x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Home
  • News
  • Browser Wars: the best 10 Android browsers go toe-to-toe, part 1

Browser Wars: the best 10 Android browsers go toe-to-toe, part 1

Posted: , by Chris P.

Tags:

Browser Wars: the best 10 Android browsers go toe-to-toe, part 1
Despite the mind-boggling rise in the number of apps that often take a share from your time spent surfing the interwebs the old fashion dedicated-browser-way, you're still bound to fire those up more often than most anything else on your smartphone. Mobile browsers, much alike their desktop ancestors, are plentiful in both number and the functionality they offer, not to mention in their design and other variables. And though these may be super important for some, most of us are simply looking for the most unobtrusive and minimal browser in terms of design, and perhaps even more importantly – the speediest.

Now, benchmarking overall browser performance is a tricky affair. There's always the fear that one or all (in which case its fine) of the browsers you may want to test are going to game the benchmark one way or another. Moreover, browser performance is just so much more than a simple set of synthetic benchmarks – memory/storage consumption and start-up speed, to name a few, are just as essential for the overall experience. These are rarely (I could probably even get away by saying never, at least as far as mobile browsers go) taken into consideration when trying to construct a proper deathmatch. That's because it's burdensome and truly time consuming. So it's safe to say that some time has been spent crunching those for you.

Synthetic


Before we jump right into this one, it's important to note that all testing was performed on a Google Nexus 4, and great care has been taken to ensure browsers get an equal footing. This means that even the lengthy tests were ran several times (at identical conditions) and the results were then averaged to get as close to being representative as possible. 

Let's start with the popular SunSpider. Developed by Apple in 2007, SunSpider attempts to measure JavaScript performance.

Browser Wars: the best 10 Android browsers go toe-to-toe, part 1

Before you scream foul at the sight of Puffin's performance, allow us to explain. Puffin is no ordinary browser, in that it leverages cloud computing to do the heavy work and then simply serves you the results, thus the downright amazing performance. What's even more impressive is that Puffin renders the actual, full desktop webpages, complete with heavy Flash-based assets, such as animated ads and such, but more on this later. 

The usual suspects, Chrome and Firefox are also in a league of their own, followed by Opera and Dolphin.

Next up, Mozilla Kraken. This one is much alike SunSpider, but nevertheless -- the more data points, the better.

Browser Wars: the best 10 Android browsers go toe-to-toe, part 1

Again, Puffin smokes the competition achieving truly desktop-grade performance, at least as far as benchmarks go. Chrome and Firefox are, again, trailing behind, but in front of the rest, which are pretty clustered. Both Opera and UC Browser had some serious issues with Kraken for whatever reason, and they kept crashing and Opera, in particular, caused the Nexus 4 to get real piping hot. Weird.

Time for Browsermark, the benchmark which tries to get as close as possible in simulating reality by running a range of tests

Browser Wars: the best 10 Android browsers go toe-to-toe, part 1

Once again, Puffin is in a league of its own, leaving the rest in the dust. On the other hand, Chrome is finally showing what it's capable of and gets a one-up on Firefox. The rest are, again, pretty clustered, though UC Browser had great trouble once again.

Developed by Futuremark (the same guys who publish 3DMark), Peacekeeper is somewhat aged, but still a relevant browser benchmark. Like Browsermark, it attempts to simulate a wide range of activity that your browser may very well have to go through in your day-to-day surfing.

Browser Wars: the best 10 Android browsers go toe-to-toe, part 1

Yep, that's right -- it's the birdie at the helm, again. However, I should probably note that Puffin, along with Opera, both got an incomplete on this one, so don't put too much stock in their score.

Unlike the rest of the benchmarks we ran, this time around we couldn't arrive at a clear second, as you can see. It's interesting to note that while UC Browser was handling benchmarks horribly (don't give up on it just yet), Firefox and Opera surprised us with the poor performance they offered. 

Let's get real


As I said in the beginning, browser performance goes beyond what synthetic benchmarks dictate. Is Puffin truly as good as benchmarks indicate? And what about the rather popular UC Browser -- is it truly as bad as numbers would lead us to believe? Let's find out.

Perhaps the metric you'll all care the most about is simply how long it takes for your browser to open up a page. Turns out, the differences between the various browser clients could be quite drastic. All the tests have been timed to the frame, more or less, and we've tested both cold and hot loading. Cold loading simply means that we first purged all the assets of the browser app, such as any stored data and cache, and exposed it to either of the sites for the first time. Hot loading, as you've probably already guessed, is the time it takes the browser to load the same site, but after it has stored everything it cares to about it. These have been ran multiple times and averaged to arrive at the final numbers you see below. 

Browser Wars: the best 10 Android browsers go toe-to-toe, part 1

Remember how I said not to give up on UC Browser just yet? It may not perform particularly well in synthetic benchmarks, but it features a rather decent ad-blocker. This helps it take the first spot when ad-supported websites such as our very own PhoneArena are involved, as the rest had to wait for ads to be served. That being said, Puffin is only technically second, because it actually loaded flash-based assets such as video ads in this particular example. Pretty great, huh? As always, Chrome is a worthy contender, but it is the now ancient Browser and Baidu that surprise -- their hot loads are significantly faster. 

Next up, we used NYTimes' mobile site as a reference:

Browser Wars: the best 10 Android browsers go toe-to-toe, part 1

Now that browsers were faced with a significantly lighter, mobile site with just one ad, UC Browser fell behind once again, though it still did better than the average. Puffin, for the thousandth time, proves that it's got a leg up on the competition, though Chrome and Firefox are not far behind it.

Last, but not least for a portion of our users, which should you pick if you're running on a legacy or a really low-powered Android device? PhoneArena to the rescue:

Browser Wars: the best 10 Android browsers go toe-to-toe, part 1

You're looking at the amount of memory consumption for each individual browser in two reference states: with 4 tabs open (Google.com; PhoneArena.com and the mobile versions of NYTimes and the BBC) and none, or in the browser's respective home. Unlike any other browser, Chrome, like the desktop version, creates a separate session for every tab that is open. I guess the idea is to improve stability, which is great, but don't forget that browsing still remains a rather burdensome task for older devices. Chrome does kill off unused tabs every now and then, but that means that unlike most other browsers, you'll be forced to reload the content on any tab that was a victim of the culling. 

With the exception of Firefox, which takes the silver in this negative ranking, the rest sit pretty much together, though Baidu did prove to be the lightest (though it has other major drawbacks, like the fact that it pretty much forces you to turn off some persistently annoying features).

Key takeaways


Many of you will not have heard of half of these browsers, even Puffin. The truth of the matter is that regardless of what these results may show, the differences in performance even between the very best and the very worst is hardly noticeable by an untrained eye. Considering the vast popularity of Android, it shouldn't be surprising to see that performance is far from a deciding factor in who's the market leader. Speaking of market leaders, check the table below:

Browser Wars: the best 10 Android browsers go toe-to-toe, part 1

As you can see, while Chrome's spot as the top dog is expected (and deserved), browsers like Dolphin, UC Browser and Opera have quite a following, despite their rather poor showing today. That's because beyond performance, the feature sets that these individual browser clients offer more than make up for the second or two longer it takes them to load the odd page.

Keeping the above in mind, lets talk of our winner today, Puffin. On paper, and in reality, the results this little browser manages are simply amazing and very much edging on desktop performance. But what about the user experience? Sure, it's arguably one of the most feature-rich clients out there, but it doesn't make up for the subpar experience we had dealing with it. Regardless, Puffin will remain on my trusty Nexus 4 and I fully intend to try and live with it and see if it sticks, though I am not that hopeful right now.

As for Chrome, as I said earlier, it's just rock solid. Of course, there's a cost -- it's significantly less feature-rich, so if you want to get fancy and creative with the way you browse on your mobile, Chrome will not make your shortlist.

Firefox is an equally solid offering. A tad less minimalistic than Chrome, it actually brings support for the widest range of HTML5 standards, meaning that every now and then I have a reason to keep it on my device in case a page fails to render in Chrome (and soon, Puffin).

The rest of the contestants are not to be underestimated, though. And truly, there's really no way for you to know which one fits your personal taste best unless you give them a shot and see for yourself. I've come across people who simply love Dolphin, for example, and weirdly enough -- people who still cling to Browser, though as far as I am aware, Chrome has now officially superseded it and I am unaware of whether someone's doing any work on it anymore.

Despite the rankings they received above, all browsers performed well in my experience. That's not to say that none of them was found lacking in one aspect or another, but I'll leave you to discover what works best for you on your own, as any effort on my part to cast a clear winner and loser turns into a maddeningly subjective affair.

106 Comments
  • Options
    Close




posted on 10 Oct 2013, 10:35

1. XperiaFanZone (Posts: 1107; Member since: 21 Sep 2012)


Opera Mobile (not Mini) for me.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 10:45 13

5. daddysbeenabadgirl (Posts: 157; Member since: 26 Jul 2012)


Dolphin is what I like. It seems to be work best for me and its one of the only browsers that I can get firstrowsports to work on. I'm definitely going to try Puffin though.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 13:01 2

46. MobileKicker (Posts: 212; Member since: 19 Sep 2013)


Safari isn't there because it will beat them all

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 13:34 8

54. WHoyton1 (Posts: 1619; Member since: 21 Feb 2013)


hahahaha good one dude!!

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 14:48 8

63. spectre1006 (Posts: 54; Member since: 27 Apr 2011)


read the title you troll.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 19:35 2

71. lorenzattractor (Posts: 56; Member since: 27 Apr 2012)


Talk about fanboyism. Geezus!

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 21:15 4

73. joey_sfb (Posts: 2519; Member since: 29 Mar 2012)


Safari is the only decent browser available due to Apple policy on not allowing third parties web engine.

Banning is the best policy to limit competition and frankly Apple user might not care. I love Firefox with Adobe flash brazing fast on the note 3.

posted on 13 Oct 2013, 11:45

92. MobileKicker (Posts: 212; Member since: 19 Sep 2013)


Still firefox wins by having a cool 3D mode

posted on 13 Oct 2013, 17:26 1

94. ZombieHunter (Posts: 18; Member since: 13 Oct 2013)


Safari isn't there because "the best 10 Android browsers". Gotta love illiterate apple fanbois.

posted on 09 Feb 2014, 11:23

103. Gzoref (Posts: 2; Member since: 09 Feb 2014)


for me, dolphin and boat are the best, though I'm on Dolphin now, because they have tabs on the top like my laptop browser has.

Although I would like to use Chrome, it doesn't have the tabs on top and so I find it difficult to navigate between pages I have open without tabs.

I don't see why people don't make more of a big deal about tabs, because they make for a much cleaner and more organized experience.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 14:14 2

57. medicci37 (Posts: 593; Member since: 19 Nov 2011)


Just tried Puffin for the first time... It's f*cking incredible! Not just the speed, but looks great with some awesome features

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 14:21

59. medicci37 (Posts: 593; Member since: 19 Nov 2011)


1 thing I don't like the with chrome on my HTC 1 is that the cache gets huge(like over a quarter gig) on a regular basis & then chrome gets real buggy until I empty it. Usually have to do this once a week.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 14:27 1

60. HalaMadrid (Posts: 92; Member since: 04 Sep 2013)


Same here.

posted on 13 Oct 2013, 11:46

93. MobileKicker (Posts: 212; Member since: 19 Sep 2013)


You play football dude
This is phonearena not footballarena

posted on 11 Oct 2013, 07:49 1

83. rob5150 (Posts: 102; Member since: 31 Oct 2011)


I came here to post this exact same comment. Been an android user since it came out and no browser ever had such speed.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 10:39 1

2. Jeradiah3 (Posts: 961; Member since: 11 Feb 2010)


I like Chrome better than the others

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:56 2

27. cezarepc (Posts: 482; Member since: 23 Nov 2012)


Same. My main is chrome then I just install a "whatever" browser in case a page fails to load in chrome. The whatever browser is usually firefox and the AOSP browser.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 10:42 8

3. brar.arsh (Posts: 121; Member since: 12 Sep 2012)


Puffin?? The best one out there and many of us havent even seen it..

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 12:25

37. Dorothy69 (banned) (Posts: 498; Member since: 21 May 2013)


It's true - this is actually useful info so stop fighting it!!

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 13:37

55. JEverettnow (Posts: 162; Member since: 11 Mar 2013)


Puffin is pretty nice, but it doesn't have the appeal that Chrome has. I will give it another shot since it supposedly supports Flash

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 21:22

74. joey_sfb (Posts: 2519; Member since: 29 Mar 2012)


Puffin, try on my iPad slow and buggy that why I fall back to safari. plus they have a paid edition that I did not buy as my experience with free is not good.

posted on 29 Oct 2013, 05:26

96. Kiiro (Posts: 7; Member since: 05 Sep 2013)


You're either a big troll or a big idiot. Read the title!

posted on 31 Jan 2014, 09:32

102. bachir8k (Posts: 78; Member since: 25 Feb 2013)


me too never heard about it before, but i guess when Puffin reach 100+ m downloads it will get slower unless its developers continue buying new servers for the content feeds.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 10:44 4

4. jphillips63 (Posts: 160; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)


I just loaded Puffin guess we will see soon. I had been using Dolphin

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 10:48 3

6. veer.d (Posts: 85; Member since: 12 Jul 2013)


opera mini is fastest and best for casual browsing

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 10:48 1

7. bloodline (Posts: 691; Member since: 01 Dec 2011)


chrome for me but will try puffin

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 10:55 1

8. sinple (Posts: 98; Member since: 04 Nov 2011)


i think you should also talk about how these sites handle flash.
Base on nexus 7
boat browser hangs while playing flash video
chrome plays html5 video very well
firefox is unable to play video in full screen
opera can hardly play any video apart from those in youtube
puffin is the only browser that can play from mp4upload.com(iphone and windows phone can play also)

Not only can puffin play more flash video, it has a special function that can render the video outside of the browser when playing video. It can somehow play the video in much more better quality than other video.

Also, puffin has a built in trackpad and gamepad that can be used for different website.

Butttt,puffin is a little bit laggy and force close more often than chrome and firefox

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 10:55 5

9. Yubnub (Posts: 100; Member since: 23 May 2013)


Time to try out puffin!

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 10:56 20

10. buccob (Posts: 1305; Member since: 19 Jun 2012)


Who else downloaded Puffin just because of this article?

I am sorry Opera, old buddy... there is a new browser on my homescreen sitting next to Chrome

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:00 2

12. SellPhones82 (Posts: 472; Member since: 11 Dec 2008)


Me! Never heard of it until now. Thanks for the info PA!

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:01 5

13. ady_lad (Posts: 73; Member since: 17 Jul 2013)


Yeah, i used to love Opera. I had Opera on my phone since i had my Nokia 6630, i used it on every phone until i bought my HTC One. On this phone opera seems sluggish. Opera used to be better on the PC too, but now it's Firefox and IE10 for me.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:13

16. buccob (Posts: 1305; Member since: 19 Jun 2012)


Agree except for your final comment... IE10 in PC is really bad... I go with Chrome for a clean UI, what it sucks is that is such a RAM hog for Android... it even closes my music thats playing in the background

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:50 2

25. ady_lad (Posts: 73; Member since: 17 Jul 2013)


I think IE10 is a pretty good browser...there is no browser to be perfect, but i like Firefox for versatility, and i like IE10 too, i think it's a pretty solid browser to be fair.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 13:08 3

50. Shatter (Posts: 1964; Member since: 29 May 2013)


Firefox > Chrome > every other browser > Internet Explorer.

I used to use Chrome but Firefox has received tons of updates since then and is faster.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 14:21 4

58. user996 (Posts: 180; Member since: 25 Feb 2013)


poor guy your back in 2000? with IE5,6 or what? IE10 and 11 rules. chrome is mess up time to time. becomes unresponsive and not responding but at that time IE10 or 11 flies through web pages

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 17:39

68. ady_lad (Posts: 73; Member since: 17 Jul 2013)


I woukdn't be so harsh on him, but i did have some bad experiences with Chrome, for me it proved it wasn't an alternative.

posted on 11 Oct 2013, 02:10

81. -box- (Posts: 3707; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)


Same here, chrome is crap, plus the privacy concerns one must have when using any Scroogle product...

posted on 16 Nov 2013, 16:34

99. rusticguy (Posts: 2818; Member since: 11 Aug 2012)


IE == Adware friendly!
FF is developer's paradise.

posted on 08 Mar 2014, 19:40

104. durnyank (Posts: 1; Member since: 15 Apr 2013)


I use a Mac, and Safari has come a very long way in the past couple of years. I USED to use Firefox and occasionally Chrome (NEVER IE), but now Safari out performs all of the other big name browsers that are compatible with Mac.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 10:59 2

11. ady_lad (Posts: 73; Member since: 17 Jul 2013)


I use Firefox mostly, it's faster and has more features than Chrome, but guess waht...i just downloaded puffin and it actually feels a lot faster than any other two...

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 16:32

66. Joshing4fun (Posts: 1044; Member since: 13 Aug 2010)


Agreed. Firefox is the smoothest which is the most important aspect to me.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:02

14. Shrihari (Posts: 79; Member since: 29 Jan 2013)


opera mini...using since five years...

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:10 2

15. maherk (Posts: 783; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)


I am stuck with dolphin mainly because of the bookmarks, I just love it when I swipe right to get to my bookmarks. And also setting up the volume keys to switch tabs. I don't know if there is any browser that has those features

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:19

19. buccob (Posts: 1305; Member since: 19 Jun 2012)


I tried Dolphin in the past, but I did not love it... so I stayed with Opera at the time... mainly because Opera was usable with an external Keyboard (using the arrows to control a virtual mouse)... but the latest update that dissed the Classic mode they took that feature out, which I used it a lot when mirroring to TV and using mouse and keyboard (turning my phone into a "pc")

So I started using Chrome more and more, but kept Opera for low bandwith usage and low memory, though Puffin is taking that place alongside with Small Web Browsers for Sony's Small Apps

Anyway ITS GREAT HAVING SO MANY OPTIONS...

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:14

17. Evil_SaNz (Posts: 258; Member since: 20 Oct 2011)


Puffin has scroll lag until it fully loads the page...chrome is fast but still has some hiccups under page load and scroll is too sensitive, causes some kind of "vertigo". Same for Firefox, while loading Phonearena site can't view immediately the page, artifacts and low res text.

Opera overheats the phone and has some bugs with some kind of pages.

My vote goes to Dolphin, always smooth even under pressure. Who cares if it's 1-2 sec slower: at least I can read immediately the sites with a smoothness feel

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:18 1

18. PootisMan (Posts: 195; Member since: 02 Aug 2013)


Sorry, but Dolphin so far is the best browser on my Nexus 4. Really love the features.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:25

20. ScruffyNerfHerder (Posts: 5; Member since: 21 Sep 2012)


Doesn't the latest Chrome have Puffin like features that can be enabled? Same with the Kindle Fire Silk browser?

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:50

26. ScruffyNerfHerder (Posts: 5; Member since: 21 Sep 2012)


Just to answer myself after some Googling, yes, Chrome (as of version 29) as well as Firefox, Opera, Silk and other browsers all support various implementations of SPDY which is a protocol for letting the certain web handling be done by a cloud server (in the case of Chrome, Google's servers) to reduce processing and page load times on the client browser. But in Chrome, it isn't enabled by default.

I'm not sure if Puffin uses SPDY and/or something else but it seems like this set of tests performed by this article needs to be re-ran with SPDY enabled for all the tested browsers for an accurate comparison of "server assisted" browsing benchmarks such as Puffin is doing.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:27 1

21. boosook (Posts: 894; Member since: 19 Nov 2012)


The problem with Chrome is its high CPU usage... but unfortunately CPU usage has not been taken into account in these tests. Just open some tabs and you'll notice that Chrome keeps on using the CPU even when all the pages have been loaded. What's more, if you exit with the Home buttone (i.e. you leave the tabs open with chrome in the background) it still uses the same cpu amount! You can really drain your batteries this way.
This does not happen with Dolphin: once you've loaded the page, the CPU is idle again.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:37 2

22. Kitkat_4.4 (Posts: 74; Member since: 03 Sep 2013)


Wonder how much $$$ PA took from Puffin devs for doing this. Just checked Puffin on my Nexus 4. Woah, this things lags, haven't seen this much lag on even opera mini or similar browsers lol. Though after reading this, gave a try to firefox and it was quite good. Though I will stick to chrome. Just one flaw I found in firefox was that when loading up phonearena.com, it kept take my data when I even clicked on "X" to stop loading the page and just show me whatever is loaded till then, but still it was taking data. sad. chrome ftmfw.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:41

23. Shatter (Posts: 1964; Member since: 29 May 2013)


It has scroll lag but the load times and benchmarks destroy 3 other browsers I tested: Firefox, Stock Browser and Chrome. Also the built in gamepad and flash player support are good if you like flash games. Its still a low slower than firefox on my i5 4670k @4.5ghz with a ramdisk caching the internet and its on a 500GB 840 Evo SSD which loads everything instantly.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 11:43 6

24. Chris.P (Posts: 247; Member since: 27 Jun 2013)


Not a dime, unfortunately ;(

And precisely what is it that we're 'doing'? If you have it downloaded then go ahead and put it through the same tests and you're bound to arrive at the same results. No lie! :)

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 12:03

30. Shatter (Posts: 1964; Member since: 29 May 2013)


Challenge accepted

Tested on my worst android backup phone (LG Optimus L9 T-Mobile version) I killed all apps possible before running this.

Sunspider: 217ms
Kraken: 2278.1ms
Browsermark: 3642
Peacekeeper: 2986 (only one that appears to be hardware reliant, nexus 4 was a little higher than yours)

The other 3 score differences between the L9 and my Nexus 4 isn't that much but the nexus 4 does run the browser much smoother.

As said above load times are way better than the other 3 still, nexus 4 loads significantly faster than the L9, better than your scores show.

Speedtest for my home internet: 12ms Ping, 12.6mbps download 1.5 upload.

Tmobile LTE Test: 55ms ping, 38mbps download, 22 upload.

Tested on both load times were slightly better on my home since less latency.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 12:16

34. ScruffyNerfHerder (Posts: 5; Member since: 21 Sep 2012)


Shatter and Chris P., from my brief reading about SPDY (mentioned above in my comment), bandwidth saving features (which may affect page load times) are enabled by default on at least some browsers (like Chrome) when connected over a wireless data service connection but disabled by default over a wifi connect. Anyway, one possible explanation why 4G and wifi testing could give different results.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 12:38

39. Kitkat_4.4 (Posts: 74; Member since: 03 Sep 2013)


Then I guess benchmarks doesn't prove a thing. Real Experience says it lags even worse than opera mini on Symbian. Scroll , zooming the page, user interface... lags alot! Though firefox is really nice. Sadly puffin was on my phone for mere 10 mins and was installed.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 16:04

65. nnaatthhaannx2 (Posts: 820; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)


You should add test notes such as the device used and your WiFi speed.

posted on 11 Oct 2013, 01:15

77. Chris.P (Posts: 247; Member since: 27 Jun 2013)


It was one possibility, but since the post got so long I decided not to burden it with stuff that aren't essential/go without saying.

Tests were performed on the PA Wi-Fi. I specifically ran SpeedTest like 10 times before I started, since I only got 2 lines of coverage in the studio and wanted to make sure I wasn't just having an exercise in futility.

DL was minimum 15 Mbit, all the way up to 35Mbit, UP was up to 20 or so.

posted on 23 Mar 2014, 01:16

105. shioupyn (Posts: 1; Member since: 23 Mar 2014)


I am Shioupyn Shen, CEO of CloudMosa, maker of the Puffin Web Browser. I can attest the Chris. P and Phone Arena did not receive any payment from CloudMosa. In fact, I do not know Chris P. at all. By the way, it is a pleasure to meet you.

CloudMosa is a self-funded and self-booting company. All revenue is spent on product development and data center expansion. I truly believe word-of-mouth marketing that a good product can sell itself through user referrals.

Here are my responses to some other questions. (1) Puffin has iOS version. Please evaluate Puffin against other browsers on iOS, too. (2) Puffin can save network usage by more than 50%. Please benchmark on network usage to see how Puffin can save users money. (3) Puffin works even better on tablets. Puffin on tablets is truly a laptop replacement. It would be great if you can evaluate Puffin against other tablet browsers on both iOS and Android.

Here is a million dollar question -- how can Puffin be possible? What is Puffin's secret recipe?

posted on 23 Mar 2014, 15:25

106. FYoung (Posts: 32; Member since: 08 Oct 2013)


Since you're Puffin's CEO, I think you should know the main reason I do not use Puffin exclusively: the fact that there is no way to import bookmarks into Puffin.

I use Puffin on Android occasionally, to save bandwidth, but I often use Chrome instead since it allowed me to import bookmarks and Chrome on Android now also saves bandwidth.

Since Chrome on Android now allows bandwidth saving, I find that the main advantage of Puffin on Android over Chrome on Android now is that Puffin zooms webpages better on Android cellphones.

Specifically, Puffin tends to snap to each collumn or frame so that they are always fully displayed and centered horizontally. It does not waste space by showing the right or left edges of neighbouring collumns, since partial collumns of text are illegible anyway.

This also makes it much easier to scroll collumns up and down, since Puffin will scroll up and down precisely instead of straying toward the right or left.

posted on 10 Oct 2013, 12:19

35. Dorothy69 (banned) (Posts: 498; Member since: 21 May 2013)


I can attest to this one: not a dang-on penny.
I use Puffin and it really blazes compared to the other browsers - all of which I've used except UC.
This, amazingly, is an objective and professional article - kudos to the author. However - I would like to see a Puffin vs Safari comparison.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories