: 11 Feb 2012)
chinese phone manufacturers are easily catching up on android tech so i don't see the reason why samsung and other oem should charge you a $600 on an android device when it's all the same android experience you will have. you heard about the blu life play, micromax, oppo, xiaomi?
32. xtian1103 (Posts: 361; Member since: 11 Feb 2012)
i agree, but until 4.2.2 when it realizes the lag has to stop.