Apple manages to fast-track its California lawsuit against Samsung for July 2012

3. PeterIfromsweden posted on 26 Aug 2011, 10:23 0

why turtles ?

6. davecann2 posted on 26 Aug 2011, 10:36 5

I just though it was relevent.

24. PeterIfromsweden posted on 26 Aug 2011, 12:11 0

why is it, please explain ?

• This comment is posted in response to #6 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #6 Hide

27. davecann2 posted on 26 Aug 2011, 12:20 0

Its relevent because Apple has a patent on their shell design.

• This comment is posted in response to #24 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #24 Hide

44. 530gemini posted on 26 Aug 2011, 15:54 1

You mean "relevant"?

• This comment is posted in response to #27 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #27 Hide

61. Droid_X_Doug posted on 26 Aug 2011, 17:59 1

@dave means relevent, because he probably has a pending patent application on the use of the word relevent....

• This comment is posted in response to #44 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #44 Hide

10. iKingTrust (banned) posted on 26 Aug 2011, 10:59 3

They did have the patent but they sold it to Chuck Norris.

72. Truth posted on 26 Aug 2011, 20:22 1

Apple tried to sue Chuck Norris for patent infringement but Chuck Norris looked at Steve Jobs and they dropped the case. That is also when Steve Jobs resigned.

14. protozeloz posted on 26 Aug 2011, 11:11 2

:D I like turtles too

33. The_Miz posted on 26 Aug 2011, 12:54 2

:D I like frogs too

29. The_Miz posted on 26 Aug 2011, 12:52 2

Ladies and gentlemen, I bring you breaking news - Samsung has decided to become original for once.

Now that would be breaking news if it happened because we all know Samsung has been copying Apple since day one of their crappy Galaxy S phones. You all know it's true.

34. tbolthasissues (unregistered) posted on 26 Aug 2011, 13:08 2

I swear to god, all these judges are f**king iSheep. It disguists me that apple is winning so many of these cases.

Oh ya, when the hell is Apple going to face legal action for falsifying documents? You know, when they Photoshopped pictures of not one but TWO Samsung devices to get them banned?

46. 530gemini posted on 26 Aug 2011, 16:20 0

@tbolt. This is another lie from an android fan. The court's decision to ban those Samsung devices in Germany was not based on those photos at all, but on other evidences that Apple presented. Matter of fact, those photos have little to no weight at all on the court's decision. Also, you said "falsifying documens". Those are photos, not documents. Android fanboys are liars.

73. Truth posted on 26 Aug 2011, 20:29 2

The ban was not based on "evidences" like you say. That is a lie. The court that banned the devices do so because that is the first step in the process for that court. That is why the ban was lifted for the rest of Europe but upheld in Germany, the home of the court.

• This comment is posted in response to #46 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #46 Hide

45. 530gemini posted on 26 Aug 2011, 16:15 1

@davecann. Another lie from an android fanboy. There is no such patent filed by Apple.

See how android fanboys just lie and make up stuff. I will be pointing it out more in this thread. I'm sure there 's more below :)

84. hormiga posted on 27 Aug 2011, 11:58 2

530gemini - overweight and jobless living in your mom's basement? Maybe if you could give up masturbation for a few hours and step away from your powermac and into the daylight you'd find you wouldn't have to derive self confidence from bashing people on online forums.

12. davecann2 posted on 26 Aug 2011, 11:02 0

In addition Apple Sues any organism that conducts photosynthesis. Trees mostliky to counter sue!

48. 530gemini posted on 26 Aug 2011, 16:23 1

@davecann. Another lie. Photosynthesis is a natural process in plants that cannot be patented by Apple, much more sue any plant for it. Android fanboy liars are on a roll :)

76. remixfa posted on 27 Aug 2011, 08:13 1

nuh uh.. since apple is a fruit, it comes from a tree.. trees produce photosynthisis. Therefore apple invented photosynthisis.

• This comment is posted in response to #48 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #48 Hide

15. iKingTrust (banned) posted on 26 Aug 2011, 11:27 0

I didnt laugh

17. davecann2 posted on 26 Aug 2011, 11:37 1

Probably because you didnt get the joke.... just busting your chops =P

20. remixfa posted on 26 Aug 2011, 11:44 2

UPDATED!

Apple sues the sun for emmitting light! Says steve jobs invented light the day he was born.. bends over to show judge that light emmits from his behind!

49. 530gemini posted on 26 Aug 2011, 16:26 1

@remix. And again another lie from an android fanboy. Patent agencies have no jurisdiction in outer space. Therefore, they could not reward Apple a patent for light emitted by the sun. Also, there is no way that Steve could've invented light because light already existed even before he was born. So you are obviously lying.

My goodness. Android fanboys are truly liars.

77. remixfa posted on 27 Aug 2011, 08:14 3

if steve jobs is the god u all think he is than he existed before he was born.. negating your statement.


no gemini, its called FUN.. you should try it sometimes.

• This comment is posted in response to #49 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #49 Hide

31. The_Miz posted on 26 Aug 2011, 12:54 3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9dg2EZeZf8

47. 530gemini posted on 26 Aug 2011, 16:21 1

@remix. Yet another lie from another android fanboy. Apple never patented breathing, and they never want anyone to stop breathing either. Android fanboys are desperate, so they resort to lies :)

More lies from android fanboys below.

65. hepresearch (unregistered) posted on 26 Aug 2011, 18:59 2

... more like resorting to jokes... :P

7. darth8ball posted on 26 Aug 2011, 10:48 0

Rumor has it that might be the whole start to this onslaught of patent wars against Uncle Sammy. Apple asked and Samsung said no, wanting to save this display for their own devices. That would make this the biggest spoiled brat fit in the history of the world.

9. remixfa posted on 26 Aug 2011, 10:58 2

tis true, apple wanted AMOLED and sammy said.. uh nope.. only got enough for me, not for you.

50. 530gemini posted on 26 Aug 2011, 16:32 1

@remix. I can site you several STATEMENTS from Apple stating that they prefer lcd over amoled. But there was never a statement from Apple saying that they want amoled on their devices, although there have been RUMORS. You're a liar.

• This comment is posted in response to #9 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #9 Hide

78. remixfa posted on 27 Aug 2011, 08:14 1

and rumors have never been more truthful than well read official statements.. lol

• This comment is posted in response to #50 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #50 Hide

11. darth8ball posted on 26 Aug 2011, 11:00 1

Because that is where Apple is based and holds alot of political clout.

21. remixfa posted on 26 Aug 2011, 11:45 0

thats where google is located too... its a home field fight for both of them.

23. darth8ball posted on 26 Aug 2011, 12:00 0

but since jobs has Pixar backing which is Disney backing which is ABC TV backing is it really even?

• This comment is posted in response to #21 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #21 Hide

36. remixfa posted on 26 Aug 2011, 13:25 2

dunno. im sure google has people more powerful than disney in their corner. they are, after all, the company that nearly single handedly has compiled EVERYONE ON THE PLANET's search information, usage statistics, any online data, and everything else... and has it available at their fingertips.

apple may have more money but google has infinitely more information.. and thus more power.

grab another bag of popcorn.. we watch it mystery science theater style!

• This comment is posted in response to #23 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #23 Hide

51. 530gemini posted on 26 Aug 2011, 16:41 0

@remix. My goodness. Google is a search engine/advertisement company, not an encyclopedia for heaven's sake. You're making it seem like google owns all knowledge. Just because you can search almost everything in google, it does not mean they own almost everything and could do whatever they want. Geez. Remember, you can find both true and false data, helpful and crappy information in google.

• This comment is posted in response to #36 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #36 Hide

66. hepresearch (unregistered) posted on 26 Aug 2011, 19:08 0

this just in...

US Military establishes new artillery proving grounds in the Santa Clara Valley of California, from Cupertino to Palo Alto. Let the Apple vs. Google death-match begin! Now we just need food for the spectators...

• This comment is posted in response to #51 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #51 Hide

79. remixfa posted on 27 Aug 2011, 08:16 0

if u can search googles database, than it exsists in googles database. your arguements are pretty lame lately.

google has massive server farms that has a catalogue and back up of everything thats on the internet.

Id say thats the largest compendium of knowledge in the world.. and google owns it.

• This comment is posted in response to #51 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #51 Hide

16. iKingTrust (banned) posted on 26 Aug 2011, 11:27 0

Hell yea. And we love it.

25. box (unregistered) posted on 26 Aug 2011, 12:15 1

I'm pretty sure oil companies are a bit more hated than apple.... but just slightly

53. 530gemini posted on 26 Aug 2011, 16:43 0

@box. On that I agree. And also pharmaceuticals.

52. 530gemini posted on 26 Aug 2011, 16:42 0

@tmachaveli. Speak for your android fans only please :)

54. 530gemini posted on 26 Aug 2011, 16:45 0

@fireboy. I know huh. It's wrong to monopolize something that you own.

I heard you own a nice house and a few cars. I'm moving in next week, and I will be using one of your cars as well. Remember, it's not nice to monopolize on things you own ;)

80. remixfa posted on 27 Aug 2011, 08:17 0

owning a car and trying to own all cars are 2 different things

your arguements really suck lately gemini.. get of the morning dose of taco-o's

32. gallitoking posted on 26 Aug 2011, 12:54 0

Apple has been waiting for the iphone killer for years now... yeap keep waiting... .......

87. remixfa posted on 28 Aug 2011, 19:22 0

come back with that statement when iOS is the dominant platform in the world. Otherwise, the iOS killer has already done its job.

55. 530gemini posted on 26 Aug 2011, 16:47 0

@corps. Well, the only device that could kill the iphone, is the iphone. And Samsung devices are really starting to look and work like iphones :)

35. tbolthasissues (unregistered) posted on 26 Aug 2011, 13:12 0

Lol, excuse me Mr Sheep, Apple is a terrible company. They made one good invention a while ago but their time up. Don't get me wrong, I'm very grateful for the work they've done, we wouldn't be where we are now without them but they are a s**tty company that has lost all my respect because of not only the constant bulls**t lawsuits they keep filing but also the fact that they falsified documents just to win a case.

41. gallitoking posted on 26 Aug 2011, 13:53 2

ahhh Apple will go broke because a un registered person is looking elsewhere... buhu,,, good luck at the other side of town... mr tbolthasissues... and by your name the t-bolt is not the only one with issues...

37. remixfa posted on 26 Aug 2011, 13:27 0

here we go.. i sheep confusing facts. apple just very recently became "americas most profitable" company. that does not mean they are the biggest or most successful company in the world. that also doesnt automatically make their products the best..

i cant wait for u to ACTUALLY get an iphone. we'll see ya back in android camp within the year.. lol

39. gallitoking posted on 26 Aug 2011, 13:50 1

if i decide between making a profit which is what every company is in business for or being sucessful... profits, and sales... moves the world... and apple has both.. better luck next time.. thanks for playing.. are you smarter than an android fan....