Samsung Galaxy S III placeholder tops AnTuTu benchmark charts

posted by Daniel P. / Apr 26, 2012, 2:21 AM

Samsung Galaxy S III placeholder tops AnTuTu benchmark charts

Invalid image meta

A new device has topped the AnTuTu Android benchmark software ranking list chart, taking over the Transformer Prime with the quad-core Tegra 3.

The device is uploaded as the Samsung Galaxy SIII, which was the preferred name for the next Galaxy flagship before it became clear that Samsung itself is calling it Galaxy S3.

The device info section uses a popular render of the SGS3 for a picture placeholder, and lists the processor as a 1.4GHz Exynos 4212, which is the fishy part, as Samsung just made the quad-core 4412 official and said it will go into the "next Galaxy" in May.

The other specs are a 4.7" HD display, and 12MP camera, which coincide with Amazon Germany's preorder listing for the phone, so we more or less know what's shaking for the May 3 announcement. The big question mark is design, and Samsung is so tight-lipped about it, that we suspect torture chambers being set up in the HQ basement for any tester that leaks the final ceramic looks.

Thanks, KJ!

Related phones

View Full specs

PhoneArena Rating:

9.3

Read Full Review

User Rating:

8.7

Based on 113 Reviews

Display 4.8" 720 x 1280 pixels

Camera 8 MP / 1.9 MP front

Processor Samsung Exynos 4 Quad, Quad-core, 1400 MHz

Storage 32 GB + microSDXC

Battery 2100 mAh(11.60h 3G talk time)

FEATURED VIDEO

Options

43 Comments

1. Atrixboyyy

Posts: 607; Member since: Nov 03, 2011

Beast! Nuff said.

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 2:25 AM 12

33. cheetah2k

Posts: 2271; Member since: Jan 16, 2011

So, the rear camera is a 1200 MP? is that like 1.2GigaPixel bwahaha...

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 8:28 AM 4

2. saiki4116

Posts: 413; Member since: Mar 31, 2011

4212 is quad core A9 processor.....

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 2:28 AM 0

3. jordan30589

Posts: 15; Member since: Jan 23, 2012

You're wrong there, the 4212 it's the 32nm version of the 45nm dual core 4210 in the Galaxy S2. The quad core version of the 4212 its the 4412.

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 2:45 AM 5

18. android_hitman unregistered

sorry mate but your wrong "The Exynos 4 Quad, also known as the Exynos 4212 (previously as the 4412)"

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 4:38 AM 1

20. TylerGrunter

Posts: 1544; Member since: Feb 16, 2012

I'm not sure where you got that from, but tha's not what Samsung themselves are telling:http://www.samsung.com/exynos 4412 is the "Exynos 4 Quad" 4212 is the "Exynos 4 Dual 32nm" It has also been changed in Wikipedia:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exynos It seems that they are changing the way to name chips.

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 5:19 AM 3

26. saiki4116

Posts: 413; Member since: Mar 31, 2011

"The Exynos 4 Quad, also known as the Exynos 4212 (previously as the 4412), packs two times the number of cores as the Exynos 4 Dual (Exynos 4210) that you find in the Galaxy S II but due to the new 32nm processor is said to be 20 percent more efficient." see herehttp://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_announces_new_quadcore_exynos_4_quad_processor-news-4160.php Might be a change of name at the 11th hour

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 6:29 AM 0

4. fxymps1

Posts: 10; Member since: Apr 16, 2012

200megapixel !! Is this written or i am alone !!

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 2:58 AM 4

5. jordan30589

Posts: 15; Member since: Jan 23, 2012

It's actually 2mp front and 12mp on the back, its shown in some kinda decimal form or something.

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 3:00 AM 2

7. Fayeznoor

Posts: 74; Member since: Nov 15, 2011

200 Megepixel = 2mp front facing camera, 1200 megapxels = 12mp read camera

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 3:02 AM 4

6. Droid_X_Doug

Posts: 5993; Member since: Dec 22, 2010

Another unknown is whether the U.S. edition gets the S3 for LTE compatibility.... If the U.S. gets the S3 version, that will be one huge disappointment. :-(

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 3:01 AM 1

8. jordan30589

Posts: 15; Member since: Jan 23, 2012

It's actually the s4, I don't think you want the out dated and slow s3.

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 3:04 AM 2

9. xenonn1

Posts: 19; Member since: Apr 13, 2012

1gb ram memory? s**t just got real..at least 1.2/4 sammy.

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 3:05 AM 1

10. jubbing

Posts: 150; Member since: Aug 20, 2008

well, my HTC One X also had a higher score than the Transformer Prime, but why didn't it get a placeholder? Proof -http://yfrog.com/z/oc7hzqzj

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 3:08 AM 3

12. WrussS

Posts: 4; Member since: Feb 26, 2012

samsung making add for it self. With this s**tty specs sgs3 don't want to make a fool oneself

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 3:33 AM 0

16. hung2900

Posts: 966; Member since: Mar 02, 2012

In your photo: - The length of One X: 67 mm - The length of TF201: 63 mm => Antutu benchmark of tf201 in Antutu list: 10561. In the photo of this article: - The length of GS3: 27.5 mm - The length of TF201: 23 mm => Antutu benchmark of GS3: 12627 with Exynos 4212 1.4 GHz Powerful!!!!!

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 3:51 AM 1

17. jubbing

Posts: 150; Member since: Aug 20, 2008

Actually mine was 11,232

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 4:27 AM 0

19. babyk

Posts: 379; Member since: Nov 03, 2011

score is based on many things not only processor

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 5:17 AM 0

21. babyk

Posts: 379; Member since: Nov 03, 2011

The length of GS3: 27.5 mm? wow strange

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 5:51 AM 0

22. hung2900

Posts: 966; Member since: Mar 02, 2012

I meant the bar of GS3 benchmark, ok?

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 5:59 AM 0

11. WrussS

Posts: 4; Member since: Feb 26, 2012

hardware sucks

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 3:27 AM 3

15. jordan30589

Posts: 15; Member since: Jan 23, 2012

You sure? Because I see the S3 having better camera,and also a better processor than the over hyped tegra 3.

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 3:49 AM 4

38. Hunt3rj2

Posts: 396; Member since: Nov 11, 2011

How much have you been smoking? Tegra 3 and Exynos 4412/4212 have the same CPUs, 4 Cortex A9s at 1.5 GHz. Of course, I wouldn't be surprised to see the Exynos much better, seeing as how Nvidia made idiotic decisions outside of the CPU, like single channel LPDDR2 (Exynos is dual channel, so is Snapdragon S4 and any other modern SoC), so it will choke under high load, and the GPU is still crap. No built in modem on Tegra 3 means it doesn't have the Snapdragon advantage either. Tegra 3 is good for being first, but they cut too many corners to get there. It will do 95% of what the Exynos does, but it's still not as good as it could be.

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 6:14 PM 0

39. kshell1

Posts: 1143; Member since: Oct 05, 2011

They don't "have the same CPU" for one the exynos 4412 is 1.4ghz quad, its also on a 32nm using HKMG transistors instead of the manufacturing process used for 40nm.

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 6:32 PM 0

40. Hunt3rj2

Posts: 396; Member since: Nov 11, 2011

Do you even understand what you're saying? Yes, 32nm HKMG uses less power than 40nm. No, it doesn't change the fact that it is the same architecture CPU at the same speed. Go read up on Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge CPUs. The Ivy Bridge is a dieshrink with minor architectural improvement, at the same clockspeed it is only 3-5% faster, which is the same as absolutely no change. The difference is that Ivy Bridge can use less power.

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 6:42 PM 0

41. kshell1

Posts: 1143; Member since: Oct 05, 2011

I wasn't referring to the HKMG making it faster, just the fact that its on the die, I was referring to the fact that the 32nm will be faster, nothing more, nothing less.

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 7:32 PM 0

42. Hunt3rj2

Posts: 396; Member since: Nov 11, 2011

That argument still is nonsensical. Yes, it will clock higher on 32nm HKMG than 40nm. This is not being clocked higher. There is no performance advantage. An 80286 made on 32nm at the same speed as an 80286 made on 260nm will have the same performance, just that one will use immensely less power than the other. That is how it is. Stop trying to put Exynos on a pedestal. It will probably beat Tegra 3, but it comes down to doing what Tegra 3 didn't, which is proper design.

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 8:04 PM 0

13. Cyan3boN

Posts: 446; Member since: Feb 23, 2012

i thought the ram was 2gb!!!!

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 3:38 AM 0

14. theingeniousgeek

Posts: 4; Member since: Apr 26, 2012

Yet another prototype?

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 3:48 AM 0

23. JDCohen722

Posts: 39; Member since: May 18, 2011

My ASUS Transformer Prime running Stock ICS with no modifications at all usually gets just over 10 000 in Antutu, my One X usually gets around 10 500. So no PhoneArena, its pretty much the same in benchmarks in Antutu as Tegra 3, just because some Primes get 8 000 and others get 10 doesn't mean the GSIII tops Tegra 3, and its better to compare it directly to the One X's benchmarks since they both have the same resolution and Software. (ICS for Tablets is heavier than on Phones)

posted on Apr 26, 2012, 6:06 AM 0

view all comments