Claimed first camera sample from the Samsung Galaxy K (S5 Zoom) appears
2. mayur007 (Posts: 360; Member since: 10 Apr 2012)
They are good, as a camera phone not as a smartphone
Their only quality is camera otherwise nothing much
3. sergiobr (Posts: 392; Member since: 25 Feb 2013)
No WP !!! Nokia made the wrong move ... windows. Nice picture,but we need low light shots ,and higher (1') sensor (please Sammy).
5. Kal-el (Posts: 91; Member since: 14 Dec 2012)
I want real optical zoom ...not digital "lossless zoom" ...sure agreed better than regular digital ...but optical hands down...after all your comparing 2 camera eccentric phones so we'll talk cameras not OS cuz ...we all know which way that goes LMAO
14. SleepingOz (unregistered)
My 6months old Note 3 still offers a better overall experience than it.
18. express77 (unregistered)
He might be talking about user experience only and not about camera quality Mr. Lie detector.
19. sergiobr (Posts: 392; Member since: 25 Feb 2013)
Note 3 user too, in good light all the tops have a good look.
4. 0xFFFF (Posts: 2045; Member since: 16 Apr 2014)
If Samsung announced a new model, the Galaxy S5P, a version of the S5 that included a really nice camera with OIS and Xenon flash, that would be interesting.
This thing, "Galaxy K", should remain in the lab. I'd rather have a better camera without a cell phone OS. Android, especially Samsung's "extra lag" version of it, does not making taking pictures any better.
6. fireblade (Posts: 634; Member since: 27 Dec 2013)
Meh, still much noise. G3 camera has better quality.
7. htcforlife (Posts: 32; Member since: 15 Apr 2014)
Damn! Imagine putting that thing to your ear and people thinking that guy has gone nuts
Still looks more like a camera than a smartphone sammy!
Remember its a smartphone based camera not a camera based smartphone
9. NIGER.AREA (Posts: 11; Member since: 14 Apr 2014)
I don't understand the role of this Galaxy camera series.
13. gigaraga (Posts: 495; Member since: 29 Mar 2013)
This will definitely trump the Lumia series and their 'cameras'.
15. surethom (Posts: 227; Member since: 04 Mar 2009)
Very nice but if the "phone" is still thick & not 3 times thinner than last year's model then no thanks.
20. Elrod (Posts: 1; Member since: 20 Apr 2014)
try doing some research not just copy paste what other blogs post
fake made with sony DSC-H200...tssss