New Samsung SM-G900S gets benchmarked: 2560x1440 display, Android KitKat and 2.5 GHz processor could define the Galaxy S5
New Samsung SM-G900S gets benchmarked with 2K display Fullscreen
More popular slideshows
LG G3 - 40 Tips & Tricks for LG's most powerful smartphone ever
25 Jul 2014, 01:36
iOS 7 release date and time are today (Sep 18), get ready to update!
18 Sep 2013, 04:00
5 Android L themes, launchers and icon packs to install while you wait
25 Jul 2014, 03:23
New Samsung SM-G900S gets benchmarked with 2K display
1. Boybawang (Posts: 29; Member since: 02 Jun 2013)
I hope the suspected device with that resolution is just a Tablet and not S5. 560ppi on a phone is just ignorance and stupidity
11. _Bone_ (Posts: 2104; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)
Technology's won't stop cause you think something's "enough", following that logic we'd still be having low-res color TVs of the last century, cause what more do you want... it's a television... with colors! :D
2k screen via low-energy pentile arrangement on a larger than 5" screen makes sense, look how efficient the Note 3 screen is already. It's about the same sub-pixel density of the demanding RGB LCD of HTC One, and ppl. only called HTC ignorant and stupid until they looked at that gorgeous screen, then realized those sentiments applied for themselves.
12. Finalflash (Posts: 1460; Member since: 23 Jul 2013)
So be it but would the effort and time wasted making that happen (including money) be better spent on "actually" increasing value in a meaningful way. Call it at 1080p for 5 inch displays and maybe focus on energy efficiency more, and maybe better software optimizations.
13. _Bone_ (Posts: 2104; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)
Increase value in what way? You are expected to get a revolutionary 16MP ISOCELL camera, 64-bit efficient 22nm true Octa-Core CPU, 4GB fast RAM, 4000mAh battery, improved AMOLED tech, possible via thin damage-resistant flexible screen, a metal frame, redesigned TouchWiz AND a 2k sharp screen for the same money you spent on your S2, S3 or S4, and you want further value increase?
15. yudi.nemesis (Posts: 1127; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)
Since both Sony and Samsung claim that their sensor is more superior than conventional BSI Sensor, I really want to see some real life and fair comparison between ISOCELL vs Exmor RS.
And maybe we can also see WQHD Display comparison from Japan Display, Samsung and LG.
22. Pancholo (Posts: 371; Member since: 27 Feb 2012)
Yup. Only with those *expected* features (battery, especifically) will it really make sense to have a ridiculously high resolution of such caliber.
We're just suckers constantly drooling at these technologies, and we usually compromise 1 or 2 features just to have the phone that tingles our dreams... every 6-12 months.
We need better batteries, not an excuse to keep raising display resolutions.
38. rallyguy (Posts: 524; Member since: 13 Mar 2012)
With governments literally wasting money, I'm not going to criticize a company for spending their own money.
17. Shatter (Posts: 1970; Member since: 29 May 2013)
No 1080p is high enough to not see pixels on the 5" and below displays. TVs are far from not seeing pixels up close even 8k tvs will have pixels if your close. Better time can be spent into improving the displays color quality, energy efficency, contrast ratio, etc. Upping the resolution is pointless on a 5" display there is nothing wrong with a 1080p phone screen.
30. Chris_Bakke (Posts: 199; Member since: 23 Jan 2013)
The last two Samsung flagships have had literally an infinite contrast ratio.
24. hurrycanger (Posts: 793; Member since: 01 Dec 2013)
Agree with you. People who say 1080p of enough are like those who said 720p was enough. I remember last year, so many people in sites like this keep saying "why 1080p? 720 is good enough. My laptop is 720 and it's good..." And now people are like 1080p is enough. XD
39. 14545 (Posts: 1067; Member since: 22 Nov 2011)
Screen quality(colors, contrast, etc.) are different than pixel densities. @ 1080 you can't, or almost can't, differentiate between different pixels without a magnifying glass. Maybe 2k will completely make any display under 5" a completely solid "picture" to the naked eye(if 1080 didn't, but I think it did). Beyond that, unless you are applying it to larger screens, there is no need to keep adding pixels. Work on screen tech(quality, efficiency), but stop adding pixels. It is useless. More pixels beyond that just requires more resources to handle the added pixels that can't even be seen. .
46. vampyren (Posts: 12; Member since: 26 Apr 2013)
And this is why Apple did not add it for their 5S, its sort of pointless. I have S4 and its totally great, i just love the screen and more pixels is just a total waste of battery and resources as you say.I'm so amazed how much Samsung managed to put into S4, for me i wouldnt even need a new phone as S4 is so so fast, software optimization and updates is where its at. They have amazing phones already. Look at S5 it has 1Gig of ram and so much less CPU power (GPU is actually quite good) but it still beat the much more powerful S4 in many tests so why not make more optimisation and use the hardware more efficiently.....
41. ngo2dd (Posts: 779; Member since: 08 Jul 2011)
1080 at 440 poi is more then enough. Anymore serves no added value to a cellphone. Most media are only scale up to 1080p, so how would this help? What value is added?
26. zuckerboy (Posts: 898; Member since: 22 Dec 2011)
I have no doubt that you will be the first who get s5
45. Adrian38 (Posts: 105; Member since: 05 Nov 2012)
Totally agree with you. I personally thought 720p was good enough on a phone. I mean, it's a phone... Haha I could never tell the difference between a 720p screen and a 1080p screen. At least not on a screen so small. But that's Samsung. Doing it because they can Lol
3. Abo3amood (Posts: 7; Member since: 16 Nov 2013)
Some confirmations of the rumors are on the way :D
4. Teja171 (unregistered)
What is this ? Cpu max frequency is 2.5ghz, which accounts for Snapdragon 805 soc.
Where is the Adreno 400 Gpu ?
This a debunked rumour surrounding the S5.
14. _Bone_ (Posts: 2104; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)
More likely the MSM8974AB, the higher clocked SD800 expected to hit the Xiaomi Mi-3 among other phones. The SD805 is not ready for testing.
5. xIJoeyBoyIx (Posts: 7; Member since: 25 Oct 2013)
Even with these specs if touchwiz isn't optimized well enough we will probably still see lag on the device.
32. ebubekir26 (Posts: 307; Member since: 21 Dec 2012)
nope, impossible, I have not once seen Touchwiz lag on my Note 3, only for a couple of seconds after rebooting but that's just normal like every phone....
7. Mr.Singh (Posts: 10; Member since: 02 Aug 2012)
plz no more resolution upgrade,, we just need more processing power & ram !! ...nd no increase in size
16. akki20892 (Posts: 3266; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)
5 inch - 2K or 1080p
Processor - Quad core(1.5Ghz to 3.5Ghz), or Hexa Core(1.2Ghz to 3.2Ghz) or Octa Core(1.2Ghz to 3Ghz)
Metal Or High quality Plastic or Graphene
RAM - 4GB to 8GB
Battery - 3000mAh to 5000mAh
Storage - 16GB to 64GB
this specs only for great smartphone.
18. Shatter (Posts: 1970; Member since: 29 May 2013)
1080p is 2k... Who started the lie that 1440p is 2k?
20. spiderpig2894 (Posts: 413; Member since: 10 Jan 2012)
Yup. 1080 is 2k and the 1440 is also in the 2k range because it is 2560x1440 or the 2K HD
21. Bishop_99 (Posts: 59; Member since: 04 Dec 2013)
They should probably refer to it as 2.5k since they are focusing on the horizontal resolution instead of the vertical resolution (1080p). Since 1080p already is 2k(1920), then the 2560x1440 should be referred to as 2.5k.
19. blingblingthing (Posts: 423; Member since: 23 Oct 2012)
Sad seeing these comments. Using that logic we'd have less capable phones, slower cars, CRT monitors etc.
Let the world continue to rotate and technology continue to advance.
23. Pancholo (Posts: 371; Member since: 27 Feb 2012)
It's like putting a V12, 8.0L motor in a Fiat 500... You'll still run out of gas - FAST.
27. McLTE (Posts: 637; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)
Not at all.. that would be the processor.
This is like putting an amazing body on the car, with unknown drag coefficients - we don't know if there will be a performance hit, but it sure looks good!
34. tedkord (Posts: 4288; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)
Except the Note 3 with 2.5x the pixels of the Note 2 and nearly 3.4x the pixels of the iPhone is one of the longest lasting phones around, equaling or beating the other two easily.
Each generation of Samsung AMOLED display has gotten much more efficient, just as each generation of CPU has.
42. ngo2dd (Posts: 779; Member since: 08 Jul 2011)
Except the battery on the note 3 is much larger. Hour per mAh for the note 3 is not as good as the G2 or the iPhone.
8. taikucing (unregistered)
Damn, my 32" TV is still 720p. This phone has 300% more pixels than my TV.
35. tedkord (Posts: 4288; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)
That's true, but you don't sit with your TV a foot from your face. Or at least you shouldn't.
25. CreeDiddy (Posts: 220; Member since: 04 Nov 2011)
If these are the benchmarks these aren't very impressive in comparison to the iPhone 5S.
36. tedkord (Posts: 4288; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)
a) It's likely a prototype, not completed.
b) it's pushing 600% the pixels.
28. McLTE (Posts: 637; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)
You people that keep whining an crying about "this is enough" or that's "overkill", need to just leave these tech forums and go play with your 720p phones on some other site.
The fact of the matter is - technology is advancing. You can't controll which aspects advance and under what timing. Many of you act as though it's an either/or situation where we are getting better screens OR batteries OR processors.
You say "oh Samsung (or any other tech firm) quit messing with your screens and make better batteries!" Really? Do you really think that a company the size of Samsung, and with their R&D funding can only focus on one thing? UM.. NO.
I can guarentee that they have many teams working on the various areas of tech advancement. Batteries, screens, processors.. etc.
If those that are involved with screen tech are seeing areas where the product can be brought to another level.. should they STOP and wait for batteries to catch up? Absolutely not!
I'm sure there are many working on the next generation of batteries and processors - relax and enjoy what is coming now.. and stop complaining.
43. ngo2dd (Posts: 779; Member since: 08 Jul 2011)
You have no idea what you talking about do you? Increasing screen resolution is not the biggest issue that Samsung, LG and any other screen manufacturing had. The cost of manufacturing has came down enough for them make it now. This is nothing new, people are complaining because it added no added value. The biggest issue Samsung face is the efficiency of the blue organic compounds use in screen.
29. mayur007 (Posts: 360; Member since: 10 Apr 2012)
its good to see innovation anyway..
bcoz something is better than nothing ...
31. Chris_Bakke (Posts: 199; Member since: 23 Jan 2013)
People need to realize that innovation comes at different speed. Battery tech might be making huge strides behind the scenes, and nothing worth showing to the consumer. Screen tech is something fathomable and easily marketed. Software optimization is boring to anyone who doesn't frequent phone/tech site. Please stop complaining about the lack of tangible innovation and be patient.
37. tedkord (Posts: 4288; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)
I do recall some stories in the last few years about breakthrough power saving tech for phones, but none has materialized. I remember one that used a small wireless relay inside the phone instead of wired connections that was supposed to make the radio over 50% more efficient. That was probably 4 years ago, where is it?
40. McLTE (Posts: 637; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)
seeing breakthrough technology at these research labs is FAR FAR from seeing it manufactured.
Could very well be that it is a viable thing to do, but impossible to manufacture in such a way that it's cheap enough or reliable enough for consumers.
33. MistB (Posts: 550; Member since: 07 Jul 2012)
Has it ever occurred to any of you that this might not be the Galaxy S5 at all and may be the new flagship line of Galaxy F Premium series. 5 plus inch screen, latest version of Android with a metallic build and chassis with the latest processor and 2k screen, the S5 will most likely come out in April. Remember, Samsung wants to make a third high end flagship to counter the rising stars from China and the established elites like Sony/LG/Microsoft/HTC and Apple of course who are most likely readying more than 1 IPhone next year.
44. Adrian38 (Posts: 105; Member since: 05 Nov 2012)
2560x1440 resolution? If this really is the S5, R.I.P. battery life. Talk about overkill. Even a 3,000mAh battery will struggle with such a display.