Samsung Gear IconX (2018) hands-on: a welcome battery boost


Last year's Samsung Gear IconX were awesome with their ability to add tunes to your workount without any wires getting in the way. But they were far from perfect. As we stated in our review, battery life was one of the earphones' weakest links.

The new Samsung Gear IconX (2018) addresses the issue by adding a larger battery in each earbud - one that is promised to deliver up to 5 hours of music listening over Bluetooth. The figure stands at 6 hours if you listen to music stored on the IconX's 4GB of built-in storage. As before, the provided carrying case doubles as a charger and battery bank, providing one full recharge. It has a USB Type-C connector now and supports rapid charging.

But while the new IconX scored a larger battery, the heart rate sensor is nowhere to be found. Intuition tells us that it could have been removed simply to make room for the bigger cell. Yet Samsung clarifies that they didn't want it to interfere with any heart-rate trackers the user might already have, such as the one on their Gear smartwatch or smartphone, hence its omission.

Despite the lack of a heart-rate sensor, the Gear IconX is still oriented towards sporty consumers, judging by the fact that it retains the built-in coaching features, accessed with a tap of the touch-sensitive side of the buds. Yes, volume and music playback are still controlled via tapping and swiping gestures. Access to Bixby is also on board.

Nothing in terms of a release date for the new Samsung Gear IconX (2018) has been announced. Pricing isn't known either, but since last year's model retailed for $200, it wouldn't be surprising if the successor costs about the same.


FEATURED VIDEO

7 Comments

1. TreyTreyTaylor

Posts: 728; Member since: Dec 21, 2010

All I wanted from the last model was longer battery life. Sold.

2. ph00ny

Posts: 2026; Member since: May 26, 2011

Put me down for one as well

3. bucky

Posts: 3776; Member since: Sep 30, 2009

I love my AirPods but for those who were looking at these headphones this is definitely a worthy successor.

4. boriqua2000

Posts: 251; Member since: Mar 11, 2009

They should have included these as a free gift for people who pre-ordered the note 8.

5. Tipus

Posts: 847; Member since: Sep 30, 2016

$200 would be way too expensive. Should be a $100 at most.

6. KingSam

Posts: 1425; Member since: Mar 13, 2016

I wouldnt pay $200 for the simple fact that i can have a solid over ear alternative at the same price. Does that make this expensive, NO! value is subjective.

7. medtxa

Posts: 1655; Member since: Jun 02, 2014

is 'true wireless' so much better than wireless with cable in betwen in comfort and fredom?

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.