Reportedly confirmed: Samsung Galaxy S5 has a fingerprint sensor inside its home button
According to the website, the Galaxy S5 will have a fingerprint sensor built in its home button. Just like Apple’s iPhone 5S, you may think. Well, yes and no.
SamMobile says that the sensor is a swipe-type one, requiring you to swipe your finger pad from base to tip against the home button. Reportedly, the fingerprint scanner is “sensitive to moisture”, hence it won’t work if your finger is wet. If this is true, the moisture sensitivity could be a nuisance at times.
It’s said that Samsung has integrated various fingerprint scanning-related features into the Galaxy S5’s OS (Android 4.4 KitKat). Apparently, users will be able to register up to 8 fingerprints, and at least one of them must have the purpose of unlocking the smartphone. There will be a new Private Mode, including a Personal Folder, accessible either by fingerprint authentication, or with a PIN. Among other things, your fingerprint will be used to verify tour Samsung account.
SamMobile mentions that these features have been “confirmed” by an insider. The website also reports that the Galaxy S5 will not have on-screen buttons. Naturally, we can't be sure that this info is accurate. Not yet.
We're now only a week away from the start of Mobile World Congress 2014 in Barcelona, where Samsung is expected to officially announce its next-generation flagship smartphone. Until then, here is all we know about the Samsung Galaxy S5 (based on rumors, of course).
15. _Bone_ (Posts: 2106; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)
Note really, Samsung was considering it for the Note 3 (pre iPhone 5S), enough sensors just weren't ready.
18. giani (Posts: 269; Member since: 13 Nov 2012)
Woooow news flash...and you don't share that with us ?!
Look...let's be clear...apples decides to put a big poop on their phone...u bet 'sammy' will have one bigger....that's their motto..copy everything and everyone...
20. christophersalse (Posts: 98; Member since: 19 Jan 2014)
Every company is going to try and one-up each other. It might be copying, but if it's good then I don't see a reason to complain. In the end it benefits consumers.
43. rangaha (banned) (Posts: 86; Member since: 05 Dec 2013)
that's nice but samsung had a fingerprint sensor on their phone way back in 2005
now continue on with your special olympics
34. KingaSpades (Posts: 39; Member since: 04 Nov 2013)
Samsung copied Apple. Several times. Once based on a 132 page document. And most importantly..AGAIN. you can dress it up with rumors that you pull out of thin air but we all know that if Apple put a human ear on the iPhone then Samsung would have to have them for the next Galaxy S.
35. christophersalse (Posts: 98; Member since: 19 Jan 2014)
Like Apple never copies? Again, if this benefits consumers, what's the problem?
41. heyhi (Posts: 123; Member since: 19 Feb 2013)
common man, im not here to defend Samsung, but, when Apple put the biometric sensor on the iphones, did it copied Motorolla's idea with the Atrix?? of course it did...when Apple put a camera on their first iphone, did they copy, for example Nokia??
and by the way, HTC put a fingerprint sensor on their phone last year, but i havent seen anybody saying that HTC "copied" Apple.
55. Anchorman86 (Posts: 15; Member since: 08 Nov 2013)
So since cr@pple is sooooo innovative and never copies, can anyone tell me where they got the idea for a pull down notification shade? I'll wait....
16. neops (Posts: 161; Member since: 28 Jan 2014)
Why fingerprint is so secure? It is ONE sole code!
Even LG claim securer system by knocking (Knock Code).
And, realy Samsung? You want my fingerprint
to verify my Samsung account?
Who do you think you are, to ask me
my biometric data? The freakin' police?
Listen to your faithfull customer Samy;
you want me to buy your thing? Leave this policy.
IF this is true, I want when my phone starts for the first time
to ask me if I want to activate the fingerprint scanner.
I mean: I want to be deactivated by default.
So no hacked app steal my fingerprint.
Or even better make a variant without it.
No more biometric $#it in my phone!
19. christophersalse (Posts: 98; Member since: 19 Jan 2014)
If it's anything like my iPhone 5s it's going to be an entirely optional feature.
36. InspectorGadget80 (Posts: 6230; Member since: 26 Mar 2011)
I would never use the FINGER SENSOR. Too many info sent out too NSA. When I had my Atrix that was the only reason I purchase the phone with it's finger sensor. now everyone is gettin doing the FINGER sensor
40. heyhi (Posts: 123; Member since: 19 Feb 2013)
just out of curiosity, doesnt your government already has your fingerprints?? i mean, at least in my country, to request my "ID document", like social security, i gotta "give my fingerprints" in order to get my id.
48. SirHamm (Posts: 11; Member since: 30 Jul 2012)
put down the tin foil hat they already know what you don't want them to.
53. neops (Posts: 161; Member since: 28 Jan 2014)
Idiot as a word derived from the Greek ἰδιώτης, idiōtēs
("person lacking professional skill", "a private citizen",
"individual"), from ἴδιος, idios ("private", "one's own".
An idiot in Athenian democracy was someone who was
characterized by self-centeredness and concerned almost
exclusively with private—as opposed to public—affairs.
Idiocy was the natural state of ignorance into which all
persons were born and its opposite, citizenship,
was effected through formalized education.
"Idiot" originally referred to "layman, person lacking
professional skill", "person so mentally deficient as to be
incapable of ordinary reasoning". Declining to take part in
public life, such as democratic government of the πόλις, polis
(city state), was considered dishonorable. "Idiots" were seen
as having bad judgment in public and political matters.
Over time, the term "idiot" shifted away from its original
connotation of selfishness and came to refer to individuals
with overall bad judgment–individuals who are "stupid".
23. afegit (Posts: 37; Member since: 12 Feb 2014)
Surprised that Samsung is innovating? No way, SS has an innovative sompany since the dawn of time, unlike its biggest competitor HTC
2. AstronautJones (Posts: 249; Member since: 01 Aug 2012)
I care little about fingerprint scanners.
Design and build quality will be key for me.
11. maccess (Posts: 583; Member since: 16 Jan 2013)
Yes i need this to replace my htc one.. hope everything will be great..
6. Fallout09 (Posts: 413; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
Why is Samsung chasing this feature????? No one really cares about TouchID at this point... including Apple. Latest rumors state that the new iPads will still not feature the fingerprint scanner. Motorola did it once and hasn't done it again. It seems that HTC is not putting the feature in their upcoming phone after the HTC Max.
29. Jayshmay (Posts: 65; Member since: 27 Mar 2011)
I agree, not interested at all. Feature WILL be disabled upon initial startup.
7. TechieXP1969 (Posts: 136; Member since: 25 Sep 2013)
I'm not surprised. After all this is why APple rushed to be first. Why? Because Apple bought the company tha makes these sensors for laptops. Likely when they bought it, they also found out other OEM's were considering a sensor so APple rushed and took the best option the company has for themselves.
I am not claiming this is true. But, consider it an option. After all, why did Apple have to buy the company for such a lame feature that has been around for decades?
9. Ninetysix (Posts: 1471; Member since: 08 Oct 2012)
Check out the fandroid's comments about missing fingers, NSA, breaking scanners, etc. Love reading their comments and now they're all confused since the major Android players are adding one to their devices.
13. Heatfan316 (Posts: 359; Member since: 21 Aug 2011)
You posting a link to that shows how much of a life you really have, I suggest getting one before it's too late, I guarantee you still live with Mommy and Daddy.
17. Ninetysix (Posts: 1471; Member since: 08 Oct 2012)
Haven't lived with my parents since 15. Try again broseph :)
Magic > Heat
56. EclipseGSX (Posts: 1570; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)
I would kick your dumbass out on the street too if I were them :P
12. Tuxedo (Posts: 124; Member since: 19 Mar 2013)
Very original Samsung. Innovation right there... LMAO
14. christophersalse (Posts: 98; Member since: 19 Jan 2014)
I like the fingerprint scanner in my iPhone 5s so I'm excited to see how it's used in the Galaxy S5.
21. afegit (Posts: 37; Member since: 12 Feb 2014)
Now this is true Innovation by Samsung!!! Good job, unlike HTC
24. bucky (Posts: 1340; Member since: 30 Sep 2009)
This might sound fanboish but I actually feel comfort in knowing almost my entire life info is protected without even noticing it. If they do implement it they better make sure the software is fast like the 5s
25. Leonis (Posts: 334; Member since: 08 Jan 2014)
Well done Samsung for always copy Apple. Gold S5 next?
26. tiara6918 (Posts: 1352; Member since: 26 Apr 2012)
Copying apple again.....Even iphone 5s users don't use their fingerprint scanners very much, so why do they have to put this feature?
37. E.S.1 (Posts: 289; Member since: 14 Sep 2013)
Maybe Samsung can make the fingerprint scanner that works...
45. rangaha (banned) (Posts: 86; Member since: 05 Dec 2013)
copying what? samsung had this feature in 2005 kek
54. geordie8t1 (Posts: 83; Member since: 18 Feb 2014)
Not copying at all, well if you admit that apple copied motorola, i will agree that samsung copied HTC, because lets not forget that they already have the one MAX out, also bear in mind that samsung have already implemented fingerprint tech into devices since 2001 in their laptops, and as far as i can recall they did not go iut and buy a company to help them develop the tech. It was built in house. At the end of the day fingerprint tech is seen as a more secure way of protecting ur data, and lets not forget how much scandal tjere was laat year when both apple and android device were cracked open to reveal info by multipe methods including fast typing and freezing the devices. These companies were hounded for not being secure. So as the galaxy s4 was already out it could not release this feature. And even though the note 3 is a big seller its not as big as the galaxy s models and so is not as cost effective to put the new tech in that as there was such little time to develop it. Think before making dumb comments about copying, because EVERY company uses ideas to improve theirs end of.
27. Jayshmay (Posts: 65; Member since: 27 Mar 2011)
Samsung account??? Hmm, no need for that I have a Google account, duh!
31. Killua (Posts: 261; Member since: 25 Nov 2013)
Sounds half-assed. I guess I won't buy new phone for this year. Sony is still the same boring stuff, HTC backside (if it's true) looks ugly, Samsung sounds half-assed, LG? Oh god, not the back buttons. Nothing to buy there.
50. Smokin (Posts: 120; Member since: 10 Oct 2013)
What? Sony and LG are pretty innovative, back buttons for LG, and waterproof in such a thin, beautiful device and a ground breaking camera atleast in android world, and xperia's ui is the best in terms of looks. Sony is not boring; the boring one is actually Samsung or Apple for that matter. Lol
32. bugsbunny00 (Posts: 927; Member since: 07 Jun 2013)
wonder what apple will do next,sammy is on its tail.
39. ameran (Posts: 16; Member since: 04 Dec 2013)
I can't wait to get GS5. I am sure it will be great as always.
44. bucky (Posts: 1340; Member since: 30 Sep 2009)
I'm sure it will be an excellent device. They just need a brush up on their software.
42. phljcnth (Posts: 259; Member since: 30 Apr 2012)
Even if this is true I think I won't likely opt to use this. PIN/Password-based lock is the most secure for me. Somebody could simply use my finger to unlock my phone while I'm sleeping.
47. bfuller2006 (Posts: 21; Member since: 31 Oct 2011)
Before someone starts crying copying remember the HTC One Maxx has a fingerprint reader
49. StraightEdgeNexus (Posts: 3071; Member since: 14 Feb 2014)
I am just waiting for the galaxy s5 ad of the next big thing is already here
51. metoyou (Posts: 277; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)
no on screen buttons? Yes! The best I've ever heard from S5