x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Sony Xperia Z5 Compact Review

Sony Xperia Z5 Compact 7

Posted: , by

Tags:

Pages
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact Review

Introduction


Sony Xperia Z5 Compact Review
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact Review
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact Review
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact Review
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact Review
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact Review
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact Review
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact Review
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact Review
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact Review
We don’t know about you, guys, but we find great joy in reading old smartphone reviews. They don’t just bring out that warm, soothing feeling of tech nostalgia. They can also be an amusing read – going back to our Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 review, for instance, reminds us that a 4-inch display was considered huge only 5 years ago.

Times have changed since then. The average smartphone has grown in size, and so has its screen diagonal, which now hovers around the 5-inch mark. At the same time, those not ready to accept a smartphone of such proportions must be finding it increasingly hard to come across a truly powerful handset.

That’s the kind of folks the Sony Xperia Z5 Compact is made for. While relatively small in size, as suggested by its 4.6-inch screen diagonal, the smartphone packs most of the features and hardware muscle one would get from the brand’s flagship, the Sony Xperia Z5. To be more specific, the Compact is equipped with a top-shelf processor, snaps photos with a 23MP camera, resists water ingress, blasts sound through stereo speakers, and promises great battery life. Not bad for a phone of this caliber, is it?

Okay, that’s enough chatter. Let’s take the Xperia Z5 Compact for a spin and see what it has to impress us with.

In the box:

  • Xperia Z5 Compact
  • Wall Charger (Output: 5V, 1.5A)
  • Micro USB cable
  • Quick Start guide

Design

You want a truly compact, pocket-friendly smartphone? Here you go!

What is it that makes a compact smartphone compact? Is it that it fits in the smallest of pockets? Or that it fits nicely in smaller palms? Or that it is easy to hold and ideal for use with one hand? Of course, all of these factors are of importance, and the Sony Xperia Z5 Compact does tick most of the right checkboxes. It is a very pocket-friendly phone and one highly suitable for single-handed use. Furthermore, folks with palms of smaller size will enjoy handling Sony’s petite handset – we did confirm this with a couple of lady friends. But the phone’s shape has a negative impact on ergonomics.

You see, when it comes to smartphones, Sony’s current design language favors flat surfaces, straight lines, and rectangular shapes. From a purely visual standpoint, there’s nothing wrong with that – a phone built around these principles has a classy, professional, timeless look. This applies to the Xperia Z5 as well. But on the flipside, the edges and corners of the Xperia Z5 Compact have barely any roundness to them and don’t feel nice against the palm. That’s not too big of a deal, but we had to mention it.

Size and shape aside, the Sony Xperia Z5 Compact is built within a plastic frame, with glass covering its front and back sides. The back, in particular, is made of what Sony calls frosted glass, and one should think of it as glass treated to a matte finish. There’s a benefit to choosing the latter over regular, glossy glass: fingerprints don’t stick to the back’s non-reflective surface. But on the downside, some folks will find the finish too slippery.

It might not look like it, but the Sony Xperia Z5 Compact comes with a pair of front-facing stereo speakers. The good news is that their openings – barely noticeable slits between the frame and glass panel – don’t spoil the looks of the phone in any way, as it was the case with the Xperia Z3 Compact.

There’s another noteworthy perk that sets the Xperia Z5 Compact apart from most other smartphones – the handset carries an IP65/68 certification, meaning that it is resistant to dust and water damage. However, while the Z5 Compact will survive accidental spills and being caught in the rain, you are strongly discouraged to submerge the phone completely underwater, especially if it is of the salty kind. In fact, improper use will invalidate your warranty. In any case, you must ensure that the cover protecting the SIM and microSD card slots is firmly in place, as that’s what stops dust and moisture from entering. Thankfully, no flap is needed for the Micro USB port at the phone’s bottom.

On the right side of the Xperia Z5 Compact reside all of its physical buttons – a power key in the middle, a volume rocker beneath it, and a 2-stage camera shutter. Disappointingly, these have not been designed well. The power button is soft, and accidental presses were common in our experience, but the volume controls are even more annoying. The volume rocker is just tiny and operating its buttons feels like pressing a sponge. On top of that, the rocker can’t be reached comfortably due to its awkward placement. At least the camera button works fine. It comes in handy while shooting photos, and long-pressing it will launch the camera from any screen.

Speaking of buttons, the Sony Xperia Z5 Compact has a fingerprint scanner built into its power key. Naturally, its main purpose is to replace your lock screen and it does a good job at that. The scanner is fast and reliable, with a very high rate of successful readings. Due to its placement, however, the scanner is less convenient to use when the Z5 Compact is held in the left hand. Sorry, lefties!


Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
5 x 2.56 x 0.35 inches
127 x 65 x 8.9 mm
4.87 oz (138 g)

Sony Xperia Z5 Compact

Apple iPhone 6s
5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches
138.3 x 67.1 x 7.1 mm
5.04 oz (143 g)

Apple iPhone 6s

Samsung Galaxy S6
5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches
143.4 x 70.5 x 6.8 mm
4.87 oz (138 g)

Samsung Galaxy S6

Sony Xperia Z5
5.75 x 2.83 x 0.29 inches
146 x 72 x 7.3 mm
5.43 oz (154 g)

Sony Xperia Z5


To see the phones in real size or compare them with other models, visit our Visual Phone Size Comparison page.

Sony Xperia Z5 Compact Review

Display

The screen gets the job done, but we were expecting better quality given the phone’s price.

The Sony Xperia Z5 Compact comes with a 4.6-inch IPS LCD display. By today’s standards, that’s a screen size below the average, and that on-screen buttons eat up precious space does not make things any better. On one hand, there’s nothing holding you back from playing a game of Need for Speed or watching an episode of Voltron on a Z5 Compact. But on the other, these and other activities are more enjoyable on a bigger screen. When chatting, for instance, the on-screen keyboard occupies more space than the actual text conversation. Although the UI is also to blame for this imperfect experience. We’re not saying that a 4.6-inch screen is too small or impractical. It just has its obvious limitations when compared to larger offerings. Those demanding a compact phone, however, should do just fine with what the Z5 Compact has to provide.

In terms of resolution, the Z5 Compact’s display packs 720 by 1280 pixels, which translates to a density of 319 pixels per inch. The screen that Sony went for is sufficiently clear and crisp, which makes it perfectly usable. However, it would have been nice seeing a screen of higher resolution in its place, seeing that this is a rather expensive phone we’re dealing with. On the plus side, lower resolution means better gaming performance.

Sony could have paid more attention to color accuracy. Our display measurements show that the Xperia Z5 Compact’s screen has a color temperature exceeding 9000 kelvins, and that’s quite far from the reference mark of 6500K. The screen appears blueish because of that. And the delta E figures, which indicate the screen’s accuracy across the color spectrum and grayscale range, are average at best. It is nice that color accuracy can be tweaked from the settings menu, but we don’t see many Z5 Compact owners actually doing that.

Where the Z5 Compact truly shines, however, is in the brightness category. With a peak output exceeding 700 nits, the phone’s screen is one of the brightest around, which explains why outdoor visibility has never been an issue during the weeks we spent testing the phone.

Before we move on, we must mention that the Xperia Z5 Compact remains usable even when its screen or your fingers are wet. There’s also a Glove Mode, which can be triggered manually, but if you don’t plan on actually using the phone with gloves on, we’d recommend you to leave the feature off. Having it on results in frequent accidental taps when the phone is used with bare fingers.

Display measurements and quality

Maximum brightness (nits)Higher is better Minimum brightness (nits)Lower is better Contrast Higher is better Color temperature (Kelvins) Gamma Delta E rgbcmy Lower is better Delta E grayscale Lower is better
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact 703
(Excellent)
5
(Excellent)
1:1486
(Excellent)
9056
(Poor)
2.75
4.35
(Average)
9.5
(Poor)
Sony Xperia Z5 672
(Excellent)
4
(Excellent)
1:1256
(Excellent)
7688
(Average)
2.62
3.79
(Good)
6.19
(Average)
Samsung Galaxy S6 563
(Excellent)
2
(Excellent)
unmeasurable
(Excellent)
6584
(Excellent)
2.11
2.02
(Good)
2.94
(Good)
Apple iPhone 6s 554
(Excellent)
6
(Good)
1:1593
(Excellent)
7056
(Good)
2.21
1.47
(Excellent)
3.23
(Good)
View all


123 Comments
  • Options
    Close




posted on 20 Nov 2015, 09:20

3. Plume-Veil (banned) (Posts: 174; Member since: 19 Nov 2015)


Still 3gb Ram, no 4gb Ram. Agree to NickT, Sony designs screams stylish.

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 09:31 2

5. Swordylove (Posts: 159; Member since: 27 Jun 2015)


Z3 Compact camera is better.

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 09:34 32

7. jellmoo (Posts: 1455; Member since: 31 Oct 2011)


Yikes. It's really strange to see chart topping battery life, followed by text that seems to find the battery life somehow disappointing.

I can't wait for the OnePlus X review. I'm anticipating a score of 3.

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 09:48 1

14. itsjustJOH (Posts: 231; Member since: 18 Oct 2012)


Too high.

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 09:53 23

16. buccob (Posts: 2489; Member since: 19 Jun 2012)


what did you expect? even when the Z3 Compact had almost TWICE the battery life of the iPhone 6, according to their benchmarks (from that time), it wasn't enough to make PA write something credible and unbiased...

iPhone reviews are always filled with "Cons" (and missing a few more) but those seem to not matter at all regarding the final Rating... in comparison the Xperia Compact line tend to have fewer "Cons" but with bigger consequences to the final rating...

I will wait for the comparison review at GSMArena if they decide to make one this year...

posted on 21 Nov 2015, 16:46 2

109. cheetah2k (Posts: 1490; Member since: 16 Jan 2011)


GSMArena FTW. iPA is just a has beens spammers paradise with zero credibility and no backbone

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 09:36 1

8. plasteek (Posts: 109; Member since: 07 Jun 2015)


antutu 61k vs S6 58k...why not !

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 09:46 14

11. buccob (Posts: 2489; Member since: 19 Jun 2012)


Nice to see that PA finally got a regular Sony 1.5A charger... perhaps they can re-test Z3/Z3C charging time as well and they will see that it is Average time and not the +3 hours that they previously measured...

Biased review as always so I won't bother pointing out the flaws, but regular readers will know...

Anyway this is still the best compact device to get right now, along with the iPhone 6s...

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 10:07 4

28. Plume-Veil (banned) (Posts: 174; Member since: 19 Nov 2015)


Ip6s is not compact, but the ip5 is.

What a great master piece of a phone and dedign by Sony , just let down by no Carl-Zeiss and Xneon flash, and 4gb Ram,

posted on 21 Nov 2015, 08:07 3

96. SYSTEM_LORD (Posts: 304; Member since: 05 Oct 2015)


Exactly this. I have a 1.5amp charger, and y Z3C takes about 130 minutes from 0 to 100. This site really needs to get real, and anyone who believes the stuff in entirety that comes out of it.

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 09:48 27

13. itsjustJOH (Posts: 231; Member since: 18 Oct 2012)


PhoneArena described in the last sentence:
"But if compact size is not of utmost priority, perhaps you might want to spend your money on something else – a proper Android flagship, perhaps, or why not even an iPhone?"

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 10:03 22

24. buccob (Posts: 2489; Member since: 19 Jun 2012)


LOL...

Call me when current "proper" Android flagships or even iPhones have Waterproof bodies, a proper fingerprint scanner location (I am lefty and this location is perfect for everyone, Left Index finger or Right Thumb), eyelet for landyard, stereo speakers, great battery life (even with 35 minutes less than predecessor), expandable memory, FM radio, Noise Cancelling headphone jack...

I recently bought the NC31EM headphones and I tested against Bose QC in a Bose store and I couldn't hear any difference between the two... so saving $250 for similar quality and nolise cancelling is AWESOME, with the only downside is that it will not have noise cancelling with other devices

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 16:44 1

66. FrankUnderwood2 (Posts: 209; Member since: 01 Oct 2015)


This!

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 20:34 3

80. Swordylove (Posts: 159; Member since: 27 Jun 2015)


Yeap. This review hurts its credibility the most by recommending iPhone at the end.

posted on 21 Nov 2015, 16:48 3

110. cheetah2k (Posts: 1490; Member since: 16 Jan 2011)


didn't hurt credibility - iPA lost credibility a long time ago :p

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 09:50 16

15. bur60 (Posts: 821; Member since: 07 Jul 2014)


Well that is it. The best compact android phone gets a 7. I do understand that it gets 7 out of 10 but compared to other phones (uhm iphone6) this should be just as high. No consistency in the scores. But let's face it, website which give phones a number aren't that good. It's more of a race on the same standard grounds without any points for something original and new and mostly biased towards certain phones. Gsmarena has the best reviews.

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 10:05 20

27. buccob (Posts: 2489; Member since: 19 Jun 2012)


Exactly... I respect GSMArena for not giving out RANDOM numbers to the devices they review... most of the time they give unbiased reviews with sincere comparisons and conclusions.

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 10:08 10

29. Plume-Veil (banned) (Posts: 174; Member since: 19 Nov 2015)


Reputable site GsmArena

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 10:13 16

31. Arch_Fiend (Posts: 1930; Member since: 03 Oct 2015)


This Made Me Laugh.

"The Sony Xperia Z5 Compact is quite the unusual handset. It promises flagship-worthy features in a tight, compact package, and there’s still plenty of folks looking for that kind of phone"

So Are You Saying The iPhone 6/6s Is Unusual? And Millions Of People Are Looking For Compact Phones. Just Look At The Sales Of The iPhone 6/6s.

"The screen gets the job done, but we were expecting better quality given the phone’s price"

LOL No You Didn't Just Go There, The Resolution Is 720p Basically The Same As Apple's 750p SMH PA.

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 10:30 18

33. WallStreet (Posts: 256; Member since: 21 Sep 2014)


This really shows how biased it is. And the only real objective of the author- to put down this phone!

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 10:40 3

34. Arch_Fiend (Posts: 1930; Member since: 03 Oct 2015)


My Thoughts Exactly.

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 11:25 25

42. 0kax0el0 (Posts: 119; Member since: 15 Nov 2012)


In Xperia Z5 Compact
"In terms of resolution, the Z5 Compact’s display packs 720 by 1280 pixels, which translates to a density of 319 pixels per inch... However, it would have been nice seeing a screen of higher resolution in its place, seeing that this is a rather expensive phone we’re dealing with."

In iPhone6s:
"4.7 inches, while the resolution is also unchanged – 750 x 1334 pixels. This may not seem like much, compared to the 1080 x 1920- and 1440 x 2560-pixel screens used by some Android phones, but in reality, it leads to a pixel density of 326 ppi, which is still a very high number even by today's computing standards."

In both reviews is mentioned the advantage of the lower resolution on battery and performance, but it is clear that while for Sony is "Meh, I don't like the low resolution", for Apple is "it isn't class leading, but it doesn't need to, because it's awesome"

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 11:38 17

45. ogee4life (Posts: 105; Member since: 12 Apr 2014)


Perfect example to show how biased and unprofessional these guys are. It's a pity some take these guys seriously.

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 17:21 1

70. dazed1 (Posts: 304; Member since: 28 Jul 2015)


If you had idea you wont spread BS like this

http://i.imgur.com/c99iXOd.png

Color temperature - should be 6.500K - Z5 - 9000! Gamma should be - 2.2 - Z5 - 2.7! Delta e greyscale should be -

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 19:00

75. mixedfish (Posts: 1144; Member since: 17 Nov 2013)


So he's talking about resolution and you're talking about calibration.

There's a saying: apples and oranges, look up the definition, you might learn something.

posted on 21 Nov 2015, 04:18 1

89. dazed1 (Posts: 304; Member since: 28 Jul 2015)


Resolution is much less important then calibration! good calibrated 720p> bad calibrated 1080p.

posted on 04 Dec 2015, 09:53

128. ogee4life (Posts: 105; Member since: 12 Apr 2014)


in your opinion, leave it as that.

posted on 21 Nov 2015, 08:57 3

98. RajRicardo (Posts: 372; Member since: 28 Feb 2014)


Do you even know that colour temperature can be adjusted?? Sony gave us that option inside the display settings. Can the iPhone do that?

posted on 22 Nov 2015, 09:15 1

113. dazed1 (Posts: 304; Member since: 28 Jul 2015)


Do not try to defend Sony. You cant adjust the greyscale, and the calibration as a whole, changing the color temperature won't solve the utter terrible calibration, also the displays are very grainy as always they got bad displays, i don't know who is the idiot who push the X-reality or whatever their TV BS is implemented.

iPhone does not need sliders, becasuse at worst their display have very good accuracy, much better viewing angles, they do not suffer from gamma/contrast shift - and the terrible grainy effect, they also got decent white balance 6500-7000K.

posted on 30 Nov 2015, 10:14

127. ogee4life (Posts: 105; Member since: 12 Apr 2014)


have u actually tested both handsets side by side, u come here spitting crap figures from phonearena. All these screen display measurements mean absolute nothing. What matters is real life quality, i can send u tons of reviews showing both displays side by side and no reviewer picked the iphone display ahead of the z5. They both render accurate colours but the z5 is punchier like an amoled screen and brighter as well. Stop all this crap talk of grainy, u have never tested a sony phone in your life talkless of owning one. I have done several side by side comparison of the i phone 6 and z3 side by side, no one can fool me.

posted on 24 Nov 2015, 19:19

119. 0kax0el0 (Posts: 119; Member since: 15 Nov 2012)


I'm not saying that the Z5 Compact display is better than the iPhone6s's. I'm just pointing out that in similar conditions the comment from PA is quite different from Sony vs Apple.

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 17:50

72. zeeBomb (Posts: 1723; Member since: 14 Aug 2014)


PERFECT EXAMPLE.

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 11:30 4

43. ogee4life (Posts: 105; Member since: 12 Apr 2014)


it's truly unbeliveble brother the rubbish from these guys, the same i phone with far worse bezels and far worse battery life with same resolution and is double the price of the z5 compact got a score of 9.2 or 3 but the Z5 compact gets a 7. Their excuses will be the i phone has a far better camera, same with samsung phones. They'll also claim the screen is far superior on those other phones than the z5 compact.

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 11:39 1

46. Arch_Fiend (Posts: 1930; Member since: 03 Oct 2015)


Yeah The Amount Of Bias Toward Apple Products Is Absolutely Unacceptable. I Don't See How Pa's Authors Aren't Ashamed At There Unbelievably Inconsistent Reviewing Methods.

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 15:19 4

58. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


Not only that, but brightness was championed like hell when the iphone had the brightest displays. Now brightness is ignored and calibration and colour temperature is what makes a "great display" lol

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 15:51 2

61. Arch_Fiend (Posts: 1930; Member since: 03 Oct 2015)


Yeah I Noticed That.

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 17:28

71. dazed1 (Posts: 304; Member since: 28 Jul 2015)


They got the brightness so high, with making the display 9000K learn how brightness/led color affect nits.

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 11:01 2

38. Commentator (Posts: 3651; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)


"The back, in particular, is made of what Sony calls frosted glass, and one should think of it as glass treated to a matte finish."

It sounds like what Sony "calls frosted glass" is just... frosted glass...

(Sorry to nitpick something like this! I actually feel kind of bad...)

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 12:20 2

50. T-rex (Posts: 147; Member since: 22 May 2013)


No you are actually right. Sony's XReality is always the "so called XReality" while apples 'ratina' is THE ratina. These guys are foolishly blind

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 11:55 1

47. xperiaZlover (Posts: 179; Member since: 15 Nov 2015)


I would have given the z5c a rating of 9 or more.
What is wrong with phonearena. They are turning to samsungarena day by day.
I have seen Z5c had a good camera on some YouTube videos.
So far I guess YouTube videos and notebookcheck are the best guides for phones,not PA or gsmarena.

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 12:17 3

48. xperiaZlover (Posts: 179; Member since: 15 Nov 2015)


Guys checkout the notebookcheck review of z5 compact.they give 89% for Z5c and 88% for the Z5.
And no heating issues.
Heating is less than even S6.
And camera is better than what Pa says.

I am sorry to say I don't trust Pa reviews hereafter.

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 13:14 1

51. javy108 (Posts: 1004; Member since: 27 Jul 2014)


Z5 Compact looks cool, even if PA gives it a 7, I know users rating will be higher.

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 13:49

53. Joshing4fun (Posts: 1230; Member since: 13 Aug 2010)


This phone is only good if money is no object. Otherwise, you can get a phone with similar performance, build quality, but a lesser camera for $250 or less.

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 15:16 3

57. Mawhob222222 (Posts: 13; Member since: 01 Oct 2015)


Good work Samsungarena hhhh

7!!

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 15:20

59. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


lol All the Samsung arena comments are hilarious. It's especially funny considering the Samsung got shafted the most with the iphonearena scores.

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 19:03

76. mixedfish (Posts: 1144; Member since: 17 Nov 2013)


It's the pecking order of the payroll. Pay more and you get the premium propaganda package at PA.

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 16:15

63. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


To be fair, my 10 minutes with a Z5 display model at the bell store the first day it was released was a very poor experience. I don't know if it was because of Bell bloatware or Sony throttling the crap out of the SD810 or what but it hung and lagged like crazy.

And I had no issues with the Z3, that performed flawlessly besides the slow dialer app.

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 16:24 9

64. FrankUnderwood2 (Posts: 209; Member since: 01 Oct 2015)


"Cons
The camera is not as exciting as it seems
Screen color accuracy could have been better
Mediocre speaker quality".
And all these cons together justify a score as low as 7?? Really PA?

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 16:51 1

68. FrankUnderwood2 (Posts: 209; Member since: 01 Oct 2015)


And Nick. T would never reply to our comments. "Cause it isn't important at all. They wanted to disgrace and degrade any and everything that hasn't got Apple written, and man they have done it so well.

posted on 21 Nov 2015, 04:41 1

93. T-rex (Posts: 147; Member since: 22 May 2013)


I think they are doing this on purpose. when they write negative reviews about sony they get the most views and comments

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 19:12 1

77. dimas (Posts: 1799; Member since: 22 Jul 2014)


It's "up to 2 days". Sony never said that it will last 2 days. You should learn english as your words can give impressions that the device is a full blown disappointment. Camera is great even at 8mp mode.

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 19:48

79. fitnesspro (Posts: 27; Member since: 07 Mar 2015)


The price is absurd. One can get the top of the line Nexus 6P with 32 g's for $499.00 pure Android with Marshmallow, 6.0, which is spectacular. 6P w/t 64 g's for $549.00 or even consider the 5.2 in. Nexus 5X at $375 if you want a smaller phone. It is a far cry from Sony' price. Next, consider the latest LG phones. Too big at 5.5 in screen? What about Zenfone Lazer or One Plus XX at $199.00 and $249.00 respectively?

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 21:16

82. ThePython (Posts: 863; Member since: 08 May 2013)


Uninspiring review.

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 22:46

85. geusan (Posts: 137; Member since: 19 Oct 2014)


it's just a review!! enjoy your z5 compact, yes i know it deserve a better score ...

posted on 20 Nov 2015, 22:50 4

87. Noonting (Posts: 131; Member since: 19 Sep 2014)


Z5 Compact's gpu is Adreno 430, not Mali t760

posted on 21 Nov 2015, 05:01 3

94. Artisto (Posts: 38; Member since: 19 Jun 2015)


OMG that just proves how little crap they give about being credible.
Thanks for noticing that!

posted on 21 Nov 2015, 06:00 4

95. nedooo (Posts: 59; Member since: 10 Apr 2012)


Mali GPU LOL

posted on 21 Nov 2015, 13:22 3

101. WallStreet (Posts: 256; Member since: 21 Sep 2014)


The only thing theyre reviewing is the logo!

posted on 21 Nov 2015, 14:10 3

102. zeeBomb (Posts: 1723; Member since: 14 Aug 2014)


Coming back to this topic, honestly this is a 8.5 MINIMUM. There are so many good things you can say about it, especially the camera that makes this compact device stand out from the rest of the competition. Yes, maybe the software isn't overly excellent, but its a lot better and improved than Sony have incorporated previously.

I think doing a group effort of reviewing a phone would be better...or at least spend more time with it, you know? And there's some minor things in paragraphs, even mistakes (uses a Adreno 430 GPU, not Mali) like check yourself before you wreck yourself.

(That concludes my TechieXP oriented rant)

posted on 22 Nov 2015, 13:48

115. perry1234 (Posts: 94; Member since: 14 Aug 2012)


Hi PhoneArena ,

Though I usually am not on a charade to diss your reviews ( unlike some other folks on this site, I particularily liked your MX5 review) , I do not understand how this phone got a score of only 7 out of ten.
Yes the camera is not as good as the megapixels say and the display is far from being colour accurate but the score penalty for these are too high , especially in the case of display when you mention that the color temperature can be adjusted but you don't see many people doing that. How do you know many people will not adjust it ? People buying such a high end Android phone and reading a review on your reputed site are tech savvy enough to color-calibrate the screen to their liking ( if not , then after reading this review they surely will) .

And your rant about the phone being too small physically is also un-justified to an extent . Sure , the software can do with some tweaking to better adjust according to the available display size, but the negativity about the physical size of the phone is just not honest. There is the term "Compact" mentioned in the name of the phone and to expect anything otherwise is foolishness in my opinion. iPhone is 4.7 inches too . If you want a bigger phone , don't buy something that has "compact" mentioned in its title ! Also you forgot to add the needed plus points for digital noise cancellation, fantastic call quality and timeless design. Not to mention the excellent battery endurance.

Based on review none other than yours and separating facts from opinion I would rate this phone 8.5/10. Of course , it would be lovely to see your justification on the above-mentioned points.

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Display4.6 inches, 720 x 1280 pixels (319 ppi) IPS LCD
Camera23 megapixels
Hardware
Qualcomm Snapdragon 810, Octa-core, 2000 MHz, ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53 processor
2048 MB RAM
Size5.00 x 2.56 x 0.35 inches
(127 x 65 x 8.9 mm)
4.87 oz  (138 g)
Battery2700 mAh, 11.5 hours talk time

Latest stories