x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7-inch Review

Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7-inch 8

Posted: , by

Tags:

Pages
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7-inch Review

Introduction


Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7-inch Review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7-inch Review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7-inch Review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7-inch Review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7-inch Review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7-inch Review
High-end Android tablets are becoming few and far between, indicating to us that the tablet segment in general has been seeing a slowdown. Most consumers seem to be more gravitated to either picking up a low-cost laptop hybrid, or the many inexpensive tablets that pack reasonable value for the money. On that note, it’s no surprise to us that many companies have stopped production and development for high-end tablets on the Android side. And then there’s Samsung!

If there’s one company you can count on for that, it’s no other than Samsung, because seriously, they absolutely love to get their presence everywhere. Although we’ve waited more than a year at this point, we’re seeing a successor to its popular and premium Galaxy Tab line. With the Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7-inch, they’re ensuring that they’ll remain relevant, as this full-size offering packs a dose of premium tablet goodness in such a svelte package.

The package contains:

  • Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7-inch
  • microUSB cable
  • Wall charger
  • Quick start guide
  • Safety & warranty documents

Design

It’s so lightweight and comfortable to use, you’d hardly know that you’re using a tablet.

Dramatic changes have come to this new tablet, as it totally sports a new design that actually follows after the Galaxy Note 4’s design language. That’s evident in how it employs a thin metal trim accent around its edges with a matte plastic chassis, which combine together nicely to give it a more appealing design than last year’s model. We can tell that it’s been designed to compete against the iPad Air 2, just because it trims off a lot of the fat to come up being skinnier, lighter, and having a smaller overall footprint than its rival. And it helps, too, in making it comfortable to use with one hand thanks to its feather-like weight – to the point that we have no discomfort holding it for a period of time.

One new, notable change is that Sammy opted to go with a portrait-style layout, as opposed to the landscape orientation of last year’s Galaxy Tab S 10.5-inch. And finally, we also find the same two dimples on its back to accommodate various covers and accessories made specifically for it. While we applaud the updated design, one that makes marked improvements over its predecessor, it doesn’t reach the same kind of premium craftsmanship we get from the iPad Air 2 – albeit, it’s surely one of the best-looking, new Android tablets around right now.

Like many of Samsung’s newer products, it now features the newer fingerprint sensor, used by devices like the Galaxy S6 and Note5, so that it’s less of a hassle to operate than before. Gently resting our finger over the home button unlocks the tablet, which is considerably better than the frustrating swipe down motion that was implemented by its predecessor.

Becoming a consistent practice of Samsung of late, the Tab S2 9.7-inch ditches the IR blaster altogether, indicating to us that it’s going to be a common thing going forward. That’s a shame to tell you the truth, seeing that the tablet also centers on multimedia consumption at home, so the lack of an IR blaster lessens its value by some degree – more so to those who religiously used it.


Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7-inch Review

Display

Oddly, the resolution is a step below its predecessor, but it’s still a generally good looking display.

An odd gesture from Samsung, a company that’s known to always outclass its previous efforts in the specs department, they’ve decided to fashion the Galaxy Tab S2 9.7-inch with a lower resolution display. This time around, it’s flaunting a 4:3 aspect ratio with its 9.7-inch 1536 x 2048 Super AMOLED display – whereas with the Tab S 10.5, it offers a widescreen format 10.5-inch 2560 x 1600 Super AMOLED panel. Even though there’s still a great deal of detail produced by it, thanks to its 264 ppi pixel density, it’s technically still not as pixel dense than Samsung’s previous effort.

There are improvements made to the screen’s quality, evident by its better ~6600K color temperature and color reproduction accuracy. Starting with the former, it betters the substantially colder ~7000K color temperature of its predecessor, which gives the screen an even more balanced tone – so it’s neither too warm nor cold. To no one’s surprise either, Sammy definitely knows how to produce an accurate screen – giving it that true-to-life representation, as opposed to the slightly saturated tones from before.

Another area that takes a step back, especially for Sammy, is seen in how the screen emits a lower luminance. In this particular case, it maxes out at a meager 375 nits, which poses trouble when it’s used outdoors with the sun’s presence glaring down on it. By comparison, the Galaxy Tab S 10.5 fared a bit better at 395 nits. While it's a fact that the screen is a step backwards from its predecessor in certain areas, it’s still a pretty good looking panel! There’s enough iridescence, wide viewing angles, and brilliance to make it a compelling visual treat to the eyes.

Display measurements and quality

Maximum brightness (nits)Higher is better Minimum brightness (nits)Lower is better Contrast Higher is better Color temperature (Kelvins) Gamma Delta E rgbcmy Lower is better Delta E grayscale Lower is better
Google Nexus 9 453
(Good)
10
(Average)
1:1178
(Good)
6942
(Excellent)
2.17
3.79
(Good)
4.56
(Average)
Apple iPad Air 2 410
(Good)
4
(Excellent)
1:1063
(Good)
7001
(Good)
2.22
4.23
(Average)
2.72
(Good)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 395
(Average)
2
(Excellent)
unmeasurable
(Excellent)
7042
(Good)
2.08
2.39
(Good)
3.06
(Good)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7-inch 375
(Average)
1
(Excellent)
unmeasurable
(Excellent)
6605
(Excellent)
2.17
2.29
(Good)
1.24
(Excellent)
View all


55 Comments
  • Options
    Close




posted on 15 Sep 2015, 06:31

1. manojmcn (Posts: 389; Member since: 16 Jul 2015)


Would be interesting to see the tablet sales for this quarter. Samsung's tablet offerings this year has been tricky re-packaging with a different aspect ratio. Nothing was improved in specs, rather they are saving dollars on some feature cut. May be the tablet sales have dried up and is not worth spending much. Even Apple skipped iPad update this year.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 06:48 4

5. TerryTerius (Posts: 1449; Member since: 10 Apr 2014)


People tend to treat tablets more like laptops. There isn't a high rate of upgrading, so sales have slowed down dramatically because of it. I don't really think tablets are going away but there isn't really a reason for manufacturers to invest heavily in them when the market trends are very clear.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 06:43 2

2. aesthetics (Posts: 128; Member since: 02 Oct 2014)


It should have exynos 7420

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 07:06 3

10. vincelongman (Posts: 3986; Member since: 10 Feb 2013)


It should have an "7420X"
Flagship tablets should have tablet SoCs
E.g. higher clocks and the MP16 variant
Like how the A8X has double the GPU of the A8

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 07:31 1

15. aesthetics (Posts: 128; Member since: 02 Oct 2014)


Exactly..

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 11:57

42. Clars123 (Posts: 563; Member since: 16 Mar 2015)


Can you honestly say that if it came with the 7420 and you were now limited to 32,64 and 128GB memory options you wouldnt complain?

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 06:44 6

3. Kruze (Posts: 1285; Member since: 30 Dec 2014)


I wonder why Samsung went with 4:3 aspect ratio, iPad wannabe? 16:9 is better IMO. It still won't help your sales if you follow Apple's footsteps.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 06:51 4

7. manojmcn (Posts: 389; Member since: 16 Jul 2015)


Since there is no major changes in specs, the 4:3 aspect ratio allows them to sell it along with the Tab S 16:9.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 06:52 2

8. TerryTerius (Posts: 1449; Member since: 10 Apr 2014)


It doesn't really matter at this point, because everyone's tablet sales are going down across the board including Apple. It won't really make much of a difference no matter what you do in this space at this point.

The sole exception thus far being the Microsoft Surface line which has had improving sales year-over-year, but that's different since it's running a full fledged desktop OS. I'm not really sure if the iPad Pro is going to be the same since it's just iOS on a bigger device that very nearly costs as much as a MacBook once you add in the stylus and keyboard cover.

But who knows? Maybe it'll be popular with the enterprise side of things.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 07:25

11. MDave (Posts: 108; Member since: 09 Apr 2015)


16:9 is plain horrible for a tablet, period. 16:10, which is the format the Tab S and 99% of Android tablets use, is somewhat better but still awkward for portrait use on large tablets and suitable only for widescreen video, really.

posted on 21 Sep 2015, 19:30

53. JulianGT (Posts: 89; Member since: 15 Oct 2012)


3:2 is the best IMO

posted on 30 Oct 2015, 12:42

55. MDave (Posts: 108; Member since: 09 Apr 2015)


It may well be (the ratio used in Google's new Pixel C sounds interesting as well). 3:2 is definitely not bad at anything, and wide enough to make it useful and natural-looking in portrait, without hurting video playback too much.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 06:46

4. WAusJackBauer (Posts: 186; Member since: 22 Mar 2015)


Wonder how battery life will be when Marshmallow lands.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 06:49 2

6. mobi_user (Posts: 150; Member since: 18 Jun 2013)


No Andriod 5.1, average maximum brightness, same old design.
And still so high in rating.
At least deduct some points. It will not effect your balance sheet much PA.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 06:54 1

9. TerryTerius (Posts: 1449; Member since: 10 Apr 2014)


I don't remember Phonearena ever actually deducting points for design language being consistent. At least not in the case of Sony, Apple, Samsung, or LG. Although they have deducted points for the chosen materials feeling terrible or build quality being bad.

And they already did deduct points, that's how it wound up with an 8.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 07:32

16. mobi_user (Posts: 150; Member since: 18 Jun 2013)


you should see the review of One plus 2

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 08:59

19. TerryTerius (Posts: 1449; Member since: 10 Apr 2014)


They didn't knock it for having similar design language to the one. They knocked it because according to them the material felt much cheaper this year than it did last year, and felt more flimsy. According to them anyway.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 07:26

12. MDave (Posts: 108; Member since: 09 Apr 2015)


5.1.1 is already available as an update (at least in the US)

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 10:52

22. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


Try it. I had it since August and it's a fantastic tablet that compliments my GS6 very well with side synch. I like it better than my iPad Air and even the iPad Air 2 when I had it for a month.

The design isn't the same at all....lol

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 07:27

13. gaming64 (unregistered)


I'm still thinking it's an iPad wannabe. But still, I'm giving Samsung praise for eliminating the 16:9 aspect ratio.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 07:29

14. MDave (Posts: 108; Member since: 09 Apr 2015)


The truly disappointing and the sore point for this tablet is actually the screen. Not only has the dpi been decreased from the Tab S, Samsung in their infinite wisdom, and in move consistent with their efforts to undermine themselves at every opportunity, has also switched to a disgusting Pentile submatrix for the display. This means that if you've got sharp eyes, you will notice that the text is anything but crisp. In short: it sucks, very especially on a tablet designed and promoted to consume websites and "printed" material.

It seems that reviewers, clueless as usual, are simply unable to appreciate the difference since they only look at the numbers so things might actually work OK for Samsung and get away with it.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 10:56

24. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


Um I don't think the 9.7 is pentile.... The 8.0 might be but that's just like last year. The 8.4 was pentile but the 10.5 wasn't.

My eyes are pretty sensitive to pentile unless it's over 500ppi like the GS6 and the Tab S2 9.7 looks pretty sharp to me.

If the text is worse then it's either the lower ppi or what LG did to save power that ruined the text on the G3.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 11:20

33. MDave (Posts: 108; Member since: 09 Apr 2015)


What can I say. It doesn't look sharp to me at all. And I've checked three different units on store, in case it was a lemon. Anandtech's review will put the screen under the microscope hopefully.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 07:45 2

17. _Bone_ (Posts: 2154; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)


The Tab S2 brightness actually jumps over 500 nits under the Sun, making it very readable.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 08:19

18. Manyci (Posts: 110; Member since: 03 Aug 2015)


Wow since the Note5/Edge Plus reviews all reviewed products get insanely low ratings... What's going on? Did I missed something? Did the standards go this high? Or its just for the Iphone 6s to get topping 9.9/10 review? o.O

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 09:04

20. TerryTerius (Posts: 1449; Member since: 10 Apr 2014)


That's usually what happens. Once any manufacturer raises the bar, it is up to everyone else to reach it. And if they don't... Well you see what happens. That's been happening since the iPhone 6 and Galaxy S6 came out.

If you are competing in the flagship space... Then you should be prepared to be judged by the standards that the best devices have set.

And it's only been two major phones I can think of that got slammed. The ZTE Axon pro came out around that time and it got over at 8.

Although I definitely am suspicious about the score of the 1 + 2, & I think they got a faulty review unit.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 11:14

30. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


9 for the Note 5 and 8.7 for the edge plus is pretty low. This 8 score is reasonable but they could have easily marked this up to a 9 using an Apple scale.

This tablet performs great, looks and feels fantastic despite the Note 4 specs. Just like the iPad mini using old specs, it still performs pretty much the same as the iPad Air 2 but smaller despite using old specs. Same thing here. Performs just as nice as my GS6 somehow.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 09:44

21. arch_angel (Posts: 1651; Member since: 20 Feb 2015)


They Obviously Lowered The Resolution To Increase The Tablets Performance, They Saw How The E5433 Struggled With The High Resolution On The Note 4(Add The Note For To The Benchmarks Test) It Would Have Been Stupid Of Samsung To Use A Resolution Higher Than That Of The Note 4. So To Me Its Good They Went With A Resolution That's Lower Than The Tab S 10.1 Cause Its Actually Higher Than The Note 4's.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 11:02

25. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


No....... There is no such thing as 2k in a 4:3 aspect ratio. They had to use the iPad resolution or change aspect ratios or go much higher than 4k. Probably like iPad pro resolutions.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 11:10

29. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


Much higher than 2k I mean.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 11:17

31. arch_angel (Posts: 1651; Member since: 20 Feb 2015)


Where Did I Say It Had A 2k Display? And The 2048x1536 Resolution Of The Tab 2 Is So Close To Standard 2k(2048x1536) That It Might As Well Be. Its Only 2 Off From The Pixel Density Of A True 9.7in 2k Screen. So Even If It Had A True 2k Screen It Would Still Be Lower Than The Resolution Of The Note 4 And The Tab S 10.1.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 11:41

38. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


You said they obviously lowered the resolution to increase performance. I said no they lowered it because there was no such thing as their previous resolution, 2k, in a 4:3 aspect ratio and that is why they lowered it.

Not for performance reasons.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 11:53

41. arch_angel (Posts: 1651; Member since: 20 Feb 2015)


GTOF. They Could Have Matched Or Surpassed The Pixel Count Found On The Tab S Easily. They Lowered It For Performance.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 12:07

43. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


Lol please. The evidence is there that they lowered it because they had to. The Nexus 9 used the same resolution too. Why didn't they beat or match the resolution on the tab pro 8.4? They have ample power to do so with the 64 bit k1. They didn't because they would have to go a much higher than 2k resolution. It's obvious that I am right and your dead wrong moron style.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 12:25

46. arch_angel (Posts: 1651; Member since: 20 Feb 2015)


GTFO You're Logic Is Completely Idiotic.

As For What You Said in Post #44 They Still Could Have Done It If They Wanted And Easily Beat The 2K Resolution The Tab S Has Without Resorting To A Ridiculous Resolution Like 3200x2400.

Again The Reason I Gave Is Much Better Than Yours, Makes Way More Sense.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 19:29

47. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


Lol how is it idiotic? Both the Nexus 9 and Tab S2 chose this resolution over the higher resolution predecessors and the pattern isn't for performance increases. The pattern is that it is the most standard resolution with the most thud party support because of Apple.

My logic is perfectly sound while yours is not. I have evidence and facts. You have nothing but an idiotic theory. Samsung never lowered anything to increase performance in their life btw. They only add unless they can't.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 20:01

49. arch_angel (Posts: 1651; Member since: 20 Feb 2015)


I'm Tired Of This Petty Argument So I'm Done. But Just For The Record I Was Right And You Were Wrong.#Winner:-)

PS. I Want Be Replying So Say Whatever You Like, Loser.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 11:07

27. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


List of 4:3 Monitor Resolutions
Resolution - Aspect ratio
640x480-----4:3
800x600-----4:3
1024x768-----4:3
1152x864-----4:3
1280x960-----4:3
1400x1050-----4:3
1600x1200-----4:3
2048x1536-----4:3
3200x2400-----4:3
4000x3000-----4:3
6400x4800-----4:3

List of 16:9 Widescreen Resolutions
Resolution - Aspect ratio
852x480-----16:9
1280x720-----16:9
1365x768-----16:9
1600x900-----16:9
1920x1080-----16:9

List of 16:10 Widescreen Resolutions
Resolution - Aspect ratio
1440x900-----16:10
1680x1050-----16:10
1920x1200-----16:10
2560x1600-----16:10
3840x2400-----16:10
7680x4800-----16:10

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 11:09

28. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


So judging by post 27. They would have to go 3200x 2400 to beat the Tab S 2k display and I don't think the Exynos 5433 can handle that. Lol

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 11:18

32. MDave (Posts: 108; Member since: 09 Apr 2015)


But they didn't need to go that far. All they needed to do was match last year's screen. At something like 2248 x 1686 (4:3) that would have meant 288 dpi and the total pixel count would still be less than last year's, on a more powerful GPU. Yeah, OK, it's s pretty unique resolution but so is the iPad Air's Pro @ 2732 x 2048. They could have done it but decided to cut back on costs and downgrade the screen.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 11:23

34. arch_angel (Posts: 1651; Member since: 20 Feb 2015)


Taters Is Stupid He Doesn't Understand.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 11:31

36. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


What? How am I stupid? I am right moron. There is no such thing as 2k in a 4:3 aspect ratio.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 11:49

39. arch_angel (Posts: 1651; Member since: 20 Feb 2015)


You're The Damn Moron You Dumbass Just Read Your Post #28.
SMH I Never Said 4:3 Had A Standard 2K Resolution Just That The Tab 2's Resolution Is Extremely Close To 2k And They Could Have Easily Beaten The 2k Resolution Of The Tab S Without To Much Trouble At All, They Definitely Wouldn't Have Had To Use The Outrageous Resolution Of 3200x2400. The Reason For Them Sticking With The Lower Than 2k resolution Is For the Reason I Gave In Post #21. GTOF.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 12:12

44. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


Please. Without much trouble at all? They would have to make a queer Apple style resolution to beat the 2k in the Tab S with a 4:3 aspect ratio. But unlike Apple they don't have their own OS to make developers scale their apps to this new queer resolution. So they HAD to use the same one Google adopted with the Nexus 9, which just so happens to be the same resolution this tablet uses. Coincidence? Um no....

posted on 16 Sep 2015, 04:54

52. MDave (Posts: 108; Member since: 09 Apr 2015)


Developers don't create their layouts using physical pixels, they've got resolution indepent units for that. The Android runtime translates them into physical pixels based on the dpi of the screen. So no, that's not a problem at all and that excuse doesn't fly.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 11:25

35. arch_angel (Posts: 1651; Member since: 20 Feb 2015)


Your List is Wrong. There Are Other 4:3 Resolutions Not Just The Ones Listed Here. 2560x1920 Is All They Needed Or What Post #32 Said.

Look At This.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_common_resolutions

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 11:38

37. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


You could use 2560 x1920 or what mddave said but the iPad resolution is probably easier and more common.

And what post 32 said is still a downgrade .....

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 11:51

40. arch_angel (Posts: 1651; Member since: 20 Feb 2015)


I Could Have Sworn He Had A Higher Res Than That. I'm Pretty Sure He Edited What He Previously Said.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 12:19 1

45. MDave (Posts: 108; Member since: 09 Apr 2015)


What I suggested gives you 288 dpi, how is that a downgrade? And anyways, the point is that they didn't even to match the pixel count to match the pixel density given the reduction in screen size...

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 19:32

48. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


It's a downgrade because 2k with a 10.1 inch screen gives you 299 or 300ppi and your oddball resolution gives only 288ppi.

You are reaching if you expect them to use an oddball resolution in order to match the resolution of the Tab S. It's just not worth the headache of straying from the Google standard Nexus 9 resolution.

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 21:11 1

50. g2a5b0e (Posts: 3704; Member since: 08 Jun 2012)


This is one of the few times times when you're actually on point, Taters. These folks clearly don't get it. Stop wasting your time.

posted on 16 Sep 2015, 03:41

51. MDave (Posts: 108; Member since: 09 Apr 2015)


Whatever. They are reaching if they expect me to give them my money for a screen that's worse than last year's. I was quite thrilled when this tablet was announced, but Samsung being Samsung, they had to find a way to f**k it up. Maybe they can model their failure after the nexus 9's too!

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 10:54

23. fyahking (Posts: 859; Member since: 28 Jan 2015)


The speaker is that low on the nexus 9?

posted on 15 Sep 2015, 11:04

26. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


The Nexus 9 is quite pimp on paper. Crazy GPU, super bright, high ppi. How did HTC f**k that up?! Lol

Ahhh HTC. They are like the super hero of screwing up mobile devices. They always find a way. Lol

posted on 21 Oct 2015, 17:24

54. dcwt2010 (Posts: 15; Member since: 01 Feb 2013)


"Although it’s not the latest piece of silicone from Samsung"

Silicone and Silicon are entirely different compounds....

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Display9.7 inches, 1536 x 2048 pixels (264 ppi) Super AMOLED
Camera8 megapixels
Hardware
Exynos 7 Octa 5433, Octa-core, 1900 MHz, ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53 processor
3072 MB RAM
Size9.34 x 6.65 x 0.22 inches
(237.3 x 169 x 5.6 mm)
13.83 oz  (392 g)

Latest stories