Apple, Samsung both suffer losses in German court
Apple’s loss is interesting, since they won an injunction against Motorola with this exact patent in Munich last week. At the time many observers noted that it seemed ludicrous for Apple to have won on the patent, since the Neonode N1m clearly introduced the feature prior to Apple’s patent application. Motorola has already announced they will appeal last week’s ruling, and it’s hard to imagine Apple not appealing today’s loss, so the German court system will get a second chance at consistency.
Samsung has announced they will appeal their loss, although Samsung has not had a winning track record so far against Apple. It may seem strange at first blush that Samsung lost when asserting a standards-essential patent, but in this case the patent was on a manner of calculating a result – and as it turns out it was the result itself which is part of the standard, not the way it’s calculated. Samsung failed to demonstrate that Apple is utilizing their patented method of calculation, so they were not found to be infringing. Samsung seems less than thrilled about their track record in court so far, and has retained a new legal team in Germany. We will have to see whether it has an impact on their win/loss record as time goes on.
Apple also is asserting a different sort of IP based on their slide-to-unlock patent. Called a Gebrauchsmuster (say that five times fast!), the “German utility model” is like a shorter-term patent (a decade rather than 20 years) that is easier to acquire, but also is looked at with greater skepticism by the courts. In particular, Gebrauchsmuster IP is intended to protect products rather than processes or methods, so it seems likely that this form of German IP won’t end up entering our daily vocabulary, but it will be interesting to see if Apple has discovered a new lawsuit avenue.
In the meantime, basically nothing has changed with these two rulings, except perhaps to give Motorola some extra hope that they will be able to successfully appeal their lose at the hands of Apple’s slide-to-unlock patent last week.
source: FOSS Patents, DPMA
1. frydaexiii (Posts: 1413; Member since: 01 Dec 2011)
Everytime one of these of these "Apple sues everyone over everything", the more i wonder how did these people manage to get so far in life without getting killed at one point or another?
2. messiah (Posts: 434; Member since: 19 Feb 2010)
someone please cover a story on why the german courts are really the only courts being reported.... why are they the Nexus ( no punn intended) of the phone patent wars?
3. LoneShaolin (Posts: 307; Member since: 14 Jan 2012)
Probably because the court system may be "looser" over there, Or maybe Apple is padding pockets. Or believes that they may lose somewhere else.
4. Scott_H (Posts: 167; Member since: 28 Oct 2011)
The German court system combines three desirable traits:
1) The courts are relatively fast
2) They are quite friendly to those who sue in terms of granting injunctions (and are also relatively tolerant of FRAND lawsuits)
3) Germany is the biggest smartphone market in the EU.
As a result of those three things, Germany offers you fast and fairly friendly courts to try and get results in, and the results matter in a large market. It's the same reason so much patent trolling happens in east Texas in the United States - those courts were less backed up and friendly to plaintiffs, so people keep using it as a basis for their lawsuits.