x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 scores a solid victory against the iPhone 6 in our blind camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S6 scores a solid victory against the iPhone 6 in our blind camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S6 scores a solid victory against the iPhone 6 in our blind camera comparison

Boy, that Samsung Galaxy S6 has one great camera, doesn't it? The shooter may not be absolutely perfect, as you surely know if you've read our review of the Galaxy S6 camera, but it is definitely potent enough to beat the iPhone 6 in a camera comparison. And our readers seem to agree. The Samsung Galaxy S6 is the winner in our blind camera comparison, and it beat the iPhone 6 by a mile. Samsung's flagship topped six out of six scenes, collecting about 9 times more reader votes than the iPhone. 

Surprised by the results? We aren't. the Samsung Galaxy S6 has proven to be an excellent shooter time and time again, especially in low light scenes. What's really surprising, however, is the margin by which it won this blind camera comparison. As a whole, the iPhone 6 has a very solid 8MP camera producing pleasing images with vivid colors. Still, our readers seem to prefer the sharper photos delivered by the Galaxy S6's 16MP camera.

That's all for today, folks, but it won't be long until we bring you a more thorough camera comparison. We'll be back with more photo samples, accompanied by our own analysis in search of what makes the Galaxy S6's photos better than the iPhone's, and where it might be leaving room for improvement. Until then, here's another look at the images used in the blind comparison, as well as the numbers of votes from our readers.

Final results:


  1. Samsung Galaxy S6 – 27063 votes
  2. iPhone 6 – 3033 votes

Scene 1: A walk in the park


Side-by-side comparison

Side-by-side comparison




Phonearena polls
sort by
Scene 1: Which photo do you like better?
Photo A (iPhone 6) 14.16% (758 votes) (758 votes)
Photo B (Galaxy S6) 85.84% (4595 votes) (4595 votes)

5353 votes



Scene 2: The ruins


Side-by-side comparison

Side-by-side comparison




Phonearena polls
sort by
Scene 2: Which photo do you like better?
Photo C (iPhone 6) 5.83% (295 votes) (295 votes)
Photo D (Galaxy S6) 94.17% (4766 votes) (4766 votes)

5061 votes



Scene 3: A colorful close-up


Side-by-side comparison

Side-by-side comparison



Phonearena polls
sort by
Scene 3: Which photo do you like better?
Photo E (Galaxy S6) 87.96% (4464 votes) (4464 votes)
Photo F (iPhone 6) 12.04% (611 votes) (611 votes)

5075 votes



Scene 4: Flowers


Side-by-side comparison

Side-by-side comparison



Phonearena polls
sort by
Scene 4: Which photo do you like better?
Photo G (iPhone 6) 9.34% (458 votes) (458 votes)
Photo H (Galaxy S6) 90.66% (4444 votes) (4444 votes)

4902 votes



Scene 5: Battleship ready


Side-by-side comparison

Side-by-side comparison



Phonearena polls
sort by
Scene 5: Which photo do you like better?
Photo I (iPhone 6) 17.16% (829 votes) (829 votes)
Photo J (Galaxy S6) 82.84% (4003 votes) (4003 votes)

4832 votes



Scene 6: Chill out


Side-by-side comparison

Side-by-side comparison



Phonearena polls
sort by
Scene 6: Which photo do you like better?
Photo K (Galaxy S6) 98.26% (4805 votes) (4805 votes)
Photo L (iPhone 6) 1.74% (85 votes) (85 votes)

4890 votes

112 Comments
  • Options
    Close





posted on 19 Jun 2015, 02:08 4

1. GreekGeek (Posts: 1276; Member since: 22 Mar 2014)


Yeah, if only it had expandable storage though

posted on 19 Jun 2015, 02:25 51

5. AnTuTu (Posts: 1580; Member since: 14 Oct 2012)


Rather than complaining about minor things try to appreciate technology where it's due.

posted on 19 Jun 2015, 02:28 15

9. vergil9 (banned) (Posts: 517; Member since: 06 Apr 2015)


+1
32GB is more than enough for most people (but not for me lol)

posted on 19 Jun 2015, 03:06 4

14. Wiencon (Posts: 2001; Member since: 06 Aug 2014)


S6 is great in almost every accept, but why do we have to alaways agree on compromises? Why can't no OEM make pocketable, waterproof phone, with great camera, internals, SD slots, wieh great screen, battery etc. Why there must be always something stupid? Lack of SD kills S6 for me, I won't spend 800$ for 128GB when I can buy SD for 50$.

posted on 19 Jun 2015, 03:25 13

19. vergil9 (banned) (Posts: 517; Member since: 06 Apr 2015)


Every device has compromises, the S6 for example, had to give up many of those for design and ergonomics.
Regarding the storage, upgrading is very expensive on the S6, but UFS 2.0 isn't cheap, especially compared to the type of flash memory used in microsd cards.

posted on 19 Jun 2015, 04:24 6

36. spin9 (Posts: 310; Member since: 31 May 2014)


I agree about expensive upgradings but I think the should have make a version
with removable mSD and any one who want the top mem speed could
remove it. They made a dual sim one after all. It's called versatility.

For some photos I like more the iphone approach e.g. scene 3. Too much
contrast and very hard colours from the S6. (Still prefaire note4's camera)
It would be better if the were reference photos from a good dslr (not a junk one).

I know that both cameras had problems distinguishing between some red hues.
S6 mostly. Remember this? >
http://tinyurl.com/owkurh8 http://tinyurl.com/py2rh33
Can anyone tell me what happened with that, did Samsung fix it?

posted on 19 Jun 2015, 04:24 4

37. Wiencon (Posts: 2001; Member since: 06 Aug 2014)


Say what You want, but UFS is not necessary, there should be 16/32GB of it for system so it could run well and for music, movies, pictures normal flash memory, nobody will notice if picture load up 0.2 seconds faster than usually. Like on PC, no one will buy 1 TB SSD for storing documents or files, SSD makes sense when OS boots from it.
And sacrificing SD slot has nothing to do with ergonomics, they could easily implement it, phone should be little thicker so camera wouldn't prount and battery would be much better. Look at Sony, they have it all, SD, waterproofing in not bulky chassis (Z3C), hell, S5 was almost perfect phone.

posted on 19 Jun 2015, 04:46 4

43. vergil9 (banned) (Posts: 517; Member since: 06 Apr 2015)


It wouldn't hurt having faster and faster storage wouldn't it? It will get cheaper as time passes.
I know that they can add an SD slot, but they intentionally didn't, I agree that people should have choice. I guess they're very afraid of inconsistent performance.
The bigger battery and thicker phone part, I fully agree with that, I don't get it why people want thinner with smaller battery.

posted on 19 Jun 2015, 05:00 7

45. Wiencon (Posts: 2001; Member since: 06 Aug 2014)


Actually nobody wants thinner phones, I've never met anyone who would rather have thinner phone than bigger battery. It just looks good in ads, but no OEM mentions battery in same ad.

" I guess they're very afraid of inconsistent performance."

Do You really believe that? SMH, and that's why pricing is so ridicolous. They just want to rip off customers who are stupid enough to believe that every decision Sammy makes is about making people happy. Same applies to Apple and many others,

posted on 19 Jun 2015, 05:23 6

48. Artisto (Posts: 38; Member since: 19 Jun 2015)


"Why can't no OEM make pocketable, waterproof phone, with great camera, internals, SD slots, wieh great screen, battery etc. "

*cough cough* Z3 Compact *cough cough*

posted on 19 Jun 2015, 05:30 2

49. Wiencon (Posts: 2001; Member since: 06 Aug 2014)


Yeah, I owned Z3 Compact for about 3months, incredible phone, but camera and washed out screen dissapointed me. I hope that with Z5 Sony will fix their awful camera algorithms, because the rest, casing, battery are simply amazing, probably my favourite Android phone along with M7 and Optimus G.

posted on 19 Jun 2015, 05:37

50. Djz89 (Posts: 356; Member since: 25 Aug 2014)


Xperia z3 compact? Or.z1? Those seems to match what you asked

posted on 19 Jun 2015, 05:51

52. Artisto (Posts: 38; Member since: 19 Jun 2015)


Oh well, I wouldn't say Z3 Compact has a washed out screen. Unless you were using AMOLED screen before? ;)
As for camera - I own Z2 and most of my photos are taken with manual mode. I find SuperiorAuto not to be so superior, it tends to wash out colours, over expose, and during the night completely kills the proper white balance.
But the manual mode is really great!

I think that Sony went a bit too much ahead of the competition - Z2 killed everything year ago and even today I see no reason how M9/S6/G4 are better than Z2? Processing package doesn't matter to me, the difference is noticeable only when you are gaming. None of the newest flagship is waterproof, only one brings superior stereo speaker - at a cost of huge bezels - and the camera with f2.0 is still a capable performer. I'd love to compare photos from S6 and manual mode Z2/Z3.

posted on 19 Jun 2015, 06:48

56. suavemezie (Posts: 86; Member since: 21 Jun 2012)


But you cab buy 16GB iPhone for $800?

posted on 19 Jun 2015, 07:15

57. nuldolor5x.com (unregistered)


Supposed Iphone 6 won. What would you have said?

posted on 19 Jun 2015, 08:06

64. DerryAhmad (Posts: 285; Member since: 05 May 2012)


Sounds like Sony Xperia Z3+ to me.

posted on 19 Jun 2015, 08:26

67. imnotascammer (Posts: 160; Member since: 22 Aug 2012)


"..but why do we have to always agree on compromises? Why can't no OEM make pocketable, waterproof phone, with great camera, internals, SD slots, wieh great screen, battery etc. Why there must be always something stupid?"

dude, you know what?? You're effin right! We shouldnt always have to agree with those. Maybe we should manufacture our own mobile dont you think? Lol.

posted on 19 Jun 2015, 08:46

69. waddup121 (unregistered)


gottem

posted on 19 Jun 2015, 09:48

73. j2001m (Posts: 3004; Member since: 28 Apr 2014)


I take ufs 2.0 over an sd card reader in the phone any day, it keeps the phone running. Like new and supper fast even now after 2 months of use, my note 4 went lager and cramp after 1 month and is now very slow, my s6 edge is faster than it was when I 1st got it as they have removed small bug with Samsung service updates like the flipbord flick back on the home page ( I have had no filmware updates)

posted on 19 Jun 2015, 09:49

74. j2001m (Posts: 3004; Member since: 28 Apr 2014)


I take ufs 2.0 over an sd card reader in the phone any day, it keeps the phone running. Like new and supper fast even now after 2 months of use, my note 4 went lager and cramp after 1 month and is now very slow, my s6 edge is faster than it was when I 1st got it as they have removed small bug with Samsung service updates like the flipbord flick back on the home page ( I have had no filmware updates)

posted on 19 Jun 2015, 09:52 1

75. j2001m (Posts: 3004; Member since: 28 Apr 2014)


Sd cards do not work with ufs 2.0' they on the way out, no joke they do not work, they removed as they do not work, no phone will have one if they are using ufs, get over it

posted on 19 Jun 2015, 10:11

77. Cicero (Posts: 913; Member since: 22 Jan 2014)


So, if you don't want to spend big bucks why you ask for the best internals and design for a phone? Take your budget and choose whatever you can and like.

posted on 19 Jun 2015, 11:09

80. Topcat488 (Posts: 1396; Member since: 29 Sep 2012)


Dear j2001m, there are ways to make your Note 4 run faster... The OEM has animation scales on, that you can turn down or even off.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTI_vKHXn3I

I hope this helps you and others with any Samsung phone for that matter. O.o

posted on 19 Jun 2015, 15:34

86. TechieXP1969 (Posts: 13607; Member since: 25 Sep 2013)


That's why there is a 64GB and 128GB model

posted on 19 Jun 2015, 21:45

96. TechieXP1969 (Posts: 13607; Member since: 25 Sep 2013)


I have an S6 Edge. Samsung has S6 models with dual SIM cards. They certainly could have put a micro SD card slot in the device.

But many keep saying they interfere with the speed of the UFS storage. I lpersnally haven't seen an as card slow down my past phones that I could tell.

The way I see it. I spend 32 bucks per m OK month to pay for it. 32bucks is cheaper than $50.

I still use an as card with my S6. I just attach it in the car which is all it need it for anyways.

posted on 19 Jun 2015, 21:52

97. vergil9 (banned) (Posts: 517; Member since: 06 Apr 2015)


It would not interfere, the problem is the performance wont be consistent, for example some of your files and apps are on internal, and some are on the sd, obviously accessing the ones on sd will be slower.

posted on 19 Jun 2015, 22:56

98. engineer-1701d (unregistered)


i do know that i have the vr headset the 64gb went in one day hahahaha games and vids take 40gb

posted on 20 Jun 2015, 13:51

102. tombcd (Posts: 23; Member since: 29 Sep 2012)


I agree with you. We don't need a 5 mm thin phone. I would very much prefer the S6 to be around 8 mm but with bigger battery.

It looks like many decisions that should be made by technical teams are made by marketing people these days (thinner, lighter, etc.).

posted on 24 Jun 2015, 09:32

108. murphslaws (Posts: 54; Member since: 22 Apr 2015)


The "inconsistent performance" statement actually holds. You have no idea how many people I know who got a phone with expandable storage and blame phone for when things like apps that are installed in sdcard either are slow or corrupt. Of course the blame cannot really be on the phone but the cheap "$4" 32 gb sd card they got from some chinese cellphone accessory retailer. By having the storage completely internal they eliminate the chance of normal people ruining the experience and blaming the manufacturer, of course this comes with the side effect of technologically versed people being upset (like myself) who own High quality sd cards. I for one have a 64 gb UHS Sandisk micro sd, but I got the S6 Edge anyways and so far am loving the phone.

posted on 26 Jun 2015, 11:55

110. alexcordogan (Posts: 15; Member since: 19 Jan 2015)


I wish it had removable battery cause of bad battery life, but would never use an SD slot even when low on storage bc using it slows down the phone. That's why iPhones and nexus phones, which focus on performance, don't offer it.
Agree with the rest of your comment though.

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories