x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • LG V10 battery life test score places it amongst shortest-lived big phones

LG V10 battery life test score places it amongst shortest-lived big phones

Posted: , by Victor H.

Tags :

LG V10 battery life test score places it amongst shortest-lived big phones

The LG V10 is a crazy phone: it has a secondary display on top of the main one, and it has not one but two front facing cameras. In a world filled with similarly looking aluminum slabs, the V10 stands out.

And while its crazy ideas are backed up by an excellent camera that is among the best we've ever tested, there is one key aspect of the phone that deserves special attention: its battery life.

Time and time again, users are saying that great battery life is essential for a great phone experience. With a demanding 5.7" Quad HD display and the Snapdragon 808 system chip under the hood, how does the LG V10 battery life measures when compared against other big phones?

3,000mAh battery does not seem enough for the demanding 5.7" Quad HD display

We put the LG V10 and its user-removable, 3,000mAh cell through our battery life test and the results are worth your consideration for one simple reason: the V10 ranks the worst among all recent large phones. We run a custom script that mimics typical use to measure battery life, and in order to achieve equal conditions, we pre-set all displays of the phones we test at a brightness level of 200 nits (a level comfortable for indoor use). In this test, the display is always on, and the script is running until the phone's battery dies. The LG V10 scored a disappointing 5 hours and 51 minutes, noticeably less than the Apple iPhone 6s Plus, Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and the class-leading Motorola Droid Maxx 2.

Battery life test results

We measure battery life by running a custom web-script, designed to replicate the power consumption of typical real-life usage. All devices that go through the test have their displays set at 200-nit brightness.

hours
Higher is better
LG V10
5h 51 min (Average)
LG G4
6h 6 min (Average)
Apple iPhone 6s Plus
9h 11 min (Excellent)
Samsung Galaxy Note 5
9h 11 min (Excellent)
Google Nexus 6P
6h 24 min (Average)
Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015)
6h 29 min (Average)
OnePlus 2
6h 38 min (Average)
BlackBerry Priv
7h 20 min (Good)
Motorola DROID MAXX 2
11h 33 min (Excellent)
Motorola DROID Turbo 2
8h 1 min (Excellent)
View all

What's interesting, though, is that at the same time, the LG V10 recharges wicked fast. It takes just 1 hour and 5 minutes to regain full charge (going from 0% to 100%), and that partly makes up for the disappointing battery longevity.

Recharge test results

minutes
Lower is better
LG V10
65
LG G4
127
Apple iPhone 6s Plus
165
Samsung Galaxy Note 5
81
Google Nexus 6P
89
Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015)
76
Huawei Mate 8
156
OnePlus 2
150
BlackBerry Priv
155
Motorola DROID MAXX 2
105
Motorola DROID Turbo 2
82
View all


51 Comments
  • Options
    Close






posted on 21 Jan 2016, 05:38 19

1. kkmkk (Posts: 493; Member since: 06 May 2013)


i had this phone for 2 weeks the battery life was a disaster

posted on 21 Jan 2016, 06:27 5

5. dimas (Posts: 2262; Member since: 22 Jul 2014)


Lg have these battery problems since the g3. They make great-spec phones but they sure discourage potential buyers like me because of the short-lived powerhouse.

posted on 21 Jan 2016, 07:02 2

8. Tsepz_GP (Posts: 992; Member since: 12 Apr 2012)


Its amazing to think they once had the best battery life phone with the LG G2, but have really lost the plot from the G3.

Truly shocking performance. That Snapdragon 808 is not a very good chip either, its performance at some points is lower than the older Snapdragon805's. The old Galaxy Note 4 scores better in AnTuTu than the V10.

posted on 21 Jan 2016, 10:16 3

34. TyrionLannister (unregistered)


"its performance at SOME points is lower than the older Snapdragon805's."

More like all points. 805 smacks the 808. Better GPU, no throttling, double the memory bandwidth and more efficient.

posted on 21 Jan 2016, 12:32

42. SYSTEM_LORD (Posts: 675; Member since: 05 Oct 2015)


Yeah. I think this is the reason their phones have had bad battery for a while. Just because a processor can handle a load, doesn't mean it should. Processors should be MORE than powerful enough for their intended use so that they're coasting along in the overwhelming majority of cases. This leads to efficient use of battery.

posted on 24 Jan 2016, 16:08

54. alex3run (Posts: 713; Member since: 18 May 2014)


SD805's GPU is slower than SD808's one, lol.

posted on 24 Jan 2016, 20:11 1

55. TyrionLannister (unregistered)


It's not. Adreno 420(sd805) is around 30% faster than 418(sd808). Check the benchmarks. You don't even need that, just check the model numbers.

posted on 21 Jan 2016, 09:28

26. ibend (Posts: 5059; Member since: 30 Sep 2014)


but it have removable battery... just need some second and get it fully charged..

posted on 21 Jan 2016, 22:01

48. medtxa (Posts: 1133; Member since: 02 Jun 2014)


Well the note 5 has almost double that battery life lol. And you need to buy the second battery and external charge for that. dont forget to bring it on your pocket all the time too.

posted on 21 Jan 2016, 12:04 1

41. QWERTYphone (Posts: 654; Member since: 22 Sep 2014)


A SPARE REMOVABLE BATTERY IN YOU POCKET AND A WALL CHARGER SOLVES ALL BATTERY ISSUES, INCLUDING BATTERY LIFE.
This should be obvious to anyone with a brain.

posted on 21 Jan 2016, 05:44 15

2. Hexa-core (banned) (Posts: 2131; Member since: 11 Aug 2015)


SD808 isn't good enough at pushing QHD!

posted on 21 Jan 2016, 06:10 5

3. Wiencon (Posts: 1920; Member since: 06 Aug 2014)


Kinda sad when you realise that G2 was a battery champ at time but this is another great example how QHD is useless

posted on 21 Jan 2016, 06:23 1

4. carlemillward (unregistered)


Saw this coming, good thing it is removable and has fast charging. What could the reason be: Snapdragon 808, LCD technology, software?

posted on 21 Jan 2016, 06:54 4

7. TyrionLannister (unregistered)


Laggypop

posted on 21 Jan 2016, 08:08

16. rubyonrails3 (Posts: 273; Member since: 01 Oct 2014)


Its not laggy its stutters a lot.. its fast in opening closing apps and everything but animations are not smooth..

posted on 21 Jan 2016, 08:49 1

21. EcoCare (Posts: 434; Member since: 30 Jul 2014)


Probably display tech. Any non-AMOLED QHD phone will have a tough time keeping its runtime high.

posted on 21 Jan 2016, 06:35 1

6. Bogdan86 (Posts: 48; Member since: 06 Oct 2014)


are they copying apple ? LOL :))

posted on 21 Jan 2016, 07:04 5

9. Tsepz_GP (Posts: 992; Member since: 12 Apr 2012)


Truly disappointing but not surprising as the Snapdragon 808 is the SoC. While the 810 is at least momentarily powerful, the 808 is both weak and power hungry.

They should have used the Snapdragon 805 with higher clock.

posted on 21 Jan 2016, 07:11 4

10. Sidewinder (Posts: 434; Member since: 15 Jan 2015)


What happened to LG flagship battery life after the g2? They need to understand that the same old 3000mah battery ain't gonna cut it with specs this powerful. But on a surprising note, the note 5 seems to be doing quite good with the same capacity battery and display size.

posted on 21 Jan 2016, 08:51 1

22. EcoCare (Posts: 434; Member since: 30 Jul 2014)


It's because of AMOLED. I've never heard a non-AMOLED QHD phone that lasts longer than S6 or 6P.

posted on 21 Jan 2016, 07:34 2

11. Blest42188 (Posts: 52; Member since: 05 Aug 2015)


i can attest to this. Battery life is cheeks with this phone

posted on 21 Jan 2016, 07:40 2

12. Sidewinder (Posts: 434; Member since: 15 Jan 2015)


It is the only thing keeping me back from buying a LG g4 right now..

posted on 21 Jan 2016, 07:47

13. UglyFrank (Posts: 1722; Member since: 23 Jan 2014)


Samsung could do it with the same battery

posted on 21 Jan 2016, 08:28 1

17. TyrionLannister (unregistered)


Samsung had it's own chipset. LG doesn't have that choice. Man, Qualcomm screwed up a lot of flagships in 2015.

posted on 21 Jan 2016, 08:02 2

14. rubyonrails3 (Posts: 273; Member since: 01 Oct 2014)


This results don't adheres to my experience.. I had LG V10 and Moto X.. I was getting better battery life with V10 than Moto X. for heavy users LG V10 is better but yes its not as great as I've other devices like Note 5, HTC One M8 or iPhone 6s plus

posted on 21 Jan 2016, 08:07

15. Ninetysix (Posts: 2460; Member since: 08 Oct 2012)


Wall-hugger.

posted on 21 Jan 2016, 08:40

18. dmomintz (Posts: 25; Member since: 21 Jan 2016)


Where is the Galaxy S6 Active on that list? Or

posted on 21 Jan 2016, 08:43

19. Ninetysix (Posts: 2460; Member since: 08 Oct 2012)


Hopefully you'll figure it out. We have high hopes for you.

posted on 21 Jan 2016, 08:45

20. Coconut00 (Posts: 480; Member since: 13 Jan 2015)


You can add it at the bottom. It scored 12 hours 9 minutes.

posted on 21 Jan 2016, 09:26

25. ibend (Posts: 5059; Member since: 30 Sep 2014)


because S6 active have 5.1 inch screen.. and this article is about big phone / phablet..
but you can manually add it

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories