x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Alleged Galaxy S5 (SM-G900F) version appears on AnTuTu with 2.5 GHz chipset and 3 GB of RAM

Alleged Galaxy S5 (SM-G900F) version appears on AnTuTu with 2.5 GHz chipset and 3 GB of RAM

Posted: , by Daniel P.

Tags :

Alleged Galaxy S5 (SM-G900F) version appears on AnTuTu with 2.5 GHz chipset and 3 GB of RAM

An eventual Samsung Galaxy S5 candidate has been unearthed, under the codename SM-G900F, in AnTuTu's benchmark database, just as it appeared in Browsermark not long ago. The handset seems restricted to 1080p display resolution, despite the numerous rumors about it sporting a 2K HD, 1440x2560 pixels screen.

Alleged Galaxy S5 (SM-G900F) version appears on AnTuTu with 2.5 GHz chipset and 3 GB of RAM
It, however, flaunts the fastest Snapdragon 800 quad-core chipset - MSM8974AC - clocked at 2.5 GHz, has 3 GB of RAM, and 32 GB of internal memory. A 2 MP front shooter is detected, and a generous 16 MP camera, likely the one with ISOCELL technology that Samsung bragged about not long ago.

Now, this could be just a working prototype of the Galaxy S5, though this late in the game, with an eventual Q1 launch, Samsung is probably hitting the conveyor belts with the handset already. Alternatively, there might be a more premium brand from Samsung next year, the elusive F-series handsets we heard about, which will sport the rumored 2K flagship with metallic chassis and 64-bit Exynos processor. Let's not forget that we had an SM-G900S leaked not long ago, and this one was listed with 1440x2560 screen, plus the same 2.5 GHz chipset, while an SM-G900A was claimed to be in testing by AT&T, so there are obviously plenty of Galaxy S5 versions floating around at the moment.

source: AnTuTu via G4Games

43 Comments
  • Options
    Close






posted on 19 Dec 2013, 06:10 19

1. muser793 (Posts: 59; Member since: 15 Aug 2013)


only 3GBs of ram?! is this a joke?! I wanna play Halo 5 on my phone, I need more ram and ofc more pixels! fu** the battery life, OS n design!

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 18:12 4

36. darkkjedii (Posts: 22025; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)


You should design, and build your own phone. All the ram you want then.

posted on 23 Dec 2013, 15:21 1

37. lacrossebowler (Posts: 8; Member since: 06 Dec 2012)


You should get a job and leave the Halo 5 to the kids. And if you are a kid then hit the books.

posted on 26 Dec 2013, 14:06

40. ThePython (Posts: 897; Member since: 08 May 2013)


#FirstWorldProblems

posted on 02 Jan 2014, 10:38

43. techguymatt (Posts: 18; Member since: 04 Nov 2013)


rumors are rumors.... take an apple pill....

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 06:12 7

2. Cesar (Posts: 139; Member since: 16 Aug 2012)


I will bet that the Samsung Galaxy S5 will not be a 64 bits, no 16MP camera, no 2K Screen resolution and no metal building! I bet! Who agree with me?

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 06:31 6

9. JakeLee (banned) (Posts: 1021; Member since: 02 Nov 2013)


Me. It would be suicidal and foolish launching a 64-bit phone running a 32-bit OS.

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 07:47 4

17. sipha (Posts: 435; Member since: 12 May 2012)


Isn't that what Apple did??

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 08:05 5

19. JakeLee (banned) (Posts: 1021; Member since: 02 Nov 2013)


No. 5s came with 64-bit iOS7.

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 10:58 6

29. sipha (Posts: 435; Member since: 12 May 2012)


does it have any benifit without 4GB of Ram??

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 13:07 2

31. Dr.Phil (Posts: 1312; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)


It would be quite easy for Android to become 64-bit capable since it is based on Linux which has been 64-bit capable for a while now. To sum it up better:

"Android uses a virtual machine in which apps are run, so only the Dalvik VM will need to be updated to 64-bit. Existing apps aren’t likely going to need any changes at all."

http://pocketnow.com/2013/10/08/android-64-bit-2

posted on 24 Dec 2013, 14:24

38. kozza3 (Posts: 702; Member since: 17 Oct 2012)


i wonder if ART would need the same thing

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 06:43 4

11. SAYED-EJAZ (Posts: 225; Member since: 10 Oct 2013)


It will be having 64bit , 16MP camera and ofcourse 2K screen .
but there will huge wrap on design but i doubt it will be metal but it will surely something better.
only question is now is will the 64bit exynos will be 14nm or 20nm ?
will they include FDD lte and TDD lte on this chip ? ( both together as china and india will be using TDD lte )

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 07:37

16. dratomic (Posts: 483; Member since: 09 Oct 2013)


totally

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 07:54 3

18. sid07desai (Posts: 290; Member since: 03 May 2012)


2k amoled could be possible. And there wouldn't be a significant difference between 13mp and 16mp samsung cams. And metal body usually implies a unibody design or a non-removable battery, which is not Samsung's style.

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 10:13

24. InspectorGadget80 (unregistered)


U should at least wait till their unveiling till next May-June. never read rumor reports that doesn't have THE REAL DETAILS

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 10:42

26. zuckerboy (banned) (Posts: 898; Member since: 22 Dec 2011)


I dont agree with you. mark my words, it will have 2K and 16mp but Im not sure about 64bit...

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 06:17 2

3. itsdeepak4u2000 (Posts: 3718; Member since: 03 Nov 2012)


This is not S5 for sure as it should have score atleast near to Note 3 (31k+), where G2 has 35k+ AnTuTu score.

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 09:14

22. WindowsiDroid (Posts: 137; Member since: 22 Jul 2013)


Yeah, I think it is the so called "F SERIES'?

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 06:22 9

4. mittalmailbox (Posts: 51; Member since: 14 Feb 2012)


Samsung won't use snapdragon 800 in s5, they will go for snapdragon 805 or exynos 64 bit.

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 06:22 5

5. mittalmailbox (Posts: 51; Member since: 14 Feb 2012)


Samsung won't use snapdragon 800 in s5, they will go for snapdragon 805 or exynos 64 bit.

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 06:22 4

6. mittalmailbox (Posts: 51; Member since: 14 Feb 2012)


Samsung won't use snapdragon 800 in s5, they will go for snapdragon 805 or exynos 64 bit.

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 06:24 1

7. chunk1x (Posts: 248; Member since: 25 Jun 2011)


Probably faked the results again.

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 06:28

8. JakeLee (banned) (Posts: 1021; Member since: 02 Nov 2013)


That might be very well real since I can hardly imagine a 64-bit GS5 with 64-bit Android nowhere in sight.

A wise move I'd say.

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 06:37 2

10. bigstrudel (Posts: 518; Member since: 20 Aug 2012)


Same overclocked old SoC architecture from Qualcomm.

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 08:08

20. JakeLee (banned) (Posts: 1021; Member since: 02 Nov 2013)


It's understandable. Sammy had no other choice.

How well it will sell is a different question though.

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 07:01 1

12. taikucing (unregistered)


Still can't impress me after I saw Vivo Xplay 3S with almost the same spec, beautiful metal body, beautiful UI, but only costs $580.
*cough* Samsung rapes your wallet *cough*

posted on 26 Dec 2013, 20:44

41. confidential_1 (Posts: 1; Member since: 26 Dec 2013)


*cough* so does apple*cough*

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 07:04 3

13. taikucing (unregistered)


Another week, another galaxy (hello cheap plastic & stupid design, we meet again).

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 07:05 4

14. Desmund (Posts: 74; Member since: 01 Nov 2012)


No it needs 3.5 Ghz and 8GB of RAM plus 40MP Camera to be worth buying Where is my **** 50,000 mah battery?

Come on Samsung

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories