Apple, Samsung, Google, HTC, Microsoft and others agree to voluntary anti-theft tool for smartphones
On Tuesday, Apple and Samsung joined with other companies like Google, HTC, Huawei, Microsoft, Motorola, Nokia, Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, and Sprint. All of these firms have agreed to add an anti-theft tool to the phones they manufacture or sell to the U.S. public, starting in July 2015. The hope is that by allowing stolen phones to be remotely shut down, it will remove the incentive for thieves to steal them. Criminals profit from smartphone thefts by obtaining personal information, including financial passwords and PIN numbers, from the phone. In addition, a stolen smartphone could be sold in the black market. The anti-theft tool is expected to prevent both of these from happening.
According to the CTIA, the tool will allow users to remotely wipe their device in the event it is lost or stolen. Data that will be wiped include personal information that is added after the purchase of the phone. The tool will also allow the user to remotely make the phone impossible to use without a PIN or password, except for emergency 911 calls. Along these lines, a locked down phone could be set not to reactivate without the user's authorization. If the lost or stolen smartphone is recovered by the authorized user, personal data can be restored from the cloud.
The anti-theft tool will come out of the box on new phones sold starting in July 2015, or will be downloaded on these devices. In addition, the mobile carriers who agreed to participate, will allow customers to obtain this anti-theft tool and use it on phones purchased from them. Many believed that the manufacturers would never agree to such a tool because it might cost them some replacement sales. And it was also believed that the carriers would not agree to a "Kill Switch" since it might cost them the revenue from selling premium smartphone insurance, which covers stolen handsets. But both have come together to agree to this very important initiative, which could save the lives of some of their customers.
Not everyone was excited with the voluntary plan. California state Sen. Mark Leno, who has a mandatory "Kill Switch" bill proposed in Congress, says that by making the anti-theft tool voluntary, the plan announced on Tuesday "misses the mark if the ultimate goal is to combat street crime and violent thefts involving smartphones and tablets."
source: CTIA, Recode via Engadget
2. express77 (unregistered)
this is great idea. better than kill switch. or is it the same?
11. Valdomero (Posts: 121; Member since: 13 Nov 2012)
It's more like an "Erase and Block" switch rather than a "Kill Switch", still, the idea is good tho. I believe there are services out there that already do this...
3. alexandrecastro (Posts: 20; Member since: 23 Feb 2014)
I wonder how they'll secure android recovery mode / adb / download mode ...
10. sprockkets (Posts: 1160; Member since: 16 Jan 2012)
Easy, lock the bootloader.
Look at moto. You won't get into their phones without unlocking it. Now, if unlocked, how will that play into the whole locking scheme? Well, the bootloader can be relocked, but there would have to be extra countermeasures in place for that to happen remotely.
4. Lt.Green (Posts: 371; Member since: 13 Mar 2014)
They should make a self-destruct mode ala Mission Impossible.
5. a_merryman (Posts: 666; Member since: 14 Dec 2011)
Thank god, so much better than that kill switch. That is the last things we need as consumers is the kill switch plan they were calling for. This method seems to keep the power solely in the consumers hands.
6. TechnoTechyes (Posts: 56; Member since: 24 Jan 2011)
This will hurt all those companies financially. Stolen phones = more new phone sales.
I'll bet this slows sales by 10%. - I'm not saying it is not a good thing to do, I'm just saying that I understand why the manufacturers were resistant.
9. Leo_MC (Posts: 513; Member since: 02 Dec 2011)
The one that buys a stolen phone today will buy a phone from a carrier/store tomorrow so I don't think you are right.
7. VZWuser76 (Posts: 1344; Member since: 04 Mar 2010)
Not much different than a blacklisted CDMA phone. You can call in and have it thrown on the blacklist and the IMIE number cannot be activated on any network.
8. htcforlife (Posts: 41; Member since: 15 Apr 2014)
only in the us? why not globally?
and what would happen if someone quickly rooted and flashed everything and sold it in another country?
apart from that i guess its good news